HK gov't to introduce proposal to boost rights of delivery couriers this year, labour minister says
The Hong Kong government will introduce a proposal this year to enhance the rights and benefits of digital platform workers, labour and welfare chief Chris Sun has said, following recent strikes by delivery workers.
The government 'will introduce a proposal for further enhancing the rights and benefits of platform workers within this year, and will consider reinforcing the protection for platform workers through legislative means,' Sun told the Legislative Council (LegCo) on Wednesday.
He also said the government had established a liaison group consisting of representatives from the government, platform companies, and labour organisations 'to explore suitable proposals.'
Sun's remarks were in response to pro-establishment lawmaker Kingsley Wong's question about whether the government would introduce a legislative proposal to protect the labour rights of delivery couriers, as promised last year.
The government said in November that it would propose ways to enhance the protection of platform workers, which 'may include proposals that can only be implemented by legislation.'
Sun said on Wednesday that the government's proposal would be based on the results of surveys and consultations conducted by the Labour Department last year, including the Thematic Household Survey, an opinion survey of platform workers, and focus groups on their working conditions.
He also told LegCo that the survey results showed that 'platform workers were most concerned about work injury compensation.'
Delivery workers do not enjoy the same labour protections as full-time employees, as Hong Kong law stipulates that delivery workers are considered self-employed contractors.
If a worker has an accident while delivering food, they can only claim accident insurance provided by the delivery platform – if any. They are not entitled to workers' compensation under the Employees' Compensation Ordinance.
However, the government is unlikely to drastically change the status of delivery workers, the labour minister told lawmakers at Wednesday's meeting.
'I think it's not suitable to give a blanket definition for platform workers as full-time employees,' Sun said, adding that a delivery courier's status as a full-time employee or self-employed contractor would depend on their working conditions.
Keeta workers' strikes
Since late April, couriers working for Keeta have been staging a series of protests across Hong Kong demanding better treatment from the delivery platform.
On May 22, around 270 Keeta riders went on strike in Central, Hung Hom, and To Kwa Wan to protest what they called an 'unfair' system that is slashing their earnings.
Owned by Chinese tech giant Meituan, Keeta launched in Hong Kong in May 2023 and has grown steadily in market share. It is one of two delivery apps in the city, after British company Deliveroo exited Hong Kong in early April.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
an hour ago
- RTHK
Beijing 'agrees to resume Japanese seafood imports'
Beijing 'agrees to resume Japanese seafood imports' Seafood imports from Japan are said to be expected to resume after China takes the 'necessary procedures'. File photo: AFP China has agreed on procedures to resume imports of Japanese seafood products, Japan's government said on Friday, marking a step towards ending a nearly two-year trade ban. Officials from Japan's Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries and China's Customs reached the agreement during a meeting in Beijing on Wednesday, the ministry said, adding China-bound seafood exports are expected to resume after China takes the "necessary procedures". The agreement comes as both governments work to ease tensions stemming from the 2023 release of treated wastewater from the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. The Japanese ministry did not specify the details of the procedures. But the Nikkei newspaper, which reported the news earlier, said that under the agreed measures, Japan will register fishery processing facilities with Chinese authorities, and export shipments will include inspection certificates confirming the absence of radioactive substances such as cesium-137. Nikkei added that China is expected to formally announce the resumption of seafood imports from Japanese prefectures outside the Fukushima region in the near future. China imposed the ban on Japanese seafood imports in 2023, shortly after Tokyo began releasing treated wastewater from the disaster-hit plant, prompting a sharp diplomatic and economic backlash. (Reuters)
HKFP
2 hours ago
- HKFP
Hong Kong leader pledges ‘full support' to local universities to attract overseas students amid US crackdown
Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee has pledged 'full support' to the city's universities to attract foreign students following US President Donald Trump's move to restrict international enrolment. 'Hong Kong will provide full support to our universities, giving [affected students] the best assistance if they wish to come to Hong Kong,' Lee told lawmakers in Cantonese during a question-and-answer session in the Legislative Council (LegCo) on Thursday. His remarks come after the US State Department vowed on Wednesday to 'aggressively' expel Chinese students and increase scrutiny of future applications from China and Hong Kong. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday ordered a pause in student visa processing until further notice and planned to expand social media vetting. The Trump administration also attempted last week to ban Harvard University from enrolling foreign nationals. A US judge temporarily blocked the move, calling it unlawful. Lee said on Thursday that he felt 'encouraged' by local universities' offers of streamlined admission into their programmes for those affected by Trump's policy. The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) and the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (PolyU) are among the higher education institutions in the city that have openly appealed to international students in the US. Lee also said he could further review the quota for international student intake at local universities if needed, after already doubling the limit to 40 per cent last year. 'I notice that the intake quota can still absorb a lot of students who are facing unfair treatment. I will review the quota if needed,' he said. He added that the US policy against foreign students provided Hong Kong with an opportunity to bring in talent. Hong Kong currently offers 30,000 places for international students at its eight publicly funded universities. Earlier this week, Lee said the city would open its universities to more international students facing 'discriminatory and unfair treatment' by the US. The city's education minister Christine Choi last week urged local universities to welcome 'outstanding students from all over the world.' 'Burning urgency' At the LegCo meeting, Lee also agreed with lawmaker Lau Kwok-fan's suggestion to expedite the establishment of a university town as part of the Northern Metropolis development plan. Lee said he felt 'a burning urgency' to speed up the development of the Northern Metropolis, which will encompass about a third of Hong Kong's territory in the vast area neighbouring mainland China's Shenzhen. Lau, from pro-establishment political party the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB), also suggested that the government establish a statutory body to oversee the development plan and draft special legislation that preempts any legal matters in the course of the development. Lee said the government would consider Lau's ideas. The Northern Metropolis, which is set to transform 30,000 hectares of land along the border, will house 2.5 million people and create 500,000 jobs, according to the government. But villagers who have been living there for decades said their lives would be uprooted by the project, while green groups warned that the development would threaten and damage wetland areas that are home to endangered wildlife. Last month, the High Court threw out a legal challenge mounted by activists against the San Tin Technopole, a planned tech zone that would be the centre of the Northern Metropolis project.
Asia Times
14 hours ago
- Asia Times
US court ruling puts Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs in disarray
A United States court has blocked the so-called 'Liberation Day' tariffs that US President Donald Trump imposed on imported goods from around 90 nations. This puts implementation of Trump's current trade policy in disarray. The Court of International Trade ruled that the emergency authority Trump used to impose the tariffs could not override Congress's right to regulate commerce with other countries. Tariffs imposed through other legislative processes – such as those related to cars, steel, and aluminum – remain in effect. But the broad-based 'reciprocal' tariffs will need to be removed within ten days of the court's ruling. Trump administration officials have already filed plans to appeal. The ruling calls into question trade negotiations underway with more than 18 different nations, which are trying to lower these tariffs. Do these countries continue to negotiate or do they wait for the judicial process to play out? The Trump administration still has other mechanisms through which it can impose tariffs, but these have limits on the amount that can be imposed or entail processes that can take months or years. This undermines Trump's preferred method of negotiation: throwing out large threats and backing down once a concession is reached. The lawsuits were filed by US importers of foreign products and some US states, challenging Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977. The lawsuits argued the national emergencies cited in imposing the tariffs – the trade deficit and the fentanyl crisis – were not an emergency and not directly addressed by the tariff remedy. The court agreed, and said by imposing tariffs Trump had overstepped his authority. The ruling said the executive orders used were 'declared to be invalid as contrary to law.' The act states the president is entitled to take economic action in the face of 'an unusual and extraordinary threat'. It's mainly been used to impose sanctions on terrorist groups or freeze assets from Russia. There's nothing in the act that refers to tariffs. The decision means all the reciprocal tariffs – including the 10% tariffs on most countries, the 50% tariffs Trump was talking about putting on the EU, and some of the Chinese tariffs – are ruled by the court to be illegal. They must be removed within 10 days. The ruling was based on two separate lawsuits. One was brought by a group of small businesses that argued tariffs materially hurt their business. The other was brought by 12 individual states, arguing the tariffs would materially impact their ability to provide public goods. The ruling does not apply to tariffs applied under Section 201, known as safeguard tariffs. They are intended to protect industries from imports allegedly being sold in the US market at unfair prices or through unfair means. Tariffs on solar panels and washing machines were brought under this regulation. Also excluded are Section 232 tariffs, which are applied for national security reasons. Those are the steel and aluminium tariffs, the automobile and auto parts tariffs. Trump has declared all those as national security issues, so those tariffs will remain. Most of the tariffs against China are also excluded under Section 301. Those are put in place for unfair trade practices, such as intellectual property theft or forced technology transfer. They are meant to pressure countries to change their policies. In addition, there are current investigations related to copper and the pharmaceuticals sector, which will continue. These investigations are part of a more traditional trade process and may lead to future tariffs, including on Australia. The Trump administration is still weighing possible sector-specific tariffs on pharmaceuticals. Planar/Shutterstock The Trump administration has already filed its intention to appeal to the federal appeals court. This process will take some time. In the meantime, there are at least five other legal challenges to tariffs pending in the courts. If the appeals court provides a ruling the Trump administration or opponents don't like, they can appeal to the Supreme Court. Alternatively, the White House could direct customs officials to ignore the court and continue to collect tariffs. The Trump administration has ignored court orders in the past, particularly on immigration rulings. So it remains to be seen if customs officials will release goods without the tariffs being paid in ten days' time. The administration is unlikely to lie down on this. In addition to its appeal process, officials complained about 'unelected judges' and 'judicial overreach' and may contest the whole process. The only thing that continues to be a certainty is that uncertainty will drive global markets for the foreseeable future. Susan Stone is Credit Union SA chair of economics, University of South Australia This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
