Former Georgia-based Army soldier convicted for sexual abuse of 2 children
Austin Michael Burak, 32 of Oak Harbor, Wash., was investigated by the Army Criminal Investigation Division and the FBI for sexually abusing a nine-year-old and sexually assaulting a 13-year-old on the same in in August 2017, according to courtroom testimony.
'No child should have to experience this heinous abuse. The FBI is committed to tracking down and holding accountable people like Burak who prey on children,' FBI Atlanta Special Agent in Charge Paul Brown said in a statement. 'We will ensure that criminals engaged in this depraved conduct are held accountable in a court of law.'
[DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]
TRENDING STORIES:
Burned body found at Stone Mountain Park, GBI on scene
'It was startling': Buckhead couple detail finding starving dog that led to R&B singer's arrest
At least 7 in GA sickened in Salmonella outbreak linked to cucumbers
A federal jury convicted Burak after four days at trial.
'This sends a clear message: Army CID and our law enforcement partners will not tolerate these heinous acts,' Special Agent in Charge Michele Starostka of the Department of Army Criminal Investigation Division's Western Field Office, said. 'We are committed to aggressively investigating all crimes, establishing the facts, and supporting the legal process against those responsible.'
Now convicted, Burak faces at least 30 years in prison, USDOJ said.
'Burak awaits sentencing upon the U.S. Probation Services completing a presentence investigation,' according to the Justice Department.
[SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I wanted to hyphenate my last names once married. I realized it'd be incredibly offensive.
I always wanted to hyphenate my name when I got married. It turns out that my initials make hyphenating impossible. I still have to be strategic about how I style my name in public. My maiden name is Khorey. Last year, I married a man whose last name is Khanna. A few weeks after the wedding, I was chatting about it with a couple of women from my team at work. "What about your name?" One asked. She was about to get married herself, and these questions were top of mind. "Are you going to hyphenate or what?" "Well, my full first name is actually Katherine with a K," I said, trying to keep it subdued. "So I don't think that would be a good idea." It took a second, and then they got it. My initials would be KK-K. I always planned to hyphenate when I got married Years ago, when this question was hypothetical, hyphenating my name once I was married seemed like the right and only choice. I wanted to keep my last name. Khorey is a spelling unique to my family, and I felt the need to help carry it forward. Khorey represented a lot of family history. It also belonged to me. My grandparents on the Khorey side had married across immigrant groups at a time and place where that was uncommon. Growing up, I often felt my grandmother's Slovak culture got lost in the Syrian family shuffle, to say nothing of my mother's family from a completely different part of the world. Keeping Khorey seemed like a way to keep every person and place I'd come from, and myself as well. At the same time, there was no question that I wanted to adopt my future husband's name as well. That name would represent his history and identity: getting married would merge that with mine. Adopting his name would seal that, signal it to the world, and ensure we always kept him as well. I thought hyphenating would be the best solution. Even if my name and initials turned out to be a little unwieldy, as I wouldn't give up my middle name either, I could accept that tradeoff. Then I grew up and fell in love with someone whose last name also began with "K". At least it's been nice to keep my monogram. Sometimes I have to be strategic with my signature Cassie has been my nickname since birth. Thanks to my parents' preference, it's always been spelled with a "C". By adopting it professionally early in my career, I saved myself a lot of trouble. Now I can freely use the LinkedIn interface to display "Cassie Khanna (Khorey)" on my profile, keeping the recognition I've built as Khorey while making my name change clear and not evoking a founding hate group. I can do the same on my résumé and in other settings where I'm Cassie first. Sometimes, I can't avoid it. I now feel the need to say, "Wow, that's unfortunate," to whoever has to read off my first, maiden, and married names to prove my ID at Walgreens. It's OK, though. People know I didn't do it on purpose. I'm happy with the name I chose I had to make a choice when I got married, and I did. Legally, I changed my name to my husband's, because that was what I wanted to do. It doesn't diminish me; it adds to both of us, just like it added to the women in my family before me, who are not lost now and truly never were. Together, we are a mashup of cultures, races, and religions, almost none of which, incidentally, would be KKK-approved. It's us. It's all of us, with our families, histories, and identities combined. That's what Khanna means today. It will always mean Khorey, too. And that's enough. Read the original article on Business Insider Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Police release name of Wylie ISD employee who died at district transportation facility
An employee was killed Tuesday at the Wylie Independent School District Transportation Facility, according to a release from the Abilene Police Department. The pedestrian, Lupe Garcia, 64, was pronounced dead at the scene after he was injured by a bus in the facility, police said. No students were on board the bus at the time of the accident and Garcia's family was notified of his passing. While APD will conduct a death investigation, preliminary information indicated this is an accidental death, police said. More: Texas Tech system, ASU partner with FBI in efforts to boost national security More: Texas Democrats return home, ending redistricting standoff against GOP This article originally appeared on Abilene Reporter-News: Wylie ISD employee dies after bus strikes him at district's bus barn Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Asked for a yes or no on nonprofit transparency, top Maryland Democrats don't answer
BALTIMORE — It should be an easy yes-or-no answer, according to taxpayer advocate David Williams. But when Spotlight on Maryland asked the state's top three Democrats whether they would ensure transparency and accountability as tax dollars flow through nonprofits, none offered a yes or no response. The Baltimore Sun reported last month that neither state budget officials nor individual agencies can say exactly how much state money is flowing to nonprofits each year. That disclosure has led some state officials to call for more oversight. In response, Spotlight on Maryland — a partnership of The Sun, WBFF FOX45 in Baltimore and WJLA in Washington, D.C. — has launched an investigation into how much taxpayer money is allocated to Maryland nonprofits and how those dollars are spent. As part of that reporting, Spotlight on Maryland asked Gov. Wes Moore, House Speaker Adrienne A. Jones and Senate President Bill Ferguson, if they would ensure full transparency and accountability around nonprofit funding. After receiving no response from Ferguson and Jones, Spotlight on Maryland sent a follow-up question to all three, asking if they would assist the investigation in the public interest as journalists follow the money through Maryland nonprofits. Moore, Jones and Ferguson did not respond to the follow-up question. 'This is crazy. It's an easy answer,' said Williams, president of the Taxpayers Protection Alliance, an advocacy group based in Washington, D.C. 'They should all say yes.' Moore, for his part, gave an answer on camera to a Spotlight on Maryland reporter at an unrelated news event in Salisbury last week. 'I think people know and realize that our administration believes in full transparency, that we understand that the things that we are going to support are things that are both sustainable and effective. And when you're looking at the entire budget for the state of Maryland, we are, we are very wise and smart stewards of taxpayer dollars to make sure that the right capital is going to the right usages,' the governor said. When The Sun asked last month whether Ferguson believes taxpayers should have access to a full accounting of how their money is spent and how much of it flows to nonprofits in Maryland, he said: 'All public dollars should be spent wisely and with the utmost care, whether a public agency or a nonprofit uses them. To that end, nonprofits are an important bridge between the state government and the communities they serve. That's why we have a robust audit division of the Department of Legislative Services that has been doing this important oversight work for decades.' As part of its July reporting, The Sun sent inquiries to individual state departments and agencies, asking them to provide the amount of money they allocate to nonprofits. A few offered specific dollar amounts. 'Many nonprofits receive funds directly from agency grant programs, and we don't track that centrally,' said Raquel Coombs, chief of staff for the Department of Budget and Management, in a July email. This lack of oversight raises concern, especially for a state that needed to make cuts and raise taxes to resolve a $3.3 billion budget deficit earlier this year. Nonprofit spending 'increases the size of government,' Williams said. The more that government spends — on nonprofits and other line items — the more taxpayer money that is needed to fund the government, he said. One political analyst said the state's top Democrats appear 'overly cautious' in not answering Spotlight on Maryland's follow-up questions on nonprofit spending. 'It seems like a no-brainer,' said Flavio Hickel, a political science professor at Washington College. 'You'd think they would say, 'I will do everything in my power to ensure good governance with taxpayer money.'' Why aren't they saying that? 'There are good nonprofits, but they're probably being cautious in case one bad actor fell through the cracks on their watch,' Hickel said. 'They're probably being overly cautious to prevent campaign ads down the line.' Even as the state's top leaders declined to answer Spotlight on Maryland's follow-up, the governor was quoted in a news release about his chief of staff, Fagan Harris, leaving for the top spot at the Abell Foundation, one of the state's biggest and most influential nonprofits with more than $300 million in assets. 'While he will be deeply missed personally and professionally, I look forward to working closely with him as he leads the Abell Foundation for years to come,' Moore said. Top officials in government administrations moving to nonprofits is similar to Pentagon officials going to work for defense contractors, Williams said. 'We need more checks and balances to stop the revolving door,' he said. 'The government and nonprofits are way too cozy. There needs to be a firewall.' Hickel said he couldn't comment on the specifics of Harris moving to a nonprofit and noted that it could be 'perfectly coincidental and benign.' But, he added, 'it does raise questions' about the relationship between the governor's office and influential nonprofits that shape life in Maryland. 'It's not uncommon at all, though, to see someone in a high government role going to work at a nonprofit,' Hickel said. 'We advise students to do that. We tell them to do legislative work for a few years, meet people, then go to a nonprofit.' --------------- Solve the daily Crossword
