Perak MACC nabs 2 civil servants over RM45,000 false claim
According to sources, the woman, in her 40s, was arrested at 6.30pm on Tuesday, followed by the detention of the second suspect, a man in his 30s, at 5pm yesterday.
Both individuals were reportedly detained at the Perak MACC office here after voluntarily presenting themselves to assist in the ongoing investigation.
Perak MACC director Datuk Ahmad Sabri Mohamed confirmed the arrests when contacted, adding that further investigations were underway.
He said the investigation into both civil servants was being conducted under Section 18 of the MACC Act 2009, which pertains to false claims and carries a maximum penalty of 20 years' imprisonment or a fine of five times the amount involved, upon conviction.
"All parties, particularly department heads, are reminded to strengthen financial systems and procedures within their departments to prevent any form of misconduct or abuse of power," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Focus Malaysia
9 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Is KLIA 'counter setting' a symptom of deeper migrant exploitation?
THE recent detention of an enforcement officer at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) Terminal 1 has renewed public scrutiny over a clandestine practice known as 'counter setting'. This tactic, where individuals are allowed to bypass formal immigration procedures, raises serious concerns not only regarding border security and official corruption but also about structural vulnerabilities in Malaysia's migration management, labour demands and institutional accountability. Last November, nearly 50 immigration officers were reassigned following investigations by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) into a similar syndicate operating at KLIA. A senior immigration officer, believed to be the mastermind behind the network, is expected to face charges over a human trafficking ring that allegedly facilitated the unlawful entry of foreign nationals without immigration clearance. The act of 'counter-setting' which involves corruption at borders is a well-recognised enabler of both human trafficking and migrant smuggling. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) identifies bribery and abuse of power as systemic 'pull factors' that facilitate transnational crime. In this context, 'counter setting' is not just negligence, it is an institutional gateway for illicit entry under the guise of administrative authority. However, criminalising rogue officers should not automatically lead to the assumption that all individuals who passed through these compromised checkpoints are victims of trafficking or knowingly complicit in smuggling. Trafficking vs. smuggling Public discourse frequently conflates 'migration', 'trafficking' and 'smuggling' as either criminal or victimhood, obscuring nuanced legal distinctions. Under both the UN Trafficking Protocol (Palermo Protocol) and Malaysia's Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007 (ATIPSOM), human trafficking consists of three essential elements: Act (e.g., recruitment, transportation), Means (e.g., coercion, fraud, abuse of power), and Purpose (e.g., exploitation such as forced labour or sexual servitude). However, ATIPSOM does not clearly criminalise attempts to traffic nor does it automatically recognise someone as a trafficked person simply because they entered the country irregularly. As studies have established, most trafficking victims enter Malaysia legally which means that they are in possession of valid passport and are even given a 30-day visa free entry if they are from Southeast Asian countries. Therefore, it is nearly impossible to establish the key component of 'exploitation' unless it is evidently demonstrated at the border entry. Mere facilitation without evidence of exploitation does not constitute trafficking. By contrast, migrant smuggling involves consensual facilitation of unlawful entry in exchange for financial gain. Once the border is crossed, the smuggling transaction ends. In such cases, the migrant is typically treated as an offender who have breached immigration laws. An individual's status only becomes 'irregular' if immigration officers on arrival fail to stamp or process their entry. This administrative omission does not by itself amount to criminal conduct or evidence of trafficking. This brings us to a critical question: how can authorities establish that the individuals who entered via 'counter setting' were trafficked, smuggled, or simply irregular migrants? Without evidence of coercion or exploitation, these individuals remain at best suspects or irregular entrants. As many of us has experienced, it is extremely difficult for individuals to board international flights to Malaysia without valid travel documents. Multiple layers of checks include immigration clearance at the point of departure, airline document verification, and pre-boarding checks by flight crew. This may not necessarily be the case when entering Malaysia through land. For example, Malaysia's land borders especially in areas such as Rantau Panjang, Sungai Golok and Wang Kelian are far more porous. In Wang Kelian, a one-kilometre 'no man's land' separates Thai and Malaysian posts, making unsupervised crossings possible. Arrests involving undocumented Myanmar nationals and the unregulated movement of Malaysians into Thailand highlight systemic gaps in surveillance and border management. Labour agents and recruitment networks Malaysia's fluctuating labour policies such as the temporary freeze (and subsequent lifting) on the intake of Bangladeshi workers, for example, have created a market of desperation. To fulfil recruitment contracts or avoid refunding fees, unscrupulous agents may resort to corrupt arrangements with enforcement personnel to smuggle workers into the country. One major concern is the licensing regime. In Malaysia, work agents are not required to possess individual licences. Licences are tied to agencies, creating a regulatory blind spot. Some agents operate without registration; others exploit legal platforms while engaging in parallel black-market operations. Disturbingly, many such agents are foreign nationals already residing in Malaysia, which helps them gain the trust of vulnerable migrant communities. Upon arrival, many of these migrants are placed in overcrowded accommodation and squalid conditions. They are also subjected to long hours of work, meagre pay, and minimal legal protection. While exploitative, these conditions do not always rise to the legal threshold of trafficking unless all the trafficking elements are clearly present. Malaysia must move beyond reactive enforcement and address the systemic factors that enable counter setting and migration-related abuse. A rights-based and reform-oriented strategy should include stricter employer vetting procedures and meaningful penalties for labour exploitation as well as crackdowns on unlicensed and unscrupulous agents, including those operating under legal facades, among others. Conclusively, it is evident that the KLIA 'counter setting' scandal is not just about corrupt officers, it exposes systemic cracks in Malaysia's migration governance, labour recruitment processes, and institutional safeguards. While prosecuting offenders is necessary, structural reforms must follow to protect migrants' rights and preserve the integrity of our borders. To strike a balance between national security and human dignity, Malaysia must clearly distinguish between 'victims', 'offenders', and 'irregular migrants' and, above all, recognise the human realities behind each case. ‒ July 28, 2025 Dr Haezreena Begum Abdul Hamid is a Criminologist and Senior Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, University of Malaya. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Malaysiakini
New Straits Times
10 hours ago
- New Straits Times
MCMC probes company over online sale of uncertified communication devices
PUTRAJAYA: The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) has launched an investigation into a company suspected of selling uncertified communication devices online. In a statement today, MCMC said the probe follows a joint operation with the police under the integrated enforcement initiative Op Taring Bravo 3, which involved multiple enforcement agencies. The operation uncovered 3,837 units of various communication devices, such as wireless gaming consoles, remote controls, smart devices and tablets, estimated to be worth RM500,000, which were seized by the police and handed over to MCMC for technical analysis and further review. "These devices are believed to have been marketed without valid technical certification from MCMC," the commission said. The case is being investigated under Regulation 16 of the Communications and Multimedia (Technical Standards) Regulations 2000, which carries a maximum fine of RM300,000, imprisonment of up to three years, or both, upon conviction. MCMC stressed its commitment to enforcing regulations to safeguard consumers and uphold market integrity. It urged the public to report any information regarding the sale or distribution of such devices through MCMC's official complaint channels or directly to the police. – Bernama
New Straits Times
10 hours ago
- New Straits Times
KLCC pixmen deny fleecing tourists, saying they are not gangsters or conmen
KUALA LUMPUR: Braving the scorching 33°C heat, four men gathered outside the Petronas Twin Towers today to tell their side of the story after a recent operation against them and their "street photographer" friends. Following public complaints and videos of alleged "KLCC photographer gangsters and scammers" going viral, Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) yesterday conducted a joint operation dubbed OP Lens with the police and other government departments. Just last night, nearly 30 of them were slapped with RM2,000 fines each for offering their "services" without a permit. But four of them today claimed that they neither accosted visitors and passers-by, nor did they overcharge for their services. "We are not criminals. We're just trying to make a living, why fine us? "We are not causing any trouble to anyone. It's very simple, we approach tourists who want to take pictures with KLCC in the background. "We tell them the price beforehand and if they agree, then only we proceed. Otherwise we go on to the next customer, " said Hussein Siri, 43, in defence of his friends and himself. The father of six from Sabah said he had been taking pictures at KLCC since 2019 and last night was not the first time that he got into trouble with the authorities. "Times are hard and yet this happens. People think we make a lot of money, but that's not true. We earn just to break even. Even this Iphone 16, which I bought under installment, the camera stand, power banks and extras, all cost money," he said. He claimed that the gadgets he held were worth about RM8,000. Contrary to claims that tourists were overcharged – some allegedly quoting as high as RM30 per photo – N. Parameswaran, 48, insisted that such allegations were not true. "Our rates are all standardised and reasonable. RM5 for locals and RM10 for tourists – not RM30 or anything more. RM10 is for one photo. If they want all the pictures, then of course the price changes, but we always explain and negotiate," he said while wiping sweat from his brow as the midday sun beat down. Speaking about last night's operation, Parameswaran said he did not understand why the photographers were fined when a video of one altercation that went viral, which according to him, occurred between two tourists who wanted to take photos at the same time. "It had nothing to do with any of us, yet just because the video went viral, the authorities came after us. We do a good job taking good photos of the visitors and that is why some choose to hire us, but that's what many people don't understand," he said, adding that they had a few trade secrets for camera settings to make their shots nicer. Another photographer, Mustafa Ali, 30, also from Sabah, said he was plying his trade for survival. "On good days, I make RM100 to RM150. On bad days, just RM50 or even less. That's barely enough for food and bills," he said, condemning the operation against his colleagues and friends. Mustafa said he migrated here after losing his job in Sabah during the pandemic. Muhd Fauzi Omar, 26, a father of three, said most customers initially wanted one or two photos only, but sometimes, after seeing all the shots, they wanted more. "We normally take 10 to 12 pictures so they can choose. If they want it all, then of course it's not RM10 anymore. But even then, we negotiate, make it fair. No forcing. We're not scammers. "A real scammer would have disappeared. But we stay because we know we are not doing wrong," he said. Fauzi said the recent viral video showing an altercation had nothing to do with them. "It was two tourists arguing among themselves. But some content creators twisted it for likes and shares. Because of that, we got blamed. Suddenly, we're all criminals," he said.
