Australian Women Strip-Searched On Qatar Airways Win Right To Sue Airline
Five Australian women who say they were pulled from a Qatar Airways flight by armed guards and strip-searched have won the right to sue the airline, after a court on Thursday overturned an earlier decision to throw out the case.
Women on 10 Qatar Airways flights, including 13 Australians, were subjected to invasive examinations to see if they had recently given birth after a newborn baby was found abandoned at Doha's Hamad Airport in October 2020.
The incident made headlines around the world, sparked outrage in Australia and strained diplomatic ties with Qatar.
A group of five women on a Sydney-bound flight launched legal proceedings in 2022 against Qatar Airways, the operator of Doha Airport MATAR, and Qatar's Civil Aviation Authority.
They brought claims under the Montreal Convention, which covers airline liability, as well as negligence, assault and false imprisonment.
The women sought damages for the impact on their mental health, including depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, stemming from the "unlawful physical contact".
After being escorted off their flight by armed Qatari authorities, some women claimed they were made to take off their underwear and subjected to non-consensual gynaecological inspections by a nurse in ambulances on the tarmac.
Federal Court Justice John Halley dismissed the claims against Qatar Airways last year, finding they had no reasonable prospect of success, and that Qatar's Civil Aviation Authority amounted to a foreign state immune from Australian law.
On Thursday, the full Federal Court overturned the ruling on Qatar Airways saying the issue was too complex to be dismissed summarily.
'Whether or not the claims come within the scope of (the Montreal Convention) is a matter of some complexity,' the summary judgment said.
'It is therefore not an issue apt to be decided at the stage of summary dismissal.'
The judgement allows the women to continue their lawsuit against Qatar Airways and MATAR. Both companies were ordered to pay the costs of the appeal.
'Our clients endured a traumatic experience on that night in Doha, and they deserve to have their day in court and compensation for their suffering,' said Damian Sturzaker, the lawyer from Marque Lawyers representing the women.
'We will continue to support them as the case continues in the Federal Court.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
31 minutes ago
- The Hindu
11 kg ganja seized from Nagercoil bound train in Dindigul
The Government Railway Police (GRP) seized 11 kg of ganja from a Nagercoil-bound train at the Dindigul Railway Junction on Tuesday. GRP personnel inspected the Coimbatore-Nagercoil Express. As the train reached Dindigul Junction, the police personnel conducted an inspection and seized 11 kg of ganja kept in a plastic cover in an unreserved coach. The bag was left unattended. The police seized the bag and handed over the ganja to the Anti Narcotics Intelligence Unit.
Economic Times
9 hours ago
- Economic Times
Big relief for thousands of Australians hit by excess bank charges: $60 million refund to be released as ASIC cracks the whip
Synopsis The Australian Securities and Investments Commission is acting against banks. This is regarding unfair charges. Thousands of customers faced excessive fees. They will soon get refunds. A second round of payments is announced. Around 770,000 customers will get sixty million dollars. ANZ and Westpac are among those who will be paying the most. Commonwealth Bank will not pay more. ASIC wants banks to improve their practices. TIL Creatives The corporate regulator said that all the customers who have been affected due to the charges will receive a refund soon. The ASIC on Tuesday (July 29, 2025) announced a second round of payments, saying a further 770,000 customers will be refunded $60 million. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) initiated a crackdown against banks for unfair practices after thousands of Australians were wrongly charged excessive bank charges. The corporate regulator said that all the customers who have been affected due to the charges will receive a refund soon. The ASIC on Tuesday (July 29, 2025) announced a second round of payments, saying a further 770,000 customers will be refunded $60 refunds in the second round will be paid to low-income customers of 21 financial institutions receiving government concession payments, who were placed in higher-fee bank accounts despite a lower fee option being available to them, according to The latest development follows $33m in fees already refunded to 150,000 customers, which were previously paid out. The report from the ASIC carried the names of three of the major banks that have now agreed to provide refunds of bank fees to a broader group of low-income customers who have been in high-fee accounts. The list contains names of several banks, including ANZ, National Australia Bank, Commonwealth Bank, Bendigo Bank, and Westpac Bank. The report suggests that ANZ will pay out an estimated $47.9m to around 590,000 account holders for fees dating back to mid-2019, and Westpac $9.9m for fees incurred since 2013. National Australia Bank was not included in the probe, as it stopped charging dishonour, account-keeping, or overdraw fees on transaction accounts in 2014. Commonwealth Bank has said that it is not paying any more after previously announcing a $25m payment to around 87,000 Indigenous concession customer accounts, has said that CBA and its subsidiary Bankwest provided data that claimed that it charged $270m in fees to low-income customers between July 2019 and October 2024. Instead, CBA plans to transition its 1.5 million eligible high-fee accounts held by low-income customers to a new 'nominal fee,' which is still awaiting approval. Meanwhile, Bankwest removed fees from its high-fee accounts and converted two products to low-fee accounts.'CBA noted that it provides services to a high volume of remote and regional customers on a much larger scale than any other financial institution. CBA considers that low-income customers benefit from informal overdraw facilities attached to its high-fee accounts, on the basis that these facilities provide customers with financial autonomy and flexibility,' according to to NewsWire, a CBA spokesperson said that the bank acknowledges ASIC's concerns and the importance of fair and accessible banking for vulnerable and concession customers. 'The $270 million in fees (incurred between 2019 and 2024) ASIC references were disclosed to customers and were charged in accordance with their terms and conditions,' a CBA spokesperson said.'The concession customer group is a diverse cohort, including customers with varying levels of income, savings, and home ownership.' In addition, CBA says they have paid over $25m in 'goodwill' payments to approximately 87,000 Indigenous concession customer accounts, as identified by CBA in response to ASIC's Better Banking for Indigenous Consumers Project. 'These payments were made on a goodwill basis, not as remediation for any contraventions,' the spokesperson also says it is removing dishonour and overdraw fees and creating an informal overdraft facility with no overdraw fee, providing flexibility and reducing the need for higher-cost alternatives like payday loans. It will also have a nominal $1 monthly fee to support universal services such as branches and ATMs, telling NewsWire it is the only bank maintaining the scale and reach of full-service banking across Australia.'We plan to migrate eligible concession customers from Smart Access and Complete Access accounts on an opt-out basis to the Essentials Account, the CBA spokesperson continued. 'This migration is temporarily paused pending the consideration by the ACCC of the proposed new authorisation for the Banking Code of Practice.'Speaking about the report, ASIC chair Joe Longo said that despite the improvements banks have made during our surveillance, there is work to be done. 'It should not take an ASIC review to force $93 million in refunds or make banks assess their processes to ensure the trust and expectations placed in them are justified,' he said, as quoted by 'Banks need to truly hear the messages in this report, read it, review it, and ask themselves some difficult questions about what led to this situation, ' he added.
News18
20 hours ago
- News18
Pakistan: Three coaches of Jaffer Express derail due to explosion; 1 injured
Peshawar, Jul 28 (PTI) Three coaches of the Quetta-bound Jaffer Express train derailed due to an explosion on Monday, leaving one injured in Pakistan's southeast Sindh province, officials said. While railway officials said that it may take up to another five hours to restore the track from rain traffic, the Sindh administration has ordered an investigation into the incident. Sukkur Railways Divisional Superintendent Jamshaid Alam said the Jaffar Express was travelling from Peshawar to Quetta when it got caught in an explosion near Shikarpur in Sindh Province. Rescue teams from Sukkur were immediately dispatched to start repair work. 'Following the blast, train operations have been suspended," Alam said, adding that passengers 'faced serious difficulties due to the derailment". This is not the first time the train has suffered such an incident. In June, the detonation of a remote-controlled explosive device fitted to rail tracks derailed four bogies of the Jaffar Express near the cattle market in Jacobabad. No one was injured in the incident, but the attack was reportedly claimed by the banned Baloch Republican Guards in a statement. On March 11, the train became the target of an unprecedented hijacking when terrorists fired on the locomotive and took over 400 passengers hostage. PTI AYZ NSD NSD First Published: July 29, 2025, 02:30 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
