Yemeni Command Calls on World Travelers to Avoid Flights Bound for Ben Gurion Airport
In a televised speech, Sayyed Houthi underlined that the aggression on Sanaa airport comes in the context of the Israeli targeting of the capabilities of the entire Umma and pressuring the Yemeni people to stop their support for Gaza and the Palestinian cause.
Sayyed Houthi affirmed that Sanaa airport will be rebuilt after every Zionist attack, adding that the Yemeni Armed Forces will escalate the confrontation with the Israeli enemy.
In turn, the chief of the supreme political council, Mahdi Al-Mashat, reiterated that Yemen would never stop teh military support for Gaza, adding that the Zionist raids on Sanaa airport affirms the feasibility of the Yemeni attacks.
Al-Mashat called on all travelers to avoid flights bound for Ben Gurion Airport, affirming that that travel agencies that plan flights to the Zionist airport will be punished.
Israeli enemy warplanes conducted a devastating attack on Yemen's capital airport Wednesday, with Yemeni sources reporting four separate airstrikes targeting the runway at Sanaa International Airport and destroying a Yemenia Airlines aircraft.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
L'Orient-Le Jour
3 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Jewelry depicting 'Greater Israel' given to Netanyahu sparks condemnations
BEIRUT — A piece of jewelry depicting "Greater Israel," presented to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during an interview on Israel's i24 channel last week, has drawn condemnation from Jordan, Egypt and France, Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported on Tuesday. The jewelry was produced by the company of i24 interviewer Sharon Gal. During the interview, Gal gave Netanyahu the piece, which he said was for his wife, Sara, describing it as a "map of the Promised Land." When asked if he "connects to the vision," Netanyahu replied, "Very much so." After the broadcast, a coalition of 31 Arab and Islamic countries — including Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria — condemned the remarks, saying they "constitute a direct threat to Arab national security, to the sovereignty of states, and to regional and international peace and security." Haaretz reported that although the jewelry was not visible during the interview, Arab diplomats later discovered that Gal's company website sells pendants shaped like "Greater Israel," with an outline including parts of Egypt, all of Jordan and Lebanon, as well as parts of Syria and Iraq. The term "Greater Israel" refers to biblical borders from the time of King Solomon, encompassing the occupied West Bank and territories in neighboring countries, which some ultra-nationalist Israelis rally to occupy. Jordan and Egypt sought clarifications from Israel, but Tel Aviv's responses were described as "an attempt to sweep the issue under the rug," Haaretz reported. A source familiar with the matter said Israel's Prime Minister's Office and Foreign Ministry emphasized that Netanyahu did not use the words "Greater Israel" and is "not responsible for the headlines published in the media after the interview." The explanation did not satisfy the neighboring countries. French diplomatic sources, cited by Haaretz, said Monday that France "reiterates and emphasizes its commitment to the recognized borders of Jordan in accordance with international law and the two-state solution. Any vision or speech built on the violation of these principles must be rejected outright." Last week, France, Jordan and European Union Foreign Minister Kaja Kallas also condemned Israel's approval of the E1 settlement project, which plans the construction of more than 3,000 housing units east of Jerusalem.
L'Orient-Le Jour
3 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
In front of Barrack, Salam calls on US to 'assume its responsibilities and pressure Israel'
Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, who met U.S. envoy Tom Barrack on Monday during Barrack's visit to Lebanon after the government's decision to disarm Hezbollah and other armed groups before the end of the year, stated that after this "step" taken by Lebanon, the United States must now "assume its responsibilities by pressuring Israel." At the end of the first stop of his series of meetings, at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, Barrack said that now that the cabinet had made a decision "that the Lebanese can be proud of," it was Israel's turn to take a "step" to respect the terms of the cease-fire agreement that went into effect at the end of November 2024, after 13 months of war between Hezbollah and the Israeli army. On Aug. 7, two days after approving the disarmament of Hezbollah and the militias by the end of the year, the government endorsed a "roadmap" presented by Barrack, which should gradually ensure the truce is respected, with Lebanon and Israel each taking one "step" at a time. Salam said during his meeting at the Grand Serail with Barrack, accompanied by the deputy envoy for the Middle East, Morgan Ortagus, that the Trump administration must now "assume its responsibilities by pressuring Israel to stop its attacks, withdraw from the five points [still occupied in southern Lebanon] and release Lebanese prisoners." He stated that the government's decisions were made in the "national interest" and insisted on the priority of strengthening support for the army, "financially and materially," so that it can fulfill its assigned missions. Salam further stressed the importance of renewing the mandate of the U.N. Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), which, he said, plays a role in "consolidating stability" in the south and "supporting the army to extend state authority" south of the Litani River. This statement from the prime minister regarding UNIFIL was made as the Associated Press reported during the day that U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio signed a draft last week aimed at gradually reducing the U.N. deployment in southern Lebanon. Salam also called for the international community to announce the organization of a conference to support Lebanon's reconstruction and economic recovery. Berri: What Israeli commitments to uphold the truce? Shortly before, Berri, an ally of Hezbollah, questioned the U.S. envoy about "Israel's commitment to respecting the cease-fire agreement and withdrawing from Lebanese territories up to internationally recognized borders." Israel's adherence to the agreement was "the key to stability in Lebanon and the opportunity to launch the reconstruction process to enable the return of residents to their villages," according to a statement from the legislative chief's press office. After his meeting with Berri, Barrack said "everyone is moving in the right direction." "What matters is achieving prosperity and peace for all," he said. It was also on the theme of "peace and prosperity" that Barrack held his meeting with Aoun. From Baabda, he stated that "the return to peace and prosperity is near, and in the coming weeks, we will see great progress and the start of a plan for dialogue with all neighbors." "The disarmament of Hezbollah is in the interest of the Shiites and not against them," said the U.S. envoy. He added that the reconstruction would take place "throughout Lebanon, not just in the south." "The Lebanese government has taken the first step by committing to reclaiming the state's monopoly over arms, and it is now up to Israel to take a step in return," he said, noting that Washington has not submitted any specific proposal to Israel. "What we are doing is implementing an agreement that was violated. The American administration is not resorting to threats regarding Hezbollah's disarmament. If the party refuses this decision, it will have lost an opportunity, because the choice of disarmament is the best way to return to prosperity." Israel awaits 'concrete measures' President Aoun told his American interlocutors that "what is needed today is for the other parties to commit to the contents" of the cease-fire agreement. According to a post on X, the president called on the international community, including the U.S. and France, to "further support the Lebanese Army and speed up the required international measures to launch the reconstruction process in the areas affected by Israeli attacks." Tom Barrack and the U.S. delegation also met in the afternoon with Lebanese Army commander Rodolphe Haykal. In response to statements from Lebanon and the initiative put forth by Barrack to Israel, an Israeli political source told al-Hadath that the withdrawal of the Israeli army from the five points it considers "strategic" in southern Lebanon "will occur in accordance with a mechanism coordinated with the cease-fire supervisory committee." Israel "will play its part when Lebanon takes concrete measures," the source added. The issue of the monopoly on arms was also the subject of a meeting at the Grand Serail between Salam and a group of independent MPs, including Yassine Yassine, Charbel Massaad, Firas Hamdan and Ibrahim Mneimneh. The latter said after the meeting, according to the Grand Serail's X account, that he fully supports the government's decision to restore the state's monopoly on arms, calling it a "decisive turning point" for the country. "The time has come to end all disputes on the question of state sovereignty," he said. In a statement after the meeting, Massaad said there needed to be "an honest and responsible dialogue between all parties" to resolve the issue of arms and "find solutions that protect the supreme national interest." While the issue of disarmament generated a lot of discussion over the past weekend after a speech by Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem, in which he mentioned a possible "confrontation" if the state persisted in disarming the party without an agreement, Lebanese authorities were sticking to their positions. President Aoun said in a televised interview Sunday night that there would be "no turning back," and once again criticized Iran's comments on the matter. Larijani responded by saying that "our comments on the situation in Lebanon and the resistance do not mean that we are interfering in the internal affairs of this country."
L'Orient-Le Jour
3 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Barrack satisfied that 'everyone' moving in the right direction
The visit of American envoys Tom Barrack and Morgan Ortagus to Beirut revolved around three main points. The first was to provide support to the Lebanese state after its decision to restore the monopoly on weapons and adopt the American roadmap, as well as to understand the planned implementation mechanism. The second concerned discussions on renewing UNIFIL's mandate, especially since Ortagus will be directly involved with this issue in her new role at the U.S. mission to the United Nations. The third point dealt with examining ways to pressure Israel to take steps corresponding to the "first move" made by Lebanon. Given the statements he made after his meetings, Barrack was relatively satisfied and delivered a clear message on the need for Israel to commit to respecting the provisions of the document and begin implementing corresponding measures, since Lebanon had accepted them and was about to start applying them. "There is always a step-by-step approach. I think the Lebanese government ... has taken a first step," he said after meeting with President Joseph Aoun. "What we need now is for Israel to make a reciprocal commitment." Asked about an Israeli troop withdrawal from Lebanon and an end to the "violations" of the agreement, Barrack said that this was "exactly the next step." "In the coming weeks, you will see progress on all sides," stated the American envoy, adding that "this means a better life for people" in the region. Barrack is also the one who proposed the "step by step" principle, while Lebanon advanced the idea of "simultaneous steps." In the settled equation, Lebanon began by taking the first step, which led the American envoy to send an explicit signal about the need for Israel to respond with a corresponding measure. The key at Ain al-Tineh The essential phrase remains the one Barrack said after his meeting with Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri: "Everyone is moving in the right direction and everyone will benefit from economic improvement." From Baabda Palace, he similarly said that "the Shiites will benefit from the withdrawal of Hezbollah's weapons." What he means by benefit for the Shiites concerns Israel's withdrawal, the end of strikes and assassinations, as well as entering a process of reconstruction and opening up to many investments in Lebanon, which should, in his view, have positive effects for all the Lebanese people. During his meeting with the American envoy, the speaker noted what the two men had agreed upon, namely the need for Israel to take serious measures for the arms monopoly process to move forward. This position was unified among the three leaders – president, prime minister and speaker – who insisted on the importance of putting pressure on Israel to stop its operations and begin at least a gradual withdrawal, even if this move would take place in parallel with other measures taken by Lebanon. This is the prism through which one should read President Aoun's remarks to his American interlocutors, in which he stated that "what is needed today is for the other parties to commit to respecting the contents" of the cease-fire agreement. The president also called on the international community, especially the U.S. and France, to "further support the Lebanese Army and accelerate the required international measures to launch the reconstruction process in areas affected by Israeli attacks." Prime Minister Nawaf Salam stated, during his meeting with Barrack at the Grand Serail, that the Trump administration must now "shoulder its responsibilities by pressuring Israel to halt its attacks, withdraw from the five points [still occupied in southern Lebanon], and release the Lebanese prisoners." He said that the government's decisions were made in the "national interest" and insisted on the priority of strengthening support for the army, "financially and materially," so that it can accomplish its assigned missions. The key phrase of this visit remains the one Barrack made at Ain al-Tineh. It reveals a certain convergence with the speaker, who represents Hezbollah in the negotiations. This statement came after Berri stated that "no one in Lebanon wants civil war," in an implicit but clear response to statements by Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem. Barrack's stance, combined with Berri's, aligns with numerous diplomatic indicators suggesting that some within Hezbollah are now convinced of the need to move toward an arms monopoly by the state. Hezbollah aware, but waiting for Iran According to diplomatic sources, Hezbollah is now raising its tone to gain as much as possible, as it has realized that the issue of its arsenal is now on the negotiating table. The same sources believe that the party may be willing to discuss the matter, provided it can integrate its weapons into the building of Lebanese power, or even include itself as an integral part of that national force under the command of the state and the Lebanese Army. However, this idea has yet to appear in the party's official discourse, especially since the visit to Lebanon by the secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, Ali Larijani. This can only fit into the broader context of Iranian-American negotiations at the regional and international level. Returning to the outcomes of Barrack's visit, sources close to the matter say he insisted that Lebanon continue implementation of the plan adopted by the government, telling Lebanese officials that he would go to Israel to obtain a clear response regarding its commitment to apply the planned measures. He also said that he would return to Lebanon at the end of the month, once the army's plan was finalized and presented to the Cabinet. According to L'Orient-Le Jour's information, his questions focused on the concrete steps the army would have to take. In return, Lebanese officials insisted on the need to put pressure on Israel to respect its commitments and called on him to work toward granting aid to the army and preparing a conference to mobilize reconstruction funds.
