Alphons says he and P J Joseph facilitated entry of private professional colleges in Kerala
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: According to former top bureaucrat-turned-Union minister in the first Modi government, K J Alphons aka Alphons Kannanthanam, it was he and P J Joseph, the education minister in the E K Nayanar government in 2000, who surreptitiously facilitated the entry of private professional colleges in Kerala.
In his latest book, 'The Winning Formula: 52 Ways to Change Your Life', Alphons reveals that as the then secretary of the higher education department, he went out of the way to issue no-objection certificates (NOCs) to 33 engineering colleges in the private sector and obtained the signature of the minister without knowledge of the cabinet. Later, when Nayanar got to know about it, according to Alphons, it was Joseph's threat to resign from cabinet if any disciplinary action was taken against the bureaucrat that rescued him.
In the book, Alphons says he had in fact persuaded the then chairman of the All India Council for Technical Education to surpass the LDF government in issuing approvals.
'When I became the higher education department secretary in Kerala in 2000, over 2 lakh Kerala students were doing engineering, medicine, nursing and MBA outside the state, as there were far too few seats here. In 2000, in the state, there were only 300 seats for MBBS, 3,000 seats for engineering, 700 seats for nursing and a few hundred seats for MBA. I told P J Joseph: our children need to study here and for this we must open up.
The minister said: I completely agree with you, but it will never ever be cleared by the LDF's Liaison Committee; it will never ever go up to the cabinet. I told him impetuously: Sir, don't our children have the right to study? I have a simple solution: since you cannot approve the idea without the sanction of the cabinet, I as secretary will issue the sanction,' Alphons writes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
7 hours ago
- New Indian Express
No Anvar factor in Nilambur, says Swaraj
MALAPPURAM: In fielding its state secretariat member M Swaraj for the Nilambur by-election, the CPM hopes to take on the Congress and the UDF politically. In an interview to TNIE, the 46-year-old candidate says P V Anvar will not be a factor in the bypoll, which he sees as a precursor to the 2026 assembly election. Excerpts: What are the political underpinnings of this election? The Nilambur by-election is a precursor to the 2026 assembly election. Common people want the LDF to win a third term in 2026. That is the sentiment of those who are benefiting from the changes that have taken place in the state over the last nine years. We are interacting with people through development activities and welfare schemes, focusing on the goal of a 'nava (new) Keralam'. Nilambur is an area where farmers face a lot of issues. How are their concerns being addressed? The lives and land of farmers are at risk. One of the most important issues is the applicable legislation, the Wildlife Protection Act of 1972, which is a central law. There is strong criticism that it lacks provisions to protect farmers. It should be amended. The environment and wildlife must be protected, but then farmers should receive equal importance. Kerala has submitted a detailed plan to the central government, which has not been approved. There is a problem with all this. The government often says that it is not getting central funds. But it increases the salaries of PSC members while pretending not to see the problems faced by ASHA workers. Wouldn't people see through this? It's propaganda. ASHA workers are part of a central government scheme. States also play a role. The Left's stance is to accept them as workers who should be paid minimum wage. The Centre has not done that. When LDF came to power in 2016, their honorarium was `1,000. We increased it sevenfold, but it is still not enough.
The Hindu
13 hours ago
- The Hindu
The rising challenge of university and college closures
Global higher education is undergoing a paradoxical shift. On the one hand, student enrolment is booming, with over 254 million currently enrolled in higher education institutions. This figure has more than doubled over the past two decades and is projected to rise. On the other hand, despite this growing demand, university closures and mergers loom large in many countries. Much more attention needs to be focused on these failures, which affect students, staff, and society. There are many reasons for this unhappy situation — population declines, a growing scepticism about the return on investment from a university degree, populist opposition to science and higher education, shifts in government funding to higher education institutions, predatory private providers, technological disruption, rise of online learning, and others. The consequences are already visible: a wave of campus closures and mergers that is reshaping the higher education map in many countries. In many cases, closures and mergers are not signs of strategic innovation, but rather responses to institutional distress. While exact figures are difficult to determine, it is estimated that hundreds of universities and colleges worldwide have shut down or merged in recent years. The Indian case India is not immune to these trends — but at the same time is an unusual case since its population continues to grow and the number of young people seeking post-secondary education is expanding as well. While the number of universities and colleges in India continue to expand, smaller institutions, especially private engineering and management colleges, are facing closure. The National Education Policy (NEP), 2020 sets an ambitious road map for improving access in the sector. One of the most significant targets set by the NEP is to raise the Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) in higher education to 50% by 2035. Another key recommendation is the expansion of higher education institutions into underserved regions. However, recent developments reveal a contrasting reality on the ground. The All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) imposed a two-year moratorium on the establishment of new engineering colleges in traditional areas of engineering in 2020-21. This was lifted only in 2023-24. In the current academic year, the AICTE approved the closure of 27 private colleges nationally. These institutions have stopped accepting new students — current students can complete their programmes. Furthermore, many affiliated colleges under the supervision of State universities are quietly being phased out. For example, in 2024 alone, 14 colleges affiliated with Mahatma Gandhi University in Kerala shut down due to declining enrolment and financial difficulties. The Karnataka government is currently reviewing the continuation of nine newly established public universities in the State. Similarly, in 2024, Anna University in Tamil Nadu decided to close down 12 of its affiliated engineering colleges due to very low enrolment rate. Unfortunately, national agencies such as the University Grants Commission or State government data do not provide an accurate picture of college closures nationally. Only the AICTE provides detailed data on closures. Global phenomenon Universities and colleges in many countries are struggling to stay viable amid shifting demographics, rising operational costs, and evolving societal perceptions of higher education's value. Countries facing significant demographic declines, such as Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, face especially serious problems — and in these countries the large majority of students are in private universities. And in all three countries, the government has considerable power over private institutions. In Japan, 33 universities have closed in the past few years and another 29 have merged with other institutions — and these numbers will significantly grow. A similar number have closed in South Korea, and others, called 'zombie' universities, are kept alive through government funding. In both South Korea and Japan, most failed institutions are in provincial areas where population decline is especially evident. In the U.S., 79 universities have closed in the past five years and at least another 80 are in imminent danger. Most of these schools are private and in rural areas with declining populations, and enrolments have declined precipitously. Mergers are also increasingly common though accurate statistics are unavailable. But a few are public — for example, in the state of Pennsylvania, which has a large number of small public colleges, the State government is merging these institutions to reduce costs. In the U.K., a majority of the non-elite universities have fiscal deficits and have been firing large number of academic and other staff. A decline in the number of overseas students, stimulated by more restrictive government policies, will exacerbate financial problems. Similar issues are evident in Canada and to a less extent in Australia. In the Canadian case, many vocationally oriented colleges, some of which have engaged in shady academic policies, have deep financial problems —estimates are that more than 80 public or non-profit colleges have already closed. Globally, closures and mergers do not affect research intensive universities but rather institutions at the lower end of the academic hierarchy. Top institutions, such as those in the U.K. and those targeted in the U.S. under the Trump administration, may face crises, but not existential threats. Early warning Competition and institutional closures are natural in any sector, including higher education. However, ignoring warning signs make the situation worse. India currently benefits from a large youth population, but changing birth rates will lead to a demographic decline in the future, similar to the East Asian and U.S. experience. This potential shift emphasises the need for sustainable strategies to ensure the stability and quality of higher education institutions. A college or university in crisis typically shows many early warning signs. In India, common indicators include a consistent drop in student admissions over time, which affect both public and private institutions. Over-reliance on tuition fees can also be considered a sign of crisis. Academically, signs of trouble include the reduction or closure of programmes, non-renewal of faculty contracts, and the resignation of prominent faculty members without proper replacements. Governance issues, such as frequent leadership changes, and reputational challenges such as poor campus infrastructure, unpaid electricity bills and inadequate student support services, further signal decline. The public, including students, parents, and faculty, should observe early warning signs of a college or university in crisis to avoid long-term harm to them. Practical steps to identify these signs include reviewing publicly available data, such as enrolment figures over the past few years. To enhance transparency, displaying this data on the institution's website should be made mandatory. Government authorities have a responsibility for tracking institutional performance and financial stability as well. (Eldho Mathews is programme officer (internationalisation) at the Kerala State Higher Education Council. Philip G. Altbach is professor emeritus and distinguished fellow, Center for International Higher Education, Boston College, United States; views are personal)
Time of India
13 hours ago
- Time of India
Nilambur bypoll: UDF polarizing voters, alleges CPM
Kozhikode: CPM accused Congress and UDF of trying to divide people along religious lines, while avoiding a direct response to UDF's allegation that CM Pinarayi Vijayan and senior CPM leaders, including politburo member A Vijayaraghavan, made remarks that 'maligned' Malappuram. Instead, CPM is countering the UDF's claims by terming communal polarization a regular UDF tactic. "They're always looking for ways to divide people. That's their method. They try to create religious divides. Opposition leader VD Satheesan's comments were part of that," alleged Vijayaraghavan, without responding to Satheesan's charge that he (Vijayaraghavan) linked Priyanka Gandhi's win in Wayanad, which includes Nilambur, to communal votes. UDF's key campaign theme is the CM's 'anti-Malappuram' remarks about gold smuggling in the district and the proceeds being used for anti-national activities. UDF seized on the issue, believing that it will resonate with the minority community, which forms a substantial part of the electorate. However, CPM is viewing it as a strategic ploy by UDF. Instead of responding directly, it is reminding voters of the Congress' past opposition to the creation of Malappuram. LDF believes any direct response will help UDF prolong the controversy and keep the issue alive in public discourse. But LDF is set to intensify its protest against AICC general secretary KC Venugopal's recent remark that the disbursal of welfare pensions, including clearing dues, amounts to bribery. Kerala State Karshaka Thozhilali Union will hold a protest meeting of pension beneficiaries in Nilambur on Friday to counter the claim. Meanwhile, Youth Congress state president Rahul Mamkootathil and Muslim Youth League general secretary PK Firos asked three pointed questions to LDF candidate M Swaraj, seeking his stand on the remarks made by the CM and other CPM leaders about Malappuram. They asked whether Swaraj agreed with the CPM view that Malappuram's essence is communal and whether he supported Vijayaraghavan's claim that Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi won in Wayanad with the help of minority communal votes. They also asked whether he will urge the CM to retract his anti-Malappuram remarks. Meanwhile in Kochi, criticizing CPM leader Thomas Isaac over his claim that there was an 18-month pension arrear during Oommen Chandy's tenure, Satheesan said, "I'm challenging CPM to prove that there was an 18-month pension arrear during Oommen Chandy's term. His allegation is baseless. The delay then was less than three months. Isaac himself had clarified that it was due to the introduction of a new treasury system and the issue was resolved immediately," he said.
