Israel strikes unfinished Arak heavy water reactor in Iran
The Israeli military said it targeted the Arak heavy water reactor's core seal to stop it being used for "nuclear weapons development".
The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed the reactor was hit and that it contained no nuclear material.
Spent fuel from heavy water reactors contains plutonium suitable for a nuclear bomb.
Iran - which says its nuclear programme is entirely peaceful - agreed under a 2015 deal with world powers to redesign and rebuild Arak so it could not produce weapons-grade plutonium.
Follow live updates as strikes continue
What caused the latest conflict, and where could it lead?
Video: How close is Iran to a nuclear weapon?
BBC Verify: The secretive nuclear site only a US bomb could hit
What are the risks of bombing Fordo?
The following year, the IAEA said Iran had removed Arak's calandria, or reactor core, and rendered it "inoperable".
The global nuclear watchdog's latest quarterly report from late May said minor civil construction work was ongoing at the reactor, and that Iran expected it to be commissioned this year and to start operating in 2026.
The Israeli military said Iran's government had "deliberately ordered [workers] not to complete the conversion... in order to exert pressure on the West".
"The strike targeted the component intended for plutonium production, in order to prevent the reactor from being restored and used for nuclear weapons development," it added.
Black-and-white aerial footage of the attack released by the military appeared to show a bomb hitting the domed roof of the reactor building and several large explosions from Arak, which about 250km (155 miles) south-west of Tehran and is also known as Khondab.
Daytime video broadcast by Iranian state TV showed two large plumes of white smoke rising from the facility. It also cited Iranian officials as saying that the site had been "secured in advance" and that there was "no contamination resulting from the attack".
Satellite imagery showed a large hole in the reactor building's roof.
Also visible were what analysts identified as destroyed distillation towers belonging to the adjacent heavy water production plant.
The IAEA initially reported that damage to the heavy water plant was not visible. But the agency later said it had assessed that key buildings at the facility were damaged, including the distillation unit.
The Israeli military also announced on Thursday that its fighter jets had struck a "nuclear weapons development site" at Natanz.
It is the location of Iran's main plant producing enriched uranium, which is used to make reactor fuel for power stations but, if further enriched, can be used in nuclear weapons.
The first wave of Israeli strikes last Friday destroyed the above-ground part of Natanz's Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant (PFEP), where cascades of centrifuges were enriching uranium, as well as electricity infrastructure at the site. The IAEA also found indications of direct impacts on the underground enrichment halls.
Rafael Grossi, the IAEA director general, told the BBC on Monday that the sudden loss of power at the underground enrichment halls was likely to have severely damaged, if not destroyed, the centrifuges operating there.
Four buildings were destroyed in a separate attack on Friday on the Isfahan Nuclear Technology Centre, he said. But very little, if any, damage was visible at Iran's underground enrichment plant at Fordo, he added.
President Donald Trump is said to be weighing up whether the US should participate in a strike on Fordo because it is the only country with a conventional bomb large enough to destroy it. Sources told the BBC's US partner CBS News that his mindset was that disabling the facility was necessary.
In 2018, Trump abandoned the nuclear deal with Iran, saying it did too little to stop its pathway to a bomb, and reinstated US sanctions that crippled the Iranian economy.
Iran retaliated by increasingly breaching the restrictions - particularly those relating to the production of enriched uranium.
In its quarterly report, the IAEA expressed concern that Iran had amassed enough uranium enriched up to 60% purity - a short, technical step away from weapons grade, or 90% - to potentially make nine nuclear bombs.
Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, said on Friday that it was targeting the Iranian nuclear programme because "if not stopped, Iran could produce a nuclear weapon in a very short time". He did not provide any evidence.
Abbas Araghchi, Iran's foreign minister, said on Sunday that Israel had "crossed a new red line in international law" by attacking nuclear sites. He also insisted that Iran's doctrine was "rooted in our belief in the prohibition and illegitimacy of nuclear weapons".
Israel is widely believed to have nuclear weapons, although it neither confirms nor denies this.
The Israeli air strikes have also destroyed Iranian military facilities and weapons, and killed senior military commanders and nuclear scientists.
Iran's health ministry said on Sunday that at least 224 people had been killed, but a human rights group put the unofficial death toll at 639 on Thursday.
Iran has launched hundreds of ballistic missiles at Israel in response to the air strikes that have killed at least 24 people, according to the prime minister's office.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News24
29 minutes ago
- News24
Gaza and Sudan drove record number of aid worker deaths in 2024 ‘with zero accountability'
The UN says a record 383 aid workers were killed in 2024. The deadliest zones included Gaza and Sudan. So far in 2025, 265 aid workers have been killed. A record 383 aid workers were killed in 2024, the United Nations said on Tuesday, branding the figures and lack of accountability a 'shameful indictment' of international apathy - and warned this year's toll was equally disturbing. The 2024 figure was up 31% on the year before, the UN said on World Humanitarian Day, 'driven by the relentless conflicts in Gaza, where 181 humanitarian workers were killed, and in Sudan, where 60 lost their lives'. It said state actors were the most common perpetrators of the killings in 2024. The UN said most of those killed were local staff, and were either attacked in the line of duty or in their homes. Besides those killed, 308 aid workers were wounded, 125 kidnapped and 45 detained last year. 'Even one attack against a humanitarian colleague is an attack on all of us and on the people we serve,' said UN aid chief Tom Fletcher. Attacks on this scale, with zero accountability, are a shameful indictment of international inaction and apathy. Tom Fletcher 'As the humanitarian community, we demand - again - that those with power and influence act for humanity, protect civilians and aid workers and hold perpetrators to account,' Fletcher said. Provisional figures from the Aid Worker Security Database show that 265 aid workers have been killed this year, as of 14 August. The UN reiterated that attacks on aid workers and operations violate international humanitarian law and damage the lifelines sustaining millions of people trapped in war and disaster zones. 'Violence against aid workers is not inevitable. It must end,' said Fletcher, the UN emergency relief coordinator and under-secretary-general for humanitarian affairs. Meanwhile the UN's World Health Organisation said it had verified more than 800 attacks on healthcare in 16 territories so far this year, with more than 1 110 health workers and patients killed and hundreds injured. 'Each attack inflicts lasting harm, deprives entire communities of life-saving care when they need it the most, endangers healthcare providers, and weakens already strained health systems,' the WHO said. World Humanitarian Day marks the day in 2003 when UN rights chief Sergio Vieira de Mello and 21 other humanitarians were killed in the bombing of the UN headquarters in Baghdad.


Los Angeles Times
33 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump's claim of fighting antisemitism at UCLA is a dangerous charade
Days after UCLA settled a lawsuit brought by three Jewish students and a Jewish professor alleging antisemitism, the Trump administration announced that it would suspend $584 million in federal research grants to the institution, alleging failure to 'promote a research environment free of antisemitism.' Pressing that case, the administration demanded $1 billion from UCLA as part of a settlement, far exceeding the $221 million that Columbia agreed to pay over similar claims. We do not know what the outcome of the negotiations between the government and UCLA will be. The options do not look promising. In all likelihood, a settlement would entail not only a huge financial price tag but also deep concessions in terms of the institutional autonomy and academic freedom. Alternatively, if a deal is not struck, those values could be upheld at the cost of devastating losses to vital medical research, public health, thousands of jobs and the overall economic well-being of the region. It is a true Faustian bargain, with strong traces of a Mafia-style shakedown. And all in the professed name of combating antisemitism and protecting Jews. This is subterfuge. What's actually happening is a shallow and disingenuous plot to destroy the university and the values of free inquiry and debate in the name of a dangerous, illiberal ideology that has been against higher education for years. What this destructive path will not do is make the campus safer for Jews — or anyone else, for that matter. Sadly, in recent years antisemitism has reared its head at UCLA, as at other universities in the United States. And according to evidence presented in a recent lawsuit, Jewish students have been targeted with deeply wounding slurs such as 'Hitler missed one' and 'go back to Poland,' prevented from accessing public spaces and subjected to harassment because of their perceived pro-Israel stances. This is completely unacceptable, and the university must do everything within its power, especially through continued training and education, to create an environment in which such language and behavior are recognized as unacceptable. At the same time, we recognize that Jewish students, faculty and staff are not the only ones who have felt at risk on campus. Palestinian, Arab and Muslim students — and their supporters, including Jewish supporters — also faced harassment, discrimination and physical violence. On April 30, 2024, off-campus counterprotesters descended on the Palestinian solidarity encampment — even though Jewish students publicly pleaded with outsiders to stay away. Fifteen people were injured and dozens arrested. A separate lawsuit, filed by encampment participants who say the university failed to protect them, is working its way through the courts. The situation in Gaza has grown much worse since April 2024 — including a massive death toll and starvation of residents that has been widely condemned. And Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has announced plans to occupy Gaza City that are opposed by the Israeli military itself. Will the Trump administration continue to brand activism calling for an end to this horrible conflict as antisemitic? No good will come to Jewish students — or Jews in general — by providing political or moral cover to the current Israeli government. Moreover, the insinuation that the Trump administration is acting on behalf of Jews threatens to awaken further the antisemitic trope of the manipulative Jew playing puppeteer, with the government as its marionette. UCLA is worth fighting for. And Jews, who have a long, proud history at the school and a huge stake in the well-being of universities, must be part of the fight to defend UCLA. And they have begun to join the fight: Jewish leaders and the Jewish Public Affairs Committee of California have publicly opposed the cuts. The old strategy of aligning with whoever holds state power to preserve Jewish interests — known as the royal or vertical alliance — is no longer practicable or justifiable. Rather, we must commit to horizontal alliances with other groups that share a sense of grave apprehension over the dismantling of one of the great institutions of higher learning in the United States. In the past, we may not always have found ourselves in sync with the tone and tactics of these groups. But at this critical moment in our nation's history, we must join together with allies old and new to rescue UCLA, the estimable American system of higher education and the best version of democracy that the U.S. represents. David N. Myers teaches Jewish history at UCLA and is a member of Jewish Partnership for Los Angeles. Aaron Greenberg and Kate Pynoos are founding board members of Jewish Partnership for Los Angeles.


Bloomberg
34 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Iran's Revolutionary Guard Defies US and Israel
Welcome to Balance of Power, bringing you the latest in global politics. If you haven't yet, sign up here. Its commanders have been assassinated, its air defenses destroyed and its ranks penetrated by Israeli intelligence.