logo
Why the fight over foreign students at Harvard has some US students leaving, too

Why the fight over foreign students at Harvard has some US students leaving, too

Yahoo3 days ago

The Trump administration's push to end Harvard's ability to enroll foreign students is predictably forcing those students to look into other options.
But it's also pushing away some students from the United States.
In one case, an incoming U.S. student at Harvard Business School asked the institution if they could defer admission because the 'educational experience would be different without any international students,' Maureen Martin, Harvard's director of immigration services, said in a Wednesday court filing.
Dozens of incoming international Harvard students have also opted to defer admission or enroll elsewhere, Martin said in the filing.
A Harvard spokesperson declined to a request for additional comment.
The stories of students deferring admission comes from a court filing where Martin detailed the ways U.S. and international students are 'reconsidering their futures at Harvard,' harming Harvard's ability to attract and enroll students, she said.
These admission challenges are a direct reaction to the federal government attempting to revoke a key certification that allows Harvard to enroll international students.
Harvard subsequently sued and asked for a temporary restraining order, which a federal judge allowed. The judge has since allowed a preliminary injunction on Thursday, further delaying the Trump administration from being able to revoke Harvard's certification.
Read more: Judge halts Trump plan to stop Harvard enrolling foreign students — again
On top of the revocation, President Donald Trump has also suggested a 15% cap on international students at Harvard University.
Growing up in Mississippi where she was often the only Asian American person in a room, Rachele Chung, a first-year U.S. student at Harvard, said a key reason she chose Harvard was because of its diversity.
International students make up more than a quarter of the total student population.
Chung said she might have gone somewhere else if Harvard didn't have international students.
Read more: Harvard commencement speaker says it's fitting to 'hear from an immigrant like me'
'What really drew me to Harvard was the diversity and also the potential to meet people from all over the U.S. but also all over the world and hear from different perspectives from that,' she said.
'I think if a different institution offered that, then, I might have leaned toward them,' she said.
Chung said she is unlikely to transfer now because she believes more institutions will also lose their certification after the Trump administration takes away Harvard's.
However, that doesn't mean she is any less concerned about the future of Harvard if international students and scholars aren't allowed to come to the institution and domestic students opt out of attending.
She said that would affect Harvard and the state of research and science more than it would the federal government.
Nuriel Vera-DeGraff, a junior at Harvard University, said he isn't surprised that incoming students would change their minds on enrolling at the institution.
'Interntionals contribute so much to campus culture,' he said.
At this point, he said he is close to finishing his degree at Harvard and has created a community and wouldn't want to leave the institution.
Vera-DeGraff said he hasn't heard about current U.S. students considering transferring to other institutions and thinks it is 'unlikely' to happen.
However, if he was an incoming student and had a choice between Harvard and another institution based in the U.S., he said he would consider doing the same thing.
'I'd definitely be very tempted to choose the other school because it's definitely not the same experience — I really can't imagine being here without the international students. It would just feel very different,' he said.
The Student and Exchange Visitor Program, also known as SEVP, allows higher education institutions to issue visa application forms to prospective international students after admitting them. The forms are used to apply for a visa to enter the United States.
The certification requirements include that the school is operational and instructing students, has the necessary facilities and adequate finances to operate, provides instruction to a degree or objective and meets state requirements to operate, according to the Department of Homeland Security website.
Read more: Here's everything Trump has stripped from Harvard so far — and what is threatened
Institutions are recertified every two years, but can be evaluated at other points in time if federal regulators have information suggesting the school isn't complying with regulations.
If the certification is taken away, an institution isn't allowed to enroll international students. Current students would have to choose between transferring to another institution, leaving the U.S., or changing their immigration status, according to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) website.
An example of the certification being stripped occurred at Herguan University in California in 2016 after its CEO pleaded guilty to providing fraudulent documents to the Department of Homeland Security, according to East Bay Times.
Harvard has been in a battle with the federal government since April.
There has been a wave of federal research grant terminations at Harvard University, in addition to $60 million in multi-year grants, a $450 million cut and a $2.2 billion freeze.
In addition to barring Harvard University from acquiring new federal grants, the Trump administration directed federal agencies to cut off existing contracts with Harvard or transfer them to other vendors on Tuesday.
Harvard President Alan Garber wrote in a letter to U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon that they share the same 'common ground,' but the university 'will not surrender its core, legally-protected principles out of fear.'
Read more: Shadow of Trump administration hangs over Harvard University commencement
Garber pushed back on the administration through a lawsuit in April. The institution argues that its constitutional rights had been violated by the government's threats to pull billions of dollars in funding if the school didn't comply with demands for an overhaul. Following the $450 million announced cuts, the university amended its lawsuit.
'No government — regardless of which party is in power — should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue,' the suit reads.
Due to the federal cuts, Harvard announced that it was committing $250 million of 'central funding' to support research impacted by suspended and canceled federal grants.
Harvard affinity group graduations held off campus amid 'capitulation' to Trump
Harvard commencement speaker says it's fitting to 'hear from an immigrant like me'
Many foreign students already fleeing Harvard University due to Trump order
Protesters pack outside Harvard commencement as families focus on their graduates
Trump admin starts 30-day countdown on Harvard foreign students
Read the original article on MassLive.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump's Net Approval Positive on Only One Key Issue
Donald Trump's Net Approval Positive on Only One Key Issue

Newsweek

time23 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump's Net Approval Positive on Only One Key Issue

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's net approval rating is negative on a range of issues except immigration, a new poll shows. According to political analyst and statistician Nate Silver, writing in his Silver Bulletin Substack, Trump has a net negative approval rating on trade, the economy and inflation but a slightly positive rating on immigration. Why It Matters Taking the temperature of the nation, approval ratings are good measures of the public's response to Trump's policies and his actions as president. In the first few months of his second term, Trump's popularity has fluctuated, with some polls more favorable than others. Sustained backlash to his policies could persuade the president to change his approach. Trump, who made immigration a central part of his campaign, has vowed to crack down on border security, carry out mass deportations and end federal benefits for people residing in the country illegally. President Donald Trump speaking with reporters in the rain after arriving on Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on May 30. President Donald Trump speaking with reporters in the rain after arriving on Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on May 30. AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson What To Know Silver aggregated dozens of recent polls and found that Trump's approval rating on immigration was +2.5 percent. The president did not fare as well on other issues, with a -9.5 percent approval rating on trade, -11.3 percent on the economy and -17.5 percent on inflation. May polling conducted by Verasight U.S. for Strength in Numbers found similar results, with Americans disapproving of the president's handling of all the policy areas they were asked about except border security. That poll also found that 49 percent disapproved of his immigration policy, while 47 percent approved. Overall, Silver found that when analyzing the polls, Trump had a -5.4 net approval rating. An RMG Research/Napolitan News poll, conducted between May 14 and 21 among 3,000 registered voters, showed Trump's approval rating at 48 percent, with 50 percent disapproving. The poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 1.8 percentage points. Other polls have found a more positive response to the president. According to a recent Rasmussen survey, 53 percent of respondents said they approved of Trump, while 46 percent said they disapproved. What People Are Saying Scott Lucas, a professor in international politics at University College Dublin, previously cautioned against reading too much into any one poll, telling Newsweek: "Opinion polls have their own biases." President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on April 20: "We are, together, going to make America bigger, better, stronger, wealthier, healthier, and more religious, than it has ever been before!!!" What Happens Next The midterm elections, scheduled for November 2026, may offer a clearer indication of voters' attitudes toward the president's policies.

Murphy launches ambitious anti-Trump PAC as 2028 rumors swirl
Murphy launches ambitious anti-Trump PAC as 2028 rumors swirl

Politico

time30 minutes ago

  • Politico

Murphy launches ambitious anti-Trump PAC as 2028 rumors swirl

Sen. Chris Murphy is launching a new PAC aimed at taking on President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress — the latest sign the Connecticut Democrat is eyeing higher office, according to plans that were first shared with POLITICO. Murphy will announce Monday that his group, American Mobilization Project, is doling out $400,000 to organizations that oppose cuts to Medicaid and register young people to vote. Two of the early recipients of his funds are based in battleground states. In an interview, Murphy said that his PAC is unique because it is not focused on funding campaigns and instead is looking to mobilize people against Trump's agenda. 'All of us have to realize that if we don't act aggressively right now to organize and mobilize, we may not have our democracy in 2026,' said Murphy. 'I'm a believer that the only thing that is ultimately going to stop Trump's corruption and his destruction of democracy is mass mobilization.' Murphy's PAC expects to spend upwards of $2 million in the 2026 midterm cycle, an aide to the senator said. In the wake of Trump's reelection, Murphy has worked to grow his profile and staked out ground as one of the Democratic Party's most outspoken critics of the president's efforts to bend institutions to his will. Murphy has appeared on numerous podcasts, held town halls across the country and churned out a steady stream of content on social media. In the run-up to presidential campaigns, would-be candidates often launch new PACs or outside groups, which can be used to expand their visibility, build their email lists and cultivate political relationships. But Murphy insists his recent moves are not designed to lay the groundwork for a future presidential bid. He has argued that it's no guarantee that there will even be a race for the White House in 2028, in fact. 'I don't think it's a foregone conclusion there's going to be an election in 2026 or 2028 for anybody to run in if we don't do the work right now,' he said, adding, 'I hope that this PAC is going to act very differently than everybody else's PAC because it's not about banking money or using money for a political campaign or for other people's political campaigns. It's about mobilization.' The first recipients of contributions from Murphy's PAC include Georgia Youth Justice and Project 26 Pennsylvania. His group is also backing the Committee to Protect Health Care's work organizing doctors and nurses to support Medicaid in Michigan, Louisiana and Utah. Murphy is far from the only Democrat who has positioned himself as a future leader of the party as it struggles to find its way back to power. Several potential 2028 candidates have traveled to critical battleground and early-voting states in recent weeks. Last week, Maryland Gov. Wes Moore and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz both visited South Carolina to attend a key Democratic dinner.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store