Lord mayor says probe reveals need to better engage and build 'trust'
NOVOCASTRIANS did not hold back when it came to venting their concerns with City of Newcastle in public submissions to an independent probe into the council's policies, procedures and processes.
Newcastle Airport expenditure and board appointments, the Scott Neylon/Jeremy Bath/Jason Sivo letters saga, Mr Bath himself, the council's Christmas parties and lavish lucky door prizes were just some of the issues raised in some 800 submissions to the review.
The full report and finer details of the probe will be made available to the public on May 21, but Newcastle Independent lord mayor Ross Kerridge said on first glance he feels "reassured" the council is "functioning well".
"I think the main thing that they've identified is the need for better engagement and trust with the community and communication, particularly early engagement about big projects, and then there are some issues around financial reporting," he said
"It's going to take a long time to work on that [trust with community], and I think it would be dangerous, and I even think with some of the responses there that I worry people will say, 'Oh, it's a huge ringing endorsement'.
"Yes, it is an endorsement, but that doesn't mean that there aren't areas for improvement, and they are serious areas for improvement."
Cr Kerridge said discussions have already been had on strategies to build better communication and trust with the community and within the council.
As part of the review process, Davidson Business Advisory had the task of wading through some 800 public submissions.
At least 260 internal council documents were considered, including strategies, plans, budgets, policies, media clips and council reports.
Davidson undertook 27 one-on-one consultations with corporate staff, the lord mayor and councillors, as well as three independent members of the council's Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee (ARIC).
In response to a question from Liberal deputy lord mayor Callum Pull, Davidson confirmed that no matters raised amid the review needed to be referred to the Independent Commission Against Corruption or another external agency.
There were "no matters of fraud or corruption identified" in the review.
The council and a packed public gallery heard at Thursday's meeting that the review cost in the order of $80,000.
More than 20 submissions were made about the Newcastle Airport, which focused mostly on board appointment processes and concerns about that, reports of decisions being made outside council delegations without council awareness and an increase in expenditure due to development.
Davison's lead consultant Colin Jensen noted the airport board structure was "necessarily complicated" because of the joint ownership between City of Newcastle and Port Stephens Council.
He said the "overarching observation" is that City of Newcastle has used its delegation to make "appropriate decisions" around the appointment of directors "currently, recently and in the past".
A shortcoming was identified, which was that the council's Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee (ARIC) should receive regular briefings on the airport.
Mr Jensen said it was "not appropriate" to go into further detail on the airport at this stage but said there is more to come in the report.
The Scott Neylon/Jeremy Bath/Jason Sivo letters saga was a topic that came up frequently as part of the review process.
Mr Jensen said Davidson found the investigations into the matter were "done appropriately" and by the "appropriate authorities".
The 2023 council-commissioned independent investigation into the City of Newcastle CEO's links to a long-term Herald letter writer found "no evidence that the CEO incentivised the author to write the articles".
The Newcastle Herald was not contacted during the investigation, nor were copies of the letters requested.
Mr Jensen said many public submissions focused specifically on City of Newcastle chief executive Jeremy Bath, and in many instances referred to decisions "espoused" to have been made by the chief executive.
However, Mr Jensen said that upon review, many of the decisions residents raised issues with were made prior to his appointment or were decisions made by the elected councillors.
Issues were also raised with council decisions, but Mr Jensen said no instances were identified where those decisions fell outside regulatory or approval processes.
"Findings highlight opportunities for improved communication, enhanced community engagement," he said.
Mr Jensen said better engagement and communication would contribute to a "broader understanding of those council decisions".
Davidson gave City of Newcastle's staff Christmas party expenditure the tick of approval.
The Newcastle Herald revealed in January that City of Newcastle (CN) staff were treated to lavish lucky door prizes in a gift-giving frenzy in December.
The items up for grabs included a hot air balloon ride, Dyson Airwrap hair stylers, skydiving, a walking pad, Nintendo Switch, power tools, theatre tickets, a Nutribullet, portable speaker, Yeti cooler, Cool Cabana, recliner camp chair, cinema and dining vouchers.
Fellow Davidson consultant Justin Hanney said the cost-per-head of the council's Christmas party compared favourably with costs for other NSW councils' Christmas celebrations.
"When you dig into this issue historically, each staffer was given a Christmas cake that was replaced with prizes in a raffle-type environment which reduced the cost by 50 per cent in expenditure overall," he said.
Mr Hanney said there is a "direct link" between how staff are rewarded and organisational culture and congratulated the CEO on personally paying for an executive team Christmas gathering.
No excessive spending was identified and there were no "adverse findings" on the Christmas bash.
Davidson has found that while City of Newcastle has a "healthy organisational culture" the relationship between the CEO, councillors and lord mayor will be "critical" to the organisational success of the council.
Members of the public raised concerns about leadership dynamics, the approach to political transitions and challenges with alignment between the council's leadership team and elected councillors.
Mr Hanney said while a difference in opinion shows a healthy democracy, once a decision is made the CEO is accountable for ensuring that position is implemented across the board.
He said the council should focus on strengthening the relationship between the CEO, executive team and councillors for a more unified approach.
When it comes to staff, Mr Hanney said the council's staff engagement survey results indicated year-on-year improvement.
The full report will be tabled at the May 27 council meeting, and with plenty of issues covered the Newcastle Herald will have more to come.
To see live coverage of the public briefing, click here.
NOVOCASTRIANS did not hold back when it came to venting their concerns with City of Newcastle in public submissions to an independent probe into the council's policies, procedures and processes.
Newcastle Airport expenditure and board appointments, the Scott Neylon/Jeremy Bath/Jason Sivo letters saga, Mr Bath himself, the council's Christmas parties and lavish lucky door prizes were just some of the issues raised in some 800 submissions to the review.
The full report and finer details of the probe will be made available to the public on May 21, but Newcastle Independent lord mayor Ross Kerridge said on first glance he feels "reassured" the council is "functioning well".
"I think the main thing that they've identified is the need for better engagement and trust with the community and communication, particularly early engagement about big projects, and then there are some issues around financial reporting," he said
"It's going to take a long time to work on that [trust with community], and I think it would be dangerous, and I even think with some of the responses there that I worry people will say, 'Oh, it's a huge ringing endorsement'.
"Yes, it is an endorsement, but that doesn't mean that there aren't areas for improvement, and they are serious areas for improvement."
Cr Kerridge said discussions have already been had on strategies to build better communication and trust with the community and within the council.
As part of the review process, Davidson Business Advisory had the task of wading through some 800 public submissions.
At least 260 internal council documents were considered, including strategies, plans, budgets, policies, media clips and council reports.
Davidson undertook 27 one-on-one consultations with corporate staff, the lord mayor and councillors, as well as three independent members of the council's Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee (ARIC).
In response to a question from Liberal deputy lord mayor Callum Pull, Davidson confirmed that no matters raised amid the review needed to be referred to the Independent Commission Against Corruption or another external agency.
There were "no matters of fraud or corruption identified" in the review.
The council and a packed public gallery heard at Thursday's meeting that the review cost in the order of $80,000.
More than 20 submissions were made about the Newcastle Airport, which focused mostly on board appointment processes and concerns about that, reports of decisions being made outside council delegations without council awareness and an increase in expenditure due to development.
Davison's lead consultant Colin Jensen noted the airport board structure was "necessarily complicated" because of the joint ownership between City of Newcastle and Port Stephens Council.
He said the "overarching observation" is that City of Newcastle has used its delegation to make "appropriate decisions" around the appointment of directors "currently, recently and in the past".
A shortcoming was identified, which was that the council's Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee (ARIC) should receive regular briefings on the airport.
Mr Jensen said it was "not appropriate" to go into further detail on the airport at this stage but said there is more to come in the report.
The Scott Neylon/Jeremy Bath/Jason Sivo letters saga was a topic that came up frequently as part of the review process.
Mr Jensen said Davidson found the investigations into the matter were "done appropriately" and by the "appropriate authorities".
The 2023 council-commissioned independent investigation into the City of Newcastle CEO's links to a long-term Herald letter writer found "no evidence that the CEO incentivised the author to write the articles".
The Newcastle Herald was not contacted during the investigation, nor were copies of the letters requested.
Mr Jensen said many public submissions focused specifically on City of Newcastle chief executive Jeremy Bath, and in many instances referred to decisions "espoused" to have been made by the chief executive.
However, Mr Jensen said that upon review, many of the decisions residents raised issues with were made prior to his appointment or were decisions made by the elected councillors.
Issues were also raised with council decisions, but Mr Jensen said no instances were identified where those decisions fell outside regulatory or approval processes.
"Findings highlight opportunities for improved communication, enhanced community engagement," he said.
Mr Jensen said better engagement and communication would contribute to a "broader understanding of those council decisions".
Davidson gave City of Newcastle's staff Christmas party expenditure the tick of approval.
The Newcastle Herald revealed in January that City of Newcastle (CN) staff were treated to lavish lucky door prizes in a gift-giving frenzy in December.
The items up for grabs included a hot air balloon ride, Dyson Airwrap hair stylers, skydiving, a walking pad, Nintendo Switch, power tools, theatre tickets, a Nutribullet, portable speaker, Yeti cooler, Cool Cabana, recliner camp chair, cinema and dining vouchers.
Fellow Davidson consultant Justin Hanney said the cost-per-head of the council's Christmas party compared favourably with costs for other NSW councils' Christmas celebrations.
"When you dig into this issue historically, each staffer was given a Christmas cake that was replaced with prizes in a raffle-type environment which reduced the cost by 50 per cent in expenditure overall," he said.
Mr Hanney said there is a "direct link" between how staff are rewarded and organisational culture and congratulated the CEO on personally paying for an executive team Christmas gathering.
No excessive spending was identified and there were no "adverse findings" on the Christmas bash.
Davidson has found that while City of Newcastle has a "healthy organisational culture" the relationship between the CEO, councillors and lord mayor will be "critical" to the organisational success of the council.
Members of the public raised concerns about leadership dynamics, the approach to political transitions and challenges with alignment between the council's leadership team and elected councillors.
Mr Hanney said while a difference in opinion shows a healthy democracy, once a decision is made the CEO is accountable for ensuring that position is implemented across the board.
He said the council should focus on strengthening the relationship between the CEO, executive team and councillors for a more unified approach.
When it comes to staff, Mr Hanney said the council's staff engagement survey results indicated year-on-year improvement.
The full report will be tabled at the May 27 council meeting, and with plenty of issues covered the Newcastle Herald will have more to come.
To see live coverage of the public briefing, click here.
NOVOCASTRIANS did not hold back when it came to venting their concerns with City of Newcastle in public submissions to an independent probe into the council's policies, procedures and processes.
Newcastle Airport expenditure and board appointments, the Scott Neylon/Jeremy Bath/Jason Sivo letters saga, Mr Bath himself, the council's Christmas parties and lavish lucky door prizes were just some of the issues raised in some 800 submissions to the review.
The full report and finer details of the probe will be made available to the public on May 21, but Newcastle Independent lord mayor Ross Kerridge said on first glance he feels "reassured" the council is "functioning well".
"I think the main thing that they've identified is the need for better engagement and trust with the community and communication, particularly early engagement about big projects, and then there are some issues around financial reporting," he said
"It's going to take a long time to work on that [trust with community], and I think it would be dangerous, and I even think with some of the responses there that I worry people will say, 'Oh, it's a huge ringing endorsement'.
"Yes, it is an endorsement, but that doesn't mean that there aren't areas for improvement, and they are serious areas for improvement."
Cr Kerridge said discussions have already been had on strategies to build better communication and trust with the community and within the council.
As part of the review process, Davidson Business Advisory had the task of wading through some 800 public submissions.
At least 260 internal council documents were considered, including strategies, plans, budgets, policies, media clips and council reports.
Davidson undertook 27 one-on-one consultations with corporate staff, the lord mayor and councillors, as well as three independent members of the council's Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee (ARIC).
In response to a question from Liberal deputy lord mayor Callum Pull, Davidson confirmed that no matters raised amid the review needed to be referred to the Independent Commission Against Corruption or another external agency.
There were "no matters of fraud or corruption identified" in the review.
The council and a packed public gallery heard at Thursday's meeting that the review cost in the order of $80,000.
More than 20 submissions were made about the Newcastle Airport, which focused mostly on board appointment processes and concerns about that, reports of decisions being made outside council delegations without council awareness and an increase in expenditure due to development.
Davison's lead consultant Colin Jensen noted the airport board structure was "necessarily complicated" because of the joint ownership between City of Newcastle and Port Stephens Council.
He said the "overarching observation" is that City of Newcastle has used its delegation to make "appropriate decisions" around the appointment of directors "currently, recently and in the past".
A shortcoming was identified, which was that the council's Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee (ARIC) should receive regular briefings on the airport.
Mr Jensen said it was "not appropriate" to go into further detail on the airport at this stage but said there is more to come in the report.
The Scott Neylon/Jeremy Bath/Jason Sivo letters saga was a topic that came up frequently as part of the review process.
Mr Jensen said Davidson found the investigations into the matter were "done appropriately" and by the "appropriate authorities".
The 2023 council-commissioned independent investigation into the City of Newcastle CEO's links to a long-term Herald letter writer found "no evidence that the CEO incentivised the author to write the articles".
The Newcastle Herald was not contacted during the investigation, nor were copies of the letters requested.
Mr Jensen said many public submissions focused specifically on City of Newcastle chief executive Jeremy Bath, and in many instances referred to decisions "espoused" to have been made by the chief executive.
However, Mr Jensen said that upon review, many of the decisions residents raised issues with were made prior to his appointment or were decisions made by the elected councillors.
Issues were also raised with council decisions, but Mr Jensen said no instances were identified where those decisions fell outside regulatory or approval processes.
"Findings highlight opportunities for improved communication, enhanced community engagement," he said.
Mr Jensen said better engagement and communication would contribute to a "broader understanding of those council decisions".
Davidson gave City of Newcastle's staff Christmas party expenditure the tick of approval.
The Newcastle Herald revealed in January that City of Newcastle (CN) staff were treated to lavish lucky door prizes in a gift-giving frenzy in December.
The items up for grabs included a hot air balloon ride, Dyson Airwrap hair stylers, skydiving, a walking pad, Nintendo Switch, power tools, theatre tickets, a Nutribullet, portable speaker, Yeti cooler, Cool Cabana, recliner camp chair, cinema and dining vouchers.
Fellow Davidson consultant Justin Hanney said the cost-per-head of the council's Christmas party compared favourably with costs for other NSW councils' Christmas celebrations.
"When you dig into this issue historically, each staffer was given a Christmas cake that was replaced with prizes in a raffle-type environment which reduced the cost by 50 per cent in expenditure overall," he said.
Mr Hanney said there is a "direct link" between how staff are rewarded and organisational culture and congratulated the CEO on personally paying for an executive team Christmas gathering.
No excessive spending was identified and there were no "adverse findings" on the Christmas bash.
Davidson has found that while City of Newcastle has a "healthy organisational culture" the relationship between the CEO, councillors and lord mayor will be "critical" to the organisational success of the council.
Members of the public raised concerns about leadership dynamics, the approach to political transitions and challenges with alignment between the council's leadership team and elected councillors.
Mr Hanney said while a difference in opinion shows a healthy democracy, once a decision is made the CEO is accountable for ensuring that position is implemented across the board.
He said the council should focus on strengthening the relationship between the CEO, executive team and councillors for a more unified approach.
When it comes to staff, Mr Hanney said the council's staff engagement survey results indicated year-on-year improvement.
The full report will be tabled at the May 27 council meeting, and with plenty of issues covered the Newcastle Herald will have more to come.
To see live coverage of the public briefing, click here.
NOVOCASTRIANS did not hold back when it came to venting their concerns with City of Newcastle in public submissions to an independent probe into the council's policies, procedures and processes.
Newcastle Airport expenditure and board appointments, the Scott Neylon/Jeremy Bath/Jason Sivo letters saga, Mr Bath himself, the council's Christmas parties and lavish lucky door prizes were just some of the issues raised in some 800 submissions to the review.
The full report and finer details of the probe will be made available to the public on May 21, but Newcastle Independent lord mayor Ross Kerridge said on first glance he feels "reassured" the council is "functioning well".
"I think the main thing that they've identified is the need for better engagement and trust with the community and communication, particularly early engagement about big projects, and then there are some issues around financial reporting," he said
"It's going to take a long time to work on that [trust with community], and I think it would be dangerous, and I even think with some of the responses there that I worry people will say, 'Oh, it's a huge ringing endorsement'.
"Yes, it is an endorsement, but that doesn't mean that there aren't areas for improvement, and they are serious areas for improvement."
Cr Kerridge said discussions have already been had on strategies to build better communication and trust with the community and within the council.
As part of the review process, Davidson Business Advisory had the task of wading through some 800 public submissions.
At least 260 internal council documents were considered, including strategies, plans, budgets, policies, media clips and council reports.
Davidson undertook 27 one-on-one consultations with corporate staff, the lord mayor and councillors, as well as three independent members of the council's Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee (ARIC).
In response to a question from Liberal deputy lord mayor Callum Pull, Davidson confirmed that no matters raised amid the review needed to be referred to the Independent Commission Against Corruption or another external agency.
There were "no matters of fraud or corruption identified" in the review.
The council and a packed public gallery heard at Thursday's meeting that the review cost in the order of $80,000.
More than 20 submissions were made about the Newcastle Airport, which focused mostly on board appointment processes and concerns about that, reports of decisions being made outside council delegations without council awareness and an increase in expenditure due to development.
Davison's lead consultant Colin Jensen noted the airport board structure was "necessarily complicated" because of the joint ownership between City of Newcastle and Port Stephens Council.
He said the "overarching observation" is that City of Newcastle has used its delegation to make "appropriate decisions" around the appointment of directors "currently, recently and in the past".
A shortcoming was identified, which was that the council's Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee (ARIC) should receive regular briefings on the airport.
Mr Jensen said it was "not appropriate" to go into further detail on the airport at this stage but said there is more to come in the report.
The Scott Neylon/Jeremy Bath/Jason Sivo letters saga was a topic that came up frequently as part of the review process.
Mr Jensen said Davidson found the investigations into the matter were "done appropriately" and by the "appropriate authorities".
The 2023 council-commissioned independent investigation into the City of Newcastle CEO's links to a long-term Herald letter writer found "no evidence that the CEO incentivised the author to write the articles".
The Newcastle Herald was not contacted during the investigation, nor were copies of the letters requested.
Mr Jensen said many public submissions focused specifically on City of Newcastle chief executive Jeremy Bath, and in many instances referred to decisions "espoused" to have been made by the chief executive.
However, Mr Jensen said that upon review, many of the decisions residents raised issues with were made prior to his appointment or were decisions made by the elected councillors.
Issues were also raised with council decisions, but Mr Jensen said no instances were identified where those decisions fell outside regulatory or approval processes.
"Findings highlight opportunities for improved communication, enhanced community engagement," he said.
Mr Jensen said better engagement and communication would contribute to a "broader understanding of those council decisions".
Davidson gave City of Newcastle's staff Christmas party expenditure the tick of approval.
The Newcastle Herald revealed in January that City of Newcastle (CN) staff were treated to lavish lucky door prizes in a gift-giving frenzy in December.
The items up for grabs included a hot air balloon ride, Dyson Airwrap hair stylers, skydiving, a walking pad, Nintendo Switch, power tools, theatre tickets, a Nutribullet, portable speaker, Yeti cooler, Cool Cabana, recliner camp chair, cinema and dining vouchers.
Fellow Davidson consultant Justin Hanney said the cost-per-head of the council's Christmas party compared favourably with costs for other NSW councils' Christmas celebrations.
"When you dig into this issue historically, each staffer was given a Christmas cake that was replaced with prizes in a raffle-type environment which reduced the cost by 50 per cent in expenditure overall," he said.
Mr Hanney said there is a "direct link" between how staff are rewarded and organisational culture and congratulated the CEO on personally paying for an executive team Christmas gathering.
No excessive spending was identified and there were no "adverse findings" on the Christmas bash.
Davidson has found that while City of Newcastle has a "healthy organisational culture" the relationship between the CEO, councillors and lord mayor will be "critical" to the organisational success of the council.
Members of the public raised concerns about leadership dynamics, the approach to political transitions and challenges with alignment between the council's leadership team and elected councillors.
Mr Hanney said while a difference in opinion shows a healthy democracy, once a decision is made the CEO is accountable for ensuring that position is implemented across the board.
He said the council should focus on strengthening the relationship between the CEO, executive team and councillors for a more unified approach.
When it comes to staff, Mr Hanney said the council's staff engagement survey results indicated year-on-year improvement.
The full report will be tabled at the May 27 council meeting, and with plenty of issues covered the Newcastle Herald will have more to come.
To see live coverage of the public briefing, click here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
a day ago
- The Advertiser
Power up: Newcastle almost triples public electric vehicle charging network
NEWCASTLE has almost tripled its public electric vehicle charging network, with 34 new charging ports being rolled out across the city. The new charges, many of which have already been powered up, are at Lambton, Wallsend, Hamilton, Stockton, Adamstown, Mayfield, Newcastle, Newcastle East and Wickham. Further chargers are set to come online at Beresfield and Georgetown in the coming weeks. City of Newcastle Planning and Environment executive director Michelle Bisson said the chargers would benefit the growing number of EV drivers and encourage others to make the switch. "The signs are already encouraging, with more than 1350 EVs currently registered in Newcastle, a number which has risen by more than 1000 per cent in the past four years," she said. "One of the challenges, however, is that many drivers lack access to off-street parking to charge an EV. "Increasing the availability of public chargers in different suburbs is an important step in achieving our goal of driving EV uptake and creating a cleaner, quieter and lower emissions city." The council's goal is to have 52 per cent of all new car registrations be EVs by 2030-31. A $270,000 state government grant has helped co-fund the installation of the chargers. Minister for the Hunter Yasmin Catley said the state government had approved $4.1 million in co-funding to install 671 charging ports across 16 local government areas, including Newcastle. "Investing in EV charging infrastructure is about making sure Newcastle is keeping up with the growing demand for electric vehicles," she said. "It's not just about future-proofing our energy grid, it's also about making everyday travel easier and more accessible for everyone. "Having more charging points across Newcastle means people can drive with confidence, knowing they'll have the support they need to charge up and get where they need to go." The 34 new chargers add to existing infrastructure at Wharf Road, No.2 Sportsground, Laman Street and Perkins Street in the CBD. City of Newcastle Strategy and Innovation Strategic Advisory Committee chair, councillor Declan Clausen, said tripling the number of public EV chargers was an "important step" to transitioning the city to net-zero emissions. "These new chargers are strategically located within key local centres to support economic activity and benefit local businesses," he said. "They will be powered by 100 per cent renewable energy that comes from a combination of our Summerhill Solar Farm and an existing power purchase agreement with the Sapphire wind farm." Newcastle now has 50 ports at 15 locations in the city. NEWCASTLE has almost tripled its public electric vehicle charging network, with 34 new charging ports being rolled out across the city. The new charges, many of which have already been powered up, are at Lambton, Wallsend, Hamilton, Stockton, Adamstown, Mayfield, Newcastle, Newcastle East and Wickham. Further chargers are set to come online at Beresfield and Georgetown in the coming weeks. City of Newcastle Planning and Environment executive director Michelle Bisson said the chargers would benefit the growing number of EV drivers and encourage others to make the switch. "The signs are already encouraging, with more than 1350 EVs currently registered in Newcastle, a number which has risen by more than 1000 per cent in the past four years," she said. "One of the challenges, however, is that many drivers lack access to off-street parking to charge an EV. "Increasing the availability of public chargers in different suburbs is an important step in achieving our goal of driving EV uptake and creating a cleaner, quieter and lower emissions city." The council's goal is to have 52 per cent of all new car registrations be EVs by 2030-31. A $270,000 state government grant has helped co-fund the installation of the chargers. Minister for the Hunter Yasmin Catley said the state government had approved $4.1 million in co-funding to install 671 charging ports across 16 local government areas, including Newcastle. "Investing in EV charging infrastructure is about making sure Newcastle is keeping up with the growing demand for electric vehicles," she said. "It's not just about future-proofing our energy grid, it's also about making everyday travel easier and more accessible for everyone. "Having more charging points across Newcastle means people can drive with confidence, knowing they'll have the support they need to charge up and get where they need to go." The 34 new chargers add to existing infrastructure at Wharf Road, No.2 Sportsground, Laman Street and Perkins Street in the CBD. City of Newcastle Strategy and Innovation Strategic Advisory Committee chair, councillor Declan Clausen, said tripling the number of public EV chargers was an "important step" to transitioning the city to net-zero emissions. "These new chargers are strategically located within key local centres to support economic activity and benefit local businesses," he said. "They will be powered by 100 per cent renewable energy that comes from a combination of our Summerhill Solar Farm and an existing power purchase agreement with the Sapphire wind farm." Newcastle now has 50 ports at 15 locations in the city. NEWCASTLE has almost tripled its public electric vehicle charging network, with 34 new charging ports being rolled out across the city. The new charges, many of which have already been powered up, are at Lambton, Wallsend, Hamilton, Stockton, Adamstown, Mayfield, Newcastle, Newcastle East and Wickham. Further chargers are set to come online at Beresfield and Georgetown in the coming weeks. City of Newcastle Planning and Environment executive director Michelle Bisson said the chargers would benefit the growing number of EV drivers and encourage others to make the switch. "The signs are already encouraging, with more than 1350 EVs currently registered in Newcastle, a number which has risen by more than 1000 per cent in the past four years," she said. "One of the challenges, however, is that many drivers lack access to off-street parking to charge an EV. "Increasing the availability of public chargers in different suburbs is an important step in achieving our goal of driving EV uptake and creating a cleaner, quieter and lower emissions city." The council's goal is to have 52 per cent of all new car registrations be EVs by 2030-31. A $270,000 state government grant has helped co-fund the installation of the chargers. Minister for the Hunter Yasmin Catley said the state government had approved $4.1 million in co-funding to install 671 charging ports across 16 local government areas, including Newcastle. "Investing in EV charging infrastructure is about making sure Newcastle is keeping up with the growing demand for electric vehicles," she said. "It's not just about future-proofing our energy grid, it's also about making everyday travel easier and more accessible for everyone. "Having more charging points across Newcastle means people can drive with confidence, knowing they'll have the support they need to charge up and get where they need to go." The 34 new chargers add to existing infrastructure at Wharf Road, No.2 Sportsground, Laman Street and Perkins Street in the CBD. City of Newcastle Strategy and Innovation Strategic Advisory Committee chair, councillor Declan Clausen, said tripling the number of public EV chargers was an "important step" to transitioning the city to net-zero emissions. "These new chargers are strategically located within key local centres to support economic activity and benefit local businesses," he said. "They will be powered by 100 per cent renewable energy that comes from a combination of our Summerhill Solar Farm and an existing power purchase agreement with the Sapphire wind farm." Newcastle now has 50 ports at 15 locations in the city. NEWCASTLE has almost tripled its public electric vehicle charging network, with 34 new charging ports being rolled out across the city. The new charges, many of which have already been powered up, are at Lambton, Wallsend, Hamilton, Stockton, Adamstown, Mayfield, Newcastle, Newcastle East and Wickham. Further chargers are set to come online at Beresfield and Georgetown in the coming weeks. City of Newcastle Planning and Environment executive director Michelle Bisson said the chargers would benefit the growing number of EV drivers and encourage others to make the switch. "The signs are already encouraging, with more than 1350 EVs currently registered in Newcastle, a number which has risen by more than 1000 per cent in the past four years," she said. "One of the challenges, however, is that many drivers lack access to off-street parking to charge an EV. "Increasing the availability of public chargers in different suburbs is an important step in achieving our goal of driving EV uptake and creating a cleaner, quieter and lower emissions city." The council's goal is to have 52 per cent of all new car registrations be EVs by 2030-31. A $270,000 state government grant has helped co-fund the installation of the chargers. Minister for the Hunter Yasmin Catley said the state government had approved $4.1 million in co-funding to install 671 charging ports across 16 local government areas, including Newcastle. "Investing in EV charging infrastructure is about making sure Newcastle is keeping up with the growing demand for electric vehicles," she said. "It's not just about future-proofing our energy grid, it's also about making everyday travel easier and more accessible for everyone. "Having more charging points across Newcastle means people can drive with confidence, knowing they'll have the support they need to charge up and get where they need to go." The 34 new chargers add to existing infrastructure at Wharf Road, No.2 Sportsground, Laman Street and Perkins Street in the CBD. City of Newcastle Strategy and Innovation Strategic Advisory Committee chair, councillor Declan Clausen, said tripling the number of public EV chargers was an "important step" to transitioning the city to net-zero emissions. "These new chargers are strategically located within key local centres to support economic activity and benefit local businesses," he said. "They will be powered by 100 per cent renewable energy that comes from a combination of our Summerhill Solar Farm and an existing power purchase agreement with the Sapphire wind farm." Newcastle now has 50 ports at 15 locations in the city.
The Advertiser
3 days ago
- The Advertiser
City of Newcastle spends $12m on Wollongong property
CITY of Newcastle has entered the Wollongong property market, snapping up a $12 million property in the Illawarra. The council fought off interest from more than 140 registered parties to buy the Sonic HealthPlus site at 21-23 Denison Street, Wollongong. The property is fully leased to subsidiaries of Sonic Healthcare, Illawarra Radiology Group and Sonic HealthPlus. It's City of Newcastle's second unusual property purchase in recent weeks - in late April, it bought a Bunnings site at Taree. So why is Newcastle council buying a hardware store and a Wollongong health facility? It's about investing in the future - quite literally, the council says. The purchases are part of what the council calls its Future Fund strategy, where surplus funds are used to buy the properties and benefit from the financial returns via rents and leases. A City of Newcastle spokesperson said the money raised for the Future Fund is to be used to maintain council infrastructure. "The Future Fund is acquiring appropriate commercial properties as an additional investment opportunity because they offer inflation protection and stable returns, allowing City of Newcastle to diversify its revenue base to cater for both the growing population and ageing assets," the spokesperson said. "The Future Fund allows us to increase investment of our cash reserves into a diverse portfolio of land, buildings and City of Newcastle's commercial operations. "The Wollongong purchase was vetted by City of Newcastle's Future Fund Governance Committee in line with its adopted investment strategy and follows the review of more than 20 properties during the past 12 months." The SonicHealth facility is the only Wollongong property owned by the City of Newcastle. It's a different approach compared to Wollongong City Council, which doesn't seem to be looking into the Newcastle property market. According to the most recent investment report released by Wollongong council, it prefers to invest its surplus money with banks and managed funds. The report shows it has $176 million invested in various funds and trusts with maturity dates years in the future. CITY of Newcastle has entered the Wollongong property market, snapping up a $12 million property in the Illawarra. The council fought off interest from more than 140 registered parties to buy the Sonic HealthPlus site at 21-23 Denison Street, Wollongong. The property is fully leased to subsidiaries of Sonic Healthcare, Illawarra Radiology Group and Sonic HealthPlus. It's City of Newcastle's second unusual property purchase in recent weeks - in late April, it bought a Bunnings site at Taree. So why is Newcastle council buying a hardware store and a Wollongong health facility? It's about investing in the future - quite literally, the council says. The purchases are part of what the council calls its Future Fund strategy, where surplus funds are used to buy the properties and benefit from the financial returns via rents and leases. A City of Newcastle spokesperson said the money raised for the Future Fund is to be used to maintain council infrastructure. "The Future Fund is acquiring appropriate commercial properties as an additional investment opportunity because they offer inflation protection and stable returns, allowing City of Newcastle to diversify its revenue base to cater for both the growing population and ageing assets," the spokesperson said. "The Future Fund allows us to increase investment of our cash reserves into a diverse portfolio of land, buildings and City of Newcastle's commercial operations. "The Wollongong purchase was vetted by City of Newcastle's Future Fund Governance Committee in line with its adopted investment strategy and follows the review of more than 20 properties during the past 12 months." The SonicHealth facility is the only Wollongong property owned by the City of Newcastle. It's a different approach compared to Wollongong City Council, which doesn't seem to be looking into the Newcastle property market. According to the most recent investment report released by Wollongong council, it prefers to invest its surplus money with banks and managed funds. The report shows it has $176 million invested in various funds and trusts with maturity dates years in the future. CITY of Newcastle has entered the Wollongong property market, snapping up a $12 million property in the Illawarra. The council fought off interest from more than 140 registered parties to buy the Sonic HealthPlus site at 21-23 Denison Street, Wollongong. The property is fully leased to subsidiaries of Sonic Healthcare, Illawarra Radiology Group and Sonic HealthPlus. It's City of Newcastle's second unusual property purchase in recent weeks - in late April, it bought a Bunnings site at Taree. So why is Newcastle council buying a hardware store and a Wollongong health facility? It's about investing in the future - quite literally, the council says. The purchases are part of what the council calls its Future Fund strategy, where surplus funds are used to buy the properties and benefit from the financial returns via rents and leases. A City of Newcastle spokesperson said the money raised for the Future Fund is to be used to maintain council infrastructure. "The Future Fund is acquiring appropriate commercial properties as an additional investment opportunity because they offer inflation protection and stable returns, allowing City of Newcastle to diversify its revenue base to cater for both the growing population and ageing assets," the spokesperson said. "The Future Fund allows us to increase investment of our cash reserves into a diverse portfolio of land, buildings and City of Newcastle's commercial operations. "The Wollongong purchase was vetted by City of Newcastle's Future Fund Governance Committee in line with its adopted investment strategy and follows the review of more than 20 properties during the past 12 months." The SonicHealth facility is the only Wollongong property owned by the City of Newcastle. It's a different approach compared to Wollongong City Council, which doesn't seem to be looking into the Newcastle property market. According to the most recent investment report released by Wollongong council, it prefers to invest its surplus money with banks and managed funds. The report shows it has $176 million invested in various funds and trusts with maturity dates years in the future. CITY of Newcastle has entered the Wollongong property market, snapping up a $12 million property in the Illawarra. The council fought off interest from more than 140 registered parties to buy the Sonic HealthPlus site at 21-23 Denison Street, Wollongong. The property is fully leased to subsidiaries of Sonic Healthcare, Illawarra Radiology Group and Sonic HealthPlus. It's City of Newcastle's second unusual property purchase in recent weeks - in late April, it bought a Bunnings site at Taree. So why is Newcastle council buying a hardware store and a Wollongong health facility? It's about investing in the future - quite literally, the council says. The purchases are part of what the council calls its Future Fund strategy, where surplus funds are used to buy the properties and benefit from the financial returns via rents and leases. A City of Newcastle spokesperson said the money raised for the Future Fund is to be used to maintain council infrastructure. "The Future Fund is acquiring appropriate commercial properties as an additional investment opportunity because they offer inflation protection and stable returns, allowing City of Newcastle to diversify its revenue base to cater for both the growing population and ageing assets," the spokesperson said. "The Future Fund allows us to increase investment of our cash reserves into a diverse portfolio of land, buildings and City of Newcastle's commercial operations. "The Wollongong purchase was vetted by City of Newcastle's Future Fund Governance Committee in line with its adopted investment strategy and follows the review of more than 20 properties during the past 12 months." The SonicHealth facility is the only Wollongong property owned by the City of Newcastle. It's a different approach compared to Wollongong City Council, which doesn't seem to be looking into the Newcastle property market. According to the most recent investment report released by Wollongong council, it prefers to invest its surplus money with banks and managed funds. The report shows it has $176 million invested in various funds and trusts with maturity dates years in the future.
The Advertiser
7 days ago
- The Advertiser
Clausen accuses Newcastle lord mayor of 'rewriting history' over deleted airport posts
NEWCASTLE Labor councillor Declan Clausen has accused Ross Kerridge of "quietly re-writing airport history" after a series of posts raising concerns about its financial position were deleted from the lord mayor's Facebook page. Cr Clausen said this week that, over the past few days, several of the lord mayor's "most inflammatory posts" about Newcastle Airport, including one where he "boasted" about writing to the Minister and Office of Local Government, have "quietly disappeared". "Every major decision about the airport was made lawfully, responsibly, and with proper controls and oversight, including from a professional board and external auditor," Cr Clausen said. "But instead of correcting the record or apologising to the airport and our fellow shareholder, Port Stephens Council, lord mayor Kerridge is quietly deleting the evidence. This isn't leadership." Cr Clausen said that following the Davidson Business Advisory review, which was released last month, he went looking to confirm "false claims" in one of Cr Kerridge's past posts when he noticed they had been deleted. The lord mayor said there were differing opinions about how to handle past Facebook posts. "I was getting messages from the airport indirectly and advice that I should take them down," he said. "Other people think, 'No, hang on, you should leave them up because you're trying to change history, ' but I made a decision to take them down, and coincidentally, almost immediately, criticism started that I'd taken them down." The lord mayor's posts were made following a Newcastle Herald investigation revealing the airport faced significant financial pressures. Cr Kerridge also wrote to the NSW Office of Local Government calling for an investigation of the "true" financial position of Newcastle Airport, a move he raised in one of his now-deleted posts. The airport, which in recent days has announced a new route to Perth and its first year-round international flights, has repeatedly denied any financial issues. Cr Clausen said deleting social media posts "doesn't undo the damage" to the airport or ratepayers and said the community deserves public accountability from the lord mayor, "not revisionism". He said the outcomes of the Davidson Business Advisory review confirmed there "was no financial mismanagement" or "governance failures" at the airport. The Davison review into the council's policies, processes and procedures did not conduct a detailed financial analysis of Newcastle Airport's financial positions and operations. However, the review report said it is "considered unlikely" that any significant financial risks will be transferred to the City of Newcastle and said the appointment of board directors was carried out with the "necessary governance and council approvals" The review found enhanced oversight by the council's Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee (ARIC) will be beneficial and has been established with annual reporting and, from December 2024, quarterly reporting. Asked whether an apology or correction, as requested from his fellow councillors, would be forthcoming, Cr Kerridge said he thinks it's time to "move on". "I think some people are getting a little bit heated and emotive and trying to prolong this discussion," he said. "I think the rights and wrongs of this argument are going to go on for a long time, and I think it would be far better if we moved on. "Not only that, I think the general community is getting distressed by watching all this behaviour, and I think we need to move on." NEWCASTLE Labor councillor Declan Clausen has accused Ross Kerridge of "quietly re-writing airport history" after a series of posts raising concerns about its financial position were deleted from the lord mayor's Facebook page. Cr Clausen said this week that, over the past few days, several of the lord mayor's "most inflammatory posts" about Newcastle Airport, including one where he "boasted" about writing to the Minister and Office of Local Government, have "quietly disappeared". "Every major decision about the airport was made lawfully, responsibly, and with proper controls and oversight, including from a professional board and external auditor," Cr Clausen said. "But instead of correcting the record or apologising to the airport and our fellow shareholder, Port Stephens Council, lord mayor Kerridge is quietly deleting the evidence. This isn't leadership." Cr Clausen said that following the Davidson Business Advisory review, which was released last month, he went looking to confirm "false claims" in one of Cr Kerridge's past posts when he noticed they had been deleted. The lord mayor said there were differing opinions about how to handle past Facebook posts. "I was getting messages from the airport indirectly and advice that I should take them down," he said. "Other people think, 'No, hang on, you should leave them up because you're trying to change history, ' but I made a decision to take them down, and coincidentally, almost immediately, criticism started that I'd taken them down." The lord mayor's posts were made following a Newcastle Herald investigation revealing the airport faced significant financial pressures. Cr Kerridge also wrote to the NSW Office of Local Government calling for an investigation of the "true" financial position of Newcastle Airport, a move he raised in one of his now-deleted posts. The airport, which in recent days has announced a new route to Perth and its first year-round international flights, has repeatedly denied any financial issues. Cr Clausen said deleting social media posts "doesn't undo the damage" to the airport or ratepayers and said the community deserves public accountability from the lord mayor, "not revisionism". He said the outcomes of the Davidson Business Advisory review confirmed there "was no financial mismanagement" or "governance failures" at the airport. The Davison review into the council's policies, processes and procedures did not conduct a detailed financial analysis of Newcastle Airport's financial positions and operations. However, the review report said it is "considered unlikely" that any significant financial risks will be transferred to the City of Newcastle and said the appointment of board directors was carried out with the "necessary governance and council approvals" The review found enhanced oversight by the council's Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee (ARIC) will be beneficial and has been established with annual reporting and, from December 2024, quarterly reporting. Asked whether an apology or correction, as requested from his fellow councillors, would be forthcoming, Cr Kerridge said he thinks it's time to "move on". "I think some people are getting a little bit heated and emotive and trying to prolong this discussion," he said. "I think the rights and wrongs of this argument are going to go on for a long time, and I think it would be far better if we moved on. "Not only that, I think the general community is getting distressed by watching all this behaviour, and I think we need to move on." NEWCASTLE Labor councillor Declan Clausen has accused Ross Kerridge of "quietly re-writing airport history" after a series of posts raising concerns about its financial position were deleted from the lord mayor's Facebook page. Cr Clausen said this week that, over the past few days, several of the lord mayor's "most inflammatory posts" about Newcastle Airport, including one where he "boasted" about writing to the Minister and Office of Local Government, have "quietly disappeared". "Every major decision about the airport was made lawfully, responsibly, and with proper controls and oversight, including from a professional board and external auditor," Cr Clausen said. "But instead of correcting the record or apologising to the airport and our fellow shareholder, Port Stephens Council, lord mayor Kerridge is quietly deleting the evidence. This isn't leadership." Cr Clausen said that following the Davidson Business Advisory review, which was released last month, he went looking to confirm "false claims" in one of Cr Kerridge's past posts when he noticed they had been deleted. The lord mayor said there were differing opinions about how to handle past Facebook posts. "I was getting messages from the airport indirectly and advice that I should take them down," he said. "Other people think, 'No, hang on, you should leave them up because you're trying to change history, ' but I made a decision to take them down, and coincidentally, almost immediately, criticism started that I'd taken them down." The lord mayor's posts were made following a Newcastle Herald investigation revealing the airport faced significant financial pressures. Cr Kerridge also wrote to the NSW Office of Local Government calling for an investigation of the "true" financial position of Newcastle Airport, a move he raised in one of his now-deleted posts. The airport, which in recent days has announced a new route to Perth and its first year-round international flights, has repeatedly denied any financial issues. Cr Clausen said deleting social media posts "doesn't undo the damage" to the airport or ratepayers and said the community deserves public accountability from the lord mayor, "not revisionism". He said the outcomes of the Davidson Business Advisory review confirmed there "was no financial mismanagement" or "governance failures" at the airport. The Davison review into the council's policies, processes and procedures did not conduct a detailed financial analysis of Newcastle Airport's financial positions and operations. However, the review report said it is "considered unlikely" that any significant financial risks will be transferred to the City of Newcastle and said the appointment of board directors was carried out with the "necessary governance and council approvals" The review found enhanced oversight by the council's Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee (ARIC) will be beneficial and has been established with annual reporting and, from December 2024, quarterly reporting. Asked whether an apology or correction, as requested from his fellow councillors, would be forthcoming, Cr Kerridge said he thinks it's time to "move on". "I think some people are getting a little bit heated and emotive and trying to prolong this discussion," he said. "I think the rights and wrongs of this argument are going to go on for a long time, and I think it would be far better if we moved on. "Not only that, I think the general community is getting distressed by watching all this behaviour, and I think we need to move on." NEWCASTLE Labor councillor Declan Clausen has accused Ross Kerridge of "quietly re-writing airport history" after a series of posts raising concerns about its financial position were deleted from the lord mayor's Facebook page. Cr Clausen said this week that, over the past few days, several of the lord mayor's "most inflammatory posts" about Newcastle Airport, including one where he "boasted" about writing to the Minister and Office of Local Government, have "quietly disappeared". "Every major decision about the airport was made lawfully, responsibly, and with proper controls and oversight, including from a professional board and external auditor," Cr Clausen said. "But instead of correcting the record or apologising to the airport and our fellow shareholder, Port Stephens Council, lord mayor Kerridge is quietly deleting the evidence. This isn't leadership." Cr Clausen said that following the Davidson Business Advisory review, which was released last month, he went looking to confirm "false claims" in one of Cr Kerridge's past posts when he noticed they had been deleted. The lord mayor said there were differing opinions about how to handle past Facebook posts. "I was getting messages from the airport indirectly and advice that I should take them down," he said. "Other people think, 'No, hang on, you should leave them up because you're trying to change history, ' but I made a decision to take them down, and coincidentally, almost immediately, criticism started that I'd taken them down." The lord mayor's posts were made following a Newcastle Herald investigation revealing the airport faced significant financial pressures. Cr Kerridge also wrote to the NSW Office of Local Government calling for an investigation of the "true" financial position of Newcastle Airport, a move he raised in one of his now-deleted posts. The airport, which in recent days has announced a new route to Perth and its first year-round international flights, has repeatedly denied any financial issues. Cr Clausen said deleting social media posts "doesn't undo the damage" to the airport or ratepayers and said the community deserves public accountability from the lord mayor, "not revisionism". He said the outcomes of the Davidson Business Advisory review confirmed there "was no financial mismanagement" or "governance failures" at the airport. The Davison review into the council's policies, processes and procedures did not conduct a detailed financial analysis of Newcastle Airport's financial positions and operations. However, the review report said it is "considered unlikely" that any significant financial risks will be transferred to the City of Newcastle and said the appointment of board directors was carried out with the "necessary governance and council approvals" The review found enhanced oversight by the council's Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee (ARIC) will be beneficial and has been established with annual reporting and, from December 2024, quarterly reporting. Asked whether an apology or correction, as requested from his fellow councillors, would be forthcoming, Cr Kerridge said he thinks it's time to "move on". "I think some people are getting a little bit heated and emotive and trying to prolong this discussion," he said. "I think the rights and wrongs of this argument are going to go on for a long time, and I think it would be far better if we moved on. "Not only that, I think the general community is getting distressed by watching all this behaviour, and I think we need to move on."
