The NT's newest youth justice law changes will heap more trauma on to traumatised kids while worsening youth crime
The most notorious among the CLP's third set of amendments to youth justice laws in under a year is the reintroduction of spit hoods, now to be called 'anti-spit guards', into youth detention centres including Don Dale. Spit hoods became emblematic of what a royal commission found in August 2016 was a system in which children were verbally and physically abused and humiliated contrary to international law in prison-like youth detention centres that were unfit for accommodating children, let alone rehabilitating them.
Among the critics of the reintroduction of 'anti-spit guards' have been Mindy Sotiri, executive director of the Justice Reform Initiative; Karly Warner, the chair of the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Services; and the NT's own children's commissioner, Shahleena Musk.
Are these leaders 'offender apologists'? Finocchiaro wants to cast the CLP's critics as people who are somehow accepting of terrible violence. In the same Instagram post, Finocchiaro justified these latest changes – which also include lowering the bar before force is used against children in detention, and broadening the kinds of force that can be used to include dogs – by referring to a shocking incident last weekend in which a 15-year-old boy was stabbed at the Royal Darwin Show.
The CLP's pattern is now clear. The opposition leader, NT Labor's Selena Uibo, called the newest amendments a 'reactive, knee-jerk response'. But it's more likely that they've sat in Finocchiaro's 'to be actioned' tray for some time. It takes time to draft laws, and these latest changes appeared just three days after the Royal Show.
In its first sitting week after returning to power, the CLP lowered the age of criminal responsibility back down to 10. And following a horrific home invasion, the CLP immediately tightened bail laws. Rather than rushed and kneejerk, the CLP's trilogy of amendments to youth justice laws have been patient and opportunistic. They are consistent with an ideological opposition among many detention centre staff and corrections and police officers to the changes demanded by the royal commission into the protection and detention of children in the Northern Territory.
Most youth crime is committed by a relatively small number of children, some of whom commit an enormous number of offences. Evidence, in the form of research into this small cohort of repeat offenders and why they behave as they do, supports targeted, therapeutic approaches that aim to address underlying reasons and causes. The overwhelming majority of kids who offend have led extraordinarily traumatic lives. Often, they were victims of serious abuse and neglect long before they began breaking and entering, or hurting people. The evidence shows that reacting to these kids' bad behaviour with violence (or 'force') and aggression simply heaps more trauma on existing trauma – and makes it more likely that the offending behaviour escalates rather than resolves.
People like Sotiri, Warner and Musk accept this evidence base. The reason they're critical of laws that authorise reactive force rather than encourage therapeutic intervention is that they know such laws will only make the existing problem worse. But therapeutic intervention just doesn't exist, even when it's been court-ordered. When children who have been traumatised inside detention centres are released, they will be more, not less, likely to commit further offences. In stark terms: there will be more victims as a result of the CLP's policies.
But the people who accept this evidence base are not the CLP's constituents. During the last decade, non-Labor parties across the country have discovered a growing appetite among communities of resentment – fuelled by online echo-chambers and shock-jock opinionistas – for reactionary approaches that get tougher and tougher on criminalised kids, and that blame what it calls 'soft' approaches by governments more interested in the evidence. (Finocchiaro herself talks about the 'soft, offender-first policies' of her Labor predecessors.)
The CLP was the first to ride this wave of reaction into power. The Liberal National Party in Queensland was the second, in October, by promising what it called 'adult crime, adult time'. Ironically, most of this crime is more accurately characterised as juvenile, in the sense that it's perpetrated by kids and young adults with damaged or under-developed pre-frontal cortexes.
But it's politics and ideology, not evidence, that guide what we might call the 'Northern approach' to youth crime, following the united approach announced by Finocchiaro and Queensland's police minister, Dan Purdie, after he visited Darwin this month. No doubt we haven't seen the last of its regressions.
Russell Marks is a criminal defence lawyer and adjunct research fellow at La Trobe University. His latest book is Black Lives, White Law: Locked Up and Locked Out in Australia (La Trobe University Press, 2022)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Why are some Australian farmers losing faith in peak agricultural bodies to represent their interests?
Last September, a leaked email revealed the National Farmers' Federation had directed members to stay silent about the putative health risks from paraquat, a widely used herbicide. Some farmers rebelled. Among them was Mirboo North grower and grazier Emma Germano, who was then the president of the Victorian Farmers Federation. Germano broke ranks with the NFF to support the farmers who'd been vilified for speaking out about clusters of Parkinson's disease, which they believed to be linked to paraquat use on farms. (Manufacturer Syngenta, which has partnerships with NFF, denies any link.) 'These people are suffering,' Germano told the ABC's AM program. 'They're asking a question. For that to be shut down, when these are people who have been diligently part of our industry, salt-of-the-earth farmers – that, to me, is inexcusable.' Germano's stance revealed a growing discontent with peak bodies in Australia's fragmented agriculture sector. Some farmers believe peak bodies advocate for agribusiness interests over those of grassroots farmers. In niche and nascent sectors especially, farmers say they don't feel represented by Australia's 50 farming organisations, which range from regulators and statutory bodies to commodity groups, industry associations and farmers federations. The latter have faced declining memberships for decades. Andrew Meseha, whose companies grow hemp in Deniliquin, Shepparton and South Gippsland, says farm bodies cannot advocate for farmers while sponsored by corporations and aligned with specific political parties. 'The chemical companies are in every pocket,' he says. Meseha believes consequent farmer discontent accounts for the rising influence of independent rural MPs and the advent of non-partisan, issue-based collectives such as Lock the Gate and Farmers for Climate Action (FCA). Sign up to receive Guardian Australia's fortnightly Rural Network email newsletter Founded in 2010, Lock the Gate says it has 120,000 supporters, and decade-old FCA claims it has 45,000 supporters and more than 8,400 members. By comparison, state federations and associations – some more than a century old with huge legacy capital – report membership bases from about 3,500 in Western Australia and about 19,000 in New South Wales. The NFF accepts only organisational members – a structure Germano says privileges 'special interests, factions and commodity groups', and generates 'a huge amount of overlap' with state federations. 'It's a pyramid scheme without the Tupperware,' she says. The NFF president, David Jochinke, who was previously the president of the VFF, says the structure of agricultural organisations has been 'a topic of discussion for decades' and should continue to be so 'to make sure we have the best system to ensure agriculture and farmers are heard'. 'We recognise that the agricultural landscape is changing, and with it the expectations of how peak bodies engage, advocate and represent grassroots voices,' he says. This week, the NFF chief executive, Troy Williams, resigned after three months in the job, citing 'personal reasons'. Consumed with infighting, the VFF lost about 400 members in the year before the paraquat showdown – partly attributable to corporatisation and mergers of farms. Farm sizes have swelled, meaning fewer individual farmers to represent, with the number of Australian broadacre and dairy farms declining by a third in the last 25 years. Increasing automation has also reduced the sector's workforce – a dragnet of occupations that includes pickers and processors, as well as fishing and forestry labourers – to only 2.1% of Australia's working population, represented largely by unions, not peak farm bodies. Farmers – a famously individualistic sector – don't tend to collectively organise in union style. But first-generation farmers are increasingly looking to 'collective action solutions that peak bodies could embrace', says horticulturist and 'agvocate' Lisa Brassington. These bodies could 'depoliticise the messages and reach out to the commons', she says. Politicking by farm bodies can stoke populist myths about urban-rural divides, with the 'latte line' and 'quinoa belt' rhetoric sometimes deployed, but Brassington says fire and flood relief donors are largely 'from urban and township postcodes', showing broad solidarity and goodwill. 'Natural and financial crises create a loss of autonomy' for farmers and peak bodies 'have a time-sensitive role' to support 'collective interests', she says. Claiming to amplify the voices of farmers, aspiring social media influencers such as FOALS (Future of Agricultural Leadership) are emerging. Agricultural influencers are also a growth industry. But many influencers reiterate divisive messaging and can't effectively advocate because they don't have the established bodies' governance structures and transparency obligations, says Brassington. Furthermore, issues for farmers remain mostly 'similar to previous generations – drought, flood, roads, labour, supply chains, and profit margins', alongside 'succession planning, affording technology and water rights' and mental health. Much advocacy for the latter is carried by charities such as Farm Angels and Rural Doctors Foundation, and university research outfits such as AgHealth. Sign up to The Rural Network Subscribe to Calla Wahlquist's fortnightly update on Australian rural and regional affairs after newsletter promotion Germano believes farm bodies need to modernise and reform their profligate cultures if they want to retain grassroots members. 'Peak state organisations mirror National party branches from long ago, when they served men from the landed gentry,' she says. A third of Australia's farmers are now women, yet women 'can't step outside the status quo' inside federations, she says. 'They're still old boys' clubs.' Jochinke says the NFF's national advocacy model is 'proudly member-driven and we are actively working with our member organisations to shape a modernised, effective approach'. Germano led the VFF's split from the NFF in September, after the NFF didn't consult with Victorian sheep farmers before staging a Coalition-partnered Canberra rally against the phase-out of live exports. She believes such tactics are undemocratic and outdated – promoting myths that farmers are indifferent to animal welfare and 'that the big war is against animal activists'. 'The live sheep ban was advocated most strongly by meatworkers unions who wanted meat locally processed,' she says. Negotiating with diverse interest groups achieves better policy outcomes for farmers and the broader community. To advocate effectively, farm bodies need 'better governance, independence and listening – discipline, culture, restructure', says Germano. 'They need to ask: do we stand for farmers or do we stand for agribusiness? These are different things and are often at cross purposes.' Jochinke says the NFF 'reject the notion that peak bodies prioritise agribusiness over grassroots concerns'. 'Our recent work, such as opposing the biosecurity levy, securing bipartisan support for a national food security plan, and advocating for fair environmental and tax policies, demonstrates our commitment to representing the interests of everyday farmers.' Katherine Wilson is a writer and freelance journalist from the Yarra Ranges in Victoria Sign up for the Rural Network email newsletter
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
NSW supreme court rules in favour of pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge
Pro-Palestinian protesters will be legally protected while marching across the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday after a New South Wales supreme court decision. The Palestine Action Group has claimed as many as 50,000 people will take part in the march across the iconic bridge, protesting against Israel's conduct in Gaza and the starvation of children. Earlier this week, police rejected an application from organisers for it to facilitate the march. Police argued there was not enough time to prepare a traffic management plan and warned of a potential crowd crush and huge disruptions. Once the application, known as 'a form 1' was rejected by police, the supreme court was required to decide whether the protest should be considered as 'authorised', which provides some legal protections to demonstrators. The court ruling means protesters will have immunity from being charged under the summary offences act. This includes protection from offences like 'obstructing' traffic – crucial in this particular protest. However, police will still have access to a range of other powers to stem so-called 'anti-social behaviour' or other types of offending. This includes showing prohibited symbols. David Mejia-Canales, a senior lawyer at the Human Rights Law Centre, said the authorisation 'doesn't give people the ability to engage in all types and all forms of activism'. 'It's really important for people who do attend that they follow the directions of organisers and marshals.' There is no authority to ban protest or deem it unlawful in NSW. This is because while there is no express right to protest in the state, it is covered in common law and by the Australian constitution, which the high court has found implies the right to freedom of political communication. The Palestinian Action Group's lawyer, Felicity Graham, told the court on Friday that organisers would proceed with the demonstration regardless of the decision. 'I have the firmest of instructions that Palestine Action Group are proceeding with this protest … it cannot be stopped,' Graham said. Graham said her argument was not to threaten the court, but to point out 'the police have no choice' and there was no evidence prohibiting the protest would increase public safety. 'The intention to march, irrespective of an immunity, is grounded in a belief that the situation is one of profound moral urgency and that the time is now,' she said. A spokesperson for the group, Josh Lees, said they were willing to delay protest by up to three weeks if the police were willing to work with them. The police's barrister Lachlan Gyles argued that what was being asked was 'unprecedented' in terms of the 'risk, the lack of time to prepare, and, of course, the location, which is one of the main arteries in one of the largest cities in the world'. 'There's been no liaison whatsoever with any of the agencies and government authorities who would be involved, most particularly Transport for New South Wales,' he said. The decision came after several NSW Labor MPs defied their premier, Chris Minns, by vowing to attend the march. Labor's Stephen Lawrence, Anthony D'Adam, Lynda Voltz, Cameron Murphy and Sarah Kaine were among 15 NSW politicians who signed an open letter on Thursday evening calling on the government to facilitate 'a safe and orderly event' on Sunday
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
‘Revolving door' between ICE and private prison companies is boosting Trump's deportation plans
As the Trump administration bulks up its mass deportation machine, officials have relied on a network of for-profit prison companies that run the overwhelming majority of America's immigration detention centers. One of the officials overseeing those contracts at Immigration and Customs Enforcement, part of the government's Department of Homeland Security, is a former executive from a top private prison firm, GEO Group, which manages 20 detention centers across the country. According to The Washington Post, Trump's border czar Tom Homan approached David Venturella for a role in the administration, despite federal ethics rules that largely prohibit government employees from working on contracts with their former employers. Instead, Venturella was hired by the Department of Homeland Security as a full-time adviser and was granted a waiver from those ethics rules, according to the newspaper. Doing so has kept him out of the public eye and away from potentially contentious Senate confirmation hearings, the newspaper noted. Venturella worked as an assistant director at ICE before he was recruited by GEO Group in 2012. He left the company in 2023 though he stayed on as a paid consultant through January 31, according to company filings reviewed by The Washington Post. This apparent revolving door has also swung in the other direction. Days before the 2024 election, a top official at ICE left his position to take a senior role at GEO. Daniel Bible, who worked for ICE for nearly 15 years, is now a senior vice president at the company. At least six former ICE officials who left government work over the past decade now work in top roles at the company, according to reporting from nonprofit Project on Government Oversight. The group found a 'long tradition of ICE officials departing to work for the agency's top contractor,' part of the so-called 'revolving door' between the federal government and the private sector. The Independent has requested comment from ICE and GEO. In a statement to The Washington Post, a spokesperson for ICE said Venturella has divested his GEO stocks and holdings and 'has no financial ties to the company.' The spokesperson said he 'has no role in reviewing, approving, or recommending contracts,' but declined to comment on why he was given a waiver that authorizes him to work on Geo matters, according to the newspaper. White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson told the newspaper that Homan adheres to 'the highest ethical standards and he had no knowledge of any potential conflicts' involving Venturella. GEO runs 100 facilities globally, with a capacity of approximately 81,000 beds across those facilities, according to documents obtained by the ACLU. More than 22,000 beds – more than a quarter of GEO's global capacity – are inside ICE detention centers in the United States, including California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington. Nearly 90 percent of all immigration detention systems are operated by private prison contractors. More than 56,000 people are currently in ICE detention — likely a record in modern history. The figures top both the 39,000 people held in the final days of Joe Biden's administration, and the previous recent record of 55,654 in August 2019 during the first Trump administration. Since January, ICE has awarded GEO new and modified contracts expected to increase the agency's bed space to keep up with the administration's anti-immigration agenda, which the president and Congress have boosted by tens of billions of dollars over the next decade. With a directive from the White House to make at least 3,000 daily arrests, ICE received record-breaking funding from Congress — expanding the agency's budget to be larger than most countries' militaries — to hire more officers and expand detention space. That surge in congressional funding could land private contractors lucrative deals to detain more immigrants. Earlier this year, GEO inked a 15-year contract with ICE worth $60 million a year, the company announced. According to the Federal Procurement Data System, the contract is worth a total of $1.2 billion.
