Elon Musk's X refuses to comply with French investigation, calls probe politically motivated
On 11 July, the Paris prosecutor's office stated that the investigation targets the platform X, a legal entity associated with it, and several individuals, though it did not disclose the names of those involved, according to a press release issued by prosecutor Laure Beccuau.
The preliminary investigation was launched earlier this year amid suspicions of foreign interference. Musk and other senior figures at X leaders are suspected of deliberately disrupting data processing and engaging in fraudulent data extraction "as part of organised crime", as previously reported by Euractiv.
However, X announced on Monday that it would not comply with the demands of the authorities "as we have a legal right to do so", according to a statement posted on the platform.
X described the investigation as "politically motivated" and denied all allegations.
'X believes that this investigation is distorting French law in order to serve a political agenda, and ultimately restrict free speech,' the statement read, without elaborating on what that agenda might be.
The platform further criticised those involved in the investigation, including individuals who requested access to its recommendation system. It implied that the investigation lacked impartiality and expressed 'serious concerns' about the process.
French authorities are pursuing two probes into the platform. Should those under investigation be found guilty, they could face up to 10 years in prison and a €300,000 fine, according to the French penal code.
Separately, the Commission met with representatives of X last week, following reports that its chatbot, Grok, was spreading hate speech and antisemitic content. However, it remains unclear whether this meeting will lead to a further investigation under the Commission's ongoing probe into X's compliance with the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA).
(aw)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
2 hours ago
- Euractiv
EU stays quiet as Greek top court appointment row deepens
Despite flagging judicial independence concerns in its own report, the European Commission has declined to comment on Greece's latest court appointment controversy Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Sarantis Michalopoulos Euractiv Jul 24, 2025 15:09 2 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Greek judges are up in arms after the conservative government bypassed their input on Supreme Court appointments. Yet, Brussels remains silent despite flagging rule of law concerns in its annual report on such matters this year. According to the European Commission's 2025 Rule of Law Report, public trust in the Greek justice system remains low, with citizens and businesses consistently believing that the judiciary is politically influenced. At the centre of the dispute lies the process of appointing top judges, which, unlike in other EU countries, remains under the government's complete control. Following a Commission recommendation, the Greek government passed legislation in 2024 enabling judges to express a non-binding opinion on their preferred candidates for senior judicial roles - a move the EU executive welcomed just last month. But earlier this week, the conservative Mitsotakis government disregarded the results of a secret ballot conducted among judges on eight vice-presidential candidates to the Supreme Court, excluding all those endorsed by the judiciary. The Commission, however, has so far refused to comment on the situation. 'We do not comment on individual cases,' a spokesperson told Euractiv, referring to the Rule of Law Report and adding that the Commission will "continue monitoring development". Meanwhile, the Greek Association of Judges and Prosecutors issued a statement accusing the government of trying to preserve its unchecked authority over judicial appointments once again. The judges also said the new law serves no purpose if judicial opinions are ignored. Justice Minister Giorgos Floridis hit back on Wednesday, saying Greece would 'not become a state of judges.' He also warned that judicial autonomy could lead to a system 'that has nothing to do with democracy,' and stressed that nowhere in the world do judges alone select their top officials. Judicial appointment systems vary across the EU. In most member states, governments do not have exclusive control as parliaments and judicial bodies are also involved. In Italy, for example, five of the 15 Constitutional Court judges are appointed by the president, five are elected by parliament, and five come from high courts. In France, top judges are appointed by the president based on proposals from the High Council of the Judiciary, a body composed of judges, legal professionals, and political appointees. In Germany, judges of the Federal Constitutional Court are elected by a two-thirds majority in both houses of parliament, ensuring broad political consensus. (cs, de)
Euractiv
2 hours ago
- Euractiv
Belgium and France double down on nuclear power alliance
PARIS - Belgium and France have agreed to strengthen joint work on nuclear power following Brussels' decision to reverse its phase-out plan and go all-in on the zero-emissions technology – another sign of growing momentum for a European nuclear renaissance. The two countries will cooperate on reactor lifetime extensions, new projects including small modular reactors, research and development, strategic supply chains, and worker training, according to a declaration of intent signed in Paris on Wednesday by Belgian Energy Minister Mathieu Bihet and his French counterpart Marc Ferracci. Stronger together The partnership with France 'is based on a shared ambition to make nuclear power a strategic lever for a more sustainable, competitive and resilient Europe', the Belgian energy ministry said in a press release. Ferracci said on X that the recent Belgian U-turn on nuclear power 'makes it possible to envisage concrete partnerships on the extension of existing reactors, the deployment of new power reactors, and the joint development of small modular reactors'. 'This declaration demonstrates our shared desire to develop our nuclear industries and to embark on ambitious energy programmes to secure our future,' he said. 'Together, we are defending a European energy strategy based on technological neutrality, energy sovereignty and decarbonisation,' Ferracci added, applauding Belgium for its recent decision to join a French-led alliance of pro-nuclear states. Nuclear alliance The alliance was set up by France in 2023 to promote pro-nuclear countries' interests at the EU level. It has grown stronger this year, with Belgium and Italy joining the group. With 14 members, the alliance now represents just over half of EU countries but still falls short of the requirement to represent 65% of the EU population needed to reach a qualified majority in the Council of the EU. This will not change even if prospective members Estonia and Lithuania decide to join. Estonia recently participated as an observer at a meeting of the group, while Lithuania began assessing on 2 July whether to restart nuclear power production – with a formal decision expected in 2028. The Lithuanian government recently told Euractiv that the Baltic state is 'actively considering the possibility' of participating in the alliance, although 'no formal decisions have been taken at this stage'. Nuclear-friendlier? The question of EU financial support for nuclear power has long been controversial, with countries like Austria and, at least until recently, Germany firmly opposed to the technology. The new German government appears divided on the issue, with the more nuclear-friendly Chancellor Friedrich Merz facing resistance from his junior coalition partner, the Social Democrats. His conservative energy minister recently ruled out a return to nuclear despite she had made supportive comments on small modular reactors. In Brussels, however, the European Commission appears increasingly receptive to pro-nuclear voices. As recently as June, it allowed nuclear technology manufacturing to benefit from streamlined support under a new state aid rulebook, drafted to support the EU's new Clean Industrial Deal growth strategy. (rh, aw)
Euractiv
2 hours ago
- Euractiv
International media groups urge Israel to allow access to Gaza
International news agencies Agence France-Presse (AFP), Associated Press (AP) and Reuters as well as the BBC called on Israel on Thursday to allow journalists in and out of Gaza, which is subject to a strict blockade. "We are desperately concerned for our journalists in Gaza, who are increasingly unable to feed themselves and their families," the media groups said in a joint statement. They added that "journalists endure many deprivations and hardships in war zones. We are deeply alarmed that the threat of starvation is now one of them." "We once again urge the Israeli authorities to allow journalists in and out of Gaza. It is essential that adequate food supplies reach the people there," they concluded. With Gaza sealed off, many media groups around the world depend on photo, video, and text coverage of the conflict by Palestinian reporters working for international news agencies such as AFP. International criticism is growing over the plight of the more than two million Palestinian civilians in Gaza, where more than 100 aid and rights groups have warned that "mass starvation" is spreading. Since the war started following the unprecedented October 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Palestinian militant group Hamas, journalists have been able to enter Gaza only with the Israeli army and with strict military censorship rules. Media watchdog Reporters Without Borders (RSF) said in early July that more than 200 journalists had been killed in Gaza since the war began. Evacuations AFP news agency said this week it was concerned about "the appalling situation" faced by its staff in the Gaza Strip, warning that their lives were in danger. "We have no energy left due to hunger and lack of food," said Omar al-Qattaa, a 35-year-old AFP photographer shortlisted for a Pulitzer Prize earlier this year. Israel says humanitarian aid is being allowed in and accuses Hamas of exploiting civilian suffering, including by stealing food handouts to sell at inflated prices or shooting at those awaiting aid. Witnesses and Gaza's civil defence agency, however, have repeatedly accused Israeli forces of firing on aid seekers, with the UN saying the military had killed more than 1,000 Palestinians trying to get food since late May. AFP succeeded in evacuating eight staff members and their families from Gaza between January and April 2024, after months of effort. The agency and French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot had urged Israel to allow AFP's freelancers and their families to leave the occupied coastal territory earlier this week. The World Health Organization's chief warned on Wednesday of widespread starvation in Gaza, saying food deliveries into the territory were "far below what is needed for the survival of the population". 'Extinction' With foreign reporters prevented from entering Gaza and local reporters being killed repeatedly, Gaza was "a place where journalism itself is threatened with extinction", Reporters Without Borders warned in its 2024 annual report. In some cases, Israel has accused reporters of being "terror operatives", such as when it killed a Gaza-based Al Jazeera staff journalist and freelancer last year -- allegations condemned by the Qatari news network. Al Jazeera, which has been banned in Israel, says the Israeli military has been targeting its staff since the start of the war because of the channel's coverage. "We know that probably most journalists inside Gaza are operating under the auspices of Hamas, and until Hamas is destroyed, they will not be allowed to report freely," Israeli government spokesman David Mercer told a press conference in December. (vib)
