Tunisia: Head of State orders thorough review of role of social security funds
During a meeting held at Carthage Palace, the President emphasized the importance of continuing efforts in the social domain with the aim of building a true social state, according to a statement from the Presidency of the Republic.
He also urged a reconsideration of certain commonly used terms and concepts, affirming that "social support is neither a favor nor an act of charity, but a legitimate right that calls for fresh thinking and innovative approaches."
© Tap 2022 Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
12 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Could this be the way Starmer placates his revolting MPs?
'Keir cannot afford another fiasco like welfare,' one Starmer loyalist told me, recalling the government's humiliating climbdown on proposed cuts to disability benefits after a revolt by Labour MPs. The prime minister knows the episode showed that his way of governing is unsustainable. He is consulting people widely this summer about how to turn things round. There's a fierce internal debate taking place. In Keir Starmer's right ear, Morgan McSweeney, his influential chief of staff, tells him to focus on wooing back voters in the red wall from Nigel Farage. In his left ear, soft-left cabinet ministers urge a more progressive approach to woo centre-left voters who have deserted Labour for the Liberal Democrats and the Greens. They argue that these lost voters outnumber defectors to Reform by a margin of three to one. The soft left's allies in Downing Street want Starmer to emulate Bill Clinton, who fought back against a right-wing populist — Newt Gingrich, the Republican speaker of the House of Representatives — after a rocky start to his first term in 1993. One minister admitted: 'There is a battle over the direction of the government. There is only one person who can resolve it. Keir has got to decide for himself - based on his values, who he is, who he wants to be.' The left-ear whisperers want the PM to trust the instincts that are serving him well on foreign affairs and apply them to the domestic agenda, too. Starmer appeared to be tacking leftwards when he told Tom Baldwin for the paperback version of his biography, published on Thursday: 'We have to be the progressives fighting against the populists of Reform — yes, Labour has to be a progressive party.' He has hinted that he wants to tackle child poverty by scrapping the two-child benefit limit. Peter Kyle The PM has nodded to Labour critics who argue — persuasively — that his government has sometimes acted left but talked right, and that it's no wonder, therefore, that it gets little credit from progressive voters. He said that issues such as clean energy, nationalising the railways and increasing the national minimum wage should be shouted louder from the rooftops. 'We should show we're proud of all that,' he told Baldwin. Starmer views this as part of 'telling a better story'. But you can only tell one if you know the direction in which you are heading. The battle isn't over yet; I'm told McSweeney is not convinced about a shift to the left. His critics say the shortcomings of attacking Reform head-on were illustrated when the science secretary Peter Kyle claimed Farage was on the paedophile Jimmy Savile's side in the heated debate over internet regulation. The attack line was reportedly approved by No 10, but it backfired. It was the sort of smear we might expect from Reform. The lesson for Starmer: Labour can't 'out-Farage Farage', and the public will vote for the real thing if Labour tries to look like Reform-lite. Allies of McSweeney believe the red wall will decide the next general election, so Labour's primary pitch must be to the white working class. His internal opponents insist that trying to re-run the 2024 election triumph, McSweeney's greatest hit, will not work next time. They dispute the idea that Labour 'won' the north and the Midlands last year, saying that it reaped the benefit of a split on the right between the Conservatives and Reform, and that Labour regained seats seized by the Tories in 2019 mainly because Tory voters switched to Reform. At the next election, Farage will likely hoover up the right-wing vote. Crucially, the left vote will be split this time — inflicting deep damage to Labour unless Starmer can appeal to left-of-centre voters. He won't do that by tacking right, cutting benefits for the disabled and pensioners or aping Farage. For Starmer to win a presidential contest against the Reform leader, being the anti-Farage candidate will not be enough: he will have to offer progressive voters more than he has offered them so far.
Zawya
a day ago
- Zawya
Political inclusion, how to deal with spoilers—SRSG Tetteh answers Libyans' questions
Special Representative of the Secretary General Hanna Tetteh engaged with 239 Libyans Friday in an open Zoom call, discussing issues ranging from options to take the country to elections, to accountability measures for potential spoilers, to the inclusion of women, youth and persons with disabilities. The online meeting, the second the SRSG has hosted in the last month, was part of the United Nations Support Mission in Libya's ongoing efforts to increase two-way communication with the public about the political process. Since May, the Mission has engaged nearly 1,000 people across the country in person and another 1,250 online, including focused meetings with community leaders, women, youth, unionists, cultural components, and persons with disabilities. Until 9 August, the Mission is also running a public poll on the proposals put forth by the Advisory Committee, a body of Libyan legal, constitutional and political experts that UNSMIL assembled to advise on the best options to resolve the political impasse and unify state institutions. Everyone has a role to play in the success of any political process, SRSG Tetteh said, calling on Libyans to participate in the online poll and once the roadmap is announced, work with the Mission to hold their leaders accountable in its implementation. 'The situation has gone on for some time and it's going to take a collective effort to change it,' she said. 'Democracy, inclusiveness—they're not events. They are processes. They are built over time." During the Zoom meeting, some expressed concern that many roads to elections have already been tried and failed, saying the only way forward is establishing a constituent assembly through a national dialogue forum to appoint a new government to oversee elections. Others spoke out in support of simultaneous presidential and legislative elections and a constitution-first approach. 'We have no trust in the bodies in power now,' one woman said 'These need to be removed for any roadmap to be successful. They are prolonging the crisis and creating problems.' The 'actual power' is not with political bodies, but with armed groups, said another. 'How can we have democracy with these forces on the ground?' Others echoed her concern, pointing out that the security situation is not conducive to elections. Several participants asked the Mission, 'Are sanctions going to be a deterrent to obstructionists?' The Advisory Committee recommended, in its' report to UNSMIL, that a unified government be established prior to elections, the SRSG said, acknowledging that it has been a topic of discussion across UNSMIL's public consultations. 'We think it's important to have a unified government,' she said. 'How that unified government comes about is a matter that will be part of the negotiation of the roadmap. How we approach that will be informed by the public's feedback and other consultations.' The SRSG emphasized, however, that the way for institutions to be changed is through elections. The goal is to move away from transitions to elections, she said, to a leadership with a mandate, who takes responsibility for Libya and who Libyans hold accountable. 'In developing a roadmap, it's about how we get to elections and what needs to be done to make them happen safely,' she said. 'There are actors who believe that they will be harmed, that their interests will be so badly impacted that their incentive is to spoil. That may jeopardize the process, so in designing this, and in engaging, we have to make it clear that we have to think through these challenges and manage them.' The SRSG outlined some of the Advisory Committee's proposals to address issues that have prevented elections from taking place in the past, including putting in place a legal framework that clearly settles issues about the timing of the elections and candidacy requirements. 'The legal framework also provides for sanctions,' she said. 'It also addresses some of the security issues—not all of them, because some need to be dealt with operationally—but it deals with some of the security issues that need to be taken care of for successful elections to take place.' One man asked what UNSMIL is doing to advance disability rights. Another inquired, 'Are there guarantees to involve youth in the political process?' A woman expressed concern about the difficulties facing women who wish to participate in the political process, describing her experience as a candidate in municipal elections as 'terrifying.' 'I was subjected to indirect threats, defamation and the abusive use of my personal photos on social media platforms—and also direct, face-to-face threats' she said. 'Some personalities pressured me to withdraw mycandidacy.' 'I thank you for your bravery and your courage,' SRSG Tetteh responded. 'I would say that Libya needs not just you, but all Libyan women to be able participate in discussions on your country's future and in decision-making about how that future will come to pass. Sometimes there is a feeling that women's voices don't belong, but women wanting to participate is not about competing with men. Women's voices will contribute to make society better.' It is UNSMIL's goal, she said, not only to champion women's voices, but to represent all segments of the population's interests—including persons with disabilities, youth, and cultural components—in negotiations about the political roadmap. The Mission has withheld participants' names and affiliations to protect their privacy.
Middle East Eye
2 days ago
- Middle East Eye
Reform UK candidate descended from top Muslim scholar rues racist abuse in campaign
A Muslim candidate in Nigel Farage's Reform UK who came second in a recent local election has revealed to Middle East Eye that he faced a storm of Islamophobic and racist abuse during his campaign - and that he wished the party had addressed it publicly. Siddiq Mahmood Malik, widely known as "Sidney", stood in the 24 July byelection in Llanrumney, a predominantly working-class ward in Cardiff in Wales. Malik, a Cardiff resident and descendant of the renowned 19th-century Indian Muslim thinker Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, received 630 votes and lost to a Labour incumbent who received 755. This week, Malik told MEE he faced a barrage of online abuse over his 'Muslim identity' during the campaign. On 6 July, an anonymous X account with over 100,000 followers posted a photo of Malik with the caption: 'Why do Reform keep choosing Muslims for candidates?' New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The post had received over 600,000 views and over 800 comments at the time of writing, many of which were racist and Islamophobic in nature. Malik is descended from the famous Aligarh founder Sir Syed Ahmed Khan Far-right activist Tommy Robinson's X account shared the post and commented 'I hope people can see it now' in a post that received over 500 comments. Numerous comments also directed anti-Muslim abuse at Reform's former chairman and current head of the its department of government efficiency, Zia Yusuf. 'During my candidacy, I encountered significant challenges, primarily related to my Muslim identity,' Malik told MEE. 'Reform UK was supportive throughout my campaign, and I'm grateful for that,' he added. 'However, I did hope there would be some public acknowledgement of the negative commentary directed at me online - particularly from figures like Tommy Robinson.' MEE asked Reform UK for comment but did not receive a response by the time of publication. Malik added that his ethnic background was 'clearly a point of contention, even among some within the online Reform UK community". "I'm still a member of Reform UK and may remain involved in the future," he said. But, he added: 'I found Reform UK still faces serious challenges with its relationship with Muslim communities and other minority communities. All communities play a role in British national cohesion, our great multiculturalism and contribute to how we're perceived globally.' Sir Syed Ahmed Khan's legacy During the campaign, a spokesperson for Reform UK Wales said that Malik 'is passionate about Reform. It runs in his family as he is a descendant of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, the 19th-century Muslim reformer and scholar'. Khan was an Indian modernist thinker and Anglophile who founded the Aligarh Mohamedan Anglo-Oriental College, modelled on Oxford and Cambridge, after the fall of the Mughal Empire. Khan was an Indian modernist thinker and Anglophile who founded the Aligarh Mohamedan Anglo-Oriental College (Wikimedia Commons) He was avowedly loyal to the British empire and was revered by later generations of Indian Muslim thinkers. Renowned 20th-century philosopher Sir Muhammad Iqbal said of Khan: "The real greatness of the man consists in the fact that he was the first Indian Muslim who felt the need of a fresh orientation of Islam and worked for it." Khan's university exists today in India as the Aligarh Muslim University and has produced many of the subcontinent's most famous politicians. In the early 20th century, it was considered the main recruiting ground for the All-India Muslim League, the party which would found Pakistan in 1947. 'I'm deeply proud of my heritage and of Sir Syed,' Malik told MEE, describing him as 'the first British Muslim knight, and a reformer of education, science, and integration during a time of deep division'. 'In many ways, he inspired me to stand,' he said. Reform's complex relationship with Muslims Opinion polls consistently indicate that Reform, which advocates for the mass deportation of illegal immigrants and has four MPs in parliament, is the most popular party in Britain. It has often been accused of stoking bigotry against Muslims and other minorities, which the party strenuously denies. On the other hand, far-right activists, including Tommy Robinson, have often accused the party of being too pro-Muslim. UK: Nigel Farage blames riots on Andrew Tate and online misinformation Read More » In June Zia Yusuf, who describes himself as a 'British Muslim patriot', resigned as the party's chairman in a shock move following a public row with Reform MP Sarah Pochin after she urged a ban on women wearing the burqa in a parliamentary debate. Party leader Nigel Farage suggested Yusuf quit because he received relentless abuse online from the 'very hard extreme right'. 'When Zia says anything you cannot believe the absolute tirade of personal racist abuse that he gets,' Farage said. 'And I just think he snapped.' But Yusuf rejoined the party just days later, saying his resignation had been a mistake. Malik, while disheartened at the abuse he faced during his own campaign, said he was 'proud to have come a very close second to Labour' in the recent byelection. He said the result signalled that 'many are ready, open-minded, and willing to support my candidacy and hope to one day lead meaningful change on the national stage'. He also said he is working on 'the first British VR [virtual reality] feature film', entitled Once Upon a Time In Britain. 'I aim to empower underrepresented voices and foster understanding through storytelling.'
