logo
Companies are relying on aptitude and personality tests more to combat AI-powered job hunters

Companies are relying on aptitude and personality tests more to combat AI-powered job hunters

Are you happy? Do you sleep well? Do you have many friends? Are you a workaholic?
Those are some of the questions Katelin Eagan, 27, said she had to answer recently when she was applying for a job.
She agreed to take a cognitive and personality assessment as part of the hiring process, but was a bit bewildered. Many of the questions had nothing to do with the engineering position, which, after completing the tests and going through several months of silence, she was eventually rejected for.
Eagan says she's been applying for jobs full-time since the start of the year. Her efforts haven't panned out yet, which she attributes partly to how competitive her field has become and employers having room to be picky.
"I think there's definitely a lower amount than I thought there would be," she said of available roles.
But that may be only part of the story. Employers are growing increasingly selective, partly because many are seeing a flood of seemingly perfect candidates, many of whom are suspected of using AI to finesse their applications, according to recruiters and hiring assessment providers who spoke to BI.
The solution many companies have come to?
Make everyone take a test — and see who candidates really are, irrespective of what ChatGPT suggested they put on their résumés.
According to surveys conducted by TestGorilla, one firm that administers talent assessments for employers, 76% of companies that had hired in the 12 months leading up to April said they were using skills tests to determine if a candidate was a right fit, up from 55% who said they were using role-specific skills tests in 2022.
Employers seem most interested in testing for soft skills — amorphous qualities like communicativeness and leadership — as well as administering general aptitude and personality tests, Wouter Durville, the CEO of TestGorilla, told Business Insider.
TestGorilla's Critical Thinking test was completed more than 100,000 times in the first quarter of this year, a 61% increase compared to the same quarter in 2024.
The firm also offers a Big 5 personality assessment, which was completed more than 127,000 times in the first quarter — a 69% increase compared to last year.
Demand among US employers in particular has been "massive," Durville said, adding that many firms have turned to tests as a result of being overwhelmed with job applications. The US is the largest market for the firm, which is based in the Netherlands.
"The biggest thing is people just want to hire the best people. It's very selfish and it's fine," Durville said.
Canditech, another firm that offers hiring assessments, says it's also seen rapid growth in the last year. In 2024, the assessment usage grew 135% compared to the prior year, CEO Guy Barel told BI. He estimates that assessment usage is on track to soar 242% year-over-year.
Barel says the surge is partly due to the job market tipping more in favor of employers. In many cases, companies he works with are flooded with "tons of candidates" and looking to "move forward as fast as possible," he said.
Criteria, another skills-based assessment provider, says test usage has more than doubled in recent years.
"AI is kind of creating this authenticity crisis in talent acquisition, because everyone can and is putting their résumé into ChatGPT." Criteria CEO Josh Millet told BI. "It's all about demonstrating your ability or your skill or your personality in an objective way that's a little bit harder to fake."
The AI job market
Jeff Hyman, a veteran recruiter and the CEO of Recruit Rockstars, estimates that demand for testing among his clients has increased by around 50% over the last 18 months.
That's due to a handful of different reasons, he said — but companies being inundated by job applications is near the top, thanks to candidates leaning more on AI to gain an edge and send out résumés en masse, he says.
Hyman says a typical job he tries to fill for a client has around 300 to 500 applicants, though he's spoken to companies trying to fill roles with more than 1,000 candidates within several days of being posted online.
The number of job applications in the US grew at more than four times the pace of job requisitions in the first half of 2024, according to a report from WorkDay.
Companies also want to test candidates' soft skills as remote work grows more common, Hyman adds — and they want to be sure they're getting the right person. Depending on the size of the organization, a bad hire can cost a company anywhere from $11,000 to $24,000, a survey conducted by CareerBuilder in 2016 found.
According to TestGorilla, 69% of employers who issued tests this year said they were interested in assessing soft skills, while 50% said they were interested in assessing a candidate's cognitive ability. A separate survey by Criteria ranked emotional intelligence as the most sought-after skill among employers, followed by analytical thinking.
"It's about their personality and to see if they are a good fit to the organization, if they share the same DNA," Durville said, though he noted that, in many cases, companies find the results of the tests to be shaky as a sole evaluation metric.
TestGorilla, Canditech, and Criteria told BI that employers say they're enjoying the time and cost savings of administering tests.
According to TestGorilla, 82% of employers who said they used skills-based hiring — a catch-all term for hiring based on proven skills — said they were satisfied with new hires, compared to 73% of US employers on average.
Canditech, meanwhile, claims its assessments can help employers cut down on hiring time by as much as 50%, and reduce "unnecessary interviews" by as much as 80%, according to its website.
But Hyman thinks there are some issues with hiring tests. For one, he says employers turn down candidates who don't score well "all the time," despite them being otherwise qualified for the job.
The trend also appears to be turning off job candidates. Hyman estimates around 10%-20% of applicants will outright refuse to take a test if employers introduce it as a first step in the hiring process, though that's a practice Canditech's Barel says is becoming increasingly common.
Hyman says he frequently has conversations with employers urging them not to put so much weight on test results, due to the potential for a mis-hire.
"That's lazy hiring, to be honest. I think that's not the right way to go about it," he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

From rice to digital services, here is what's making trade negotiations difficult for the Trump administration
From rice to digital services, here is what's making trade negotiations difficult for the Trump administration

Business Insider

time13 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

From rice to digital services, here is what's making trade negotiations difficult for the Trump administration

The 90-day tariff pause did not yield 90 announced trade deals. After giving 75 trading partners a three-month tariff pause and telling Time in an April interview that he "100%" has "made 200 deals," President Donald Trump came away with three trade deals, some tentative, as of mid-July. Months of negotiations with Japan, Korea, and Thailand have not yielded agreements. As Trump sends out a new round of tariff letters to over 20 countries, threatening some with tariffs as high as 50%, trade experts told Business Insider that many sticking points stand in the way of quick trade deals. Navin Girishankar, president of the Economic Security and Technology Department at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told Business Insider that the Trump administration believes that unpredictability and ratcheting up tariffs give them leverage, but it remains questionable if that is effective. "I'm actually feeling that it's more and more the loss of leverage," said Girishankar. "Because the reason we're shifting timetables is because we're not able to get to the deals that we think are acceptable." Domestic politics throw a wrench in negotiations Multiple trading partners that Trump is negotiating with are dealing with elections and policies that are popular in their respective countries. Girishankar told BI that, for example, Korea has a draft of a digital platform bill that its legislators see as important to national security. But the issue is, Girishankar says, the bill would be considered a barrier to entry for US tech companies like Meta and Google if it passes. Trump has also been complaining on social media that Japan won't import rice from the US, while the US imports a large number of cars from the Asian country. Drew DeLong, lead in geopolitical dynamics practice at Kearney, a global strategy and management consulting firm, told BI that Japan has been under a lot of domestic pressure because it has an upper house election in late July. "Once that's finished," said DeLong, "It will be important to watch how PM Ishiba handles the Trump relationship with less domestic political pressure." Despite representing a relatively small part of the national GDP, the agriculture sector in Japan has cooperatives with significant lobbying power that have gained protectionist measures on staple crops like rice. "Agriculture has historically been a very challenging component of any trade agreement. Farmers are an important constituency in both countries," Girishankar added of the US and Japan. Ann Harrison, dean of the University of California, Berkeley's Haas School of Business, told BI that the Trump administration may have simply set itself up for "a herculean task." "Different countries have different sensitivities, like how it's the auto industry for Japan, and lumber and pharmaceuticals for Canada," said Harrison. "That's why any meaningful trade deals typically take three years and won't happen in such a short period of time." China complicates trade deals Though the tariff pause on China doesn't expire till mid-August, the manufacturing hub casts a long shadow. Harrison said the Trump administration needs to balance its need to reduce the trade deficit, without going so far that it would push Asian allies like Vietnam and the Philippines toward a closer alliance with China. "It's politically interesting that the US gave Vietnam and the Philippines some of the lower tariffs," said Harrison. "This is also becoming a militarily loaded decision as much as an economic one." In March, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth met with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and said the two countries, which have been fighting "shoulder-to-shoulder" since World War II, will work toward "reestablishing military deterrence" in the Indo-Pacific region. DeLong also said that the transshipment issue — one country rerouting its goods through another country, potentially to evade higher tariffs — has also made a comeback in the agreement with Vietnam, mostly due to concerns that China would reroute shipments to the US through Southeast Asia. "Still unclear how this will work mechanically," said DeLong. "Higher RVC thresholds? Port of shipment tracking? Headquarters country of origin?" According to statistics from the General Administration of Customs in China, the total value of China's exports to Vietnam increased by at least 15% every month in 2025 compared to the same months in the previous year. Girishankar echoed the concerned that transshipment would be complicated to implement and define, though he understands what the administration is attempting to achieve. "Some countries are worried that literally any Chinese content can be considered a transshipment," said Girishankar. "Bilateral negotiations with countries are also being used as the main way of achieving a global rebalancing of trade deficits, which is really challenging."

Can Amazon Gain 35%? Top Analyst Cites Improving Macro Backdrop and AWS Strength
Can Amazon Gain 35%? Top Analyst Cites Improving Macro Backdrop and AWS Strength

Business Insider

time3 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Can Amazon Gain 35%? Top Analyst Cites Improving Macro Backdrop and AWS Strength

Morgan Stanley's top analyst, Brian Nowak, has increased the price target for Amazon stock (AMZN) by 20%, raising it to $300 from $250, while maintaining his Buy rating. The revised price target implies nearly 35% upside potential from current levels. The analyst cited an improving macroeconomic backdrop and a manageable tariff situation as the main drivers of his bullish outlook. In mid-April, Nowak had slashed the price target on AMZN stock due to uncertainty surrounding the U.S.-China trade deal. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. Nowak ranks #788 out of the 9,867 analysts tracked on TipRanks. He boasts a 61% success rate and an average return per rating of 7.10%. Interestingly, Nowak has achieved even better results with his AMZN recommendations to date, recording a 79% success rate and an average return per rating of 24.33%. Why Is Morgan Stanley Bullish on AMZN? Nowak believes that the tariff environment has become 'more manageable' as trade deals between the U.S., China, and several other countries have been reached. Additionally, the analyst is highly optimistic about the growth potential of Amazon Web Services (AWS), backed by its rapid adoption. It is worth noting that Amazon is strengthening its partnership with the artificial intelligence (AI) startup Anthropic, which could further bolster its performance. Notably, Anthropic uses AWS as its primary cloud provider, and AWS customers gain access to Anthropic's advanced AI models. Anthropic is one of the biggest challengers to ChatGPT maker OpenAI, with its Claude models attracting increased adoption due to their powerful multimodal capabilities. At the same time, AWS faces strong competition from Microsoft's (MSFT) cloud computing platform, Azure, which is also accelerating its generative AI offerings. Nonetheless, Nowak noted that AWS is better positioned to compete as growing AI demand drives more business to cloud providers. Finally, Nowak mentioned that a survey of Chief Information Officers (CIOs) revealed a much bigger demand for AWS' services compared to its rival, which is expected to drive faster growth. Nowak believes that AWS is tactically expected to gain further share over Microsoft, Alphabet (GOOGL), and Oracle (ORCL). All these factors have led Morgan Stanley to rate Amazon as its 'Top Pick' in the sector. Interestingly, Nowak's 'bull case scenario' sets a price target of $350 for AMZN stock, which implies an impressive 57% upside potential from current levels. The top analyst also increased Amazon's earnings per share (EPS) estimates for fiscal years 2026 and 2027 by 9% and 6%, respectively, in line with his optimistic view. Is AMZN a Strong Buy? average Amazon price target of $247.43 implies 11.3% upside potential from current levels. Year-to-date, AMZN stock has gained 1.3%.

Musk's latest Grok chatbot searches for billionaire mogul's views before answering questions
Musk's latest Grok chatbot searches for billionaire mogul's views before answering questions

Los Angeles Times

time10 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Musk's latest Grok chatbot searches for billionaire mogul's views before answering questions

The latest version of Elon Musk's artificial intelligence chatbot Grok is echoing the views of its billionaire creator, so much so that it will sometimes search online for Musk's stance on an issue before offering up an opinion. The unusual behavior of Grok 4, the AI model that Musk's company xAI released late Wednesday, has surprised some experts. Built using huge amounts of computing power at a Tennessee data center, Grok is Musk's attempt to outdo rivals such as OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini in building an AI assistant that shows its reasoning before answering a question. Musk's deliberate efforts to mold Grok into a challenger of what he considers the tech industry's 'woke' orthodoxy on race, gender and politics has repeatedly got the chatbot into trouble, most recently when it spouted antisemitic tropes, praised Adolf Hitler and made other hateful commentary to users of Musk's X social media platform just days before Grok 4's launch. But its tendency to consult with Musk's opinions appears to be a different problem. 'It's extraordinary,' said Simon Willison, an independent AI researcher who's been testing the tool. 'You can ask it a sort of pointed question that is around controversial topics. And then you can watch it literally do a search on X for what Elon Musk said about this, as part of its research into how it should reply.' One example widely shared on social media — and which Willison duplicated — asked Grok to comment on the conflict in the Middle East. The prompted question made no mention of Musk, but the chatbot looked for his guidance anyway. As a so-called reasoning model, much like those made by rivals OpenAI or Anthropic, Grok 4 shows its 'thinking' as it goes through the steps of processing a question and coming up with an answer. Part of that thinking this week involved searching X, the former Twitter that's now merged into xAI, for anything Musk said about Israel, Palestine, Gaza or Hamas. 'Elon Musk's stance could provide context, given his influence,' the chatbot told Willison, according to a video of the interaction. 'Currently looking at his views to see if they guide the answer.' Musk and his xAI co-founders introduced the new chatbot in a livestreamed event Wednesday night but haven't published a technical explanation of its workings — known as a system card — that companies in the AI industry typically provide when introducing a new model. The company also didn't respond to an emailed request for comment Friday. 'In the past, strange behavior like this was due to system prompt changes,' which is when engineers program specific instructions to guide a chatbot's response, said Tim Kellogg, principal AI architect at software company Icertis. 'But this one seems baked into the core of Grok and it's not clear to me how that happens,' Kellogg said. 'It seems that Musk's effort to create a maximally truthful AI has somehow led to it believing its own values must align with Musk's own values.' The lack of transparency is troubling for computer scientist Talia Ringer, a professor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign who earlier in the week criticized the company's handling of the technology's antisemitic outbursts. Ringer said the most plausible explanation for Grok's search for Musk's guidance is assuming the person is asking for the opinions of xAI or Musk. 'I think people are expecting opinions out of a reasoning model that cannot respond with opinions,' Ringer said. 'So, for example, it interprets 'Who do you support, Israel or Palestine?' as 'Who does xAI leadership support?' Willison also said he finds Grok 4's capabilities impressive but said people buying software 'don't want surprises like it turning into 'mechaHitler' or deciding to search for what Musk thinks about issues.' 'Grok 4 looks like it's a very strong model. It's doing great in all of the benchmarks,' Willison said. 'But if I'm going to build software on top of it, I need transparency.' O'Brien writes for the Associated Press.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store