logo
House Republicans buck Trump on NOAA cuts

House Republicans buck Trump on NOAA cuts

E&E News15-07-2025
House Republican appropriators would cut NOAA by nearly $400 million for fiscal 2026, but they're rejecting deeper reductions proposed by the White House.
The Commerce-Justice-Science bill — released Monday and up for subcommittee markup Tuesday — represents a blowback to the administration's efforts to dismantle the science agency, including dissolving the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research.
The legislation would still amount to a 6 percent cut from current levels, and Republicans focused more on its law enforcement portions than science provisions.
Advertisement
'This bill importantly balances federal funding to support American values and the priorities of the Trump Administration by investing in programs that strengthen our economy and policies that protect our constitutional rights,' said Rep. Hal Rogers (R-Ky.), chair of the Commerce, Justice and Science Appropriations Subcommittee.
'This bill also ensures that America remains the global leader in space exploration as adversaries like China ramp up global aggression,' he said.
Republicans say the bill includes 'reducing spending on reckless climate change efforts' and 'right-size the bureaucracy of the federal government by reducing salaries and expenses where appropriate.'
Committee Democrats said the bill 'continues Republicans' attacks on America's scientific and economic competitiveness by cutting billions from science, technology development, STEM education, and aeronautics research of NASA and the National Science Foundation.'
The legislation would slash funding for independent ocean species research, with a 78 percent cut for the Marine Mammal Commission, established in 1972 under the Marine Mammal Protection Act.
The National Science Foundation would see a 23 percent cut of $2 billion. That's significantly less than the 57 percent proposed drop included in the Trump administration budget request.
The Republican bill would hold funding levels steady for NASA, at roughly $24.8 billion, compared to a 25 percent cut under the White House budget proposal of $18.8 billion.
The House bill would codify President Donald Trump's executive orders to end diversity, equity and inclusion programs and prohibit federal funding 'for DEI efforts and critical race theory.'
The Senate Appropriations Committee planned to release its own Commerce-Justice-Science bill last week but a dispute over FBI headquarters thwarted that effort.
But lawmakers discussing the bill said it would include full funding for the National Weather Service. Senators are working on their spending bills on a bipartisan basis.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

It's Liberation Day III - and from today, dozens of countries will face painful Trump tariffs
It's Liberation Day III - and from today, dozens of countries will face painful Trump tariffs

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

It's Liberation Day III - and from today, dozens of countries will face painful Trump tariffs

It is "Liberation Day" III - the third tariff deadline set by Donald Trump. From today, countries without bilateral trade agreements face reciprocal tariffs - ranging from 25% to 50% - with a baseline of 15% to 20% for any not making a deal. He has delayed twice, from April to July and from July to August, but hammered this date home in his trademark caps-on style: "THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE STANDS STRONG, AND WILL NOT BE EXTENDED. A BIG DAY FOR AMERICA!!!" "Will not be extended" for anyone but Mexico, it seems. The country secured a 90-day extension at the last minute, with Mr Trump citing the "complexities" of the border. By close of business on the eve of deadline, he had a handful of framework deals - some significant - including the UK (10%), the EU, Japan and South Korea (15%), Indonesia and the Philippines (19%), Vietnam (20%). On the EU agreement, which he struck in Scotland, the president said: "It's a very powerful deal, it's a big deal, it's the biggest of all the deals." But what happened to the "90 deals in 90 days" touted by the White House earlier this year? The short answer is they were replaced by letters of instruction to pay a tariff set by the US. Amid of flurry of late activity, the US played hardball with major trading partners like Canada. "For the rest of the world, we're going to have things done by Friday," said US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick - the "rest of the world" meaning everyone but China. There is, apparently, the "framework of a deal" between the world's two largest economies, but talks between Washington and Beijing are continuing. Read more US news: In terms of wins, he can claim some significant deals and point to his tariffs having generated an impressive $27bn (£20.4bn) in June, not bad for a single month. But the legality of the approach is under siege - with the US Court of International Trade ruling that the "Liberation Day" tariffs exceeded the president's authority, with enforcement paused pending appeal. The deadline has stirred the pot, forcing a handful of deals onto the table. Whether they stick or survive legal scrutiny is far from settled. But the playbook remains the same - threaten the world with trade chaos, whittle it down, celebrate the wins, and pray no one checks what's legal.

Virginia Giuffre's Brother Asks Why Epstein Files Haven't Been Released
Virginia Giuffre's Brother Asks Why Epstein Files Haven't Been Released

Newsweek

time4 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Virginia Giuffre's Brother Asks Why Epstein Files Haven't Been Released

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Virginia Giuffre's brother, Sky Roberts, said he wants to know why the documents related to the investigation into sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have not been released, saying in part that "it's time for these monsters to be exposed." Newsweek reached out to the Department of Justice (DOJ) via online form Thursday night for comment. Why It Matters Backlash regarding the investigation into the disgraced financier reached fever pitch this month after the DOJ and the FBI released a joint statement confirming that Epstein died by suicide in 2019 and that there was no "client list." Attorney General Pam Bondi has faced the brunt of the backlash from MAGA and Democrats alike as lawmakers plead for transparency and access to documents. What To Know Earlier this week, Trump was asked aboard Air Force One whether one of the workers "stolen" from his Mar-a-Lago Club by Epstein was Giuffre. Trump responded, "I don't know. I think she worked at the spa. I think so, I think that was one of the people, yep. He stole her, and by the way, she had no complaints about us, as you know, none whatsoever." Trump's comments prompted Giuffre's family to release a statement, saying in part, "It was shocking to hear President Trump invoke our sister and say that he was aware that Virginia had been 'stolen' from Mar-a-Lago," the family said. "We would like to clarify that it was convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell who targeted and preyed upon our then 16-year-old sister, Virginia, from Mar-a-Lago, where she was working in 2000, several years before Epstein and President Trump had their falling out," Giuffre's family added. Giuffre died by suicide in April 2025 in Australia. The family members of Virginia Giuffre can be seen talking with CNN's Kaitlan Collins on July 31. (Photo from CNN) The family members of Virginia Giuffre can be seen talking with CNN's Kaitlan Collins on July 31. (Photo from CNN) If you or someone you know is considering suicide, contact the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline by dialing 988, text "988" to the Crisis Text Line at 741741 or visit This is a developing story that will be updated with additional information.

Van Hollen blocks FBI funding bill from floor debate over Trump headquarters dispute
Van Hollen blocks FBI funding bill from floor debate over Trump headquarters dispute

Politico

time4 minutes ago

  • Politico

Van Hollen blocks FBI funding bill from floor debate over Trump headquarters dispute

The simmering dispute over the FBI's future headquarters derailed Senate efforts Thursday night to launch floor debate on the legislation that funds the agency, as well as the departments of Commerce and Justice, NASA and science programs. Sen. Chris Van Hollen objected Thursday night to including the bill in a larger package of funding measures. The Maryland Democrat demanded that the Senate agree to adopt language that would require the FBI to meet a specific security threshold for its headquarters, as the Trump administration keeps the agency in downtown Washington instead of relocating it to the suburban Maryland campus previously selected after a yearslong competition. But Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas), who chairs the funding panel that handles the bill, shot down that request on the Senate floor Thursday night, after the dispute over the FBI headquarters already snagged committee action on the bill. Tearing up as he spoke on the floor, Moran said he knows 'no path forward' that would allow Van Hollen's amendment. 'Our appropriations process is fragile,' he said. If Van Hollen, who serves as the ranking member on the Commerce-Justice-Science Subcommittee, hadn't objected, his amendment would have been teed up for a vote. But Van Hollen didn't want to take the risk that the language would not have been adopted. 'That is a simple request that I would have thought all of us could stand behind,' Van Hollen said, 'making sure that the new headquarters of the men and women of the FBI meets the security requirements that we and they have set out.' Senate appropriators already killed another amendment Van Hollen proposed in committee, which would have barred the Trump administration from dipping into a $1.4 billion construction account for anything besides relocating the FBI to the previously selected site. After the proposal was initially adopted, the committee later voted to strike the language because so many Republicans were threatening to tank the underlying bill if it rebuked Trump on the headquarters decision. 'We did it because the president of the United States was going to throw a fit if that provision stayed on, that's why people reversed the position,' Van Hollen said on the Senate floor Thursday night. 'And we shouldn't make our decisions out of fear about what somebody in the White House is going to do, because that distorts the entire process here in the United States Senate.' Moran's Thursday evening request was to tie together four bills to fund the government for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1. Those bills would collectively fund the departments of Veterans Affairs and Agriculture, as well as military construction projects, the operations of Congress and the FDA. The Kansas Republican touted that those four measures had made it through the full Senate Appropriations Committee with bipartisan support and 'in some instances, unanimously.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store