Trump ramps up pressure on GOP holdouts as his megabill meets its ultimate fate
President Donald Trump and Republican leaders are betting that key GOP holdouts will buckle under enormous pressure to pass his sweeping agenda within days – even as a number are warning they're prepared to sink the multi-trillion-dollar measure without major changes.
But tensions are escalating between the House and Senate and between moderates and conservatives who are battling over competing versions – as Trump demands the bill on his desk by July 4.
With the Senate planning a critical vote to begin debate as soon as Thursday, Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Speaker Mike Johnson are both racing to quell rebellions among their centrist and right-wing factions.
Behind the scenes, Johnson and his allies are in high-stakes talks with Senate GOP leaders to resolve final sticking points, while stressing to their own House members that they may ultimately need to back the Senate's version because further cross-Capitol negotiations aren't feasible, according to two sources familiar with the discussions, a move certain to cause an outcry among many in his conference.
That means GOP holdouts could ultimately be left with this choice: Vote for a plan they detest or sink the bill and endure Trump's wrath. GOP leaders in both chambers are gambling their members will choose the former.
'When it comes over, we'll pass it,' House Majority Whip Tom Emmer told CNN. 'We've been talking over a year. The time for voting is now.'
But multiple House Republicans are fuming that the Senate rewrote their carefully crafted version of bill – most critically to propose deeper cuts on Medicaid – and are openly calling to blow past Trump's timeline to change it back.
Plus Johnson now has at least three Republican hardliners declaring they will oppose the Senate version without even deeper spending cuts: Reps. Andy Harris of Maryland, Chip Roy of Texas and Eric Burlison of Missouri. And then there's the parochial issue dogging the GOP: The push led by New York Republicans to increase the amount taxpayers can deduct from their local levies, a deal that GOP senators want to gut and force House members to swallow.
Some are warning they won't cave – a threat GOP leaders must weigh since they can only afford three defections in each chamber to pass the bill.
'If they're trying to jam us with something that we can't support, then I think we need to take those extra days to make sure it's a good product,' said Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, who was one of 16 House Republicans who declared in a letter to both GOP leaders on Tuesday that they couldn't support the Senate's Medicaid provisions without major changes. She also met with Johnson about the issue on Tuesday.
Malliotakis was among several GOP lawmakers who told CNN she would support a formal 'conference committee' between the House and Senate – against the wishes of Trump and GOP leaders, since it would dramatically slow down the president's agenda.
Even Rep. David Joyce, a close leadership ally, said he was willing to miss Trump's July 4 deadline to fight for more of the House's original provisions.
'I think a good bill deserves to take its time,' the Ohio Republican told CNN. 'There's differences in what the Senate's talking about and what can pass here.'
The GOP is largely united on the main tenets of the bill, including extending Trump's 2017 tax cuts for individuals and businesses, imposing new work requirements on social safety net programs and fulfilling the president's campaign promises like no tax on tips and overtime pay — all while providing hundreds of billions more for the Pentagon and border security agencies. But how to pay for many of those provisions has been far more contentious, including cuts to Medicaid and phasing out Biden-era energy tax credits.
And official estimates that the measure could add more than $3.4 trillion to deficits over the next decade have left many on the right uneasy – in addition to the Senate's proposed $5 trillion increase to the national debt limit.
Meanwhile, patience is running thin in the Senate, with many Republicans eager to move on and call their House counterparts' bluff.
'It's a little arrogant to say the Senate has got to eat exactly what the House proposed. I mean it's a bicameral process,' Sen. Bernie Moreno, a Republican from Ohio. 'I don't look like Alexander Hamilton or James Madison do I? That's just the process our founders created.'
And Trump himself is heaping pressure on Congress, posting on Truth Social on Tuesday: 'Lock yourself in a room if you must, don't go home, and GET THE DEAL DONE THIS WEEK.'
Senate Republicans are particularly frustrated by the so-called SALT Caucus, the group of House Republicans in New York and California that is demanding bigger deductions on state and local tax payments.
Those Republicans cut a deal with Johnson to win their support by raising the amount of state and local levies that eligible taxpayers can deduct to a $40,000 limit. Now, several of those New York Republicans say they won't accept a penny less than that number, even though Senate Republicans say they should jam the House with a less expensive deal.
'I'm OK with them making crazy statements like that if they want,' said North Dakota Republican Sen. Kevin Cramer, referring to the House Republicans from New York. 'I hear 'red line' a lot around here. I hear that a lot, but at the end of day, it turns into a rather light pink.'
But those House GOP lawmakers pressing for tax relief said it would be a mistake to assume that they would simply swallow whatever SALT deal the Senate passes.
'I think that would be the wrong assumption,' Rep. Mike Lawler, a New York Republican and leading proponent of the House deal, told reporters Tuesday.
Any whipping operation among House Republicans, however, is complicated by the still-fluid negotiations in the Senate. GOP senators are still tweaking their bill themselves and trying to navigate changes forced on them by the Senate parliamentarian's rulings that some of their provisions are out of order with strict Senate budget rules that they must follow to pass the bill along party lines.
The biggest headache for Republicans, though, remains the fate of Medicaid.
At least 20 centrist Republicans in both chambers are trying to reverse the Senate's biggest cuts to Medicaid, which were not part of the House-passed bill. But another group of GOP hardliners – including Sens. Mike Lee of Utah, Rick Scott of Florida and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin – wants to slash even deeper from the program and have raised major concerns about the impact the bill would have on the deficit. And they all met with Trump on Monday night.
During a closed-door meeting Monday, Sen. Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri who has been outspoken about his concerns the bill is cutting too much into Medicaid, said North Carolina Republican Sen. Thom Tillis gave out information to senators on how much rural hospitals in states like his could lose if some of the changes the Senate rolled out went into effect.
At issue are new proposed limits on how much states can tax health care providers, a levy that helps fund the Medicaid program. Some key Republicans fear that the new proposed limits could devastate Medicaid providers, especially rural hospitals, and are demanding changes.
'Senate leadership now needs to fix this,' Hawley said. 'They're the ones who invented this new rural hospital defund scheme that the House says they can't pass. It's going to close rural hospitals. They need to get with rural hospitals, figure out what's going to work for them, and then they need to get the sign off of the House.'
'The leadership needs to work on this with rural hospitals and the House,' he said. 'This won't work to not ever talk to the House and hope that they just take the bill. That will land us in a conference committee. I don't want to do that.'
Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican and a key swing vote facing reelection next year, is pushing for the bill to include a relief fund to providers hardest hit by the new cuts — potentially around $100 billion although multiple sources told CNN that the number has been extremely fluid.
'I've been very concerned about the cuts in Medicaid and the impact on my state, but other states as well,' Collins told CNN on Tuesday. 'I've also been concerned about the health of rural hospitals, nursing homes, health centers and have been working on a provider relief fund. But that doesn't offset the problem with the Medicaid cuts.'
Tillis, a Republican who like Collins is also up for reelection next year, said that the proposed Medicaid cuts could cost his state $38 billion over 10 years.
'That's a big impact,' he told CNN. He added: 'I'm very much in favor of moving in that direction. You just have to do it at a pace that states can absorb, or we're going to have bad outcomes, political and policy.'
But if Trump and Senate GOP leaders give in to the demands of those holdouts, it would drive up the already hugely expensive price tag — prompting a revolt on the right.
Rep. Andy Harris, a Maryland Republican who leads the House Freedom Caucus, contended that the Senate is moving in the wrong direction, calling for deeper cuts into Medicaid and saying it should more quickly eliminate green energy tax credits enacted under the Democrats' Inflation Reduction Act. Harris voted 'present' when the bill passed the House by a single vote last month.
But Harris said he would go even further if forced to accept the Senate bill in the coming days.
'If the Senate tries to jam the House with this version, I won't vote ' present.' I'll vote 'NO,'' Harris said Tuesday.
CNN's Ali Main contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
7 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump calls out Putin as ‘misguided,' says US could send Ukraine Patriot missile systems
President Trump took a rare dig at his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, following this week's NATO summit in the Netherlands before telling a Ukrainian reporter that 'we're going to see' if Washington is able to supply Patriot missile systems and munitions to assist Kyiv in its war against Moscow's invasion. 'I know one thing: He'd like to settle, he'd like to get out of this thing. It's a mess for him,' Trump told reporters in The Hague before departing the two-day gathering of Western leaders. 'I consider him a person that's, I think, been misguided. I'm very surprised, actually. I thought we would have had that settled.' Advertisement Gray TV reporter Jon Decker had pressed Trump about whether he views Russia as an adversary or whether he believes that the Kremlin has its sights set on territory beyond Ukraine. 4 Russian President Vladimir Putin, pictured Monday during a meeting with the interim president of Mali. Getty Images 'It's possible. I mean, it's possible,' Trump replied to the latter question. Advertisement Despite some of his high-profile dustups with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Trump also admitted that Putin was the 'more difficult' leader to engage. 'Vladimir Putin has been more difficult. Frankly, I've had some problems with Zelensky,' Trump told reporters when asked about his campaign pledge to end the war in 24 hours. 'It's been more difficult than other wars.' Trump also showed empathy for BBC Ukraine correspondent Myroslava Petsa after she asked the president 'whether or not the US is ready to sell anti-air missile systems to Ukraine.' 'We know that Russia has been pounding Ukraine really heavily right now,' she added. Advertisement Before addressing her question, Trump asked Petsa: 'Are you living there, yourself, now?' 4 President Trump listens to a question from BBC Ukraine reporter Myroslava Petsa (below) following the NATO Summit at The Hague in the The Netherlands. instagram/saintjavelin 'My husband is there now,' she said. 'And me with the kids, I'm in Warsaw [Poland], actually. Because he wanted me to.' Advertisement The visibly moved Trump responded, 'wow, that's amazing,' before asking whether Petsa's husband was 'a soldier,' which she confirmed. 'Wow, that's rough stuff, right?' he told the reporter. 'That's tough.' Trump then went on to affirm that Kyiv wants to buy the weapons from the US — and pledged that 'we're going to see if we can make some available.' 'You know, they're very hard to get. We need them too,' the president said. 'We were supplying them to Israel, and they're very effective — 100% effective. Hard to believe how effective. And they do want that more than any other thing, as you probably know.' 'That's very good question, and I wish you a lot of luck,' Trump told Petsa. 'I mean, I can see it's very upsetting to you.' Trump has been growing impatient with Putin, lashing out in response to some of Russia's most brutal attacks on Ukraine — such as a barrage of 300 drone and missile attacks last month, which prompted the president to rip the Russian leader as 'crazy.' Still, the administration has been reticent about ratcheting up sanctions on Russia, despite a growing push from Congress to do so. 'If we did what everybody here wants us to do, and that is come in and crush them with more sanctions, we probably lose our ability to talk to them about the cease-fire, and then who's talking to them?' Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Politico in an interview on the sidelines of the summit. Advertisement 4 President Trump, right, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky shake hands during their meeting at the NATO Summit Wednesday. UKRAINIAN PRESIDENTIAL PRESS SERVICE/AFP via Getty Images Trump met with Zelensky earlier Wednesday, after which the the Ukrainian leader said he 'congratulated President Trump on the successful operation in the Middle East.' 'It is important that the US actions have weakened not only their nuclear program but also their drone production capabilities. We will continue to keep an eye on the situation,' he said. 'We discussed the protection of our people with the president — first and foremost, the purchase of American air defense systems to shield our cities, our people, churches, and infrastructure,' Zelensky explained in a readout. 'Ukraine is ready to buy this equipment and support American weapons manufacturers. Europe can help. We also discussed the potential for co-production of drones. We can strengthen each other.'

7 minutes ago
Trump doesn't rule out sending Ukraine more Patriot missiles after Zelenskyy meeting
Following his closed-door meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the NATO Summit on Wednesday, President Donald Trump didn't rule out sending Ukraine monetary and defense aid as he voiced frustrations with Russian President Vladimir Putin. During his press conference at the conclusion of his trip to The Hague, Netherlands, Trump signaled a willingness to provide Ukraine with additional aid and sell or send Patriot air-defense missiles to help Ukraine defend itself against Russia. "They do want to have the anti-missile, missiles," Trump said of Ukraine. "As they call them the Patriots, and we're going to see if we can make some available." Trump's openness comes as Zelenskyy told ABC News earlier this month the United States diverted anti-drone weapons, previously promised to Ukraine under a Biden administration agreement, to the Middle East. "You know, they're very hard to get. We need them to. We were supplying them to Israel, and they're very effective, 100% effective. Hard to believe how effective," Trump said. "As far as money going, we'll see what happens. There's a lot of spirit," Trump added. Trump also appeared to shift his tone when describing his conversation with Zelenskyy, a relationship marked by many pivots. "He was very nice, actually. You know, we had little rough times sometimes. He was uh - couldn't have been nicer. I think he'd like to see an end to this. I do," he said of Zelenskyy. Zelenskyy offered similar praise of Trump, calling their meeting "long and substantive" while affirming he told him Ukraine is ready to buy more U.S. weapons. "With the President, we discussed the protection of our people — first and foremost, the purchase of American air defense systems to cover our cities, our people, churches, and infrastructure," Zelenskyy said in a statement on Wednesday. "Ukraine is ready to buy this equipment and support American arms manufacturers. Europe can help as well," Zelenskyy said. "We also talked about possible joint drone production. We can strengthen each other." During his press conference, Trump added Zelenskyy was fighting a "brave" and "tough" battle while putting pressure on Putin to show more willingness to end the conflict. "Look. Vladimir Putin really has to end that war. People are dying at levels that people haven't seen for a long time." Then, when pressed on why he wasn't able to end the conflict between Russia and Ukraine quickly as he adamantly claimed while on the campaign trail, Trump again pointed the blame towards Putin. "It's more difficult than people wouldn't have any idea," Trump said. "Vladimir Putin has been more difficult. Frankly, I had some problems with Zelenskyy. You may have read about him, and it's been more difficult than other wars." Trump's public praise of Zelenskyy marks a shift in tone for the President, who has had public battles with the leader of Ukraine. Most notably in February, a public Oval Office spat between the two officials led to a scrapped bilateral mineral deal, which wasn't finalized for two months until the pair sat down together on the sidelines of Pope Francis' funeral. Then, in recent weeks, as Trump focused on negotiating an agreement between Iran and Israel, he left last week's G7 Summit in Canada early, skipping out on a bilateral with Ukraine. However, after their meeting on Wednesday, Trump displayed more compassion for the situation in Ukraine in a moment highlighted by his exchange with a Ukrainian reporter who said her husband was a Ukrainian soldier while she and her children fled to Warsaw for safety. "Wow, that's rough stuff, right? That's tough," Trump said, asking the reporter many personal questions before answering her policy question. "That's very good question. And I wish you a lot of luck. I mean, I can see it's very upsetting to you. So say hello to your husband. Okay?" Trump said.


CNN
8 minutes ago
- CNN
GOP Rep on leaked DIA report: ‘I'll take Israeli intelligence over that document any time'
Republican Rep. Carlos Gimenez tells CNN's Wolf Blitzer and Pamela Brown why he thinks Israeli Intelligence about the damage to Iran's nuclear facilities is more reliable than an assessment from the US Defense Intelligence Agency.