Health Of The Hauraki Gulf Declines As Delay To Marine Protection Approaches One-year Mark
The Hauraki Gulf Forum is calling on the Government to progress the Hauraki Gulf / Tīkapa Moana Marine Protection Bill without further delay.
'It has been more than six months since the second reading of the Bill was interrupted, with no indication that it will be progressed any time soon.' says Nicola Rata-MacDonald, Co-Chair of the Forum.
'If the Bill is not passed next week, it will have been over a year since the Environment Select Committee unanimously recommended that the Bill be passed by the time Parliament reconvenes at the end of June.'
'Once passed, the new marine protections will enable us to make the most significant progress towards restoring the Gulf since the marine park was established over 25 years ago.'
Cr Warren Maher, Co-Chair of the Forum, says the constant stalling and postponement of legislative progress is impacting years of restoration efforts by communities across the Gulf.
'Constantly kicking the can down the road when we are so close to making real progress is a kick in the guts for everyone who has worked to ensure the Gulf is protected and restored.' Warren says.
'Our message to the Government is simple: pass the Bill, and let us get on with restoring the Gulf to ensure it thrives for generations to come.'
More information on the Forum and the Marine Park is available at www.gulfjournal.org.nz
Timeline: Progress of the Hauraki Gulf / Tīkapa Moana Marine Protection Bill
22 August 2023: Bill introduced to Parliament.
29 August 2023: First reading and referral to the Environment Select Committee.
1 November 2023: Submissions closed.
6 December 2023: Bill reinstated with the Environment Select Committee following the 2023 General Election, and the Business Committee agrees that all bills before select committees shall be reported to the House by 29 March 2024.
31 January 2024: the date by which the Environment Committee must report the Bill back to the House is extended from 29 March 2024 to 29 May 2024.
March 2024: Environment Select Committee completes hearing of oral submissions on the Bill.
10 April 2024: the date by which the Environment Committee must report the Bill back to the House is extended from 29 May 2024 to 20 June 2024.
20 June 2024: Environment Committee reports the Bill to the House, with unanimous support for the Bill to be passed as reported.
13 October 2024: Minister of Conservation announces changes will be made to the Bill to allow commercial ring-net fishing within protected areas.
14 November 2024: Second reading (interrupted).
30 May 2025 (today): The Bill remains at its interrupted second reading stage, and the Government's intended changes are still to be published despite being announced 230 days ago.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
8 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Te Pāti Māori stand down confirmed
Parliament has confirmed the unprecedented punishments proposed for Te Pāti Māori MPs who performed a haka in protest against the Treaty Principles Bill. Te Pāti Māori co-leaders Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi will be suspended for 21 days, and MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke suspended for seven days, taking effect immediately. Opposition parties tried to reject the recommendation, but did not have the numbers to vote it down. The heated debate to consider the proposed punishment came to an end just before Parliament was due to rise. Waititi moved to close the debate and no party disagreed, ending the possibility of it carrying on in the next sitting week. Leader of the House Chris Bishop - the only National MP who spoke - kicked off the debate earlier in the afternoon saying it was "regrettable" some MPs did not vote on the Budget two weeks ago. Bishop had called a vote ahead of Budget Day to suspend the privileges report debate to ensure the Te Pāti Māori MPs could take part in the Budget, but not all of them turned up. The debate was robust and rowdy with both the deputy speaker Barbara Kuriger and temporary speaker Tangi Utikare repeatedly having to ask MPs to quieten down. Tākuta Ferris spoke first for Te Pāti Māori saying the haka was a "signal of humanity" and a "raw human connection". He said Māori had faced acts of violence for too long and would not be silenced by "ignorance or bigotry". "Is this really us in 2025, Aotearoa New Zealand?" he asked the House. "Everyone can see the racism." He said the Privileges Committee's recommendations were not without precedent, noting the fact Labour MP Peeni Henare, who also participated in the haka, didn't face suspension. Henare attended the committee and apologised, which contributed to his lesser sanction. MP Parmjeet Parmar - a member of the Committee - was first to speak on behalf of ACT, and referenced the hand gesture - or "finger gun" - that Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer made in the direction of ACT MPs during the haka. Parmar told the House debate could be used to disagree on ideas and issues, and there wasn't a place for intimidating physical gestures. Greens co-leader Marama Davidson said New Zealand's Parliament could lead the world in terms of involving the indigenous people. She said the Green Party strongly rejected the committee's recommendations and proposed their amendment of removing suspensions, and asked the Te Pāti Māori MPs be censured instead. Davidson said The House had evolved in the past - such as the inclusion of sign language and breast-feeding in The House. She said the Greens were challenging the rules, and did not need an apology from Te Pāti Māori. NZ First leader Winston Peters said Te Pāti Māori and the Green Party speeches so far showed "no sincerity, saying countless haka had taken place in Parliament but only after first consulting the Speaker. "They told the media they were going to do it, but they didn't tell the Speaker did they? "The Māori party are a bunch of extremists," Peters said, "New Zealand has had enough of them". Peters was made to apologise after taking aim at Waititi, calling him "the one in the cowboy hat" with "scribbles on his face". He continued afterward, describing Waititi as possessing "anti western values". Labour's Willie Jackson congratulated Te Pāti Māori for the "greatest exhibition of our culture in The House in my lifetime". Jackson said the Treaty bill was a great threat, and was met by a great haka performance. He was glad the ACT Party was intimidated, saying that was the whole point of doing the haka. He also called for a bit of compromise from Te Pāti Māori - encouraging them to say sorry - but reiterated Labour's view the sanctions were out of proportion with past indiscretions in the House. Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick said the debate "would be a joke if it wasn't so serious". "Get an absolute grip", she said to the House, arguing the prime minister "is personally responsible" if The House proceeds with the committee's proposed sanctions. She accused National's James Meager of "pointing a finger gun" at her - the same gesture coalition MPs had criticised Ngarewa-Packer for during her haka - the Speaker accepted he had not intended to, Swarbrick said it was an example where the interpretation can be in the eye of the beholder. She said if the government could "pick a punishment out of thin air" that was "not a democracy", putting New Zealand in very dangerous territory. An emotional Maipi-Clarke said she had been silent on the issue for a long time, the party's voices in haka having sent shockwaves around the world. She questioned whether that was why the MPs were being punished. "Since when did being proud of your culture make you racist?" "We will never be silenced, and we will never be lost," she said, calling the Treaty Principles bill was a "dishonourable vote". She had apologised to the Speaker and accepted the consequence laid down on the day, but refused to apologise. She listed other incidents in Parliament that resulted in no punishment. Maipi-Clarke called for the Treaty of Waitangi to be recognised in the Constitution Act, and for MPs to be required to honour it by law. "The pathway forward has never been so clear," she said. ACT's Nicole McKee said there were excuses being made for "bad behaviour", that The House was for making laws and having discussions, and "this is not about the haka, this is about process". She told The House she had heard no good ideas from the Te Pāti Māori, who she said resorted to intimidation when they did not get their way, but the MPs needed to "grow up" and learn to debate issues. She hoped 21 days would give them plenty of time to think about their behaviour. Labour MP and former Speaker Adrian Rurawhe started by saying there are "no winners in this debate", and it was clear to him it was the government, not the Parliament, handing out the punishments. He said the proposed sanctions set a precedent for future penalties, and governments may use it as a way to punish opposition, imploring National to think twice. He also said an apology from Te Pāti Māori would "go a long way", saying they had a "huge opportunity" to have a legacy in The House, but it was their choice - and while many would agree with the party there were rules and "you can't have it both ways". Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi said there had been many instances of misinterpretations of the haka in The House and said it was unclear why they were being punished, "is it about the haka... is about the gun gestures?" "Not one committee member has explained to us where 21 days came from," he said. Waititi took aim at Peters over his comments targeting his hat and "scribbles" on his face. He said the haka was an elevation of indigenous voice and the proposed punishment was a "warning shot from the colonial state that cannot stomach" defiance. Waititi said that throughout history when Māori did not play ball, the "coloniser government" reached for extreme sanctions, ending with a plea to voters: "make this a one-term government, enrol, vote". He brought out a noose to represent Māori wrongfully put to death in the past, saying "interpretation is a feeling, it is not a fact ... you've traded a noose for legislation".
NZ Herald
10 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Parliament votes for harshest-ever sanctions for Te Pāti Māori co-leaders
Parliament has voted to dish out the toughest Parliamentary sanctions ever to the Te Pāti Māori co-leaders after a fiery debate in the house today. The debate relaunched this afternoon after it was abruptly adjourned last month to give way to the Budget. Parliament's Privileges Committee recommended suspending Te Pāti Māori co-leaders Rawiri Waititi and Debbie Ngarewa-Packer for 21 days and MP Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke for seven days after a controversial haka in the House last year. Previously, the longest suspension in Parliament's 171-year history was three sitting days. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW LIVE BLOG ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW The committee's recommendations were put to the House for debate where they passed - but only after acrimonious scenes. Winston Peters called Te Pāti Māori is a 'bunch of extremists' and said the Māori world 'has had enough of them'. Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi held up a noose in Parliament, saying those in power had 'traded the noose for legislation'. Labour and the Greens MPs pushed fiercely for a weaker punishment. Green Party MP Marama Davidson said she believes the committee's recommendations were partisan and the House should guard against this. She said the Treaty Principles Bill was designed to provoke and threatened generations of 'fundamental relationships' between Māori and non-Māori. 'It was political violence,' she said, adding the haka was the least it deserved. Labour's Dr Duncan Webb said the Privileges Committee is usually bipartisan, but it is 'unfortunate' this isn't the case with these recommendations. He acknowledged there was a contempt of the House, but warned the sanctions proposed were 'inconsistent' with the principles of democracy. Act MP Parmjeet Parmar, a member of the Privileges Committee, spoke about the MPs approaching Act's seats and highlighted a hand gesture that Debbie Ngarewa-Packer made which Act compared to a gun. She said MPs can disagree on ideas through debate, rather than intimidating physical gestures. She said the House has debated controversial legislation before without that kind of behaviour. The vote on the sanction for Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke passed with 68 in favour and 55 opposed, meaning she has been suspended for seven days. On the question of Debbie Ngarewa-Packer being suspended for 21 days, this passed with 68 in favour and 54 votes opposed. The one fewer vote opposed reflects that Maipi-Clarke has been suspended and therefore cannot vote. On the question of Waititi being suspended for 21 days, this passed with 68 in favour, 53 votes opposed. The haka at the centre of the matter happened during the first reading of the controversial Treaty Principles Bill, which was eventually voted down at second reading. The haka has since gone viral globally, amassing hundreds of millions of views on social media. Maipi-Clarke, Parliament's youngest MP, brought Parliament to a standstill when she began the haka while ripping up a copy of the Treaty Principles Bill, a proposal from Act leader David Seymour to replace the many Treaty principles developed over time by experts and the court with three new ones. Many perceived the bill as a threat to Māori and detrimental to Te Tiriti o Waitangi. It was a catalyst of the massive hīkoi protest to Parliament in November last year. Waititi and Ngarewa-Packer stood up and joined Maipi-Clarke in the haka, moving from their seats towards the Act party benches. Labour's Peeni Henare also moved away from his seat to perform. Henare later apologised to the Judith Collins-led Privileges Committee for knowingly breaking the rules by stepping away from his seat, but said he stood by his haka and would do it again. The trio from Te Pāti Māori were referred to the Privileges Committee but ignored the initial summons to appear in person, arguing they had been denied legal representation and the ability to appear together. At the time, they promised to hold a separate 'independent' hearing. Te Pāti Māori have been defiant in their defence of the haka. Waititi told reporters on Wednesday afternoon it was not clear exactly what the trio were being punished for. 'Some of the House found it intimidating, some of the House found it exhilarating because half of House stood up. We don't know what the reasons are for the 21 days sanctions.' Waititi spoke with The Hui soon after the committee's unprecedented recommendations were released. He said he was thinking about the people who had entrusted him to 'represent them the best way I know'. 'And that is to be unapologetic, that is to be authentic and honest and respectful of who we are. We should be able to do that without fear or favour and be able to do that without being ashamed of being Māori,' Waititi told The Hui host Julian Wilcox. 'What I feel is that we are being punished for being Māori. The country loves my haka, the world loves my haka, but it feels like they don't love me.'
The Spinoff
17 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Echo Chamber: Emergency housing, climate targets and the art of not saying sorry
'I was wrong' isn't always as easy as saying 'what I would just say to you …' Echo Chamber is The Spinoff's dispatch from the press gallery, recapping sessions in the House. Columns are written by politics reporter Lyric Waiwiri-Smith and Wellington editor Joel MacManus. Question time in the House on Wednesday was another bog-standard affair. Straight into it, probing from Labour leader Chris Hipkins to prime minister Christopher Luxon over emergency housing had MPs across the benches going rogue, like how one might act after consuming too many drinks at an awards ceremony. The issue has been a question time hot topic all year, after the government 'tighten[ed] the gateway into emergency housing' last August, making eligibility criteria stricter. Since then, the number of families in emergency housing has dropped by 75%, five years earlier than anticipated, but 20% of those who have left emergency housing remain unaccounted for – while homelessness is at an all-time high. When he's been questioned on where those one in five might be in recent months, Luxon typically starts with the same line: 'I would just say to that member …' What he'd say is that actually, 'on all four dimensions of housing', there have been 'improved outcomes'. What he'd say is that when he thinks of the 'abject failure' of the previous government, he feels 'incredibly proud' of his record. What he'd say is, kids are out of motels, rates and housing prices look stable, 'and interest rates are coming down'. But voices from the opposition side already had their own narrative: 'they're on the street!', 'they're homeless!', 'people are leaving [the country]!' National MP Tom Rutherford had a retort for them: 'Cheer up!' And, like clockwork, the barracking became enough for speaker Gerry Brownlee to threaten to throw everybody out, as he does in most question time sessions. It was NZ First minister Shane Jones who was the voice of reason. 'Sir,' he told the speaker, 'from this hitherto unknown perch we can't hear a thing the prime minister is saying. You really need to enforce your ruling to have some order and a better sense of decorum from that side of the House.' It wasn't just teething issues with the new seating chart put in place after the deputy prime minister switcheroo – the heckling truly was louder than the prime minister. Later, Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi asked Luxon about comments made by new deputy prime minister David Seymour alleging 99.5% of submissions on a discussion document on the Regulatory Standards Bill were 'fake' and 'driven by bots'. Luxon said the DPM had 'clarified his comments'. Then, amazingly, Waititi was finally the first person in the House to mention minister Chris Bishop's music awards gaffe last week, asking Luxon why he had said he was 'comfortable' with it. The three ministers to Bishop's right – Erica Stanford, Paul Goldsmith and Louise Upston – all turned and grinned at him. 'As I've said publicly, I quite like country music, but a lot of people give me grief for that too and use similar language that Chris Bishop used,' Luxon said, to expected groans from the opposition. 'Can you give us an example?' Waititi asked. 'Sing us a song?' Earlier in the session, after fielding questions on pay equity from Labour's finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds and pledging her appreciation to the care workers of the nation, finance minister Nicola Willis made a misquote that clearly haunted her. Asked about 'stripping' the $12.8bn contingency for pay equity claims, Willis said Edmonds should talk to her leader, who apparently had said the figure was an 'awfully big number that he doesn't understand'. So, after patsy time between National's Vanessa Weenink and Stanford, with her phone open on the relevant NZ Herald article, Willis now understood her paraphrasing was wrong. Now, 'out of an abundance of caution and wishing not to have misled the House', she wished to repeat the correct quote, but Brownlee wanted to know why she couldn't just say sorry, and get over it. 'If you said something that's wrong, apologise for saying it's wrong and move on,' Brownlee told her, but she persisted. And after more back and forth, Willis repeated Hipkins' direct quote: 'What National should do is release to the New Zealand public how they arrived at that figure because it is a very big number.' And all Brownlee had to say in response was 'well, that's good'. Elton John said it best: sorry seems to be the hardest word. When Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick had her turn to question the prime minister, she focused on an open letter penned by 26 climate scientists, urging our government not to adopt a 'no additional warming' method of measuring methane emissions, which they say would put Aotearoa's Paris Agreement targets at risk. Luxon was indifferent: 'I'd just say to the people who kindly wrote the letter that they should write it to 194 other countries before they send me a letter, and then I might read it.' Then something about farmers. It was clearly exasperating for Swarbrick, who had spent the whole session hearing her new neighbours from across the way, NZ First, call her a Marxist and communist. We could debate how good our farmers are till we're blue in the face – like, quite literally blue – she told Luxon, but what about our climate targets? The cheers from the government benches, and jeers from NZ First, seemed to throw the co-leader off. Once Luxon confirmed that no, he would not be 'heeding' the call of these scientists, she tried to get him to commit to something else, but ran into a grumpy old obstacle. 'Spit it out!' Winston Peters taunted, before Swarbrick gestured the speaker's attention towards Peters and Jones, leaned together in their seats and giggling like two schoolboys who had just been called out by the class tattletale. 'Hoax! Hoax!' Jones mocked her. 'We are back on track,' Luxon grinned over his methane targets. Maybe there's more than one person in this House who could learn when to admit that they're wrong.
