Norway parliament approves new power subsidy scheme for households
OSLO, June 16 (Reuters) - Norwegian lawmakers on Monday passed a law introducing subsidised fixed price power contracts for households, the country's second scheme to help alleviate consumer concerns over volatile and high power prices.
Norway will hold a general election in September, with the cost of living and industrial competitiveness expected to be a key topic.
Called Norway Price, the model offers consumers the option to sign a fixed price contract, set at 0.40 Norwegian crowns ($0.041) per kilowatt hour (kWh) excluding fees, for an initial period from Oct. 1 until Dec. 12, 2026.
The law is limited until the end of 2029 and allows for price adjustments from 2027, while payments are capped at 5,000 kWh per month for households and 1,000 kWh/month for holiday homes.
Norway Price seeks to provide consumers with predictable costs and offers an alternative to an existing subsidy scheme introduced in response to rising prices during the 2022 energy crisis, which covers 90% of all costs above 0.7 crowns/kWh.
The government expects 60% of households and 80% of holiday home owners in southern Norway to opt for the new model, estimating it could cost 6.6 billion crowns for 2026.
Abundant and cheap hydropower has traditionally kept electricity prices low in Norway.
However, consumers in southern Norway, which is connected to other European markets via cross-border power cables, have been facing higher and more volatile prices since the wider 2022 European energy crisis.
The Norway Price law introduced by the ruling Labour Party, garnered last-minute support from former coalition partner Centre Party and the Socialist Left, and is also supported by the far-left Red Party.
Critics argued the government proposal was unnecessarily expensive, removed power saving incentives and in turn lifted prices for those not eligible, such as businesses.
($1 = 9.8811 Norwegian crowns)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
Casey report pulls no punches - but will it lead to meaningful change?
Baroness Louise Casey's report into group-based sexual exploitation pulls no punches in its description of the failures at all levels to tackle what it calls one of the most horrendous crimes in our the question many will be asking is will her report bring about meaningful change?Certainly, for survivors of abuse, who have often had to fight hard to get their voices heard, practical, on-the-ground change will be government accepted all Baroness Casey's recommendations, but the grooming gangs report itself made the point that many of the problems highlighted have been known about for years – yet there was a failure to act over decades. The report said too often the children being abused were blamed, not helped."If we'd got this right years ago – seeing these girls as children raped rather than 'wayward teenagers' or collaborators in their abuse, collecting ethnicity data, and acknowledging as a system that we did not do a good enough job - then I doubt we'd be in this place now," Baroness Casey said in her foreword to the fact, if you were to read many past reports, including Baroness Casey's own 2015 investigation into the failure to tackle grooming gangs by Rotherham Council, you would find many of the same issues being instance, ten years ago she recommended tighter checks on Rotherham taxis because of their use by grooming gangs. In Monday's audit she called for legal loopholes to be closed nationally so cab drivers can't simply move to another area to get a she described the lack of action by the authorities over the years as "denial" or a collective "blindness", particularly when it comes to the ethnicity of government has accepted her call for better data collection on the ethnicity of grooming gang suspects and has promised research into what that tells us about the factors driving reliable information, Baroness Casey argues there is a vacuum which different sides can use to "suit the ends of those presenting it."The national inquiry will be watched closely to again see if its recommendations are put into one experienced lawyer put it, this can't be another exercise in simply gathering evidence and producing recommendations that are quietly shelved.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Taxing rich never on agenda when politicians talk 'tough'
FOLLOWING the Labour government's partial U-turn on the winter fuel payment for pensioners, the First Minister John Swinney has announced that no pensioner in Scotland will receive less than they would if they lived in England or Wales. Shortly after taking office, Labour announced its deeply unpopular decision to axe the universal winter fuel payment for pensioners. Starmer introduced the measure in a bid to demonstrate to his corporate backers that he was prepared to take 'tough' decisions, which of course always translate in practice to beating up the poor and the vulnerable. Taxing the rich is never on the agenda when politicians talk about being 'tough'. While it may have bought him brownie points with the City of London, the move was electorally suicidal and generated massive public anger. The decision cost the Scottish Government £140-160 million in expected Barnett consequentials. READ MORE: SNP take control of Dumfries and Galloway council from Scottish Tories Last week, faced with tanking in the polls and growing unrest on the Labour back benches, the Chancellor Rachel Reeves (below) announced a partial U-turn. The universal winter fuel payment would not be restored, but the UK Government will make the payment to all pensioners living in households with an annual income of less than £35,000. All those people born before 22 September 1959 would receive £200, rising to £300 if they are in a household with someone over 80. (Image: Owen Humphreys/PA) In Scotland, the Winter Fuel Payment which was introduced in order to mitigate Labour's cuts was guaranteed at £100 per household. When Reeves announced her U-turn, the Scottish Government was once again left in the dark about the financial implications for the Scottish budget. Responsibility for the equivalent benefit in Scotland is devolved. Last week, Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said people on pension credit and under 80 would get £203, and people on pension credit and over 80 would get £305. However on Monday morning, speaking at the hospital which everyone in Glasgow knows is properly called the Southern General, the First Minister said that the Scottish Government would match the payments being made elsewhere in the UK, and said the Scottish Government will set out more details on how the UK and Scottish payments would be matched up in 'due course'. He said: "The Winter Fuel Payment kept some of the most vulnerable in society warm in winter. "It was always the right thing to do, but it was also the smart thing to do, smart because it kept people out of hospital in their own home. It kept them warm and well, and then it was gone." READ MORE: The SNP's current strategy is political suicide. Here's what needs to change He insisted that axing the payment was a false economy that was never going to save the government any money, noting the links between cold weather and increased NHS bills, particularly when it comes to pensioners. The Chancellor's partial U-turn will result in an estimated £120 million in funding for the Scottish Government. This will leave a shortfall of £20 to £40 million which the Scottish Government will have to find elsewhere in the Scottish budget. Anas Sarwar will then stand up at FMQs and denounce this as SNP cuts. The BBC has reported that Scottish rubbish will have to be exported to England. The Scottish government is banning "black bag" waste from being buried in landfill from 31 December but acknowledges that there are not currently enough incinerators to meet the extra demand. The BBC has reported that up to 100 lorry loads a day of Scottish waste could be sent to England until there is sufficient incinerator capacity in Scotland, which is estimated to take three years. It seems fair enough to me. England takes Scotland's oil, gas, and renewable energy. Scotland takes England's nuclear weaponry and if Starmer has his way, Scotland will have to take England's radioactive waste too. It's only reasonable that England takes Scotland's crisp packets, pizza boxes and sweetie wrappers, unlike England's nuclear waste, that won't still be a contaminant 50,000 years from now - by which time Labour still won't have abolished the House of Lords. Union flag as a symbol of sectarianism The Tories have been engaged in one of their periodic bouts of pearl clutching after a primary school head in East Renfrewshire suggested that the Union flag was linked to 'potentially offensive or sectarian messaging'. Party leader Russell Findlay (Image: Andrew Milligan/PA Wire)They're not wrong though. Whenever there's a fascist rally or an Orange Walk, Union flags are prominently displayed. An Orange Walk without a Union flag is not an Orange Walk – it's just a few badly dressed bigots sauntering to a drunken hate fest. Especially since the independence referendum of 2014, the Union flag has been intensely political in Scotland. It is disingenuous in the extreme to pretend that displaying the Union flag in Scotland is politically neutral or that it does not have connotations of sectarianism or taking sides in Scotland's constitutional debate. But where there's a Tory, there's a British nationalist in search of something to feel victimised by. Russell Findlay, the current branch manager of the Tories in Scotland took to social media to harrumph: 'This is what happens when the SNP's toxic nationalism infects schools and councils. Our country's flag is NOT 'offensive or sectarian'.' The only reason so many people in Scotland feel uncomfortable with the Union flag is due to the toxic Anglo-British nationalism of the Tories and Labour. Both parties were more than happy to play the sectarian card in the recent Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse by election, with a Labour candidate who made big play of his links to Rangers and a Tory candidate who is a member of the Orange Order.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
The Casey report: the authorities had a culture of denial
Disproportionate numbers of Asian men have been responsible for child sex grooming gangs, but successive governments covered up the fact for fear of racism or raising tensions, a report has found. The national audit of grooming gangs, by Baroness Casey of Blackstock, found that flawed data had been used repeatedly to dismiss claims about Asian grooming gangs as sensationalised, biased or untrue, while an institutional view persisted that there was an overwhelming problem with white perpetrators when, in fact, that could not be proved. Casey pointed to a culture of denial that meant governments, police and local authorities had avoided the issue of ethnicity 'for fear of appearing racist, raising community tensions or causing community cohesion problems'.
