Latest news with #CityofNewcastle
The Advertiser
4 days ago
- General
- The Advertiser
Cliffhanger: no telling how long it will take to stabilise South Newcastle beach cliff
THERE is still no telling how long it will take to stabilise a section of the South Newcastle beach cliff which came unstuck after a recent deluge hit the Hunter. The unstable section is just a short distance away from where a 20-tonne rock fell 15 metres onto the Shortland Esplanade in 2002, narrowly missing a security guard. Known to locals as 'The Rock', the boulder sat unmoved for more than two years while a decision was made on whether to remove it and how to stabilise the cliff. City of Newcastle said it will work with consulting geotechnical experts and the University of Newcastle-Research Centre for Geotechnical Science and Engineering (UON-GSE) to ensure the design, method and remediation takes place in a timely manner to return Bathers Way to locals. A council spokesman said it has been managing the Newcastle South cliff line over a number of years. "This area has a long history of cliff instability and is known as 'Yirannali' by the local Awabakal community, meaning 'place of falling rocks'," he said. "Our most recent investment in 2023-24 renewed and increased the height of the full length of the rock catch fence from the southern extent of the cliff line to the rear of the skate park amenities building. "In 2024, we also remediated the face of the southern cliff line, with specialists scaling the cliff face to remove loose rocks before installing drainage, shotcrete and additional rock anchors as well as soft fall to reduce rocks bouncing into the rock catch fence." The council's contracts register shows the City of Newcastle paid Daracon some $979,000 to replace the rock catch fence in June 2024. City of Newcastle has been working with UON-GSE to undertake cliff line stability monitoring. The council spokesman said that the monitoring program identified a rock column that had moved away from the cliff face due to recent severe wet weather, which saw the council close the area off for safety. "Considering the unstable area is located behind the rock catch fence, additional temporary fencing has been installed to further extend the exclusion zone in the interest of public safety while we confirm the methodology for remediation," he said. The skate bowl, skate plaza, amenities and kiosk are still open to the public. Access is available via the lower promenade of Bathers Way between King Edward Park and South Newcastle beach. THERE is still no telling how long it will take to stabilise a section of the South Newcastle beach cliff which came unstuck after a recent deluge hit the Hunter. The unstable section is just a short distance away from where a 20-tonne rock fell 15 metres onto the Shortland Esplanade in 2002, narrowly missing a security guard. Known to locals as 'The Rock', the boulder sat unmoved for more than two years while a decision was made on whether to remove it and how to stabilise the cliff. City of Newcastle said it will work with consulting geotechnical experts and the University of Newcastle-Research Centre for Geotechnical Science and Engineering (UON-GSE) to ensure the design, method and remediation takes place in a timely manner to return Bathers Way to locals. A council spokesman said it has been managing the Newcastle South cliff line over a number of years. "This area has a long history of cliff instability and is known as 'Yirannali' by the local Awabakal community, meaning 'place of falling rocks'," he said. "Our most recent investment in 2023-24 renewed and increased the height of the full length of the rock catch fence from the southern extent of the cliff line to the rear of the skate park amenities building. "In 2024, we also remediated the face of the southern cliff line, with specialists scaling the cliff face to remove loose rocks before installing drainage, shotcrete and additional rock anchors as well as soft fall to reduce rocks bouncing into the rock catch fence." The council's contracts register shows the City of Newcastle paid Daracon some $979,000 to replace the rock catch fence in June 2024. City of Newcastle has been working with UON-GSE to undertake cliff line stability monitoring. The council spokesman said that the monitoring program identified a rock column that had moved away from the cliff face due to recent severe wet weather, which saw the council close the area off for safety. "Considering the unstable area is located behind the rock catch fence, additional temporary fencing has been installed to further extend the exclusion zone in the interest of public safety while we confirm the methodology for remediation," he said. The skate bowl, skate plaza, amenities and kiosk are still open to the public. Access is available via the lower promenade of Bathers Way between King Edward Park and South Newcastle beach. THERE is still no telling how long it will take to stabilise a section of the South Newcastle beach cliff which came unstuck after a recent deluge hit the Hunter. The unstable section is just a short distance away from where a 20-tonne rock fell 15 metres onto the Shortland Esplanade in 2002, narrowly missing a security guard. Known to locals as 'The Rock', the boulder sat unmoved for more than two years while a decision was made on whether to remove it and how to stabilise the cliff. City of Newcastle said it will work with consulting geotechnical experts and the University of Newcastle-Research Centre for Geotechnical Science and Engineering (UON-GSE) to ensure the design, method and remediation takes place in a timely manner to return Bathers Way to locals. A council spokesman said it has been managing the Newcastle South cliff line over a number of years. "This area has a long history of cliff instability and is known as 'Yirannali' by the local Awabakal community, meaning 'place of falling rocks'," he said. "Our most recent investment in 2023-24 renewed and increased the height of the full length of the rock catch fence from the southern extent of the cliff line to the rear of the skate park amenities building. "In 2024, we also remediated the face of the southern cliff line, with specialists scaling the cliff face to remove loose rocks before installing drainage, shotcrete and additional rock anchors as well as soft fall to reduce rocks bouncing into the rock catch fence." The council's contracts register shows the City of Newcastle paid Daracon some $979,000 to replace the rock catch fence in June 2024. City of Newcastle has been working with UON-GSE to undertake cliff line stability monitoring. The council spokesman said that the monitoring program identified a rock column that had moved away from the cliff face due to recent severe wet weather, which saw the council close the area off for safety. "Considering the unstable area is located behind the rock catch fence, additional temporary fencing has been installed to further extend the exclusion zone in the interest of public safety while we confirm the methodology for remediation," he said. The skate bowl, skate plaza, amenities and kiosk are still open to the public. Access is available via the lower promenade of Bathers Way between King Edward Park and South Newcastle beach. THERE is still no telling how long it will take to stabilise a section of the South Newcastle beach cliff which came unstuck after a recent deluge hit the Hunter. The unstable section is just a short distance away from where a 20-tonne rock fell 15 metres onto the Shortland Esplanade in 2002, narrowly missing a security guard. Known to locals as 'The Rock', the boulder sat unmoved for more than two years while a decision was made on whether to remove it and how to stabilise the cliff. City of Newcastle said it will work with consulting geotechnical experts and the University of Newcastle-Research Centre for Geotechnical Science and Engineering (UON-GSE) to ensure the design, method and remediation takes place in a timely manner to return Bathers Way to locals. A council spokesman said it has been managing the Newcastle South cliff line over a number of years. "This area has a long history of cliff instability and is known as 'Yirannali' by the local Awabakal community, meaning 'place of falling rocks'," he said. "Our most recent investment in 2023-24 renewed and increased the height of the full length of the rock catch fence from the southern extent of the cliff line to the rear of the skate park amenities building. "In 2024, we also remediated the face of the southern cliff line, with specialists scaling the cliff face to remove loose rocks before installing drainage, shotcrete and additional rock anchors as well as soft fall to reduce rocks bouncing into the rock catch fence." The council's contracts register shows the City of Newcastle paid Daracon some $979,000 to replace the rock catch fence in June 2024. City of Newcastle has been working with UON-GSE to undertake cliff line stability monitoring. The council spokesman said that the monitoring program identified a rock column that had moved away from the cliff face due to recent severe wet weather, which saw the council close the area off for safety. "Considering the unstable area is located behind the rock catch fence, additional temporary fencing has been installed to further extend the exclusion zone in the interest of public safety while we confirm the methodology for remediation," he said. The skate bowl, skate plaza, amenities and kiosk are still open to the public. Access is available via the lower promenade of Bathers Way between King Edward Park and South Newcastle beach.
The Advertiser
4 days ago
- General
- The Advertiser
South Newcastle cliff declared unstable following big wet
A section Bathers Way has been closed while investigations into how to stabilise a section of the South Newcastle cliff are completed. The area became unstable during the recent heavy rain that fell across the region. Following preliminary investigations on Saturday morning, City of Newcastle temporarily closed a 30-metre section of the upper promenade south of the gym equipment and skate park southern access ramp. "We are working with experts to confirm the best way to address the unstable section of cliff line, with the safety of the community our top priority," a spokeswoman said. "This might be to secure the boulder that has slipped, or it may be to have it removed. We do not expect a solution to require the area to be closed for any lengthy period of time." The skate bowl, skate plaza, amenities and kiosk remain open to the public, with access also still available via the lower promenade of Bathers Way between King Edward Park and South Newcastle Beach. The cliff line was last inspected by independent experts in 2024. Significant work was undertaken to improve the cliff's stability as part of the recently completed $20 million skate park and South Newcastle Bathers Way project. The current area of focus is a short distance away from where a 20-tonne rock fell 15 metres onto the Shortland Esplanade, narrowly missing a security guard, in late 2002. Known as 'The Rock" the giant boulder remained in place for more than two years while civic officials debated whether to remove it and how best to stabilise the cliff. A section Bathers Way has been closed while investigations into how to stabilise a section of the South Newcastle cliff are completed. The area became unstable during the recent heavy rain that fell across the region. Following preliminary investigations on Saturday morning, City of Newcastle temporarily closed a 30-metre section of the upper promenade south of the gym equipment and skate park southern access ramp. "We are working with experts to confirm the best way to address the unstable section of cliff line, with the safety of the community our top priority," a spokeswoman said. "This might be to secure the boulder that has slipped, or it may be to have it removed. We do not expect a solution to require the area to be closed for any lengthy period of time." The skate bowl, skate plaza, amenities and kiosk remain open to the public, with access also still available via the lower promenade of Bathers Way between King Edward Park and South Newcastle Beach. The cliff line was last inspected by independent experts in 2024. Significant work was undertaken to improve the cliff's stability as part of the recently completed $20 million skate park and South Newcastle Bathers Way project. The current area of focus is a short distance away from where a 20-tonne rock fell 15 metres onto the Shortland Esplanade, narrowly missing a security guard, in late 2002. Known as 'The Rock" the giant boulder remained in place for more than two years while civic officials debated whether to remove it and how best to stabilise the cliff. A section Bathers Way has been closed while investigations into how to stabilise a section of the South Newcastle cliff are completed. The area became unstable during the recent heavy rain that fell across the region. Following preliminary investigations on Saturday morning, City of Newcastle temporarily closed a 30-metre section of the upper promenade south of the gym equipment and skate park southern access ramp. "We are working with experts to confirm the best way to address the unstable section of cliff line, with the safety of the community our top priority," a spokeswoman said. "This might be to secure the boulder that has slipped, or it may be to have it removed. We do not expect a solution to require the area to be closed for any lengthy period of time." The skate bowl, skate plaza, amenities and kiosk remain open to the public, with access also still available via the lower promenade of Bathers Way between King Edward Park and South Newcastle Beach. The cliff line was last inspected by independent experts in 2024. Significant work was undertaken to improve the cliff's stability as part of the recently completed $20 million skate park and South Newcastle Bathers Way project. The current area of focus is a short distance away from where a 20-tonne rock fell 15 metres onto the Shortland Esplanade, narrowly missing a security guard, in late 2002. Known as 'The Rock" the giant boulder remained in place for more than two years while civic officials debated whether to remove it and how best to stabilise the cliff. A section Bathers Way has been closed while investigations into how to stabilise a section of the South Newcastle cliff are completed. The area became unstable during the recent heavy rain that fell across the region. Following preliminary investigations on Saturday morning, City of Newcastle temporarily closed a 30-metre section of the upper promenade south of the gym equipment and skate park southern access ramp. "We are working with experts to confirm the best way to address the unstable section of cliff line, with the safety of the community our top priority," a spokeswoman said. "This might be to secure the boulder that has slipped, or it may be to have it removed. We do not expect a solution to require the area to be closed for any lengthy period of time." The skate bowl, skate plaza, amenities and kiosk remain open to the public, with access also still available via the lower promenade of Bathers Way between King Edward Park and South Newcastle Beach. The cliff line was last inspected by independent experts in 2024. Significant work was undertaken to improve the cliff's stability as part of the recently completed $20 million skate park and South Newcastle Bathers Way project. The current area of focus is a short distance away from where a 20-tonne rock fell 15 metres onto the Shortland Esplanade, narrowly missing a security guard, in late 2002. Known as 'The Rock" the giant boulder remained in place for more than two years while civic officials debated whether to remove it and how best to stabilise the cliff.
The Advertiser
5 days ago
- Business
- The Advertiser
Business Newcastle president asks what's next if traders reject controversial rate
CITY of Newcastle will go to business owners that pay a Special Business Rate (SBR) with two questions: whether they think the scheme provides value for money, and if it should continue. Business Newcastle president Edward Duc has a question of his own: What's next if the answer is no? This week, councillors voted to survey business owners in SBR precincts about the future of the controversial scheme after several submissions to a recent independent probe into the council raised concerns about the transparency of how the funds are levied, allocated and spent. Mr Duc said feedback he has received is that a large proportion of those who pay the SBR do not see the value in the scheme. "We've got businesses, and I'm not saying this is the only reason, who are moving from Newcastle to Charlestown because of the high commercial rates," he said. "The more money that traders have to give to the council, the more it just inhibits what they can do. "It is Business Newcastle's view that the council should suspend the SBR and generate the funding themselves out of the generous commercial rates they're charging, that's our stand at the moment." City of Newcastle made $65.9 million in business rates in 2023/24 from 15,489 active businesses, the second-highest sum of any NSW council. The SBR is an additional charge levied on businesses in the precincts on top of their standard commercial rates. The Newcastle Herald asked City of Newcastle when it intends to conduct the survey and whether it intends to remove the SBR if businesses answer no to its two questions. If not, the Herald asked what the purpose of the survey is and what the council feels the value of the SBR is to businesses. Questions were also asked about the impact of the Port of Newcastle on commercial rates and the council's response to claims that SBR funds used on events should be funded by ratepayers and the council rather than business owners. In response, a City of Newcastle spokesman said following Tuesday's council meeting, the council is considering the "most appropriate" mechanism for implementing the SBR survey. "The elected council and community will be informed at the appropriate time," he said. The scheme has long been a point of contention, with some business owners questioning its necessity and others calling for it to be axed entirely. In 2024/25, the council said the cost to administer the scheme, including BIA governance and support, is $152,700. That figure is 10 per cent of total funds levied. Business Improvement Associations (BIA) in the city centre and Darby Street, Hamilton, Mayfield, New Lambton and Wallsend are independent organisations responsible for disbursing up to $100,000 of SBR funds each year. That money can be used for strategic directions to promote local business, marketing and promotions, prioritising and managing beautification projects and coordinating community events aimed at encouraging business demand. The council decides how the remainder of SBR funds are spent. Mr Duc said many business owners do not feel the SBR is being spent in a way that directly benefits them. "We've got to make sure that all of the people who actually pay the levy get to have a say," he said. "If the council doesn't take notice of the business community, then we will be having a big say, and we have a bit of muscle because we're part of Business NSW and Business Hunter. "Be assured, if the answer from businesses is no and the council decides not to act on it through the BIAs, then we will be lobbying to have it [the SBR] removed." The Davidson review recommended that the council require BIAs to undertake research with membership and the community annually, or at agreed regular intervals, to assess satisfaction, impact and present the findings to the council for consideration. CITY of Newcastle will go to business owners that pay a Special Business Rate (SBR) with two questions: whether they think the scheme provides value for money, and if it should continue. Business Newcastle president Edward Duc has a question of his own: What's next if the answer is no? This week, councillors voted to survey business owners in SBR precincts about the future of the controversial scheme after several submissions to a recent independent probe into the council raised concerns about the transparency of how the funds are levied, allocated and spent. Mr Duc said feedback he has received is that a large proportion of those who pay the SBR do not see the value in the scheme. "We've got businesses, and I'm not saying this is the only reason, who are moving from Newcastle to Charlestown because of the high commercial rates," he said. "The more money that traders have to give to the council, the more it just inhibits what they can do. "It is Business Newcastle's view that the council should suspend the SBR and generate the funding themselves out of the generous commercial rates they're charging, that's our stand at the moment." City of Newcastle made $65.9 million in business rates in 2023/24 from 15,489 active businesses, the second-highest sum of any NSW council. The SBR is an additional charge levied on businesses in the precincts on top of their standard commercial rates. The Newcastle Herald asked City of Newcastle when it intends to conduct the survey and whether it intends to remove the SBR if businesses answer no to its two questions. If not, the Herald asked what the purpose of the survey is and what the council feels the value of the SBR is to businesses. Questions were also asked about the impact of the Port of Newcastle on commercial rates and the council's response to claims that SBR funds used on events should be funded by ratepayers and the council rather than business owners. In response, a City of Newcastle spokesman said following Tuesday's council meeting, the council is considering the "most appropriate" mechanism for implementing the SBR survey. "The elected council and community will be informed at the appropriate time," he said. The scheme has long been a point of contention, with some business owners questioning its necessity and others calling for it to be axed entirely. In 2024/25, the council said the cost to administer the scheme, including BIA governance and support, is $152,700. That figure is 10 per cent of total funds levied. Business Improvement Associations (BIA) in the city centre and Darby Street, Hamilton, Mayfield, New Lambton and Wallsend are independent organisations responsible for disbursing up to $100,000 of SBR funds each year. That money can be used for strategic directions to promote local business, marketing and promotions, prioritising and managing beautification projects and coordinating community events aimed at encouraging business demand. The council decides how the remainder of SBR funds are spent. Mr Duc said many business owners do not feel the SBR is being spent in a way that directly benefits them. "We've got to make sure that all of the people who actually pay the levy get to have a say," he said. "If the council doesn't take notice of the business community, then we will be having a big say, and we have a bit of muscle because we're part of Business NSW and Business Hunter. "Be assured, if the answer from businesses is no and the council decides not to act on it through the BIAs, then we will be lobbying to have it [the SBR] removed." The Davidson review recommended that the council require BIAs to undertake research with membership and the community annually, or at agreed regular intervals, to assess satisfaction, impact and present the findings to the council for consideration. CITY of Newcastle will go to business owners that pay a Special Business Rate (SBR) with two questions: whether they think the scheme provides value for money, and if it should continue. Business Newcastle president Edward Duc has a question of his own: What's next if the answer is no? This week, councillors voted to survey business owners in SBR precincts about the future of the controversial scheme after several submissions to a recent independent probe into the council raised concerns about the transparency of how the funds are levied, allocated and spent. Mr Duc said feedback he has received is that a large proportion of those who pay the SBR do not see the value in the scheme. "We've got businesses, and I'm not saying this is the only reason, who are moving from Newcastle to Charlestown because of the high commercial rates," he said. "The more money that traders have to give to the council, the more it just inhibits what they can do. "It is Business Newcastle's view that the council should suspend the SBR and generate the funding themselves out of the generous commercial rates they're charging, that's our stand at the moment." City of Newcastle made $65.9 million in business rates in 2023/24 from 15,489 active businesses, the second-highest sum of any NSW council. The SBR is an additional charge levied on businesses in the precincts on top of their standard commercial rates. The Newcastle Herald asked City of Newcastle when it intends to conduct the survey and whether it intends to remove the SBR if businesses answer no to its two questions. If not, the Herald asked what the purpose of the survey is and what the council feels the value of the SBR is to businesses. Questions were also asked about the impact of the Port of Newcastle on commercial rates and the council's response to claims that SBR funds used on events should be funded by ratepayers and the council rather than business owners. In response, a City of Newcastle spokesman said following Tuesday's council meeting, the council is considering the "most appropriate" mechanism for implementing the SBR survey. "The elected council and community will be informed at the appropriate time," he said. The scheme has long been a point of contention, with some business owners questioning its necessity and others calling for it to be axed entirely. In 2024/25, the council said the cost to administer the scheme, including BIA governance and support, is $152,700. That figure is 10 per cent of total funds levied. Business Improvement Associations (BIA) in the city centre and Darby Street, Hamilton, Mayfield, New Lambton and Wallsend are independent organisations responsible for disbursing up to $100,000 of SBR funds each year. That money can be used for strategic directions to promote local business, marketing and promotions, prioritising and managing beautification projects and coordinating community events aimed at encouraging business demand. The council decides how the remainder of SBR funds are spent. Mr Duc said many business owners do not feel the SBR is being spent in a way that directly benefits them. "We've got to make sure that all of the people who actually pay the levy get to have a say," he said. "If the council doesn't take notice of the business community, then we will be having a big say, and we have a bit of muscle because we're part of Business NSW and Business Hunter. "Be assured, if the answer from businesses is no and the council decides not to act on it through the BIAs, then we will be lobbying to have it [the SBR] removed." The Davidson review recommended that the council require BIAs to undertake research with membership and the community annually, or at agreed regular intervals, to assess satisfaction, impact and present the findings to the council for consideration. CITY of Newcastle will go to business owners that pay a Special Business Rate (SBR) with two questions: whether they think the scheme provides value for money, and if it should continue. Business Newcastle president Edward Duc has a question of his own: What's next if the answer is no? This week, councillors voted to survey business owners in SBR precincts about the future of the controversial scheme after several submissions to a recent independent probe into the council raised concerns about the transparency of how the funds are levied, allocated and spent. Mr Duc said feedback he has received is that a large proportion of those who pay the SBR do not see the value in the scheme. "We've got businesses, and I'm not saying this is the only reason, who are moving from Newcastle to Charlestown because of the high commercial rates," he said. "The more money that traders have to give to the council, the more it just inhibits what they can do. "It is Business Newcastle's view that the council should suspend the SBR and generate the funding themselves out of the generous commercial rates they're charging, that's our stand at the moment." City of Newcastle made $65.9 million in business rates in 2023/24 from 15,489 active businesses, the second-highest sum of any NSW council. The SBR is an additional charge levied on businesses in the precincts on top of their standard commercial rates. The Newcastle Herald asked City of Newcastle when it intends to conduct the survey and whether it intends to remove the SBR if businesses answer no to its two questions. If not, the Herald asked what the purpose of the survey is and what the council feels the value of the SBR is to businesses. Questions were also asked about the impact of the Port of Newcastle on commercial rates and the council's response to claims that SBR funds used on events should be funded by ratepayers and the council rather than business owners. In response, a City of Newcastle spokesman said following Tuesday's council meeting, the council is considering the "most appropriate" mechanism for implementing the SBR survey. "The elected council and community will be informed at the appropriate time," he said. The scheme has long been a point of contention, with some business owners questioning its necessity and others calling for it to be axed entirely. In 2024/25, the council said the cost to administer the scheme, including BIA governance and support, is $152,700. That figure is 10 per cent of total funds levied. Business Improvement Associations (BIA) in the city centre and Darby Street, Hamilton, Mayfield, New Lambton and Wallsend are independent organisations responsible for disbursing up to $100,000 of SBR funds each year. That money can be used for strategic directions to promote local business, marketing and promotions, prioritising and managing beautification projects and coordinating community events aimed at encouraging business demand. The council decides how the remainder of SBR funds are spent. Mr Duc said many business owners do not feel the SBR is being spent in a way that directly benefits them. "We've got to make sure that all of the people who actually pay the levy get to have a say," he said. "If the council doesn't take notice of the business community, then we will be having a big say, and we have a bit of muscle because we're part of Business NSW and Business Hunter. "Be assured, if the answer from businesses is no and the council decides not to act on it through the BIAs, then we will be lobbying to have it [the SBR] removed." The Davidson review recommended that the council require BIAs to undertake research with membership and the community annually, or at agreed regular intervals, to assess satisfaction, impact and present the findings to the council for consideration.
The Advertiser
26-05-2025
- Politics
- The Advertiser
'Respect': community calls out behaviour at Newcastle council meetings
CONCERNS about councillor behaviour, respect and the effectiveness of council meetings have been thrust into the spotlight with the release of a report into City of Newcastle's policies, processes and procedures. A perceived lack of respect among councillors, including towards independent lord mayor Ross Kerridge, was one of the key issues raised in 29 submissions to the Davidson Business Advisory review. While that specific issue represented just under four per cent of some 800 submissions to the review, more than 270 submissions centred around general governance, and Davidson set aside significant space in its report to address community concerns. Davidson's Justin Hanney told a public briefing earlier this month that the firm only expected to receive between 25 and 50 submissions total based on similar reviews elsewhere. The review report, released late on Thursday, said that while council meetings naturally involved political debate, some submissions expressed concern that the debate was "hindering constructive discussion and decision-making". "Despite the political diversity within the council, decision-making processes have not been significantly affected, although community feedback raised concerns regarding the transparency of voting practices during meetings," the report said. Members of the public raised a number of issues, with a strong focus on council meetings, correspondence with the media, transparency in decision-making and Government Information Public Access (GIPA) processes. The community called for more clarity on how and why council decisions are made. Concerns were also raised about poor access to councillors to raise issues or discuss decisions made by the elected council. A central finding of the report was the importance of a "strong, collaborative" relationship between the lord mayor, councillors and chief executive Jeremy Bath, which Davidson said was "critical" to the success of the council. "There understandably may be some differences in views between the councillors, including the lord mayor, just as the community they represent may hold differing views," the report said. "However, once the council has decided a direction, the chief executive officer is accountable to ensure that this agreed position is effectively implemented by the public service." There have been ongoing tensions between Mr Bath and the lord mayor since Cr Kerridge defeated former lord mayor Nuatali Nelmes in the September election, culminating in Cr Kerridge publicly alleging bullying by council staff. He later retracted and apologised for the comments. A number of areas of improvement were identified in the Davidson review aimed at getting the lord mayor, councillors and Mr Bath on the same page about strategic priorities, which the review said would be "essential" for cohesive decision-making and leadership. "Strengthening this relationship will support improved collaboration between the lord mayor, CEO and executive team and councillors, creating a more unified leadership environment," the report said. The review found the council's executive team had faced "some challenges" in effectively and quickly aligning the organisation with the priorities of the newly elected council, which it said had resulted in some operational difficulties. Davidson said there were indications of a need for "smoother coordination" between the lord mayor, councillors and senior staff, which in turn impacted decision-making processes. "Some further challenges at this time result from the political process whereby the lord mayor must gain the majority support of councillors before the chief executive can be clearly directed on these established priorities," the report said. Concerns were also raised around meeting procedures, highlighting a need for "more structured discussions" and "clearer communication" about councillor voting decisions. While council decisions were made in line with the rules, the review found communication and transparency could be improved, along with better engagement to help locals understand council decisions. One suggestion was to have councillors identify if they are speaking for or against a motion for greater transparency. The review found that while the structure of meetings is "generally followed", there is an opportunity to sharpen their efficiency. "On several occasions, meetings have extended beyond six hours, continuing into the early hours of the morning," the report said. "While occasional longer sessions may be necessary, this area warrants attention to ensure that decisions are made in a timely and well-considered manner." The review gave council staff the tick of approval, pointing out their professionalism and effort in setting councillors up with the tools to get the job done. However, the report said meetings would benefit from greater structure, and said there is some uncertainty around Mr Bath's role at council meetings. As the head of the council, Mr Bath is responsible for bringing the council's vision to life, providing strategic advice to the lord mayor and councillors and ensuring decisions are made within regulations. The report recommended the council stick more closely to meeting procedures, scheduling and governance and in particular, speaking time limits. CONCERNS about councillor behaviour, respect and the effectiveness of council meetings have been thrust into the spotlight with the release of a report into City of Newcastle's policies, processes and procedures. A perceived lack of respect among councillors, including towards independent lord mayor Ross Kerridge, was one of the key issues raised in 29 submissions to the Davidson Business Advisory review. While that specific issue represented just under four per cent of some 800 submissions to the review, more than 270 submissions centred around general governance, and Davidson set aside significant space in its report to address community concerns. Davidson's Justin Hanney told a public briefing earlier this month that the firm only expected to receive between 25 and 50 submissions total based on similar reviews elsewhere. The review report, released late on Thursday, said that while council meetings naturally involved political debate, some submissions expressed concern that the debate was "hindering constructive discussion and decision-making". "Despite the political diversity within the council, decision-making processes have not been significantly affected, although community feedback raised concerns regarding the transparency of voting practices during meetings," the report said. Members of the public raised a number of issues, with a strong focus on council meetings, correspondence with the media, transparency in decision-making and Government Information Public Access (GIPA) processes. The community called for more clarity on how and why council decisions are made. Concerns were also raised about poor access to councillors to raise issues or discuss decisions made by the elected council. A central finding of the report was the importance of a "strong, collaborative" relationship between the lord mayor, councillors and chief executive Jeremy Bath, which Davidson said was "critical" to the success of the council. "There understandably may be some differences in views between the councillors, including the lord mayor, just as the community they represent may hold differing views," the report said. "However, once the council has decided a direction, the chief executive officer is accountable to ensure that this agreed position is effectively implemented by the public service." There have been ongoing tensions between Mr Bath and the lord mayor since Cr Kerridge defeated former lord mayor Nuatali Nelmes in the September election, culminating in Cr Kerridge publicly alleging bullying by council staff. He later retracted and apologised for the comments. A number of areas of improvement were identified in the Davidson review aimed at getting the lord mayor, councillors and Mr Bath on the same page about strategic priorities, which the review said would be "essential" for cohesive decision-making and leadership. "Strengthening this relationship will support improved collaboration between the lord mayor, CEO and executive team and councillors, creating a more unified leadership environment," the report said. The review found the council's executive team had faced "some challenges" in effectively and quickly aligning the organisation with the priorities of the newly elected council, which it said had resulted in some operational difficulties. Davidson said there were indications of a need for "smoother coordination" between the lord mayor, councillors and senior staff, which in turn impacted decision-making processes. "Some further challenges at this time result from the political process whereby the lord mayor must gain the majority support of councillors before the chief executive can be clearly directed on these established priorities," the report said. Concerns were also raised around meeting procedures, highlighting a need for "more structured discussions" and "clearer communication" about councillor voting decisions. While council decisions were made in line with the rules, the review found communication and transparency could be improved, along with better engagement to help locals understand council decisions. One suggestion was to have councillors identify if they are speaking for or against a motion for greater transparency. The review found that while the structure of meetings is "generally followed", there is an opportunity to sharpen their efficiency. "On several occasions, meetings have extended beyond six hours, continuing into the early hours of the morning," the report said. "While occasional longer sessions may be necessary, this area warrants attention to ensure that decisions are made in a timely and well-considered manner." The review gave council staff the tick of approval, pointing out their professionalism and effort in setting councillors up with the tools to get the job done. However, the report said meetings would benefit from greater structure, and said there is some uncertainty around Mr Bath's role at council meetings. As the head of the council, Mr Bath is responsible for bringing the council's vision to life, providing strategic advice to the lord mayor and councillors and ensuring decisions are made within regulations. The report recommended the council stick more closely to meeting procedures, scheduling and governance and in particular, speaking time limits. CONCERNS about councillor behaviour, respect and the effectiveness of council meetings have been thrust into the spotlight with the release of a report into City of Newcastle's policies, processes and procedures. A perceived lack of respect among councillors, including towards independent lord mayor Ross Kerridge, was one of the key issues raised in 29 submissions to the Davidson Business Advisory review. While that specific issue represented just under four per cent of some 800 submissions to the review, more than 270 submissions centred around general governance, and Davidson set aside significant space in its report to address community concerns. Davidson's Justin Hanney told a public briefing earlier this month that the firm only expected to receive between 25 and 50 submissions total based on similar reviews elsewhere. The review report, released late on Thursday, said that while council meetings naturally involved political debate, some submissions expressed concern that the debate was "hindering constructive discussion and decision-making". "Despite the political diversity within the council, decision-making processes have not been significantly affected, although community feedback raised concerns regarding the transparency of voting practices during meetings," the report said. Members of the public raised a number of issues, with a strong focus on council meetings, correspondence with the media, transparency in decision-making and Government Information Public Access (GIPA) processes. The community called for more clarity on how and why council decisions are made. Concerns were also raised about poor access to councillors to raise issues or discuss decisions made by the elected council. A central finding of the report was the importance of a "strong, collaborative" relationship between the lord mayor, councillors and chief executive Jeremy Bath, which Davidson said was "critical" to the success of the council. "There understandably may be some differences in views between the councillors, including the lord mayor, just as the community they represent may hold differing views," the report said. "However, once the council has decided a direction, the chief executive officer is accountable to ensure that this agreed position is effectively implemented by the public service." There have been ongoing tensions between Mr Bath and the lord mayor since Cr Kerridge defeated former lord mayor Nuatali Nelmes in the September election, culminating in Cr Kerridge publicly alleging bullying by council staff. He later retracted and apologised for the comments. A number of areas of improvement were identified in the Davidson review aimed at getting the lord mayor, councillors and Mr Bath on the same page about strategic priorities, which the review said would be "essential" for cohesive decision-making and leadership. "Strengthening this relationship will support improved collaboration between the lord mayor, CEO and executive team and councillors, creating a more unified leadership environment," the report said. The review found the council's executive team had faced "some challenges" in effectively and quickly aligning the organisation with the priorities of the newly elected council, which it said had resulted in some operational difficulties. Davidson said there were indications of a need for "smoother coordination" between the lord mayor, councillors and senior staff, which in turn impacted decision-making processes. "Some further challenges at this time result from the political process whereby the lord mayor must gain the majority support of councillors before the chief executive can be clearly directed on these established priorities," the report said. Concerns were also raised around meeting procedures, highlighting a need for "more structured discussions" and "clearer communication" about councillor voting decisions. While council decisions were made in line with the rules, the review found communication and transparency could be improved, along with better engagement to help locals understand council decisions. One suggestion was to have councillors identify if they are speaking for or against a motion for greater transparency. The review found that while the structure of meetings is "generally followed", there is an opportunity to sharpen their efficiency. "On several occasions, meetings have extended beyond six hours, continuing into the early hours of the morning," the report said. "While occasional longer sessions may be necessary, this area warrants attention to ensure that decisions are made in a timely and well-considered manner." The review gave council staff the tick of approval, pointing out their professionalism and effort in setting councillors up with the tools to get the job done. However, the report said meetings would benefit from greater structure, and said there is some uncertainty around Mr Bath's role at council meetings. As the head of the council, Mr Bath is responsible for bringing the council's vision to life, providing strategic advice to the lord mayor and councillors and ensuring decisions are made within regulations. The report recommended the council stick more closely to meeting procedures, scheduling and governance and in particular, speaking time limits. CONCERNS about councillor behaviour, respect and the effectiveness of council meetings have been thrust into the spotlight with the release of a report into City of Newcastle's policies, processes and procedures. A perceived lack of respect among councillors, including towards independent lord mayor Ross Kerridge, was one of the key issues raised in 29 submissions to the Davidson Business Advisory review. While that specific issue represented just under four per cent of some 800 submissions to the review, more than 270 submissions centred around general governance, and Davidson set aside significant space in its report to address community concerns. Davidson's Justin Hanney told a public briefing earlier this month that the firm only expected to receive between 25 and 50 submissions total based on similar reviews elsewhere. The review report, released late on Thursday, said that while council meetings naturally involved political debate, some submissions expressed concern that the debate was "hindering constructive discussion and decision-making". "Despite the political diversity within the council, decision-making processes have not been significantly affected, although community feedback raised concerns regarding the transparency of voting practices during meetings," the report said. Members of the public raised a number of issues, with a strong focus on council meetings, correspondence with the media, transparency in decision-making and Government Information Public Access (GIPA) processes. The community called for more clarity on how and why council decisions are made. Concerns were also raised about poor access to councillors to raise issues or discuss decisions made by the elected council. A central finding of the report was the importance of a "strong, collaborative" relationship between the lord mayor, councillors and chief executive Jeremy Bath, which Davidson said was "critical" to the success of the council. "There understandably may be some differences in views between the councillors, including the lord mayor, just as the community they represent may hold differing views," the report said. "However, once the council has decided a direction, the chief executive officer is accountable to ensure that this agreed position is effectively implemented by the public service." There have been ongoing tensions between Mr Bath and the lord mayor since Cr Kerridge defeated former lord mayor Nuatali Nelmes in the September election, culminating in Cr Kerridge publicly alleging bullying by council staff. He later retracted and apologised for the comments. A number of areas of improvement were identified in the Davidson review aimed at getting the lord mayor, councillors and Mr Bath on the same page about strategic priorities, which the review said would be "essential" for cohesive decision-making and leadership. "Strengthening this relationship will support improved collaboration between the lord mayor, CEO and executive team and councillors, creating a more unified leadership environment," the report said. The review found the council's executive team had faced "some challenges" in effectively and quickly aligning the organisation with the priorities of the newly elected council, which it said had resulted in some operational difficulties. Davidson said there were indications of a need for "smoother coordination" between the lord mayor, councillors and senior staff, which in turn impacted decision-making processes. "Some further challenges at this time result from the political process whereby the lord mayor must gain the majority support of councillors before the chief executive can be clearly directed on these established priorities," the report said. Concerns were also raised around meeting procedures, highlighting a need for "more structured discussions" and "clearer communication" about councillor voting decisions. While council decisions were made in line with the rules, the review found communication and transparency could be improved, along with better engagement to help locals understand council decisions. One suggestion was to have councillors identify if they are speaking for or against a motion for greater transparency. The review found that while the structure of meetings is "generally followed", there is an opportunity to sharpen their efficiency. "On several occasions, meetings have extended beyond six hours, continuing into the early hours of the morning," the report said. "While occasional longer sessions may be necessary, this area warrants attention to ensure that decisions are made in a timely and well-considered manner." The review gave council staff the tick of approval, pointing out their professionalism and effort in setting councillors up with the tools to get the job done. However, the report said meetings would benefit from greater structure, and said there is some uncertainty around Mr Bath's role at council meetings. As the head of the council, Mr Bath is responsible for bringing the council's vision to life, providing strategic advice to the lord mayor and councillors and ensuring decisions are made within regulations. The report recommended the council stick more closely to meeting procedures, scheduling and governance and in particular, speaking time limits.
The Advertiser
19-05-2025
- Politics
- The Advertiser
'Gang' mentality: fisherman says Horseshoe beach 'not safe' after violent assault
SHANE Ross has been fishing at Horseshoe beach for more than 45 years. Now he's scared to go back. The Novocastrian had been living out of his car due to family circumstances and on Tuesday morning accidentally bumped into another man's rearview mirror while trying to park at Horseshoe beach. A few minutes later about 8.20am while he was parked watching the surf at Newcastle beach, the same man came to his window and started throwing punches. "He came out of the blue, I was just sitting there watching the surf," he said. "I got out of the way enough, but when he tried to grab my keys I reached over and there was a bit of a scuffle for the keys, so he's cracked the key in half trying to get it out of the ignition. "He's thrown the keys down, smashed the keys and done a runner." It's not the first abusive incident Mr Ross has experienced down at Horseshoe Beach, which he said had become overrun with "vagrants" with a "gang" mentality. The northern sections of Camp Shortland and horseshoe beach are owned and managed by the state government. Earlier this week, Newcastle MP Tim Crakanthorp met with Transport for NSW (TFNSW) and NSW Police. "This is a complex issue," he said. "I have been working with TFNSW and police to determine the appropriate action required to address the community's concerns. "Communication will be provided to anyone staying long term in the Horseshoe beach precinct to make them aware that enforcement action will be undertaken in the near future." Mr Crakanthorp said Assertive Outreach were working with those experiencing homelessness and would continue to do so. NSW Police confirmed Mr Ross's incident on May 13 was reported and investigations were ongoing. Mr Ross said not enough was being done to deal with antisocial behaviour in the area. "They basically think they're untouchable, if anyone comes along, they can just harass them out of being there," he said. "I've been fishing down at that beach since like year 7, no one can go there anymore. They basically sit there and make everyone feel uneasy and decide who they want on their beach. "It's just not safe. It is not safe anymore." Earlier this year, City of Newcastle met with TFNSW to discuss the management of horseshoe beach. A City of Newcastle spokeswoman said council staff outlined the terms on which they would agree to manage the land and said a follow-up meeting was agreed to, but then cancelled by TFNSW. "We are as in the dark as the community as to why TFNSW continue to ignore responsibility for land they own," she said. "NSW government laws do not provide councils with the regulatory powers in relation to antisocial behaviour. Instead, this power rests with NSW Police. "Instances of antisocial behaviour should be directed to the NSW Police as the appropriate authority." TFNSW Maritime, then called the Maritime Services Beach, leased the Horseshoe beach car park and Camp Shortland area to council starting September 1973. The lease expired in January 1976 and has continued on holdover since then. A TFNSW spokeswoman said in regards to illegal campers, the state government had not undertaken enforcement action to free up the car park or any other state-owned parking areas in the local government area in the past 12 months. The spokeswoman said the lease provided the council with responsibility for management of activities on the land, including car parking, beach cleaning, boat ramp and lawn maintenance. "Transport for NSW Maritime have sought to have an updated lease agreement formalised on a number of occasions. Council's decision to discontinue leasing non-core assets around 2018 has caused delay in reinstating the lease," she said. "A meeting was held in January 2025, with both parties, to commence discussions reinstating council's powers as authorised officers." TFNSW does not have the power to move people on from public land. The Newcastle Herald understands TFNSW has received only one report of antisocial behaviour recently, which took place at an event, and was told after the incident. Members of the community should contact triple zero about antisocial behaviour if it involves a crime, and emergency or poses a threat to safety or wellbeing. SHANE Ross has been fishing at Horseshoe beach for more than 45 years. Now he's scared to go back. The Novocastrian had been living out of his car due to family circumstances and on Tuesday morning accidentally bumped into another man's rearview mirror while trying to park at Horseshoe beach. A few minutes later about 8.20am while he was parked watching the surf at Newcastle beach, the same man came to his window and started throwing punches. "He came out of the blue, I was just sitting there watching the surf," he said. "I got out of the way enough, but when he tried to grab my keys I reached over and there was a bit of a scuffle for the keys, so he's cracked the key in half trying to get it out of the ignition. "He's thrown the keys down, smashed the keys and done a runner." It's not the first abusive incident Mr Ross has experienced down at Horseshoe Beach, which he said had become overrun with "vagrants" with a "gang" mentality. The northern sections of Camp Shortland and horseshoe beach are owned and managed by the state government. Earlier this week, Newcastle MP Tim Crakanthorp met with Transport for NSW (TFNSW) and NSW Police. "This is a complex issue," he said. "I have been working with TFNSW and police to determine the appropriate action required to address the community's concerns. "Communication will be provided to anyone staying long term in the Horseshoe beach precinct to make them aware that enforcement action will be undertaken in the near future." Mr Crakanthorp said Assertive Outreach were working with those experiencing homelessness and would continue to do so. NSW Police confirmed Mr Ross's incident on May 13 was reported and investigations were ongoing. Mr Ross said not enough was being done to deal with antisocial behaviour in the area. "They basically think they're untouchable, if anyone comes along, they can just harass them out of being there," he said. "I've been fishing down at that beach since like year 7, no one can go there anymore. They basically sit there and make everyone feel uneasy and decide who they want on their beach. "It's just not safe. It is not safe anymore." Earlier this year, City of Newcastle met with TFNSW to discuss the management of horseshoe beach. A City of Newcastle spokeswoman said council staff outlined the terms on which they would agree to manage the land and said a follow-up meeting was agreed to, but then cancelled by TFNSW. "We are as in the dark as the community as to why TFNSW continue to ignore responsibility for land they own," she said. "NSW government laws do not provide councils with the regulatory powers in relation to antisocial behaviour. Instead, this power rests with NSW Police. "Instances of antisocial behaviour should be directed to the NSW Police as the appropriate authority." TFNSW Maritime, then called the Maritime Services Beach, leased the Horseshoe beach car park and Camp Shortland area to council starting September 1973. The lease expired in January 1976 and has continued on holdover since then. A TFNSW spokeswoman said in regards to illegal campers, the state government had not undertaken enforcement action to free up the car park or any other state-owned parking areas in the local government area in the past 12 months. The spokeswoman said the lease provided the council with responsibility for management of activities on the land, including car parking, beach cleaning, boat ramp and lawn maintenance. "Transport for NSW Maritime have sought to have an updated lease agreement formalised on a number of occasions. Council's decision to discontinue leasing non-core assets around 2018 has caused delay in reinstating the lease," she said. "A meeting was held in January 2025, with both parties, to commence discussions reinstating council's powers as authorised officers." TFNSW does not have the power to move people on from public land. The Newcastle Herald understands TFNSW has received only one report of antisocial behaviour recently, which took place at an event, and was told after the incident. Members of the community should contact triple zero about antisocial behaviour if it involves a crime, and emergency or poses a threat to safety or wellbeing. SHANE Ross has been fishing at Horseshoe beach for more than 45 years. Now he's scared to go back. The Novocastrian had been living out of his car due to family circumstances and on Tuesday morning accidentally bumped into another man's rearview mirror while trying to park at Horseshoe beach. A few minutes later about 8.20am while he was parked watching the surf at Newcastle beach, the same man came to his window and started throwing punches. "He came out of the blue, I was just sitting there watching the surf," he said. "I got out of the way enough, but when he tried to grab my keys I reached over and there was a bit of a scuffle for the keys, so he's cracked the key in half trying to get it out of the ignition. "He's thrown the keys down, smashed the keys and done a runner." It's not the first abusive incident Mr Ross has experienced down at Horseshoe Beach, which he said had become overrun with "vagrants" with a "gang" mentality. The northern sections of Camp Shortland and horseshoe beach are owned and managed by the state government. Earlier this week, Newcastle MP Tim Crakanthorp met with Transport for NSW (TFNSW) and NSW Police. "This is a complex issue," he said. "I have been working with TFNSW and police to determine the appropriate action required to address the community's concerns. "Communication will be provided to anyone staying long term in the Horseshoe beach precinct to make them aware that enforcement action will be undertaken in the near future." Mr Crakanthorp said Assertive Outreach were working with those experiencing homelessness and would continue to do so. NSW Police confirmed Mr Ross's incident on May 13 was reported and investigations were ongoing. Mr Ross said not enough was being done to deal with antisocial behaviour in the area. "They basically think they're untouchable, if anyone comes along, they can just harass them out of being there," he said. "I've been fishing down at that beach since like year 7, no one can go there anymore. They basically sit there and make everyone feel uneasy and decide who they want on their beach. "It's just not safe. It is not safe anymore." Earlier this year, City of Newcastle met with TFNSW to discuss the management of horseshoe beach. A City of Newcastle spokeswoman said council staff outlined the terms on which they would agree to manage the land and said a follow-up meeting was agreed to, but then cancelled by TFNSW. "We are as in the dark as the community as to why TFNSW continue to ignore responsibility for land they own," she said. "NSW government laws do not provide councils with the regulatory powers in relation to antisocial behaviour. Instead, this power rests with NSW Police. "Instances of antisocial behaviour should be directed to the NSW Police as the appropriate authority." TFNSW Maritime, then called the Maritime Services Beach, leased the Horseshoe beach car park and Camp Shortland area to council starting September 1973. The lease expired in January 1976 and has continued on holdover since then. A TFNSW spokeswoman said in regards to illegal campers, the state government had not undertaken enforcement action to free up the car park or any other state-owned parking areas in the local government area in the past 12 months. The spokeswoman said the lease provided the council with responsibility for management of activities on the land, including car parking, beach cleaning, boat ramp and lawn maintenance. "Transport for NSW Maritime have sought to have an updated lease agreement formalised on a number of occasions. Council's decision to discontinue leasing non-core assets around 2018 has caused delay in reinstating the lease," she said. "A meeting was held in January 2025, with both parties, to commence discussions reinstating council's powers as authorised officers." TFNSW does not have the power to move people on from public land. The Newcastle Herald understands TFNSW has received only one report of antisocial behaviour recently, which took place at an event, and was told after the incident. Members of the community should contact triple zero about antisocial behaviour if it involves a crime, and emergency or poses a threat to safety or wellbeing. SHANE Ross has been fishing at Horseshoe beach for more than 45 years. Now he's scared to go back. The Novocastrian had been living out of his car due to family circumstances and on Tuesday morning accidentally bumped into another man's rearview mirror while trying to park at Horseshoe beach. A few minutes later about 8.20am while he was parked watching the surf at Newcastle beach, the same man came to his window and started throwing punches. "He came out of the blue, I was just sitting there watching the surf," he said. "I got out of the way enough, but when he tried to grab my keys I reached over and there was a bit of a scuffle for the keys, so he's cracked the key in half trying to get it out of the ignition. "He's thrown the keys down, smashed the keys and done a runner." It's not the first abusive incident Mr Ross has experienced down at Horseshoe Beach, which he said had become overrun with "vagrants" with a "gang" mentality. The northern sections of Camp Shortland and horseshoe beach are owned and managed by the state government. Earlier this week, Newcastle MP Tim Crakanthorp met with Transport for NSW (TFNSW) and NSW Police. "This is a complex issue," he said. "I have been working with TFNSW and police to determine the appropriate action required to address the community's concerns. "Communication will be provided to anyone staying long term in the Horseshoe beach precinct to make them aware that enforcement action will be undertaken in the near future." Mr Crakanthorp said Assertive Outreach were working with those experiencing homelessness and would continue to do so. NSW Police confirmed Mr Ross's incident on May 13 was reported and investigations were ongoing. Mr Ross said not enough was being done to deal with antisocial behaviour in the area. "They basically think they're untouchable, if anyone comes along, they can just harass them out of being there," he said. "I've been fishing down at that beach since like year 7, no one can go there anymore. They basically sit there and make everyone feel uneasy and decide who they want on their beach. "It's just not safe. It is not safe anymore." Earlier this year, City of Newcastle met with TFNSW to discuss the management of horseshoe beach. A City of Newcastle spokeswoman said council staff outlined the terms on which they would agree to manage the land and said a follow-up meeting was agreed to, but then cancelled by TFNSW. "We are as in the dark as the community as to why TFNSW continue to ignore responsibility for land they own," she said. "NSW government laws do not provide councils with the regulatory powers in relation to antisocial behaviour. Instead, this power rests with NSW Police. "Instances of antisocial behaviour should be directed to the NSW Police as the appropriate authority." TFNSW Maritime, then called the Maritime Services Beach, leased the Horseshoe beach car park and Camp Shortland area to council starting September 1973. The lease expired in January 1976 and has continued on holdover since then. A TFNSW spokeswoman said in regards to illegal campers, the state government had not undertaken enforcement action to free up the car park or any other state-owned parking areas in the local government area in the past 12 months. The spokeswoman said the lease provided the council with responsibility for management of activities on the land, including car parking, beach cleaning, boat ramp and lawn maintenance. "Transport for NSW Maritime have sought to have an updated lease agreement formalised on a number of occasions. Council's decision to discontinue leasing non-core assets around 2018 has caused delay in reinstating the lease," she said. "A meeting was held in January 2025, with both parties, to commence discussions reinstating council's powers as authorised officers." TFNSW does not have the power to move people on from public land. The Newcastle Herald understands TFNSW has received only one report of antisocial behaviour recently, which took place at an event, and was told after the incident. Members of the community should contact triple zero about antisocial behaviour if it involves a crime, and emergency or poses a threat to safety or wellbeing.
