
There's a taskforce dreaming up radical climate solutions – and you can help
The Global Solidarity Levies Task Force, an independent group of experts set up after Cop28, has now set out 16 specific ideas for consultation that could raise hundreds of billions of dollars a year to fight global heating, from taxes on cryptocurrencies to flying.
The results will be presented to the world's governments at the Cop30 summit in Brazil in November. The good news is that many of the taxes already exist in some countries, making the prospect of a wide rollout less far-fetched than you may think. The even better news is that you can have your say during the public consultation stage.
More on all this, after this week's top stories.
Levels of microplastics in human brains may be rapidly rising, study suggests
Climate change target of 2C is 'dead', says renowned climate scientist
'It's like solving a murder': who dumped 30 tonnes of rubbish on Lichfield?
The first thing to say about the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force is that it is a serious operation. It is being driven by the leaders of France, Kenya and Barbados, has members including Denmark, Senegal and Colombia, and is partnered with the UN, World Bank, G20, European Commission and African Union. It's got clout.
That matters, as the gap between the billions of dollars being mobilised to fight the climate crisis and the trillions needed is huge. The aim of the taskforce is both simple and potentially transformative: to use internationally coordinated levies to raise funds, penalise polluters and increase the fairness of the global tax system.
The consultation sets out the pros and cons of each potential levy. You can read them and submit your thoughts here. The most obvious is the levy on the fossil fuels that cause global heating, but which currently enjoy $7tn in subsidies a year. The world's five biggest oil companies made a combined total of $281bn in profits in 2022-23 alone.
The simplest fossil fuel levy the taskforce sets out is on extraction: $5 per tonne of CO2, rising by $5 every year to 2030. It could raise $1tn a year by 2035. Coal, oil and gas extraction is often already taxed, making it administratively simple. 'The power of the fossil fuel lobby would make this hard to achieve politically,' the taskforce rightly notes. 'However, each country that introduces the levy could gain a significant increase in tax revenue.'
Flying – an elite, heavily polluting activity – is growing – just 1% of the world's population causes half of all aviation emissions. The taskforce puts forward a tax on tickets or on jet fuel for international flights, which is barely taxed at all today.
The ticket tax may raise $100bn a year, the jet fuel levy $10bn. A frequent flyer tax is also being considered, with the levy rising with each flight, but this may require each passenger to have an ID number. Several countries have already used an aeroplane ticket levy to fund the fight against Aids and other diseases.
Like aviation, the international shipping industry does not pay taxes proportional to the damage its pollution causes. But the International Maritime Organization already collects funds from operators to compensate for oil spills, and most countries already support a carbon levy. This could raise up to $127bn a year between 2027 and 2030.
Plastic relies on fossil fuels, is emissions intensive and environmentally damaging, but there are currently no taxes at all levied on its producers. Ongoing negotiations on a global plastics treaty include a levy proposal, which would raise about $30bn a year. There are relatively few plastic producers, which would make it easier to collect this tax. The impact on people's pockets would also be small, as the cost of primary polymers is a fraction of the price of final products.
The taskforce's ideas also include a striking billionaire tax. The ultrarich usually have extremely high carbon footprints, often pay tax at far lower rates than regular workers and, frankly, can afford it.
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
An annual tax of 2% of billionaires' wealth would raise a staggering $200bn-$250bn from just 3,000 people. 'The political feasibility of agreement to a global standard is very challenging,' says the taskforce. But it's hard to imagine the levy being unpopular with ordinary citizens.
Finally, the taskforce is proposing a tax on financial transactions, which it says 'have benefited hugely from globalisation, without being taxed in most jurisdictions', and on cryptocurrencies, which require huge amounts of energy to generate.
A tax of 0.5% on the value of the transaction of the stocks would raise $270bn a year. Thirty countries already have a similar tax and France even earmarks part of its levy for climate and development.
A 0.1% tax on cryptocurrency transactions would raise about $16bn a year, but it wouldn't be easy to implement. 'Given the anonymity and decentralised nature of crypto, there is a high possibility of tax evasion,' the taskforce says. On the plus side, Kazakhstan, a big crypto miner, already taxes the energy used.
Of course, all this requires governments and companies to step up to the plate, but they are not doing so quickly enough. In the meantime, solidarity taxes could be another route to making polluters pay.
Let the taskforce know what you think.
Read more:
'Morally, nobody's against it': Brazil's radical plan to tax global super-rich to tackle climate crisis
Former world leaders seek $25bn levy on oil states' revenues to pay for climate damage
How Trump is targeting wind and solar energy – and delighting big oil
To read the complete version of this newsletter, subscribe to receive Down To Earth in your inbox every Thursday

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Iran's president orders suspension of co-operation with UN nuclear watchdog
The order by Masoud Pezeshkian included no timetable or details but is likely to further limit inspectors' ability to track Tehran's programme which had been enriching uranium to near weapons-grade levels. Iran has limited the UN watchdog's inspections in the past as a pressure tactic in negotiating with the West, although Tehran has denied there are any immediate plans to resume talks with the US which had been upended by the 12-day Iran-Israel war. Iranian state television announced Mr Pezeshkian's order, which followed a law passed by Iran's parliament to suspend co-operation. The bill had already received the approval of Iran's constitutional watchdog, the Guardian Council, on Thursday, and is likely to have the support of the country's Supreme National Security Council, which Mr Pezeshkian chairs. 'The government is mandated to immediately suspend all co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency under the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons and its related Safeguards Agreement,' state television quoted the bill as saying. 'This suspension will remain in effect until certain conditions are met, including the guaranteed security of nuclear facilities and scientists.' The Vienna-based IAEA has monitored Iran's nuclear programme for years. It is not known how Tehran will implement the suspension. Under Iran's theocractic government, there is room for the council to implement the bill as it sees fit, which means everything legislators asked for might not be done. However, the move stops short of what experts feared the most. They had been concerned that Tehran, in response to the war, could fully end its co-operation with the IAEA, abandon the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and rush towards creating a bomb. Under the treaty, countries agree not to build or obtain nuclear weapons and allow the IAEA to conduct inspections to verify authorities have correctly declared their programmes. Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, negotiated under then US president Barack Obama, allowed Iran to enrich uranium to 3.67% — enough to fuel a nuclear power plant, but far below the threshold of 90% needed for weapons-grade uranium. It also drastically reduced Iran's stockpile of uranium, limited its use of centrifuges and relied on the IAEA to oversee Tehran's compliance through additional oversight. The IAEA served as the main assessor of Iran's commitment to the deal. But Donald Trump, in his first term as president in 2018, unilaterally withdrew Washington from the accord, insisting it was not tough enough and did not address Iran's missile programme or its support for militant groups in the wider Middle East. That set in motion years of tensions, including attacks at sea and on land. Iran had been enriching up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels. It also has enough of a stockpile to build multiple nuclear bombs. Iran has long insisted its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes, but the IAEA, western intelligence agencies and others say Tehran had an organised weapons programme until 2003. Israeli air strikes, which began on June 13, decimated the upper ranks of Iran's powerful Revolutionary Guard and targeted its arsenal of ballistic missiles. The strikes also hit Iran's nuclear sites, which Israel claimed put Tehran within reach of a nuclear weapon. Iran has said the Israeli attacks killed 935 'Iranian citizens', including 38 children and 102 women. However, Tehran has a long history of offering lower death counts around unrest over political considerations. The Washington-based Human Rights Activists group, which has provided detailed casualty figures from multiple rounds of unrest in Iran, put the death toll at 1,190 people, including 436 civilians and 435 security force members. The attacks wounded another 4,475 people, the group said. Meanwhile, it appears that Iranian officials are assessing the damage done by the American strikes on the three nuclear sites on June 22, including those at Fordo, a site built under a mountain about 60 miles south west of Tehran. Satellite images from Planet Labs PBC analysed by the Associated Press show Iranian officials at Fordo on Monday apparently examining the damage caused by American bunker-buster bombs.


Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Iran's president orders suspension of co-operation with UN nuclear watchdog
The order by Masoud Pezeshkian included no timetable or details but is likely to further limit inspectors' ability to track Tehran's programme which had been enriching uranium to near weapons-grade levels. Iran has limited the UN watchdog's inspections in the past as a pressure tactic in negotiating with the West, although Tehran has denied there are any immediate plans to resume talks with the US which had been upended by the 12-day Iran-Israel war. Iranian state television announced Mr Pezeshkian's order, which followed a law passed by Iran's parliament to suspend co-operation. The bill had already received the approval of Iran's constitutional watchdog, the Guardian Council, on Thursday, and is likely to have the support of the country's Supreme National Security Council, which Mr Pezeshkian chairs. Masoud Pezeshkian (Iranian Presidency Office/AP) 'The government is mandated to immediately suspend all co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency under the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons and its related Safeguards Agreement,' state television quoted the bill as saying. 'This suspension will remain in effect until certain conditions are met, including the guaranteed security of nuclear facilities and scientists.' The Vienna-based IAEA has monitored Iran's nuclear programme for years. It is not known how Tehran will implement the suspension. Under Iran's theocractic government, there is room for the council to implement the bill as it sees fit, which means everything legislators asked for might not be done. However, the move stops short of what experts feared the most. They had been concerned that Tehran, in response to the war, could fully end its co-operation with the IAEA, abandon the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and rush towards creating a bomb. Under the treaty, countries agree not to build or obtain nuclear weapons and allow the IAEA to conduct inspections to verify authorities have correctly declared their programmes. Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, negotiated under then US president Barack Obama, allowed Iran to enrich uranium to 3.67% — enough to fuel a nuclear power plant, but far below the threshold of 90% needed for weapons-grade uranium. It also drastically reduced Iran's stockpile of uranium, limited its use of centrifuges and relied on the IAEA to oversee Tehran's compliance through additional oversight. The IAEA served as the main assessor of Iran's commitment to the deal. But Donald Trump, in his first term as president in 2018, unilaterally withdrew Washington from the accord, insisting it was not tough enough and did not address Iran's missile programme or its support for militant groups in the wider Middle East. Donald Trump (Evan Vucci/AP) That set in motion years of tensions, including attacks at sea and on land. Iran had been enriching up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels. It also has enough of a stockpile to build multiple nuclear bombs. Iran has long insisted its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes, but the IAEA, western intelligence agencies and others say Tehran had an organised weapons programme until 2003. Israeli air strikes, which began on June 13, decimated the upper ranks of Iran's powerful Revolutionary Guard and targeted its arsenal of ballistic missiles. The strikes also hit Iran's nuclear sites, which Israel claimed put Tehran within reach of a nuclear weapon. Iran has said the Israeli attacks killed 935 'Iranian citizens', including 38 children and 102 women. However, Tehran has a long history of offering lower death counts around unrest over political considerations. The Washington-based Human Rights Activists group, which has provided detailed casualty figures from multiple rounds of unrest in Iran, put the death toll at 1,190 people, including 436 civilians and 435 security force members. The attacks wounded another 4,475 people, the group said. Meanwhile, it appears that Iranian officials are assessing the damage done by the American strikes on the three nuclear sites on June 22, including those at Fordo, a site built under a mountain about 60 miles south west of Tehran. Satellite images from Planet Labs PBC analysed by the Associated Press show Iranian officials at Fordo on Monday apparently examining the damage caused by American bunker-buster bombs.


South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Iran's president orders suspension of co-operation with UN nuclear watchdog
The order by Masoud Pezeshkian included no timetable or details but is likely to further limit inspectors' ability to track Tehran's programme which had been enriching uranium to near weapons-grade levels. Iran has limited the UN watchdog's inspections in the past as a pressure tactic in negotiating with the West, although Tehran has denied there are any immediate plans to resume talks with the US which had been upended by the 12-day Iran-Israel war. Iranian state television announced Mr Pezeshkian's order, which followed a law passed by Iran's parliament to suspend co-operation. The bill had already received the approval of Iran's constitutional watchdog, the Guardian Council, on Thursday, and is likely to have the support of the country's Supreme National Security Council, which Mr Pezeshkian chairs. 'The government is mandated to immediately suspend all co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency under the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons and its related Safeguards Agreement,' state television quoted the bill as saying. 'This suspension will remain in effect until certain conditions are met, including the guaranteed security of nuclear facilities and scientists.' The Vienna-based IAEA has monitored Iran's nuclear programme for years. It is not known how Tehran will implement the suspension. Under Iran's theocractic government, there is room for the council to implement the bill as it sees fit, which means everything legislators asked for might not be done. However, the move stops short of what experts feared the most. They had been concerned that Tehran, in response to the war, could fully end its co-operation with the IAEA, abandon the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and rush towards creating a bomb. Under the treaty, countries agree not to build or obtain nuclear weapons and allow the IAEA to conduct inspections to verify authorities have correctly declared their programmes. Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, negotiated under then US president Barack Obama, allowed Iran to enrich uranium to 3.67% — enough to fuel a nuclear power plant, but far below the threshold of 90% needed for weapons-grade uranium. It also drastically reduced Iran's stockpile of uranium, limited its use of centrifuges and relied on the IAEA to oversee Tehran's compliance through additional oversight. The IAEA served as the main assessor of Iran's commitment to the deal. But Donald Trump, in his first term as president in 2018, unilaterally withdrew Washington from the accord, insisting it was not tough enough and did not address Iran's missile programme or its support for militant groups in the wider Middle East. That set in motion years of tensions, including attacks at sea and on land. Iran had been enriching up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels. It also has enough of a stockpile to build multiple nuclear bombs. Iran has long insisted its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes, but the IAEA, western intelligence agencies and others say Tehran had an organised weapons programme until 2003. Israeli air strikes, which began on June 13, decimated the upper ranks of Iran's powerful Revolutionary Guard and targeted its arsenal of ballistic missiles. The strikes also hit Iran's nuclear sites, which Israel claimed put Tehran within reach of a nuclear weapon. Iran has said the Israeli attacks killed 935 'Iranian citizens', including 38 children and 102 women. However, Tehran has a long history of offering lower death counts around unrest over political considerations. The Washington-based Human Rights Activists group, which has provided detailed casualty figures from multiple rounds of unrest in Iran, put the death toll at 1,190 people, including 436 civilians and 435 security force members. The attacks wounded another 4,475 people, the group said. Meanwhile, it appears that Iranian officials are assessing the damage done by the American strikes on the three nuclear sites on June 22, including those at Fordo, a site built under a mountain about 60 miles south west of Tehran. Satellite images from Planet Labs PBC analysed by the Associated Press show Iranian officials at Fordo on Monday apparently examining the damage caused by American bunker-buster bombs.