The $115 billion a year boost to Australia at the touch of a button
Artificial intelligence could provide a $115 billion annual boost to the economy within five years, lifting the quality of goods and services while generating more jobs, the first examination of the technology's impact on Australia has revealed.
Compiled by OpenAI, the organisation behind ChatGPT, it argues the nation's economic success will depend on the uptake of AI with its chief economist likening the technology to the advent of electricity.
The Albanese government is holding a three-day productivity roundtable in early August with business groups, unions and community organisations to map out ways to lift the pace at which the economy can grow while boosting living standards.
Labour productivity – the amount produced by the number of staff or hours worked – has effectively flatlined in Australia over the past five years, although the IT sector has outperformed almost every other part of the economy.
While AI is promising massive productivity gains, companies involved in its development – including OpenAI – have come under fire on a range of issues, including massive job losses, copyright infringement from information producers such as newspapers, and theft of intellectual property.
Loading
According to OpenAI, the ability of Australia to lift living standards, increase wages and expand growth opportunities will be tied to AI.
It estimates AI adoption would produce $115 billion annually in economic benefits to Australia by 2030, or almost $4000 a person, with 70 per cent of that flowing directly from higher productivity. Its broad findings mirror previous research on the possible gains from AI.
Another $4 billion would flow from new jobs, $6 billion from new businesses and $25 billion from improved quality of goods and services.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
20 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Australia 'lagging' behind insufficient 1.2 million new homes target, REA Group senior economist Anne Flaherty declares
Aussies desperate to break into the nation's housing market have been delivered a devastating reality check as Labor attempts to boost housing supply. The Albanese government has promised to build 1.2 million new homes by 2029. However, construction efforts in Australia have not matched up to the target which are also insufficient to meet the nation's housing needs, REA Group senior economist Anne Flaherty said. 'We are lagging,' Ms Flaherty said on Business Now. 'There are some positive signs that things are picking up a bit but if we continue on the trajectory that we're already on, we're looking at around a 20 per cent shortfall in the government's target of 1.2 million houses or homes. 'I should add to that … (Labor's) 1.2 million new homes is really what we need to keep the ratio of supply of homes to the population steady from where we are. 'With population growth continuing to outpace forecasts, that's likely to mean that this 1.2 million new homes - which we are unlikely to achieve - would already be below what we would actually need.' Ms Flaherty's warning comes as recent figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics showed the nation is falling well short of its 1.2 million new home goal. If the government were to achieve its target, it would need to ensure 240,000 are built each year. However, ABS figures show that since the Housing Accord began in July 2024, only about 90,000 new dwellings have been completed. There were 90,136 houses built from July to December 2024 under the Albanese government, almost the same amount delivered by the Morrison government over the same period in 2021. The National Housing Supply and Affordability Council has projected the government will fall short of its target by more than 250,000 homes—or roughly 20 per cent. In separate findings, the ABS found that younger Aussies are struggling more to get their foot in the door of the housing market compared to previous generations. About half (55 per cent) of Millennials are homeowners, whereas 66 per cent of Baby Boomers were homeowners at the same age. In 1984, the average Australian could buy a home that cost 3.3 times their annual income, while in 2025, the average person faces house prices 10 times their annual pay packet. In the lead up to the 2025 Federal Election, both major parties put the nation's housing crisis under the microscope. Labor pledged $10b to build 100,000 homes exclusively for first home buyers and promised to guarantee mortgages for homeowners that can put down a five per cent deposit. The Coalition said it would allow home buyers to take upwards of $50,000 out of their super to put towards a down payment and vowed to unlock 500,000 new homes through $5b of investment in essential infrastructure.
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Tech giant's tips for Australia to catch the AI wave
Tax incentives and artificial intelligence lessons in schools could help ensure Australia doesn't miss out on the benefits of the AI wave, according to the firm behind industry giant ChatGPT. For OpenAI chief economist Ronnie Chatterji, a visit to Australia to meet with business leaders, investors and policy makers comes at an opportune moment. The federal government has embraced AI as a key plank in its mission to fix the nation's stagnant productivity growth and improve living standards ahead of an economic reform roundtable in August. "It's a good time where there's a big conversation in economic policy circles right now about how to increase productivity," Dr Chatterji told AAP. AI can make the economy more productive and society more prosperous by freeing workers from mundane administrative tasks, OpenAI said in an economic blueprint for Australia released on Tuesday. "A nurse unburdened by paperwork can spend more time with patients," its report said. "A business owner with more bandwidth can pursue bold ideas." But to achieve this utopian vision, governments must encourage adoption with targeted investment and extra training, it argued. Tax incentives should be offered for businesses to increase adoption and training programs should be rolled out to increase the capability of the workforce. In education, AI literacy and ethics lessons should be introduced to schools to give students the skills to harness the technology when they enter the workforce. Australia had huge potential to capitalise on AI, Dr Chatterji said. Its geographic position near Southeast Asia, strong software sector epitomised by firms like Canva and Atlassian and abundant renewable energy resources made it a perfect place to invest in data centres needed to power the technology. AI has been touted as a general-purpose technology that, like electricity or the steam engine, can transform the entire economy. But like the industrial revolutions of the past, fears have grown about the dislocation that the new technology will bring to the job market. Early studies showed AI was complementing workers and boosting their productivity rather than eliminating them, Dr Chatterji said. The view that over time transformative technologies add more jobs to the economy than they eliminate is shared by Andrew Leigh, the assistant minister for productivity. "The biggest employment risk from AI may not be job displacement - it may be working for a business that doesn't adopt it and falls behind or fails entirely," he said in a June speech. But Dr Leigh acknowledged there was a risk removing grunt work would eliminate entry-level positions, like his role sifting through case documents as a young lawyer. Dr Chatterji, a former Biden administration adviser, is alive to concerns about AI's potential impact on jobs, privacy and misinformation, insisting his company is intensely committed to safety and aligning with societal values. An OpenAI model was recently pulled back from release after in-house testing revealed concerns it was being too sycophantic. While it shows an example of the industry self-regulating, governments would also have a role to play, especially around behavioural models and safety, Dr Chatterji added. ACTU secretary Sally McManus said it was important the economic dividends AI brought were shared with workers and not just swallowed up in corporate profits. "We want (productivity) to improve because we want people's living standards to improve," she said. "You have to make sure that you have a fair distribution of gains in productivity, and that could be via shorter working hours, or it could be via higher pay."
AU Financial Review
5 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Why OpenAI's top economist gets ChatGPT to check his meals
Ronnie Chatterji has a new workout buddy, and it lives in his phone. The OpenAI chief economist doesn't just help shape global policy on artificial intelligence, he uses it to count his calories. 'I take pictures of what I eat,' Chatterji says of his ChatGPT-powered fitness assistant. 'It remembers what I ate the last meal, and helps me understand if, especially on a trip like this, if I'm being balanced.'
