Woman, 77, loses $44k in cash and jewellery to con artists claiming she was cursed
One of the accused, 56-year-old Li Yu Lian (transliterated), pleaded guilty on July 18 to one count of cheating. The incident happened in November 2019.
According to Shin Min Daily News, the victim was walking near Block 815 Jellicoe Road on the morning of Nov 16, 2019, when she was approached by a woman, Liang Gui Lian (transliterated), who asked if she knew of a 90-year-old doctor living nearby.
Liang was reportedly an accomplice of the accused.
When the woman said she didn't, Li joined the conversation, claiming to know the doctor personally.
Li then claimed the elderly woman had three sons and a daughter - a detail the group had learned in advance.
Having gained the woman's trust, she told her that she was cursed and needed the doctor's help to lift it.
But treatment, she said, required a large sum of money, and the doctor only treated patients in even numbers. She then used this as a reason to accompany the victim.
The victim returned home to collect $8,000 in cash, gold jewellery and her bank book, then withdrew another $36,000 from a bank near Boon Keng MRT station with Li by her side.
The pair returned to Jellicoe Road, where they met Liang and a third accomplice, Zhu Mian Fang (transliterated), who posed as the doctor's granddaughter.
Zhu told the victim she too had been cured of a similar curse.
She instructed the victim to place all her cash and jewelry into a brown reusable bag for the ritual. She was then handed an identical bag and told not to open it until midnight - and to keep the ritual secret.
When the victim returned home and shared the story with her children, her daughter opened the bag - only to find plastic bags and drinks inside.
Gone were the real contents: $44,000 in cash, three gold bracelets, two gold rings, two pairs of earrings, a Rolex watch, and a bracelet worth $350.
Court proceedings against the accomplices are ongoing.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
‘Modest sum' of $4,500 confiscated from foreigner over undeclared cash brought into Singapore
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Under Singapore's anti-money laundering laws, travellers must declare if they are carrying more than $20,000 when entering or leaving the country. SINGAPORE – A 47-year-old foreigner who brought more than $49,000 into Singapore without declaring the cash has had $4,500 confiscated by the state, in addition to being fined $3,000 for the offence. The money in various currencies was found in the sling bag and luggage of Ding Rongwei, a St Kitts and Nevis national, in Changi Airport after he arrived in Singapore from Cambodia in July 2024. Under Singapore's anti-money laundering laws, travellers must declare if they are carrying more than $20,000 when entering or leaving the country. In the current case, while there was insufficient evidence to prove that the cash was illegally obtained, a district judge concluded that it was 'just and appropriate' to forfeit part of the seized money as an additional deterrent and punishment. In a written judgment published on July 26, District Judge Vince Gui said a 'modest sum' of $4,500 would be commensurate with the culpability and harm arising from this offence. The confiscated sum represented about 15 per cent of $29,486.29 – the amount exceeding $20,000 – that was liable to be confiscated. The judge said: 'The accused failed to satisfactorily disclose the source and intended purpose of the undeclared cash, thereby undermining the authorities' efforts to investigate their legitimacy. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia Thailand, Cambodia agree to 'immediate and unconditional ceasefire' to de-escalate border row Singapore Tanjong Katong sinkhole backfilled; road to be repaved after LTA tests Singapore Ong Beng Seng set to plead guilty on Aug 4 in case linked to ex-transport minister Iswaran Asia Gunman kills 5 security guards near Bangkok's Chatuchak market before taking own life Singapore COE quota up 2.6% to 18,701 for August to October Business Resilient economy versus uncertain outlook splits views on Singapore's monetary policy Singapore HPB looking for vaping, smoking counselling services for up to 175 secondary school students Singapore Jail for former pre-school teacher who tripped toddler repeatedly, causing child to bleed from nose 'The sums moved were not extraordinary but also not insignificant.' The remaining cash will be returned to Ding. He was stopped at Changi Airport on July 21, 2024, by an officer from the Immigration and Checkpoint Authority. After Ding said he had nothing to declare, the officer checked his bag and discovered an assortment of currencies. Ding initially denied that he was carrying more cash, but eventually admitted that there was money in his luggage. The money was in nine different currencies, including US dollars, Hong Kong dollars, Singapore dollars, Philippine pesos and Chinese yuan. During investigations, he claimed that he did not know he was required to report movement of sums above $20,000 into and out of Singapore. He admitted to moving money into and out of Singapore on two previous occasions. On June 3, 2024, he moved $32,360.35 into Singapore, and on July 4, 2024, he moved $49,645 out of Singapore. Ding pleaded guilty to a charge of failing to report the movement of cash. The maximum sentence is a fine of up to $50,000 and a jail term of up to three years. Two similar charges over each of the previous occasions were taken into consideration during sentencing. According to Ding, he travelled frequently as a car salesman with a Singapore company, helping high-net-worth Chinese nationals purchase vehicles from his company. He said the cash he was carrying came from his family-run provision shop business in the Philippines, supplemented with $15,000 he had borrowed from his employer for his travels. Deputy Public Prosecutor Louis Ngia sought a fine of $3,000, and also asked the court to confiscate a sum of $4,500. He argued that disclosure helps law enforcement agencies detect and combat money laundering, and it was therefore not only cases where there is 'actual money laundering' that are of concern. The prosecutor said it was unbelievable that Ding, a frequent traveller, did not know of the reporting requirement. He also pointed out Ding's shifting claims as to the source of the cash in US dollars and Hong Kong dollars. Ding first said these were profits from the previous year, but subsequently claimed that they were a loan to be deducted from the next year's profit. Ding's lawyer, Mr Ravindran Ramasamy, asked for a fine of $2,500. He objected to a confiscation order, arguing that the monies were not linked to criminal conduct. The lawyer said Ding did not have a credit card and habitually carried large amounts of cash. He warned against the risk of injustice in imposing confiscation orders not based on proven wrongdoing but on a perceived likelihood. In his judgment, Judge Gui said it was open to the court to make a confiscation order even when the prosecution had not proven that the cash is linked to criminal conduct. In the current case, he agreed that a fine was appropriate as the prosecution did not have sufficient evidence to prove that the undeclared cash was 'tainted' by illegality. But the judge also noted that the prosecution did not concede that the funds came from legitimate sources. He noted that the difficulty in establishing the legitimacy of the funds stemmed primarily from Ding's failure to provide credible explanations regarding the source and purpose of the undeclared cash. The judge said Ding failed to give further information about the supposed family business in the Philippines, and noted that the sum in Philippine pesos was just a fraction of the cash seized. Ding also did not give the name of the supposed employer who allegedly lent him $15,000. 'His explanations raised more questions than provided answers,' said the judge.
New Paper
2 hours ago
- New Paper
'Come lah!': Taxi driver allegedly refuses passenger ride from zoo to Bukit Panjang, gets into heated exchange
A Transcab taxi driver allegedly refused to ferry a passenger from Mandai Zoo to Bukit Panjang last week, leading to a dispute that was caught on camera. An altercation between the driver and another man ensued, which was filmed and later circulated online. The one-minute and 34-second video of the incident, which took place on July 24, was uploaded to the SGRV Facebook page, according to Shin Min Daily News. In the video, the person filming claims that the driver had refused to pick up a passenger, despite being the first taxi in the queue. Shin Min reported that the individual behind the camera was not the passenger involved, but a bystander who witnessed the incident and decided to confront the driver. He can also be heard telling passers-by not to take the driver's cab: "Never mind, you can all go over there and take a Grab." According to him, the driver had declined the trip to Bukit Panjang as he felt the distance was too short. 'Come lah!' The footage shows the driver initially walking away in an attempt to avoid the confrontation. However, tensions escalate when the cameraman continues shouting, asking him to return. The driver then turns around and approaches the man, leading to a heated verbal exchange. They are heard yelling "come lah!" at each other, as the dispute intensifies. The recording shows that the taxi is empty and displaying an "available" sign. There are also four other taxis seen waiting in line behind it. The video has quickly gained traction online, drawing over 130 comments and sparking a heated debate among netizens. While many slammed the taxi driver for allegedly cherry-picking passengers, others felt that the situation could have been handled more calmly. Some suggested the bystander should have simply filed a report to the Land Transport Authority (LTA) instead of confronting the driver publicly. According to LTA regulations, it is an offense for taxi drivers to refuse to pick up and ferry passengers without a valid reason. Drivers found guilty of such conduct may face a $300 fine, six demerit points, and a possible two-week suspension of the vocational license.
AsiaOne
2 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Shaolin Temple's 'CEO monk' probed for embezzlement, relations with women, China News
BEIJING — The abbot of China's famed 1,500-year-old Shaolin Temple is under criminal investigation for alleged embezzlement, "improper relationships" with women and fathering illegitimate children, religious authorities said. Shi Yongxin, 59, previously a member of China's parliament, is "suspected of criminal offences, misappropriating and embezzling project funds and the temple's assets," the temple said in a statement, adding Shi is under joint investigation by multiple agencies. Shi could not immediately be reached for comment. The temple did not answer a call from Reuters. Nicknamed the "CEO monk" and known for his commercial ambitions, Shi sought to capitalise on the monastery's fame during his decades-long tenure at Shaolin Temple, the fabled birthplace of kung fu and the setting for many martial arts films in the central Chinese province of Henan. Shi has "seriously violated Buddhist precepts, maintained improper relationships with multiple women over a long period of time" and fathered at least one "illegitimate" child, the temple said in its statement released on its social media account on Sunday. In a statement issued on Monday, the state-supervised Buddhist Association of China said it approved the revoking of Shi's ordination certificate, adding that his "behaviours are extremely deplorable in nature, have seriously damaged the reputation of the Buddhist community and tarnished the image of monks." In 2015, a letter circulated online accusing Shi of misconduct and improper sexual relations. The temple denied the allegations at the time. Shi, known as Liu Yingcheng before he became a monk in 1981, has overseen the temple since 1987 and became its abbot in 1999, the temple's website showed. In 2008, the temple opened an online store, offering a range of goods including shoes, tea, T-shirts, and a kung fu instruction manual for 9,999 yuan (S$1,788). Its business ventures over the years also included book publishing, medicine, kung fu performances, film production, asset management and real estate. Shi posted daily on his social media account on Weibo with more than 882,000 followers. Shi was a delegate of China's rubber-stamp parliament, the National People's Congress, for around two decades until 2018. He has also been deputy head of China's Buddhist association. [[nid:720293]]
