Why more wealthy Chinese property buyers are looking to Australia
Deep-pocketed Chinese property buyers are more likely to search for homes in Australia compared to the rest of the world than they were a year ago.
Australia was the second-highest destination for buyer enquiries on the Chinese-language listings website Juwai IQI among homes priced at $US5 million plus ($A7.78 million) in 2024. That's a rise from the fourth highest during 2023.
Over the same period the US fell from the top-ranked destination to the seventh, while Thailand took over the top spot during 2024.
Juwai IQI co-founder and group chief executive Kashif Ansari said Australia had risen in the rankings as wealthy Chinese buyers favoured stability and sought-after schools, as well as advantageous currency movements.
'The move reflects long-term realities like strong schools, political calm, lifestyle appeal, and a soft Australian dollar. The Australian dollar fell more than five per cent against the yuan in the first half of the year, so buyers got more value for their money,' he said in a statement.
'Chinese buyers want schools, sun, and stability, and the lucky country delivers all three.'
He said that based on a survey of most buyers who make an enquiry on the site, 94 per cent were looking for homes they or their family would use, but only 6.5 per cent said they were buying strictly for investment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
3 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Lithium rout intensifies as UBS urges clients to sell
UBS has warned clients that the brutal sell-off in lithium stocks is far from over, predicting that an oversupply of the battery material will continue to weigh on prices for the rest of this decade. That caused the broker to shift back to an 'underweight' rating on the Australian sharemarket's lithium sector and cut its long-term spodumene, which is what Australian miners typically produce, forecast by 8 per cent to $US1200 a tonne.
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Albanese's gas project extension is not just a mistake, it's a betrayal
The Albanese government's approval of the North West Shelf gas extension to 2070 is not just a mistake – it's a devastating blow; a blow to voters who so recently backed a renewable-powered future, to young Australians hopeful for change, to the traditional owners caring for the Murujuga rock art, and to Labor's own proud tradition of acting for the benefit of all Australians. This is the most polluting fossil fuel project approved in Australia in a decade – more polluting than any project approved under coal-loving Scott Morrison. It will unleash more than 4 billion tonnes of climate pollution, equivalent to a decade of Australia's current emissions. It risks wiping out any climate progress this government has made and it tarnishes its legacy. This decision will cast a long shadow over the Albanese government. Visionary Labor prime ministers have stood up against short-term vested interests to protect Australia's environment: think saving the Franklin River; banning uranium mining at Coronation Hill; preventing oil drilling on the Great Barrier Reef. This decision does not fit with that proud history. It's a capitulation to one of the most powerful fossil fuel companies operating in Australia today: Woodside. Voters rejected Peter Dutton's gas expansion plan, yet the Albanese government is pressing ahead with it. The justifications don't stack up. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese keeps telling us this gas is needed for 'firming capacity' or to support our neighbours. But the WA gas markets are completely separate from those on the east coast. There is simply no pipeline connecting them. That's why the prime minister's comments this week, linking the North West Shelf extension to the need for gas in the eastern states, were hard to believe. It's frankly misleading to suggest this project will support energy reliability for most Australians. In reality, only a tiny fraction of the gas will be used in WA, and none of it will be used on the east coast. Most will be exported. And even our biggest customer, Japan, is now exporting more gas than it imports from us. The global market is heading for oversupply. Australia doesn't need this gas. The world doesn't want it. So who benefits? Not Australian households, who already pay the price for our over-reliance on gas. Not workers, whose skills should be helping build clean industries – not propping up a dying one. And not communities on the climate frontline – like flood-hit towns on the NSW coast or farmers battling drought in South Australia. Loading The only clear winners here are Woodside's executives and shareholders. This is a company that has long leveraged its political connections and its deep pockets to keep its polluting projects in business and the Albanese government just handed it a new lease on life. It is plundering petroglyphs for profit and burning down the prospect of a safer future for the next generation of Australians. Because this project is not just a climate disaster – it's a cultural and diplomatic disaster in the making.
The Age
3 hours ago
- The Age
Albanese's gas project extension is not just a mistake, it's a betrayal
The Albanese government's approval of the North West Shelf gas extension to 2070 is not just a mistake – it's a devastating blow; a blow to voters who so recently backed a renewable-powered future, to young Australians hopeful for change, to the traditional owners caring for the Murujuga rock art, and to Labor's own proud tradition of acting for the benefit of all Australians. This is the most polluting fossil fuel project approved in Australia in a decade – more polluting than any project approved under coal-loving Scott Morrison. It will unleash more than 4 billion tonnes of climate pollution, equivalent to a decade of Australia's current emissions. It risks wiping out any climate progress this government has made and it tarnishes its legacy. This decision will cast a long shadow over the Albanese government. Visionary Labor prime ministers have stood up against short-term vested interests to protect Australia's environment: think saving the Franklin River; banning uranium mining at Coronation Hill; preventing oil drilling on the Great Barrier Reef. This decision does not fit with that proud history. It's a capitulation to one of the most powerful fossil fuel companies operating in Australia today: Woodside. Voters rejected Peter Dutton's gas expansion plan, yet the Albanese government is pressing ahead with it. The justifications don't stack up. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese keeps telling us this gas is needed for 'firming capacity' or to support our neighbours. But the WA gas markets are completely separate from those on the east coast. There is simply no pipeline connecting them. That's why the prime minister's comments this week, linking the North West Shelf extension to the need for gas in the eastern states, were hard to believe. It's frankly misleading to suggest this project will support energy reliability for most Australians. In reality, only a tiny fraction of the gas will be used in WA, and none of it will be used on the east coast. Most will be exported. And even our biggest customer, Japan, is now exporting more gas than it imports from us. The global market is heading for oversupply. Australia doesn't need this gas. The world doesn't want it. So who benefits? Not Australian households, who already pay the price for our over-reliance on gas. Not workers, whose skills should be helping build clean industries – not propping up a dying one. And not communities on the climate frontline – like flood-hit towns on the NSW coast or farmers battling drought in South Australia. Loading The only clear winners here are Woodside's executives and shareholders. This is a company that has long leveraged its political connections and its deep pockets to keep its polluting projects in business and the Albanese government just handed it a new lease on life. It is plundering petroglyphs for profit and burning down the prospect of a safer future for the next generation of Australians. Because this project is not just a climate disaster – it's a cultural and diplomatic disaster in the making.
