Microsoft Windows to get rid of 'blue screen of death' and frowning face after 40 years
The changes to the notorious error screen come as part of broader efforts by Microsoft to improve the resiliency of the Windows operating system in the wake of last year's CrowdStrike incident, which crashed millions of Windows machines worldwide.
'Now it's easier than ever to navigate unexpected restarts and recover faster,' Redmond, Washington-based Microsoft wrote in a Wednesday announcement.
As part of that effort, Microsoft says it's 'streamlining' what users experience when encountering 'unexpected restarts' that cause disruptions. And that means a makeover to the infamous error screen.
Related
The 50-year-old code that reshaped the world: Bill Gates on the 'revolution' that started Microsoft
Beyond the now-black background, Windows' new 'screen of death' has a slightly shorter message. It's also no longer accompanied by a frowning face — and instead shows a percentage completed for the restart process.
Microsoft says this 'simplified' user interface for unexpected restarts will be available later this summer on all of its Windows 11 (version 24H2) devices.
And for PCs that may not restart successfully, Microsoft on Wednesday also said it's adding a 'quick machine recovery' mechanism. They will be particularly useful for during a widespread outage, the tech giant noted, as Microsoft 'can broadly deploy targeted remediations' and automate fixes with this new mechanism 'without requiring complex manual intervention from IT".
Microsoft said this quick machine recovery will also be 'generally available' later this summer on Windows 11 — with additional capabilities set to launch later in the year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Red Flag Can Prevent You From Getting Hired
CEOs, hiring managers, and recruiters look for a few key components when deciding who to hire. Each person has a different set of criteria, but avoiding red flags will give you a greater chance of landing a job. While some executives are tight-lipped about their hiring processes, Joan Nguyen, the co-founder and CEO of childcare service provider Bumo, recently shared one of her red flags that won't get you hired. Nguyen's red flag isn't just about the hiring process. People who possess this negative trait can put themselves at a disadvantage in their careers and personal lives. Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — Bill Gates Warned About Water Scarcity. Critical And Negative Mindsets Lose Out The way you talk about past employers plays a role in Nguyen's hiring decisions. She explained that anyone who gives critical information or says negative things about their previous employer is a red flag. The only exception is if a hiring manager specifically asked a question that led in that direction, but Nguyen says her team doesn't do that in conversations. No workplace is perfect, but Nguyen believes it shows a "lack of dignity and grace' if you say bad things about your former employer. It can indicate a negative mindset, and any negative or overly critical employees can poison a vibrant workplace. Nguyen has to be extra careful since Bumo only has 12 full-time employees. A single bad employee will have a bigger impact on that team than a corporation that has hundreds of employees. Trending: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can Don't Burn Bridges Expanding your network can introduce you to new job opportunities and accelerate your career growth. However, if you burn bridges along the way, you risk losing out on progress and key partnerships. Some people may hire you because you worked at your former employer. It's possible that the recruiter or one of their friends previously worked at your former employer's company. You don't do yourself any favors by harping about a former employer. This one red flag can negate all of the green flags you exhibit during the interview process. Most people don't want to hear someone complain about their former employer or say negative things about them. It's best to leave those things in the past and focus on how you can make a positive impact in your current Mindset Affects Your Future Job candidates who say negative things about their former employers also offer a glimpse into their thoughts. If a potential hire speaks in a critical way and voices negative thoughts during the hiring process, it will likely get worse once the employee gets hired. The employee will feel more comfortable sharing negative thoughts and sharp remarks if they get through the hiring process. A negative mindset can result in people getting fired sooner since co-workers won't enjoy their company. This mentality can also reduce an employee's work performance and make it more difficult for them to tackle new challenges. Bosses have to be careful about who they hire. Each new hire will impact the workplace's culture, and hiring one person requires saying no to other applicants who could have been better for the role. The red flags that can result in your application getting rejected also offer perspective on best practices and things to avoid as you live out your life. Read Next: These five entrepreneurs are worth $223 billion –CEOs, hiring managers, and recruiters look for a few key components when deciding who to hire. Each person has a different set of criteria, but avoiding red flags will give you a greater chance of landing a job. While some executives are tight-lipped about their hiring processes, Joan Nguyen, the co-founder and CEO of childcare service provider Bumo, recently shared one of her red flags that won't get you hired. Nguyen's red flag isn't just about the hiring process. People who possess this negative trait can put themselves at a disadvantage in their careers and personal lives. Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — Bill Gates Warned About Water Scarcity. Critical And Negative Mindsets Lose Out The way you talk about past employers plays a role in Nguyen's hiring decisions. She explained that anyone who gives critical information or says negative things about their previous employer is a red flag. The only exception is if a hiring manager specifically asked a question that led in that direction, but Nguyen says her team doesn't do that in conversations. No workplace is perfect, but Nguyen believes it shows a "lack of dignity and grace' if you say bad things about your former employer. It can indicate a negative mindset, and any negative or overly critical employees can poison a vibrant workplace. Nguyen has to be extra careful since Bumo only has 12 full-time employees. A single bad employee will have a bigger impact on that team than a corporation that has hundreds of employees. Trending: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can Don't Burn Bridges Expanding your network can introduce you to new job opportunities and accelerate your career growth. However, if you burn bridges along the way, you risk losing out on progress and key partnerships. Some people may hire you because you worked at your former employer. It's possible that the recruiter or one of their friends previously worked at your former employer's company. You don't do yourself any favors by harping about a former employer. This one red flag can negate all of the green flags you exhibit during the interview process. Most people don't want to hear someone complain about their former employer or say negative things about them. It's best to leave those things in the past and focus on how you can make a positive impact in your current Mindset Affects Your Future Job candidates who say negative things about their former employers also offer a glimpse into their thoughts. If a potential hire speaks in a critical way and voices negative thoughts during the hiring process, it will likely get worse once the employee gets hired. The employee will feel more comfortable sharing negative thoughts and sharp remarks if they get through the hiring process. A negative mindset can result in people getting fired sooner since co-workers won't enjoy their company. This mentality can also reduce an employee's work performance and make it more difficult for them to tackle new challenges. Bosses have to be careful about who they hire. Each new hire will impact the workplace's culture, and hiring one person requires saying no to other applicants who could have been better for the role. The red flags that can result in your application getting rejected also offer perspective on best practices and things to avoid as you live out your life. Read Next: These five entrepreneurs are worth $223 billion – Image: Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article This Red Flag Can Prevent You From Getting Hired originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meta's reported shake-up, Hims & Hers sinks on GoodRx–Novo deal
Meta (META) stock is dipping on reports that the company is restructuring its artificial intelligence (AI) unit for the fourth time in six months, according to The Information. Hims & Hers (HIMS) stock sinks following Novo Nordisk's (NVO) new partnership with GoodRx (GDRX), replacing a scrapped Hims deal back in June. Stay up to date on the latest market action, minute-by-minute, with Yahoo Finance's Market Minute. It's time for Yahoo! Finance's Market Minute. Stocks little changed ahead of a busy week on Wall Street. Investors are awaiting news from President Trump's meeting with Ukraine's President Zelensky, retail earnings, and the Fed's Jackson Hole Symposium. Meta shares are edging lower by over 2%, underperforming the other Magnificent Seven. The company is planning its fourth restructuring of its AI unit in six months. That's according to a report from The Information. This comes as Meta faces backlash over policies that reportedly allow its AI chatbots to have inappropriate conversations with children. Meanwhile, Hims & Hers shares slumping after Novo Nordisk announced a partnership with GoodRx. Remember, Novo scrapped its deal with Hims in June over what it said were deceptive marketing of compounded versions of Novo Nordisk's weight loss drugs. GoodRx CEO telling Yahoo! Finance today that they have no interest in compounded drugs. And that's your Yahoo! Finance Market Minute. Scan the QR code below to track the best and worst performing stocks of the session.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Maryland's first-in-the-nation tax on digital ads violated Big Tech's free speech, judges say
ANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) — Maryland's first-in-the-nation tax on digital advertising violated the Constitution, a federal appeals court says, because blocking Big Tech from telling customers about the tax violates the companies' right to free speech. Supporters say Maryland needed to overhaul its tax methods in response to significant changes in how businesses advertise. The tax focuses on large companies that make money advertising on the internet such as Meta, Google and Amazon, who say they're being unfairly targeted. The ongoing legal fight is being watched by other states that are considering taxes for online ads. Maryland estimated the tax could raise about $250 million a year to help pay for a sweeping K-12 education measure. Maryland's law says the companies must not only pay the tax, but avoid telling customers how it affects pricing, with no line items, surcharges or fees, said the appeals court Friday in siding with trade associations fighting the tax. Judge Julius Richardson cited the Colonial-era Stamp Act, which helped spark the Revolutionary War, and wrote that 'criticizing the government — for taxes or anything else — is important discourse in a democratic society.' The plaintiffs contended Maryland lawmakers were trying to insulate themselves from criticism and political accountability by forbidding companies from explaining the tax to their customers. 'A state cannot duck criticism by silencing those affected by its tax,' the judge wrote. The unanimous ruling by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reverses a decision by U.S. District Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby and sends the case back to her with instructions to consider an appropriate remedy in light of the panel's decision. Trade groups praised the decision. 'Maryland tried to prevent criticism of its tax scheme, and the Fourth Circuit recognized that tactic for what it was: censorship,' said Paul Taske, co-director of the NetChoice Litigation Center, said in a statement. The law imposes a tax based on global annual gross revenues for companies that make more than $100 million globally. Under the law, the tax rate is 2.5% for businesses making more than $100 million in global gross annual revenue; 5% for companies making $1 billion or more; 7.5% for companies making $5 billion or more and 10% for companies making $15 billion or more. The law has been challenged in multiple legal venues, including Maryland Tax Court, where the case is ongoing. The Maryland General Assembly, which is controlled by Democrats, overrode a veto of the legislation in 2021 by then-Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican. Brian Witte, The Associated Press
