'Respect': community calls out behaviour at Newcastle council meetings
A perceived lack of respect among councillors, including towards independent lord mayor Ross Kerridge, was one of the key issues raised in 29 submissions to the Davidson Business Advisory review.
While that specific issue represented just under four per cent of some 800 submissions to the review, more than 270 submissions centred around general governance, and Davidson set aside significant space in its report to address community concerns.
Davidson's Justin Hanney told a public briefing earlier this month that the firm only expected to receive between 25 and 50 submissions total based on similar reviews elsewhere.
The review report, released late on Thursday, said that while council meetings naturally involved political debate, some submissions expressed concern that the debate was "hindering constructive discussion and decision-making".
"Despite the political diversity within the council, decision-making processes have not been significantly affected, although community feedback raised concerns regarding the transparency of voting practices during meetings," the report said.
Members of the public raised a number of issues, with a strong focus on council meetings, correspondence with the media, transparency in decision-making and Government Information Public Access (GIPA) processes.
The community called for more clarity on how and why council decisions are made.
Concerns were also raised about poor access to councillors to raise issues or discuss decisions made by the elected council.
A central finding of the report was the importance of a "strong, collaborative" relationship between the lord mayor, councillors and chief executive Jeremy Bath, which Davidson said was "critical" to the success of the council.
"There understandably may be some differences in views between the councillors, including the lord mayor, just as the community they represent may hold differing views," the report said.
"However, once the council has decided a direction, the chief executive officer is accountable to ensure that this agreed position is effectively implemented by the public service."
There have been ongoing tensions between Mr Bath and the lord mayor since Cr Kerridge defeated former lord mayor Nuatali Nelmes in the September election, culminating in Cr Kerridge publicly alleging bullying by council staff. He later retracted and apologised for the comments.
A number of areas of improvement were identified in the Davidson review aimed at getting the lord mayor, councillors and Mr Bath on the same page about strategic priorities, which the review said would be "essential" for cohesive decision-making and leadership.
"Strengthening this relationship will support improved collaboration between the lord mayor, CEO and executive team and councillors, creating a more unified leadership environment," the report said.
The review found the council's executive team had faced "some challenges" in effectively and quickly aligning the organisation with the priorities of the newly elected council, which it said had resulted in some operational difficulties.
Davidson said there were indications of a need for "smoother coordination" between the lord mayor, councillors and senior staff, which in turn impacted decision-making processes.
"Some further challenges at this time result from the political process whereby the lord mayor must gain the majority support of councillors before the chief executive can be clearly directed on these established priorities," the report said.
Concerns were also raised around meeting procedures, highlighting a need for "more structured discussions" and "clearer communication" about councillor voting decisions.
While council decisions were made in line with the rules, the review found communication and transparency could be improved, along with better engagement to help locals understand council decisions.
One suggestion was to have councillors identify if they are speaking for or against a motion for greater transparency.
The review found that while the structure of meetings is "generally followed", there is an opportunity to sharpen their efficiency.
"On several occasions, meetings have extended beyond six hours, continuing into the early hours of the morning," the report said.
"While occasional longer sessions may be necessary, this area warrants attention to ensure that decisions are made in a timely and well-considered manner."
The review gave council staff the tick of approval, pointing out their professionalism and effort in setting councillors up with the tools to get the job done.
However, the report said meetings would benefit from greater structure, and said there is some uncertainty around Mr Bath's role at council meetings.
As the head of the council, Mr Bath is responsible for bringing the council's vision to life, providing strategic advice to the lord mayor and councillors and ensuring decisions are made within regulations.
The report recommended the council stick more closely to meeting procedures, scheduling and governance and in particular, speaking time limits.
CONCERNS about councillor behaviour, respect and the effectiveness of council meetings have been thrust into the spotlight with the release of a report into City of Newcastle's policies, processes and procedures.
A perceived lack of respect among councillors, including towards independent lord mayor Ross Kerridge, was one of the key issues raised in 29 submissions to the Davidson Business Advisory review.
While that specific issue represented just under four per cent of some 800 submissions to the review, more than 270 submissions centred around general governance, and Davidson set aside significant space in its report to address community concerns.
Davidson's Justin Hanney told a public briefing earlier this month that the firm only expected to receive between 25 and 50 submissions total based on similar reviews elsewhere.
The review report, released late on Thursday, said that while council meetings naturally involved political debate, some submissions expressed concern that the debate was "hindering constructive discussion and decision-making".
"Despite the political diversity within the council, decision-making processes have not been significantly affected, although community feedback raised concerns regarding the transparency of voting practices during meetings," the report said.
Members of the public raised a number of issues, with a strong focus on council meetings, correspondence with the media, transparency in decision-making and Government Information Public Access (GIPA) processes.
The community called for more clarity on how and why council decisions are made.
Concerns were also raised about poor access to councillors to raise issues or discuss decisions made by the elected council.
A central finding of the report was the importance of a "strong, collaborative" relationship between the lord mayor, councillors and chief executive Jeremy Bath, which Davidson said was "critical" to the success of the council.
"There understandably may be some differences in views between the councillors, including the lord mayor, just as the community they represent may hold differing views," the report said.
"However, once the council has decided a direction, the chief executive officer is accountable to ensure that this agreed position is effectively implemented by the public service."
There have been ongoing tensions between Mr Bath and the lord mayor since Cr Kerridge defeated former lord mayor Nuatali Nelmes in the September election, culminating in Cr Kerridge publicly alleging bullying by council staff. He later retracted and apologised for the comments.
A number of areas of improvement were identified in the Davidson review aimed at getting the lord mayor, councillors and Mr Bath on the same page about strategic priorities, which the review said would be "essential" for cohesive decision-making and leadership.
"Strengthening this relationship will support improved collaboration between the lord mayor, CEO and executive team and councillors, creating a more unified leadership environment," the report said.
The review found the council's executive team had faced "some challenges" in effectively and quickly aligning the organisation with the priorities of the newly elected council, which it said had resulted in some operational difficulties.
Davidson said there were indications of a need for "smoother coordination" between the lord mayor, councillors and senior staff, which in turn impacted decision-making processes.
"Some further challenges at this time result from the political process whereby the lord mayor must gain the majority support of councillors before the chief executive can be clearly directed on these established priorities," the report said.
Concerns were also raised around meeting procedures, highlighting a need for "more structured discussions" and "clearer communication" about councillor voting decisions.
While council decisions were made in line with the rules, the review found communication and transparency could be improved, along with better engagement to help locals understand council decisions.
One suggestion was to have councillors identify if they are speaking for or against a motion for greater transparency.
The review found that while the structure of meetings is "generally followed", there is an opportunity to sharpen their efficiency.
"On several occasions, meetings have extended beyond six hours, continuing into the early hours of the morning," the report said.
"While occasional longer sessions may be necessary, this area warrants attention to ensure that decisions are made in a timely and well-considered manner."
The review gave council staff the tick of approval, pointing out their professionalism and effort in setting councillors up with the tools to get the job done.
However, the report said meetings would benefit from greater structure, and said there is some uncertainty around Mr Bath's role at council meetings.
As the head of the council, Mr Bath is responsible for bringing the council's vision to life, providing strategic advice to the lord mayor and councillors and ensuring decisions are made within regulations.
The report recommended the council stick more closely to meeting procedures, scheduling and governance and in particular, speaking time limits.
CONCERNS about councillor behaviour, respect and the effectiveness of council meetings have been thrust into the spotlight with the release of a report into City of Newcastle's policies, processes and procedures.
A perceived lack of respect among councillors, including towards independent lord mayor Ross Kerridge, was one of the key issues raised in 29 submissions to the Davidson Business Advisory review.
While that specific issue represented just under four per cent of some 800 submissions to the review, more than 270 submissions centred around general governance, and Davidson set aside significant space in its report to address community concerns.
Davidson's Justin Hanney told a public briefing earlier this month that the firm only expected to receive between 25 and 50 submissions total based on similar reviews elsewhere.
The review report, released late on Thursday, said that while council meetings naturally involved political debate, some submissions expressed concern that the debate was "hindering constructive discussion and decision-making".
"Despite the political diversity within the council, decision-making processes have not been significantly affected, although community feedback raised concerns regarding the transparency of voting practices during meetings," the report said.
Members of the public raised a number of issues, with a strong focus on council meetings, correspondence with the media, transparency in decision-making and Government Information Public Access (GIPA) processes.
The community called for more clarity on how and why council decisions are made.
Concerns were also raised about poor access to councillors to raise issues or discuss decisions made by the elected council.
A central finding of the report was the importance of a "strong, collaborative" relationship between the lord mayor, councillors and chief executive Jeremy Bath, which Davidson said was "critical" to the success of the council.
"There understandably may be some differences in views between the councillors, including the lord mayor, just as the community they represent may hold differing views," the report said.
"However, once the council has decided a direction, the chief executive officer is accountable to ensure that this agreed position is effectively implemented by the public service."
There have been ongoing tensions between Mr Bath and the lord mayor since Cr Kerridge defeated former lord mayor Nuatali Nelmes in the September election, culminating in Cr Kerridge publicly alleging bullying by council staff. He later retracted and apologised for the comments.
A number of areas of improvement were identified in the Davidson review aimed at getting the lord mayor, councillors and Mr Bath on the same page about strategic priorities, which the review said would be "essential" for cohesive decision-making and leadership.
"Strengthening this relationship will support improved collaboration between the lord mayor, CEO and executive team and councillors, creating a more unified leadership environment," the report said.
The review found the council's executive team had faced "some challenges" in effectively and quickly aligning the organisation with the priorities of the newly elected council, which it said had resulted in some operational difficulties.
Davidson said there were indications of a need for "smoother coordination" between the lord mayor, councillors and senior staff, which in turn impacted decision-making processes.
"Some further challenges at this time result from the political process whereby the lord mayor must gain the majority support of councillors before the chief executive can be clearly directed on these established priorities," the report said.
Concerns were also raised around meeting procedures, highlighting a need for "more structured discussions" and "clearer communication" about councillor voting decisions.
While council decisions were made in line with the rules, the review found communication and transparency could be improved, along with better engagement to help locals understand council decisions.
One suggestion was to have councillors identify if they are speaking for or against a motion for greater transparency.
The review found that while the structure of meetings is "generally followed", there is an opportunity to sharpen their efficiency.
"On several occasions, meetings have extended beyond six hours, continuing into the early hours of the morning," the report said.
"While occasional longer sessions may be necessary, this area warrants attention to ensure that decisions are made in a timely and well-considered manner."
The review gave council staff the tick of approval, pointing out their professionalism and effort in setting councillors up with the tools to get the job done.
However, the report said meetings would benefit from greater structure, and said there is some uncertainty around Mr Bath's role at council meetings.
As the head of the council, Mr Bath is responsible for bringing the council's vision to life, providing strategic advice to the lord mayor and councillors and ensuring decisions are made within regulations.
The report recommended the council stick more closely to meeting procedures, scheduling and governance and in particular, speaking time limits.
CONCERNS about councillor behaviour, respect and the effectiveness of council meetings have been thrust into the spotlight with the release of a report into City of Newcastle's policies, processes and procedures.
A perceived lack of respect among councillors, including towards independent lord mayor Ross Kerridge, was one of the key issues raised in 29 submissions to the Davidson Business Advisory review.
While that specific issue represented just under four per cent of some 800 submissions to the review, more than 270 submissions centred around general governance, and Davidson set aside significant space in its report to address community concerns.
Davidson's Justin Hanney told a public briefing earlier this month that the firm only expected to receive between 25 and 50 submissions total based on similar reviews elsewhere.
The review report, released late on Thursday, said that while council meetings naturally involved political debate, some submissions expressed concern that the debate was "hindering constructive discussion and decision-making".
"Despite the political diversity within the council, decision-making processes have not been significantly affected, although community feedback raised concerns regarding the transparency of voting practices during meetings," the report said.
Members of the public raised a number of issues, with a strong focus on council meetings, correspondence with the media, transparency in decision-making and Government Information Public Access (GIPA) processes.
The community called for more clarity on how and why council decisions are made.
Concerns were also raised about poor access to councillors to raise issues or discuss decisions made by the elected council.
A central finding of the report was the importance of a "strong, collaborative" relationship between the lord mayor, councillors and chief executive Jeremy Bath, which Davidson said was "critical" to the success of the council.
"There understandably may be some differences in views between the councillors, including the lord mayor, just as the community they represent may hold differing views," the report said.
"However, once the council has decided a direction, the chief executive officer is accountable to ensure that this agreed position is effectively implemented by the public service."
There have been ongoing tensions between Mr Bath and the lord mayor since Cr Kerridge defeated former lord mayor Nuatali Nelmes in the September election, culminating in Cr Kerridge publicly alleging bullying by council staff. He later retracted and apologised for the comments.
A number of areas of improvement were identified in the Davidson review aimed at getting the lord mayor, councillors and Mr Bath on the same page about strategic priorities, which the review said would be "essential" for cohesive decision-making and leadership.
"Strengthening this relationship will support improved collaboration between the lord mayor, CEO and executive team and councillors, creating a more unified leadership environment," the report said.
The review found the council's executive team had faced "some challenges" in effectively and quickly aligning the organisation with the priorities of the newly elected council, which it said had resulted in some operational difficulties.
Davidson said there were indications of a need for "smoother coordination" between the lord mayor, councillors and senior staff, which in turn impacted decision-making processes.
"Some further challenges at this time result from the political process whereby the lord mayor must gain the majority support of councillors before the chief executive can be clearly directed on these established priorities," the report said.
Concerns were also raised around meeting procedures, highlighting a need for "more structured discussions" and "clearer communication" about councillor voting decisions.
While council decisions were made in line with the rules, the review found communication and transparency could be improved, along with better engagement to help locals understand council decisions.
One suggestion was to have councillors identify if they are speaking for or against a motion for greater transparency.
The review found that while the structure of meetings is "generally followed", there is an opportunity to sharpen their efficiency.
"On several occasions, meetings have extended beyond six hours, continuing into the early hours of the morning," the report said.
"While occasional longer sessions may be necessary, this area warrants attention to ensure that decisions are made in a timely and well-considered manner."
The review gave council staff the tick of approval, pointing out their professionalism and effort in setting councillors up with the tools to get the job done.
However, the report said meetings would benefit from greater structure, and said there is some uncertainty around Mr Bath's role at council meetings.
As the head of the council, Mr Bath is responsible for bringing the council's vision to life, providing strategic advice to the lord mayor and councillors and ensuring decisions are made within regulations.
The report recommended the council stick more closely to meeting procedures, scheduling and governance and in particular, speaking time limits.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
4 days ago
- The Advertiser
'David vs Goliath': council hires Sydney law firm, landslip victims left in the dark
DISPLACED New Lambton residents say they feel like they're in a "David versus Goliath" fight, up against City of Newcastle's "legal machine". Residents of 15 properties, one of which has been condemned and continues to crumble, were forced out of their homes on May 23 following a landslip, and have been barred from returning for about 10 weeks. Now, they say City of Newcastle (CN) has hired a "top-tier Sydney law firm", left emails unacknowledged and is refusing to release property access and work records. Russell Road resident David, who does not want to be named and has become a spokesman for a number of affected residents, said the council committed in writing on August 1 to provide responses to all residents "at the same time". On August 1, CN wrote to residents and said, out of respect, it would provide a response to their letter that would be shared with everyone impacted. Since then, David said two formal resident letters sent Monday and Tuesday had not been acknowledged or responded to as of Friday morning, and the council had phoned a small, select group of residents, leaving the majority uninformed. "This is a David versus Goliath fight, displaced families up against City of Newcastle's legal machine," he said. "We're not asking for special treatment, just the basic respect of being told what's happening to our homes. "CN's selective updates create confusion, erode trust, and deepen the trauma of an already devastating situation." A council spokesman said it engaged external legal advisors from "time to time" to advise on a range of matters, including the New Lambton landslip and its legal ability to access private property. "This also enables City of Newcastle to appropriately respond to legal correspondence from lawyers acting for third parties," he said. The council spokesman said at least one of the property owners had engaged a lawyer. "It is logical City of Newcastle would therefore need to similarly engage legal representation to respond to their questions," he said. Meanwhile, David said he was seeking further information via a freedom of information application to the council. The council spokesman said in recent weeks, a resident had submitted multiple, detailed letters on behalf of themselves and other residents. He said the Government Information Public Access (GIPA) application was being considered. "We are working to address the matters raised; however, the frequency and evolving nature of the resident's recent requests on 4, 5 and 8 August means we are continuing to consolidate our response to ensure it reflects the new letters," he said. "We communicate with residents in the most appropriate way depending on the circumstances. "This includes phone calls to arrange property access or to discuss upcoming site investigations to enable works to proceed without delay." The council spokesman said written updates were provided to all affected residents when there was information relevant to the whole group. Despite repeated requests, residents say it has been eight weeks since they have had a face-to-face meeting with council representatives. The NSW Reconstruction Authority handed over recovery efforts to Newcastle council at the end of July, and the council has told victims to plan to live elsewhere into 2026. Residents say they have given conditional consent for geotechnical investigations to start at their properties next week, on the proviso the council commits to a transparent process and independent oversight. David said residents wanted to work shoulder-to-shoulder with the council, instead of feeling like they're on opposing sides up against a well-resourced organisation with legal muscle that controls information and decision-making. "Honestly, it's just tiring, we could be on their side here and we're having to spend all of this time and effort fighting them first," he said. "On one hand, the council has all the information, all of the access and lawyers that we quite frankly can't afford. I don't have ratepayer money to go engage lawyers. "On the other hand, literally, you've got residents whose houses are either falling over or have fences around them that the council put there to stop us going in; it's not fair, and I don't even want it to be a fight. "We feel extremely frustrated, extremely let down." Residents have demanded immediate written acknowledgement of both letters, a single, consistent written update to all residents and a joint face-to-face meeting between them and the council within two weeks. The council spokesman said it released information to residents in accordance with privacy, legal and operational requirements, and where appropriate. "City of Newcastle continues to work directly with all residents impacted by the New Lambton landslip to progress recovery works as quickly and safely as possible," he said. He said arrangements for geotechnical investigations were progressing, and the council remained in contact with residents to coordinate access. DISPLACED New Lambton residents say they feel like they're in a "David versus Goliath" fight, up against City of Newcastle's "legal machine". Residents of 15 properties, one of which has been condemned and continues to crumble, were forced out of their homes on May 23 following a landslip, and have been barred from returning for about 10 weeks. Now, they say City of Newcastle (CN) has hired a "top-tier Sydney law firm", left emails unacknowledged and is refusing to release property access and work records. Russell Road resident David, who does not want to be named and has become a spokesman for a number of affected residents, said the council committed in writing on August 1 to provide responses to all residents "at the same time". On August 1, CN wrote to residents and said, out of respect, it would provide a response to their letter that would be shared with everyone impacted. Since then, David said two formal resident letters sent Monday and Tuesday had not been acknowledged or responded to as of Friday morning, and the council had phoned a small, select group of residents, leaving the majority uninformed. "This is a David versus Goliath fight, displaced families up against City of Newcastle's legal machine," he said. "We're not asking for special treatment, just the basic respect of being told what's happening to our homes. "CN's selective updates create confusion, erode trust, and deepen the trauma of an already devastating situation." A council spokesman said it engaged external legal advisors from "time to time" to advise on a range of matters, including the New Lambton landslip and its legal ability to access private property. "This also enables City of Newcastle to appropriately respond to legal correspondence from lawyers acting for third parties," he said. The council spokesman said at least one of the property owners had engaged a lawyer. "It is logical City of Newcastle would therefore need to similarly engage legal representation to respond to their questions," he said. Meanwhile, David said he was seeking further information via a freedom of information application to the council. The council spokesman said in recent weeks, a resident had submitted multiple, detailed letters on behalf of themselves and other residents. He said the Government Information Public Access (GIPA) application was being considered. "We are working to address the matters raised; however, the frequency and evolving nature of the resident's recent requests on 4, 5 and 8 August means we are continuing to consolidate our response to ensure it reflects the new letters," he said. "We communicate with residents in the most appropriate way depending on the circumstances. "This includes phone calls to arrange property access or to discuss upcoming site investigations to enable works to proceed without delay." The council spokesman said written updates were provided to all affected residents when there was information relevant to the whole group. Despite repeated requests, residents say it has been eight weeks since they have had a face-to-face meeting with council representatives. The NSW Reconstruction Authority handed over recovery efforts to Newcastle council at the end of July, and the council has told victims to plan to live elsewhere into 2026. Residents say they have given conditional consent for geotechnical investigations to start at their properties next week, on the proviso the council commits to a transparent process and independent oversight. David said residents wanted to work shoulder-to-shoulder with the council, instead of feeling like they're on opposing sides up against a well-resourced organisation with legal muscle that controls information and decision-making. "Honestly, it's just tiring, we could be on their side here and we're having to spend all of this time and effort fighting them first," he said. "On one hand, the council has all the information, all of the access and lawyers that we quite frankly can't afford. I don't have ratepayer money to go engage lawyers. "On the other hand, literally, you've got residents whose houses are either falling over or have fences around them that the council put there to stop us going in; it's not fair, and I don't even want it to be a fight. "We feel extremely frustrated, extremely let down." Residents have demanded immediate written acknowledgement of both letters, a single, consistent written update to all residents and a joint face-to-face meeting between them and the council within two weeks. The council spokesman said it released information to residents in accordance with privacy, legal and operational requirements, and where appropriate. "City of Newcastle continues to work directly with all residents impacted by the New Lambton landslip to progress recovery works as quickly and safely as possible," he said. He said arrangements for geotechnical investigations were progressing, and the council remained in contact with residents to coordinate access. DISPLACED New Lambton residents say they feel like they're in a "David versus Goliath" fight, up against City of Newcastle's "legal machine". Residents of 15 properties, one of which has been condemned and continues to crumble, were forced out of their homes on May 23 following a landslip, and have been barred from returning for about 10 weeks. Now, they say City of Newcastle (CN) has hired a "top-tier Sydney law firm", left emails unacknowledged and is refusing to release property access and work records. Russell Road resident David, who does not want to be named and has become a spokesman for a number of affected residents, said the council committed in writing on August 1 to provide responses to all residents "at the same time". On August 1, CN wrote to residents and said, out of respect, it would provide a response to their letter that would be shared with everyone impacted. Since then, David said two formal resident letters sent Monday and Tuesday had not been acknowledged or responded to as of Friday morning, and the council had phoned a small, select group of residents, leaving the majority uninformed. "This is a David versus Goliath fight, displaced families up against City of Newcastle's legal machine," he said. "We're not asking for special treatment, just the basic respect of being told what's happening to our homes. "CN's selective updates create confusion, erode trust, and deepen the trauma of an already devastating situation." A council spokesman said it engaged external legal advisors from "time to time" to advise on a range of matters, including the New Lambton landslip and its legal ability to access private property. "This also enables City of Newcastle to appropriately respond to legal correspondence from lawyers acting for third parties," he said. The council spokesman said at least one of the property owners had engaged a lawyer. "It is logical City of Newcastle would therefore need to similarly engage legal representation to respond to their questions," he said. Meanwhile, David said he was seeking further information via a freedom of information application to the council. The council spokesman said in recent weeks, a resident had submitted multiple, detailed letters on behalf of themselves and other residents. He said the Government Information Public Access (GIPA) application was being considered. "We are working to address the matters raised; however, the frequency and evolving nature of the resident's recent requests on 4, 5 and 8 August means we are continuing to consolidate our response to ensure it reflects the new letters," he said. "We communicate with residents in the most appropriate way depending on the circumstances. "This includes phone calls to arrange property access or to discuss upcoming site investigations to enable works to proceed without delay." The council spokesman said written updates were provided to all affected residents when there was information relevant to the whole group. Despite repeated requests, residents say it has been eight weeks since they have had a face-to-face meeting with council representatives. The NSW Reconstruction Authority handed over recovery efforts to Newcastle council at the end of July, and the council has told victims to plan to live elsewhere into 2026. Residents say they have given conditional consent for geotechnical investigations to start at their properties next week, on the proviso the council commits to a transparent process and independent oversight. David said residents wanted to work shoulder-to-shoulder with the council, instead of feeling like they're on opposing sides up against a well-resourced organisation with legal muscle that controls information and decision-making. "Honestly, it's just tiring, we could be on their side here and we're having to spend all of this time and effort fighting them first," he said. "On one hand, the council has all the information, all of the access and lawyers that we quite frankly can't afford. I don't have ratepayer money to go engage lawyers. "On the other hand, literally, you've got residents whose houses are either falling over or have fences around them that the council put there to stop us going in; it's not fair, and I don't even want it to be a fight. "We feel extremely frustrated, extremely let down." Residents have demanded immediate written acknowledgement of both letters, a single, consistent written update to all residents and a joint face-to-face meeting between them and the council within two weeks. The council spokesman said it released information to residents in accordance with privacy, legal and operational requirements, and where appropriate. "City of Newcastle continues to work directly with all residents impacted by the New Lambton landslip to progress recovery works as quickly and safely as possible," he said. He said arrangements for geotechnical investigations were progressing, and the council remained in contact with residents to coordinate access. DISPLACED New Lambton residents say they feel like they're in a "David versus Goliath" fight, up against City of Newcastle's "legal machine". Residents of 15 properties, one of which has been condemned and continues to crumble, were forced out of their homes on May 23 following a landslip, and have been barred from returning for about 10 weeks. Now, they say City of Newcastle (CN) has hired a "top-tier Sydney law firm", left emails unacknowledged and is refusing to release property access and work records. Russell Road resident David, who does not want to be named and has become a spokesman for a number of affected residents, said the council committed in writing on August 1 to provide responses to all residents "at the same time". On August 1, CN wrote to residents and said, out of respect, it would provide a response to their letter that would be shared with everyone impacted. Since then, David said two formal resident letters sent Monday and Tuesday had not been acknowledged or responded to as of Friday morning, and the council had phoned a small, select group of residents, leaving the majority uninformed. "This is a David versus Goliath fight, displaced families up against City of Newcastle's legal machine," he said. "We're not asking for special treatment, just the basic respect of being told what's happening to our homes. "CN's selective updates create confusion, erode trust, and deepen the trauma of an already devastating situation." A council spokesman said it engaged external legal advisors from "time to time" to advise on a range of matters, including the New Lambton landslip and its legal ability to access private property. "This also enables City of Newcastle to appropriately respond to legal correspondence from lawyers acting for third parties," he said. The council spokesman said at least one of the property owners had engaged a lawyer. "It is logical City of Newcastle would therefore need to similarly engage legal representation to respond to their questions," he said. Meanwhile, David said he was seeking further information via a freedom of information application to the council. The council spokesman said in recent weeks, a resident had submitted multiple, detailed letters on behalf of themselves and other residents. He said the Government Information Public Access (GIPA) application was being considered. "We are working to address the matters raised; however, the frequency and evolving nature of the resident's recent requests on 4, 5 and 8 August means we are continuing to consolidate our response to ensure it reflects the new letters," he said. "We communicate with residents in the most appropriate way depending on the circumstances. "This includes phone calls to arrange property access or to discuss upcoming site investigations to enable works to proceed without delay." The council spokesman said written updates were provided to all affected residents when there was information relevant to the whole group. Despite repeated requests, residents say it has been eight weeks since they have had a face-to-face meeting with council representatives. The NSW Reconstruction Authority handed over recovery efforts to Newcastle council at the end of July, and the council has told victims to plan to live elsewhere into 2026. Residents say they have given conditional consent for geotechnical investigations to start at their properties next week, on the proviso the council commits to a transparent process and independent oversight. David said residents wanted to work shoulder-to-shoulder with the council, instead of feeling like they're on opposing sides up against a well-resourced organisation with legal muscle that controls information and decision-making. "Honestly, it's just tiring, we could be on their side here and we're having to spend all of this time and effort fighting them first," he said. "On one hand, the council has all the information, all of the access and lawyers that we quite frankly can't afford. I don't have ratepayer money to go engage lawyers. "On the other hand, literally, you've got residents whose houses are either falling over or have fences around them that the council put there to stop us going in; it's not fair, and I don't even want it to be a fight. "We feel extremely frustrated, extremely let down." Residents have demanded immediate written acknowledgement of both letters, a single, consistent written update to all residents and a joint face-to-face meeting between them and the council within two weeks. The council spokesman said it released information to residents in accordance with privacy, legal and operational requirements, and where appropriate. "City of Newcastle continues to work directly with all residents impacted by the New Lambton landslip to progress recovery works as quickly and safely as possible," he said. He said arrangements for geotechnical investigations were progressing, and the council remained in contact with residents to coordinate access.
The Advertiser
6 days ago
- The Advertiser
Change of plans: Rising Tide asks to move protestival ahead of council decision
CLIMATE action group Rising Tide has asked Newcastle council to move its event application from Richardson Park back to Foreshore Park. Newcastle councillors are set to make a decision on the controversial application at an extraordinary meeting next week called by independent lord mayor Ross Kerridge. "After carefully considering the safety concerns raised by NSW Police, reading council submissions and listening to feedback from many and varied stakeholders, we feel that Foreshore Park would mitigate many concerns," Rising Tide organiser Alexa Stuart said. "Foreshore Park was the site for the successful 2024 event and would centralise activities to one area, significantly improving many aspects of the event management, most importantly, traffic, parking and pedestrian safety. "We have been working cooperatively with council staff and councillors for months, and are doing everything in our power to achieve the best outcome for this major event. "We believe this amendment is an important part of that cooperation and negotiation." The climate concert would remain at Camp Shortland as previously advertised. An overwhelming majority threw their support behind Rising Tide's application to City of Newcastle to host its controversial protestival across Hamilton North's Richardson Park and Camp Shortland in November. Among supportive submissions, Newcastle East Residents Group (NERG) said the event saw an influx of visitors to the city. "It was characterised by a happy and peaceful atmosphere," NERG said. "The message calling for climate justice was delivered in a festive and family-friendly way. "Many Newcastle East residents participated or attended the festival, taking advantage of the live music, food stalls and community get-together." The proposed amendment follows the release of City of Newcastle's Public Notice Report, which revealed 1,855 public submissions had been received, with 86 per cent supporting Rising Tide's application. Ms Stuart said many Newcastle East residents participated in the 2024 festival. She said Rising Tide is hopeful the council will "listen to the wishes of the Newcastle community" and vote in support of its application for the 2025 People's Blockade. The council will vote on the event licence application on August 12. While the vast majority backed climate activist group Rising Tide's application to host its protestival in Newcastle later this year, warnings from industry, transport and business leaders have escalated. Last year's blockade ended in 170 arrests as activists defied police orders on the last day and paddled into the shipping channel. CLIMATE action group Rising Tide has asked Newcastle council to move its event application from Richardson Park back to Foreshore Park. Newcastle councillors are set to make a decision on the controversial application at an extraordinary meeting next week called by independent lord mayor Ross Kerridge. "After carefully considering the safety concerns raised by NSW Police, reading council submissions and listening to feedback from many and varied stakeholders, we feel that Foreshore Park would mitigate many concerns," Rising Tide organiser Alexa Stuart said. "Foreshore Park was the site for the successful 2024 event and would centralise activities to one area, significantly improving many aspects of the event management, most importantly, traffic, parking and pedestrian safety. "We have been working cooperatively with council staff and councillors for months, and are doing everything in our power to achieve the best outcome for this major event. "We believe this amendment is an important part of that cooperation and negotiation." The climate concert would remain at Camp Shortland as previously advertised. An overwhelming majority threw their support behind Rising Tide's application to City of Newcastle to host its controversial protestival across Hamilton North's Richardson Park and Camp Shortland in November. Among supportive submissions, Newcastle East Residents Group (NERG) said the event saw an influx of visitors to the city. "It was characterised by a happy and peaceful atmosphere," NERG said. "The message calling for climate justice was delivered in a festive and family-friendly way. "Many Newcastle East residents participated or attended the festival, taking advantage of the live music, food stalls and community get-together." The proposed amendment follows the release of City of Newcastle's Public Notice Report, which revealed 1,855 public submissions had been received, with 86 per cent supporting Rising Tide's application. Ms Stuart said many Newcastle East residents participated in the 2024 festival. She said Rising Tide is hopeful the council will "listen to the wishes of the Newcastle community" and vote in support of its application for the 2025 People's Blockade. The council will vote on the event licence application on August 12. While the vast majority backed climate activist group Rising Tide's application to host its protestival in Newcastle later this year, warnings from industry, transport and business leaders have escalated. Last year's blockade ended in 170 arrests as activists defied police orders on the last day and paddled into the shipping channel. CLIMATE action group Rising Tide has asked Newcastle council to move its event application from Richardson Park back to Foreshore Park. Newcastle councillors are set to make a decision on the controversial application at an extraordinary meeting next week called by independent lord mayor Ross Kerridge. "After carefully considering the safety concerns raised by NSW Police, reading council submissions and listening to feedback from many and varied stakeholders, we feel that Foreshore Park would mitigate many concerns," Rising Tide organiser Alexa Stuart said. "Foreshore Park was the site for the successful 2024 event and would centralise activities to one area, significantly improving many aspects of the event management, most importantly, traffic, parking and pedestrian safety. "We have been working cooperatively with council staff and councillors for months, and are doing everything in our power to achieve the best outcome for this major event. "We believe this amendment is an important part of that cooperation and negotiation." The climate concert would remain at Camp Shortland as previously advertised. An overwhelming majority threw their support behind Rising Tide's application to City of Newcastle to host its controversial protestival across Hamilton North's Richardson Park and Camp Shortland in November. Among supportive submissions, Newcastle East Residents Group (NERG) said the event saw an influx of visitors to the city. "It was characterised by a happy and peaceful atmosphere," NERG said. "The message calling for climate justice was delivered in a festive and family-friendly way. "Many Newcastle East residents participated or attended the festival, taking advantage of the live music, food stalls and community get-together." The proposed amendment follows the release of City of Newcastle's Public Notice Report, which revealed 1,855 public submissions had been received, with 86 per cent supporting Rising Tide's application. Ms Stuart said many Newcastle East residents participated in the 2024 festival. She said Rising Tide is hopeful the council will "listen to the wishes of the Newcastle community" and vote in support of its application for the 2025 People's Blockade. The council will vote on the event licence application on August 12. While the vast majority backed climate activist group Rising Tide's application to host its protestival in Newcastle later this year, warnings from industry, transport and business leaders have escalated. Last year's blockade ended in 170 arrests as activists defied police orders on the last day and paddled into the shipping channel. CLIMATE action group Rising Tide has asked Newcastle council to move its event application from Richardson Park back to Foreshore Park. Newcastle councillors are set to make a decision on the controversial application at an extraordinary meeting next week called by independent lord mayor Ross Kerridge. "After carefully considering the safety concerns raised by NSW Police, reading council submissions and listening to feedback from many and varied stakeholders, we feel that Foreshore Park would mitigate many concerns," Rising Tide organiser Alexa Stuart said. "Foreshore Park was the site for the successful 2024 event and would centralise activities to one area, significantly improving many aspects of the event management, most importantly, traffic, parking and pedestrian safety. "We have been working cooperatively with council staff and councillors for months, and are doing everything in our power to achieve the best outcome for this major event. "We believe this amendment is an important part of that cooperation and negotiation." The climate concert would remain at Camp Shortland as previously advertised. An overwhelming majority threw their support behind Rising Tide's application to City of Newcastle to host its controversial protestival across Hamilton North's Richardson Park and Camp Shortland in November. Among supportive submissions, Newcastle East Residents Group (NERG) said the event saw an influx of visitors to the city. "It was characterised by a happy and peaceful atmosphere," NERG said. "The message calling for climate justice was delivered in a festive and family-friendly way. "Many Newcastle East residents participated or attended the festival, taking advantage of the live music, food stalls and community get-together." The proposed amendment follows the release of City of Newcastle's Public Notice Report, which revealed 1,855 public submissions had been received, with 86 per cent supporting Rising Tide's application. Ms Stuart said many Newcastle East residents participated in the 2024 festival. She said Rising Tide is hopeful the council will "listen to the wishes of the Newcastle community" and vote in support of its application for the 2025 People's Blockade. The council will vote on the event licence application on August 12. While the vast majority backed climate activist group Rising Tide's application to host its protestival in Newcastle later this year, warnings from industry, transport and business leaders have escalated. Last year's blockade ended in 170 arrests as activists defied police orders on the last day and paddled into the shipping channel.
The Advertiser
04-08-2025
- The Advertiser
'Safety' first: grant to boost crucial Hamilton Station Park upgrade
SAFETY will be the focus of an $80,000 upgrade of Hamilton Station Park to build on the community's efforts to address a rise in antisocial behaviour and crime in Hamilton. The grant has been awarded to the City of Newcastle to boost its project 'Hamilton Station Park - A Place For All' through the NSW government's 2025 Community Building Partnership program It will fund the installation of a community noticeboard with Aboriginal cultural storytelling and artwork, as well as lighting, bollards and benches, landscaping, surface levelling, and turf. It is one of 20 projects funded across the Newcastle local government area to the tune of almost $450,000. The $41 million program aims to ensure local organisations and councils across the state have the facilities to support more vibrant and inclusive communities. Newcastle State MP Tim Crakanthorp joined Newcastle Lord Mayor Ross Kerridge and councillor Jennie Barrie on Monday (August 4) to announce the funding and the list of recipients. Mr Crakanthorp welcomed the funding and applauded the program for bringing "much-needed improvements to local facilities". "These projects make a real and impactful difference to the local residents and organisations," Mr Crakanthorp said. "Congratulations to all successful applicants. I look forward to seeing these projects come to life to benefit our community." Cr Kerridge thanked the state government on behalf of the council for their contribution to the upgrade of Hamilton Station Park. "This funding will help provide upgraded lighting, landscaping, and public infrastructure to make the park more welcoming, more accessible, and safer for everyone in the community," Cr Kerridge said. City of Newcastle's executive director of creative and community services, Alissa Jones, said the proposal had been developed using the principles of crime prevention through environmental design to make the park a safer and more welcoming community space. The area is known as Ahwar-tah Bulboolba, which translates to 'flat it is, Wallaby Place. A place of sand flats covered in tea tree scrub and an abundance of wildlife.' It hosts a 'Food Not Bombs' meal service and cupboards, which act as a point of donation for food and other items. The park's proposed upgrade has not been without controversy. Cr Jenny Barrie and others have flagged concerns about the free food sharing initiative drawing antisocial behaviour to the area. But the initiative, Food Not Bombs, has defended itself as trying to help people in need, saying issues in the area won't go away if it were to stop operating. SAFETY will be the focus of an $80,000 upgrade of Hamilton Station Park to build on the community's efforts to address a rise in antisocial behaviour and crime in Hamilton. The grant has been awarded to the City of Newcastle to boost its project 'Hamilton Station Park - A Place For All' through the NSW government's 2025 Community Building Partnership program It will fund the installation of a community noticeboard with Aboriginal cultural storytelling and artwork, as well as lighting, bollards and benches, landscaping, surface levelling, and turf. It is one of 20 projects funded across the Newcastle local government area to the tune of almost $450,000. The $41 million program aims to ensure local organisations and councils across the state have the facilities to support more vibrant and inclusive communities. Newcastle State MP Tim Crakanthorp joined Newcastle Lord Mayor Ross Kerridge and councillor Jennie Barrie on Monday (August 4) to announce the funding and the list of recipients. Mr Crakanthorp welcomed the funding and applauded the program for bringing "much-needed improvements to local facilities". "These projects make a real and impactful difference to the local residents and organisations," Mr Crakanthorp said. "Congratulations to all successful applicants. I look forward to seeing these projects come to life to benefit our community." Cr Kerridge thanked the state government on behalf of the council for their contribution to the upgrade of Hamilton Station Park. "This funding will help provide upgraded lighting, landscaping, and public infrastructure to make the park more welcoming, more accessible, and safer for everyone in the community," Cr Kerridge said. City of Newcastle's executive director of creative and community services, Alissa Jones, said the proposal had been developed using the principles of crime prevention through environmental design to make the park a safer and more welcoming community space. The area is known as Ahwar-tah Bulboolba, which translates to 'flat it is, Wallaby Place. A place of sand flats covered in tea tree scrub and an abundance of wildlife.' It hosts a 'Food Not Bombs' meal service and cupboards, which act as a point of donation for food and other items. The park's proposed upgrade has not been without controversy. Cr Jenny Barrie and others have flagged concerns about the free food sharing initiative drawing antisocial behaviour to the area. But the initiative, Food Not Bombs, has defended itself as trying to help people in need, saying issues in the area won't go away if it were to stop operating. SAFETY will be the focus of an $80,000 upgrade of Hamilton Station Park to build on the community's efforts to address a rise in antisocial behaviour and crime in Hamilton. The grant has been awarded to the City of Newcastle to boost its project 'Hamilton Station Park - A Place For All' through the NSW government's 2025 Community Building Partnership program It will fund the installation of a community noticeboard with Aboriginal cultural storytelling and artwork, as well as lighting, bollards and benches, landscaping, surface levelling, and turf. It is one of 20 projects funded across the Newcastle local government area to the tune of almost $450,000. The $41 million program aims to ensure local organisations and councils across the state have the facilities to support more vibrant and inclusive communities. Newcastle State MP Tim Crakanthorp joined Newcastle Lord Mayor Ross Kerridge and councillor Jennie Barrie on Monday (August 4) to announce the funding and the list of recipients. Mr Crakanthorp welcomed the funding and applauded the program for bringing "much-needed improvements to local facilities". "These projects make a real and impactful difference to the local residents and organisations," Mr Crakanthorp said. "Congratulations to all successful applicants. I look forward to seeing these projects come to life to benefit our community." Cr Kerridge thanked the state government on behalf of the council for their contribution to the upgrade of Hamilton Station Park. "This funding will help provide upgraded lighting, landscaping, and public infrastructure to make the park more welcoming, more accessible, and safer for everyone in the community," Cr Kerridge said. City of Newcastle's executive director of creative and community services, Alissa Jones, said the proposal had been developed using the principles of crime prevention through environmental design to make the park a safer and more welcoming community space. The area is known as Ahwar-tah Bulboolba, which translates to 'flat it is, Wallaby Place. A place of sand flats covered in tea tree scrub and an abundance of wildlife.' It hosts a 'Food Not Bombs' meal service and cupboards, which act as a point of donation for food and other items. The park's proposed upgrade has not been without controversy. Cr Jenny Barrie and others have flagged concerns about the free food sharing initiative drawing antisocial behaviour to the area. But the initiative, Food Not Bombs, has defended itself as trying to help people in need, saying issues in the area won't go away if it were to stop operating. SAFETY will be the focus of an $80,000 upgrade of Hamilton Station Park to build on the community's efforts to address a rise in antisocial behaviour and crime in Hamilton. The grant has been awarded to the City of Newcastle to boost its project 'Hamilton Station Park - A Place For All' through the NSW government's 2025 Community Building Partnership program It will fund the installation of a community noticeboard with Aboriginal cultural storytelling and artwork, as well as lighting, bollards and benches, landscaping, surface levelling, and turf. It is one of 20 projects funded across the Newcastle local government area to the tune of almost $450,000. The $41 million program aims to ensure local organisations and councils across the state have the facilities to support more vibrant and inclusive communities. Newcastle State MP Tim Crakanthorp joined Newcastle Lord Mayor Ross Kerridge and councillor Jennie Barrie on Monday (August 4) to announce the funding and the list of recipients. Mr Crakanthorp welcomed the funding and applauded the program for bringing "much-needed improvements to local facilities". "These projects make a real and impactful difference to the local residents and organisations," Mr Crakanthorp said. "Congratulations to all successful applicants. I look forward to seeing these projects come to life to benefit our community." Cr Kerridge thanked the state government on behalf of the council for their contribution to the upgrade of Hamilton Station Park. "This funding will help provide upgraded lighting, landscaping, and public infrastructure to make the park more welcoming, more accessible, and safer for everyone in the community," Cr Kerridge said. City of Newcastle's executive director of creative and community services, Alissa Jones, said the proposal had been developed using the principles of crime prevention through environmental design to make the park a safer and more welcoming community space. The area is known as Ahwar-tah Bulboolba, which translates to 'flat it is, Wallaby Place. A place of sand flats covered in tea tree scrub and an abundance of wildlife.' It hosts a 'Food Not Bombs' meal service and cupboards, which act as a point of donation for food and other items. The park's proposed upgrade has not been without controversy. Cr Jenny Barrie and others have flagged concerns about the free food sharing initiative drawing antisocial behaviour to the area. But the initiative, Food Not Bombs, has defended itself as trying to help people in need, saying issues in the area won't go away if it were to stop operating.
