TN must protect victims of non-consensual recordings. This is digital assault.
In Tennessee, one of those issues has been the growing concern over non-consensual recordings, particularly in the context of intimate relationships. Women have become victims of a disturbing and invasive crime. That's why House Bill (HB) 602 was introduced, the "Voyeurism Victims Act," a bill designed to provide more justice for victims of hidden cameras and unauthorized recordings.
This legislation was born from the stories of women who were secretly recorded during intimate moments − women like Erika Thomas, who was unable to seek justice because the statute of limitations had already passed.
By the time Erika discovered she had been recorded, the legal window for prosecution had closed. This is a reality that far too many victims face in our digital age, where technology makes it easier to commit such offenses but harder to hold offenders accountable once the damage is done.
HB 602 aims to change that by addressing the statute of limitations. Under current law, the clock starts ticking on the statute of limitations when the crime occurs, not when the victim learns they've been harmed.
In cases of non-consensual recording, victims often have no idea they've been filmed until years later. Our bill changes the law so that the statute of limitations starts when the victim discovers the crime, not when it happens.
This simple change will ensure that those who violate people's privacy will not escape justice simply because the victim was unaware of the crime until much later.
In addition to extending the statute of limitations, HB 602 also proposes that offenders who target multiple victims should face stronger legal penalties.
The bill would classify these offenses as an E felony if there are multiple victims involved.
This stronger penalty reflects the severity of the crime and sends a clear message that we will not tolerate the exploitation of women, or anyone for that matter, through hidden cameras or non-consensual recordings.
Opinion: Federal funding for victims services is drying up. Tennessee must fill the gap.
By making it a felony offense, we increase the legal consequences for offenders, deterring future violations and protecting victims in the process.
Some might ask why this issue requires such urgent attention. The answer is simple: technology is advancing, and so are the ways in which criminals exploit it.
With the advent of smartphones, smart devices, and hidden cameras, it's easier than ever for perpetrators to invade someone's privacy without their knowledge. Women who were once vulnerable to physical assault now find themselves at risk of digital assault − an invisible, often more insidious violation.
When these videos go viral, when they circulate on the internet, they leave a permanent scar on the victim's life. The damage to their reputation, sense of safety, and personal well-being can be devastating.
Opinion: Sign up for the Tennessee Voices newsletter showcasing opinion across the Volunteer State
This bill isn't just about punishment − it's about empowerment. It's about giving victims the legal tools they need to seek justice, even if they only learn about the crime years after it was committed.
It's about acknowledging that privacy is a fundamental right, and that no one should ever have to fear being secretly recorded during intimate moments. By supporting HB 602, we are standing up for those who have been harmed and ensuring that those who would commit these crimes cannot hide behind the technology they misuse.
Finally, I want to emphasize that HB 602 is about more than just changing the law; it's about giving victims a voice. As Erika Thomas told us, she felt empowered by her decision to testify, even though she couldn't press charges. She chose to speak out not just for herself but for other women who might be suffering in silence.
I believe that HB 602 is a critical step forward in ensuring that victims of non-consensual recordings are given the protections and opportunities for justice they deserve. It's a step toward a safer, more accountable future for everyone.
State Rep. Bob Freeman, D-Nashville, represents House District 56 in the Tennessee General Assembly. Bob Freeman is also the president of Freeman Webb Company in Nashville, Tenn., a full-service real estate investment and management firm that specializes in the acquisition, management and rehabilitation of multi-family residential and commercial properties.
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Non-consensual recording victims need Tennessee's protection | Opinion
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
05-08-2025
- Wall Street Journal
The Defenestration of the BLS Commissioner
Last week's dismal labor market report sent shock waves through U.S. markets. In 'Trump Claims the Jobs Report Was Rigged. Was It?' (Life Science, Aug. 4), Allysia Finley describes how President Trump accused the Bureau of Labor Statistics of publishing 'rigged' numbers and fired its well-respected commissioner, Erika McEntarfer. The bureau reported that only 73,000 nonfarm jobs were added in July, well below expectations. It also revised May and June numbers, erasing a combined 258,000 jobs from earlier employment estimates—the biggest downward revision since the pandemic.
Yahoo
05-08-2025
- Yahoo
Facing facts about Trump and the jobs numbers
In announcing the firing of the government's chief labor statistician last week, President Trump condemned the works of Erika McEntarfer as 'phony.' McEntarfer was just the 16th commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics since the position was created by Congress in 1884 to keep track of unemployment during an ongoing depression of a very Gilded Age variety. The job is to produce consistent, reliable data that Congress and other agencies can use for setting their own policies. What we have turned it into, however, is some kind of political rhabdomancer, an oracle on whose divinations the results of elections supposedly hang. But, like most good governance, it's actually really boring. McEntarfer was confirmed by the Senate by a richly bipartisan vote of 86-8 to a four-year term that began in 2024. But there's no doubt that Trump was within his powers to fire her. All of the other counters of beans at the bureau are civil servants, but not the bean-counter in chief, who has always been a political appointee — which McEntarfer became only after more than 20 years in various statistical gigs as a federal worker bee. Until Friday, she managed the bureau and her name was on the reports, but the numbers are churned out by a hive of statisticians and researchers working in the old Post Office building next to Washington's Union Station. The deputy commissioner, civil servant William Wiatrowski, will again serve as acting commissioner, as he has twice before during vacancies. We'll see what Trump thinks of Wiatrowski and the data nerds' August numbers when they come out on the first Friday of September. The president has vowed to pick an 'exceptional replacement' for McEntarfer, and that is probably true. There will be many exceptions concerning whomever Trump sends to the Senate for confirmation to the post. In the meantime, if the August numbers are as glum as the rest of this summers', Trump may start firing his way through acting commissioners until he finds one who sees the 'great Republican Success' the president claims McEntarfer was concealing. But he can burn that bridge when he comes to it. For now, let's think about why Trump fired McEntarfer and what he meant by 'phony.' 'Days before the election, [McEntarfer] came out with these beautiful numbers for Kamala, I guess Biden-Kamala, and she came out with these beautiful numbers trying to get somebody else elected,' Trump told reporters Friday. 'Then, right after the election, she had an [$800,000] or $900,000 massive reduction — said she made a mistake.' The fact is that the single poorest employment report of McEntarfer's tenure was the one she published three days before the 2024 election, in which the bureau reported Nov. 1 that the economy had created only 12,000 new jobs in October, a worrisome sign for former President Biden and former Vice President Kamala Harris. There was indeed a revision to those numbers after the election: a substantial increase to 43,000, reflecting the bureau's conclusion that the fall hurricane season had distorted the overall jobs picture. It is true, though, that Trump did complain bitterly 10 weeks before the election about the long-term revisions to the bureau's 2023 numbers that concluded the economy had added more than 800,000 fewer jobs in the previous year than initially estimated under McEntarfer's predecessor. Insofar as jobs numbers — rather than actual jobs — affect the attitude of voters, McEntarfer's bureau had given Trump a gift. But Trump was more focused on the revision itself, not the report, writing, 'the Harris-Biden administration has been caught fraudulently manipulating Job Statistics.' If the Biden-Harris administration had been cooking the books, then why on earth would it announce such a thing during the height of the campaign, on Aug. 21, the third day of the Democratic National Convention? If Trump's goal was to knock the incumbent administration's economic policies, McEntarfer & Co. had just served up a very juicy pitch, but Trump largely ignored it in favor of the allegation of corruption. It is possible that Friday, Trump confused the August downward revision with the November report, and that he unknowingly conflated the two events to fit his preferred narrative. But whether it was a premedicated lie or self-deception isn't really the essential point. The episode shows us what Trump thinks about data in general. Whether it is election returns or economic reports, none of it can be trusted, unless it has been provided by 'his own people.' Thus we come to a fork in the road: Is it that Trump believes it is possible for data to be unhappy for him and accurate, but only if he chooses the people who collect the data, or, is it closer to his way of thinking that data are mostly phony and he just prefers to be the one in whose favor it is being rigged? If it is the former, that comes with its own problems. Once a leader has installed loyalists in charge of data gathering, those loyalists out of some combination of love, ambition and fear will be motivated to hide bad news. A government that loses the ability to tell itself the truth is doomed, with terrible consequences for its citizens. But what if it's the latter, and Trump doesn't put much stock in data as anything more than a tool for marketing, messaging and politics? This is the kind of thinking that might be behind asking an elections official to 'find' enough votes to overturn an election. If Trump assumes that the blue state election returns are phony, why shouldn't Republicans provide phony vote totals for his benefit? Whether it's the Georgia secretary of state, the chair of the Federal Reserve, his own vice president or the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, if Trump assumes that all findings are the work of political malfeasance, why shouldn't they be malfeasing in his favor? Unhappy findings, therefore, can't be matters of fact or sincere interpretation, they can only be, as Trump would say, 'nice' or 'not nice.' Writing in 1942 about his recollections of fighting in the Spanish Civil War years before, George Orwell framed out how first Spain and then all of Europe had been plunged into hellish madness over the course of less than a decade. What he concluded wasn't that old saw that 'truth is the first causality of war,' but rather that the death of truth is part of what leads us to war. 'I know it is the fashion to say that most of recorded history is lies anyway. I am willing to believe that history is for the most part inaccurate and biased,' he wrote. 'but what is peculiar to our own age is the abandonment of the idea that history could be truthfully written.' It's not that employment data aren't ever wrong, it's that in a functional republic, we believe that such data can be found through an imperfect, iterative process that is pointing at something real. If we abandon that idea, then all that's left is the party line. The would-be information czars of the COVID-era and the dis-disinformation apparatus that sprang up in response to the wilderness of online life, including that part of the wilderness planted by Trump himself, frequently devoted itself to fighting 'wrong' ideas and 'bad' opinions. It was often Orwellian in its own way, fact-checking subjective assessments. But the real fight for the future isn't about what people think, but rather what people believe can be known. We may already be living in a post-truth era, but God help us if we are beyond caring about facts. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
03-08-2025
- Yahoo
White House officials defend firing of labor official as critics warn of trust erosion
By Doina Chiacu and Jasper Ward WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Top White House economic advisers on Sunday defended President Donald Trump's firing of the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, pushing back against criticism that Trump's action could undermine confidence in official U.S. economic data. U.S Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CBS that Trump had "real concerns" about the data, while Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said the president "is right to call for new leadership." Hassett said on Fox News the main concern was Friday's BLS report of net downward revisions showing 258,000 fewer jobs had been created in May and June than previously reported. Trump accused BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer of faking the jobs numbers without providing any evidence of data manipulation. The BLS compiles the closely watched employment report as well as consumer and producer price data. The BLS gave no reason for the revised data but noted that "monthly revisions result from additional reports received from businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal factors." McEntarfer's firing added to growing concerns about the quality of U.S. economic data published by the federal government and came on the heels of a raft of new U.S. tariffs on dozens of trading partners, sending global stock markets tumbling as Trump presses ahead with plans to reorder the global economy. "I think what we need is a fresh set of eyes at the BLS, somebody who can clean this thing up," Hassett said on "Fox News Sunday." In an interview with CBS' "Face the Nation," Greer acknowledged there were always revisions of job numbers, "but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways." 'PREPOSTEROUS CHARGE' Critics, including former leaders of the BLS, slammed Trump's move and called on Congress to investigate McEntarfer's removal, saying it would undermine trust in a respected statistical agency. There was no way a commissioner could rig the jobs numbers, said William Beach, a former BLS commissioner and co-chair of the group Friends of the BLS. "Every year we've revised the numbers. When I was commissioner, we had a 500,000 job revision during President Trump's first term," Beach said on CNN's "State of the Union. "And why do we do that? Because firms are created or firms go out of business, and we don't really know that during the course of our of the year, until we reconcile against a real full count of all the businesses." Democrats and at least two Republican senators also criticized the firing. "This is a preposterous charge. These numbers are put together by teams of literally hundreds of people following detailed procedures that are in manuals," former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers said Sunday on ABC's "This Week." "What does a bad leader do when they get bad news? Shoot the messenger," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a speech on the Senate floor on Friday. The firing came amid a flurry of economic upheaval last week. Just hours before the tariff deadline on Friday, Trump signed an executive order imposing duties on U.S. imports from countries including Canada, Brazil, India and Taiwan, in his latest round of levies as countries attempted to seek ways to reach better deals. Greer and Hassett said on Sunday the bulk of those tariffs are likely to stay in place rather than be cut as part of continuing negotiations. India pushed back on Trump's threats of an additional penalty if it kept purchasing oil from Russia, two Indian government sources told Reuters on Saturday. Trump imposed a new 25% tariff on Indian goods.
