
Montana scientists alarmed by wildfires encroaching on US towns
MISSOULA, Montana, Feb 27 (Reuters) - Scientists at a federal laboratory in Montana that has focused on fire for decades are increasingly concerned about wildfires that spread to population centers as Americans build communities ever closer to forests.
Mark Finney, senior scientist at the U.S. Forest Service's Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory, noted a pattern in January fires in California -- which killed dozens of people and destroyed thousands of homes -- and recent fires elsewhere.
"They start in a nearby wildland vegetation, find fuel material where it ignites and spreads very rapidly and under very dry and windy conditions. It spreads quickly from a wildland situation into a more urban situation," he said during a tour for Reuters of his lab in late January.
Finney and his team, opens new tab set fires in a controlled environment for study and modeling. What they learn from such experiments about, for example, how far and fast fires can move is shared across the country and the world to help wildland fire managers make decisions when responding to fires.
Finney's was one of three labs founded in the years after a 1949 fire in a remote area of the Helena National Forest in Montana killed 13 firefighters. The goal was to better understand how fire behaves to avoid such tragedies. Over the decades, one of the other labs, in California, has shifted focus to soil research and other areas. The third, in Georgia, closed in 1989.
"This is really the last lab left devoted to studying wildland fire behavior," Finney said. "It is kind of an irony that we rely more on fire science now than we ever had. We have bigger and bigger questions and more consequences to society, our ecosystems and our communities from fire, and yet we have less and less resources to devote to scientific study of the subject."
Work at the lab also has helped researchers identify areas of extreme wildfire risk, opens new tab in California and elsewhere, information the U.S. Forest Service makes available to the public.
Communities in areas where wildfire risk is high can apply for funds to use to help brace for disaster under the federal Community Wildfire Defense Grant Program, opens new tab that was part of a $1 trillion, five-year bipartisan infrastructure law President Joe Biden signed in 2021.
"I think what's important about those kind of programs is that, you know, some of the larger communities that maybe have the financial resources and the staffing to implement wildfire planning and mitigation work are getting that work done without that additional funding," said Greg Dillon, who directs the Missoula lab's Fire Modeling Institute.
"But it's a lot of the rural communities where the wildfire risk is, is really high, but they just simply don't have the local capacity and resources to get that mitigation work done," Dillon added.
Since taking office in January, President Donald Trump has halted federal funding for programs to reduce wildfire risk as part of broad cuts to government spending, according to organizations impacted by the moves.
The Forest Service said in a February 24 email to Reuters that the Community Wildfire Defense Grant Program's funding has continued and the deadline for applying for the grants has been extended by two weeks until March 14.
The Forest Service added that a waiver removing a cost-sharing requirement that had been available to Native American, Alaska Native, Pacific Island and US Virgin Islands communities was limited in February to low-income communities.
The Forest Service did not directly respond to a question about whether any Missoula lab staff were among the thousands of federal government workers laid off as part of a Trump effort to reduce the size of the federal government.
It instead sent a statement from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, of which the Forest Service is an agency, saying that about 2,000 probationary employees from across the Forest Service had lost their jobs.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
11 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Diet soda shockingly linked to devastating disease that kills 100,000 Americans each year
Diet soda might no longer be a healthier option after all. A new study found people who regularly drink the diet alternatives have more than double the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes compared to people who reach for full-sugar beverages. And artificial sweeteners may be to blame. The scientists found that high intake of saccharin - a common zero-calorie artificial sweetener found in diet drinks - could be the main risk factor for the chronic illness, which is suffered by 37 million Americans. The FDA approved the use of saccharin as a zero-calorie alternative to sugar in various foods and beverages in 1977. But saccharin is at least 300 times sweeter than regular sugar and researchers now believe excess consumption may interfere with the body's natural process of utilizing glucose - a sugar the body uses for energy. Based on their findings, study author Lyn Steffen recommended 'limiting the use of any sweetener' and suggested choosing 'unsweetened water, coffee, tea, milk or a small amount of 100 percent fruit juice' for beverages. The researchers examined the diets of 4,654 adults between 1985 to 2015. The participants' average intake of artificial sweeteners, diet beverages, aspartame (a low-calorie artificial sweetener) and sucralose (a synthetic artificial sweetener) were measured in the first year, seventh year and Year 20. The study did not include people who regularly or occasionally drink full sugar sodas. Based on their results, the participants were divided into groups to determine their probability of developing Type 2 diabetes. During this 30-year period, 691 participants developed diabetes. Results showed that the participants who consumed the most diet sodas in the 30 year period had a 129 percent greater chance of developing diabetes than those who barely drank any diet beverages. Additionally, the researchers also found that those who drank sodas loaded with saccharin such as fountain Diet Coca Cola, Diet Dr Pepper and Tab had a 110 percent increased risk of diabetes. No link was found between diabetes and aspartame or sucralose. The observational study did not determine the reason why artificial sweeteners may lead to Type 2 diabetes. However, the researchers believe that consuming excessive diet sodas with artificial sweeteners that are overall much sweeter than real sugar may interfere with the body's metabolism process and lead to excess sugar in the bloodstream. According to the American Heart Association, men should consume no more than 36 grams or 150 calories of sugar per day while women should consume no more than 25 grams or 100 calories of sugar per day. However, an 8oz can of Sprite Zero contains 50 mg artificial sweeteners, Coke Zero contains 58 mg and Pepsi Max has 77 mg. Along with this, Diet Pepsi and Caffeine-Free Diet Pepsi both contain 111 mg and 118 mg, respectively while Diet Dr Pepper has a shocking 123 mg of artificial sweeteners. Both Diet Coke and Caffeine-Free Coke have 125 mg of artificial sweeteners too. Excess sugar consumption can pave the way for weight gain, high blood pressure, heart disease and insulin resistance, which can cause Type 2 diabetes. Type 2 diabetes is the most common form of the condition and over 37 million American adults suffer from this form of the chronic illness. The CDC reports that over 100,000 Americans die of diabetes every year. It is caused by either the pancreas not producing enough insulin - a hormone that regulates blood sugar levels - or the body's cells not responding properly to insulin. When you eat sugar, your body breaks it down into glucose, which the enters your bloodstream for energy absorption. To regulate blood sugar levels, the pancreas releases insulin, which helps glucose enter your cells for energy. But consuming excessive amounts of sugar can make the body resistant to insulin, meaning it can't effectively use the insulin to lower blood sugar. This leads to high blood sugar levels and a buildup of glucose in the bloodstream, which can damage the eyes, kidneys, nerves and heart.

South Wales Argus
13 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Strawberry moon over South Wales: these are the best pictures
Throughout history, the nicknames used for full and new moons were used to track the seasons. The name for the strawberry moon that has been seen this week comes from indigenous Americans and has nothing to do with its reddish and pink tint. Instead, it marks the ripening of strawberries and the beginning of their annual harvest. The strawberry moon has a red tint because of its proximity to the horizon, as the light rays must pass through the densest layers of the atmosphere. This is what also gives the rising and setting sun its vibrant colour. The strawberry moon taken by Tereza Sillett (Image: Tereza Sillett) While it may not appear as strawberry red to the naked eye, it appears as orange or rusty when its close to the horizon. Any viewing locations that are far away from light pollution caused by towns and cities give ample opportunity for stargazing and capturing a glimpse of the phenomenon, without the need for any elaborate equipment. Those viewing the strawberry moon also have opportunity to see even more of space's occupants. NASA said: 'All month long, Mars and Venus will be visible in the night skies. Catch Mars in the west for a couple of hours after sunset, while Venus rises about two hours before the Sun, shining low in the eastern sky in the morning.' If you have a passion for photography and would like to have your pictures featured, search South Wales Argus Camera Club on Facebook.


Scottish Sun
17 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
‘Game changing' fat jabs WON'T help you lose as much weight as you think, scientists discover
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SO-CALLED 'miracle' weight-loss jabs are far less effective in the real world than in clinical trials, a major study has revealed. The new findings could have big implications for Brits considering the injections, which have soared in popularity across the UK in recent years. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 In a 'real-world' setting people might lose less weight in a regular clinical setting than during clinical trials Credit: Alamy 2 The drugs work best when people stick to them and take the full recommended dose Credit: Reuters Until now, the jabs have been hailed as an easier alternative to classic weight loss methods like calorie counting, weight watchers and the gym. But researchers at the Cleveland Clinic in the US found average weight loss on the jabs in the 'real world' is just 6.9 per cent after a year. This is less than half the amount typically seen in clinical trials, where patients often lose 15 per cent with semaglutide, the ingredient in Wegovy, and up to 22.5 per cent with tirzepatide, found in Mounjaro. The study, published on Tuesday in Obesity, followed 7,881 adults with severe obesity who started semaglutide or tirzepatide between 2021 and 2023. It discovered the drugs worked best when people stuck to them and took the full recommended dose, but in the real world, that rarely happened. More than one in five patients (21 per cent) stopped taking the jabs within the first three months, and another 32 per cent quit between three and 12 months. Meanwhile, over 80 per cent were on lower-than-recommended maintenance doses, needed to keep the weight off. Those who quit early lost just 3.6 per cent of their body weight. Patients who stayed on the treatment for a full year lost 11.9 per cent on average. The best results were seen in people who stayed on full doses, who lost 13.7 per cent with semaglutide and 18 per cent with tirzepatide. GP-approved tips to really lose weight safely - and keep it off 'Our findings could inform the decisions of healthcare providers and their patients on the role of treatment discontinuation and maintenance dosage in achieving clinically meaningful weight reductions," Dr Hamlet Gasoyan, lead author of the study, said. Among the 1,320 people with prediabetes, the precursor to type 2 diabetes, at the start of the study, those who stayed on the jabs were also far more likely to reverse the condition. Don't stop the drugs early These medications work by copying a natural hormone found in the body called GLP-1. This hormone helps people feel fuller for longer, which reduces appetite and helps with weight loss. It also helps control blood sugar by telling the pancreas to make more insulin and slowing down how quickly sugar from food gets into the bloodstream. That's why these drugs are effective at both preventing type 2 diabetes and helping people shed pounds. Just 33 per cent of early quitters returned to normal blood sugar levels, compared with 68 per cent of those who stayed on the medication. 'Type 2 diabetes is one of the most common complications of obesity, so diabetes prevention is very important,' Dr Gasoyan said. 'This study highlights that treatment discontinuation, especially early, negatively affects both weight and glycemic control outcomes.' The most common reasons for stopping the jabs were cost, insurance issues, side effects and shortages, it said, The experts said a follow-up study is planned to dig deeper into why patients quit, and what happens to their weight afterwards.