What to know about how Mayor O'Connell responded to Nashville ICE operation
While ICE and the Tennessee Highway Patrol collaborated to make 468 traffic stops and arrest nearly 200 immigrants, O'Connell criticized them for causing "deep community harm." And as the sweeps continued throughout the week, O'Connell and Metro Legal Director Wally Dietz repeatedly called for transparency from ICE about who exactly had been arrested and what they'd been charged with. Ultimately, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security named six of the 196 people arrested during the sweeps.
O'Connell also updated an executive order requiring city departments to report communications with federal immigration officials to the mayor's office, and addressed community and Metro Nashville Council concerns about whether the Metro Nashville Police Department was involved in the operation.
It's all culminated in an investigation that's now underway at the federal level, based on a call from U.S. Rep. Andy Ogles, to determine whether the mayor had been "obstructing ICE operations."
Here's what to know about how O'Connell responded to the Nashville ICE operation.
Ogles has made it clear that the amended Executive Order 30 is key to his complaints. It's one of a few documents and communications he's seeking in the congressional investigation.
But what does the order actually do?
Executive Order 30 isn't new — in fact, it's well over a year old, having first been issued in January 2024. But it's re-emerged in the wake of the ICE operation because O'Connell amended it to allow for a shorter timeline for reporting.
The order requires city departments to report communications with federal immigration authorities to the mayor's office. Emergency services departments like MNPD, the Nashville Fire Department and the Office of Emergency Management must report within one business day, while all other departments have three days to report communications "regarding an activity outside regular policies/procedures."
Communications involving non-emergency departments related to modifying a department's policies or practices, meanwhile, must be reported "with sufficient time for the mayor's office to assess and respond to such proposed modifications, including seeking community input if appropriate."
The executive order also requires city departments to designate one person who's responsible for collecting and transmitting immigration communications to the mayor's office, which would later be posted online for transparency. It also calls on the Department of Human Resources and Metro Legal to develop a training program for reporting immigration communications.
Early on in the ICE operation, O'Connell was joined by Hal Cato, the CEO of the Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee, to announced the Belonging Fund. Cato said funds could go toward addressing childcare and transportation costs, housing assistance and food insecurity.
Like the executive order, the fund has been the subject of recent scrutiny — Metro Nashville Council Member David Benton, who appeared with Ogles at a press conference on Memorial Day, has called for a state or federal audit of the fund.
But the fund itself was established by the Community Foundation, not the city, and the foundation's website states that donations come solely from individual donors and private organizations. The website description further clarifies that the fund "provides financial support to nonprofit organizations offering emergency assistance to immigrants in our region during times of crisis."
While announcing the fund, O'Connell said it wouldn't be intended to support immigration legal services and added that the city needed to make certain whether it could donate to the fund directly. Based on the website description — which states that "no taxpayer dollars are being used in the administration or distribution of this fund" — it appears that answer was no.
Nashville's mayor has not shied away from criticism of the ICE operation, or how the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has gone about publicizing information about the people arrested during the sweeps.
At an appearance with New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, for example, O'Connell decried the ICE presence as 'unwelcome visitors from Washington D.C.' and once again demanded that law enforcement provide the names of the people arrested as part of the sweeps.
He's also indicated plenty of times, including at the event with Booker, that he's been in constant communication with Dietz, the legal director, about which actions might leave him susceptible to retaliation.
'I will tell you, in America, in this moment, in my hometown, I never expected to be having to ask my legal director multiple times a week some version of the question, 'If I do this will I get arrested?'' O'Connell said earlier in May.
Regarding the amended executive order, O'Connell has also previously told reporters that it was "an open question" whether it would have legally allowed the city to publicize an impending immigration operation.
At a special meeting on May 7, council members learned that a federal agent contacted Nashville's Department of Emergency Communications to request extra police patrols at Nashville's ICE facility on Brick Church Park Drive ahead of the operation, but there wasn't a sufficient process in place to inform department leadership and other city offices of the impending ICE action.
That informed a key criticism from Metro Nashville Council members and community members who expressed concern about whether MNPD officers were involved in ICE's operation — that if the executive order had been followed in the first place, there would've been a greater awareness among city departments ahead of the May operation.
'I don't know that there would have been considerable change, but I think instead of asking questions about what people knew, I think both (Metro Nashville Police Chief John Drake) and I would have been able to at least make sure that within departments we knew that there was an uptick in federal enforcement,' O'Connell said on May 9.
As for whether other city departments have been involved, the short answer is no. During the May 7 special meeting, multiple city officials asserted that MNPD officers indeed were not involved in the ICE sweeps. That's a message O'Connell and Drake continued to share in the days following the meeting.
Outside of responses from O'Connell and members of the Metro Nashville Council, Nashvillians have also been vocal. The May 7 special meeting featured a packed meeting gallery, filled with community members voicing their frustrations.
A recent Vanderbilt University poll gauged community opinion on the issue of immigration, as well.
A majority of respondents overall, 61%, said they'd support deporting individuals who are living in the United States illegally if they have a criminal record unrelated to their immigration status, but only 26% of respondents said the same even if an individual lacks a criminal background.
Regardless of criminal status, a much larger share of Republicans supported deportations in both cases, at 87% and 70% respectively. Democrat respondents, meanwhile, supported deportations for undocumented immigrants with a criminal background at a rate of 46%, and only 9% for those with no criminal background.
In the poll, the highest share of respondents overall — 43% — said Nashville should actively resist efforts by the federal government to carry out deportations. The next highest share of 35% of respondents said cities like Nashville should do nothing and allow the federal government to enforce federal laws, and the smallest group of 22% of respondents said Nashville should actively assist efforts by the federal government to carry out deportations.
Democrats and Republicans responded with a similar share to the dueling questions of supporting or resisting immigration efforts — 62% of Democrat respondents said the city should resist federal deportation efforts, compared to just 6% of Republicans, and 61% of Republican respondents said the city should help the federal government, compared to just 6% of Democrats.
Austin Hornbostel is the Metro reporter for The Tennessean. Have a question about local government you want an answer to? Reach him at ahornbostel@tennessean.com.
Get Davidson County news delivered to your inbox every Wednesday.
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: What to know about how mayor responded to Nashville ICE operation
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
15 minutes ago
- New York Post
Brooklyn pols call for act of war on the feds — a pathetic new low in NYC politics
Wacko Brooklyn politicians want New York to declare war on the US government by 'turning off the power' to 26 Federal Plaza: Assemblyman Robert Carroll and City Councilman Justin Brannan claim it's the only way to counter 'the soft launch of a fascist regime.' Carroll (D-Park Slope) and Brannan (D-Bay Ridge) are mad that ICE is detaining illegal migrants for deportation inside the Jacob Javits building, which houses the Social Security Administration, HUD and other agencies. Their solution: Have city government lay siege to force the feds to release the criminal aliens being held 'illegally.' Never mind that the first victims of this idiocy would be the detainees, who would lose light, A/C and probably drinking water. Time for everyone who called the Jan. 6 Capitol riot an 'insurrection' to check their dictionaries: Intentionally cutting off the power to interfere with federal law enforcement surely fits the bill, every bit as much as the Confederates firing on Ft. Sumter. This would be outright sedition — if the Brooklyn bozos were serious. Even if they're unfamiliar with the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution, Brannan and Carroll have to know that neither the city nor state has any authority to disrupt the US government as it carries out the policies of the president: Fighting this out has to happen in the courts,or at the ballot box — period. But the rebel yells demonstrate their loyalty to the extremism that now defines the Democratic Party in New York, right up there with Zohran Mamdani's vow to be 'Trump's worst nightmare.' Heck, Brannan lost his bid for comptroller and is off the City Council come January, while Carroll's probably a decade from having enough seniority to do much in the Assembly: This call for open rebellion looks mostly like a bid for City Hall positions under a Mayor Mamdani. Local politics is in a sad state indeed when calling for insurrection is how pols apply for new jobs.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Commentary: Why job growth will slow sharply under Trump
President Trump is riled about the latest numbers showing weak job growth during the last three months. Buckle in, because that could be the new normal — thanks to Trump's own immigration policies. Employers added just 73,000 new jobs in May, with job growth for the last three months averaging an anemic 35,000. During 2024, employers saw 168,000 new jobs per month, on average. Trump falsely claimed that the latest numbers were 'rigged' and fired the head of the statistical agency responsible for the jobs report. But the jobs numbers make perfect sense to economists. By deporting migrants and putting new limits on all forms of immigration, Trump is reducing the size of the labor market, which in turn will slow the economy. 'Slowing immigration will put significant downward pressure on growth in the labor force and employment,' researchers at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) wrote in a recent report. That research finds that job growth could slow to between 10,000 and 40,000 new jobs later this year. By 2027, Trump's crackdown on immigration could generate negative job growth, with the economy losing jobs each month. US population growth has been slowing for 25 years, largely because of relatively low birth rates and a plateauing immigration rate. There was one notable exception: The last three years of the Biden administration, when US population and the US labor force both grew by more than usual. That was because of Biden's permissive policies on migration. Migrant overload in some parts of the country led Biden to restrict some forms of immigration last year. Trump has gone much further, issuing fewer green cards and temporary visas, accepting fewer refugees, and deporting thousands of others. The AEI researchers estimate that net migration — those coming in minus those going out — will drop from about 2.6 million in 2024 to 0 in 2025, and possibly end up negative, with more immigrants leaving than arriving. That has major implications for the economy. Some people may think that fewer migrants means the nation's wealth will be divvied up among fewer people, meaning more for everybody who remains. But it doesn't work that way. Most migrants work, and more people working means more growth, more output, and more jobs. Fewer people working means the opposite. So when there are fewer immigrants, there's also less wealth to spread around. While there's obviously an important difference between migrants who are in the country legally or not, it doesn't matter very much in economic terms. Workers contribute to growth whether they're authorized to be in the country or unauthorized. Biden's migrant surge became a huge political liability that gave Trump a key opening in the 2024 presidential campaign. But the migrant surge also contributed to record job growth under Biden. During Biden's four years, the economy created 16.1 million new jobs, or an astonishing 336,000 per month, on average. By early 2024, economists were attributing much of the outsized job growth under Biden to the migrant surge. That trend now seems to be reversing. Economist Jed Kolko of the Peterson Institute for International Economics believes that the US population growth rate has dropped from 1% in 2023 to 0.5% in 2025, a huge change in a short period of time. Virtually all of that is tied to immigration changes. 'Policymakers need to lower their targets and forecasts for key economic data,' he wrote in a recent analysis. Goldman Sachs recently said that plunging immigration is one factor behind its newly lowered expectations of just 30,000 new jobs per month, or less, for the rest of 2025. The firm points out that the declining size of the labor force means the unemployment rate can remain deceptively low even as hiring grinds nearly to a new tariffs on imported goods have drawn most of the attention in the Trump economy, given that he talks incessantly about tariffs and announces new import taxes or trade deals every week. But his immigration policies could ultimately have more impact on the economy. 'We believe the biggest impact on the US economy so far in 2025 has been from the closing of the border, which has slowed US population growth and potential GDP by roughly 1%,' Michael Drury, chief economist at McVean Trading, wrote to clients in an Aug. 15 newsletter. 'Tariffs are more talked about, but their impact on top-line growth will be very modest in comparison to immigration.' What will Trump do if job growth, a standout metric under Biden, dwindles to 30,000 or 20,000 or less under his watch? First, he will most likely look for scapegoats, which is the very role he's been shaping for Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Trump blames Powell for everything he dislikes about the economy, including interest rates, which Trump wants to be a couple of points lower. Trump would surely list weak job numbers as another of Powell's supposed sins. Trump could also try to rig the numbers to make them seem more favorable. Trump has nominated a right-wing figure denounced by many mainstream economists to oversee the employment and inflation reports, suggesting that Trump loyalists will fiddle with the data to make Trump look better. Markets would sniff that out immediately, but Trump doesn't normally care when traditional establishments disapprove. What Trump probably won't do is change his immigration policies, even if they kill jobs. Economist Jim Bianco of Bianco Research points out that Trump's handling of illegal immigration is the only major issue on which voters express net approval, according to recent polls. 'Even if the Republicans and/or Trump buy into the argument that job growth is slowing, they are not going to reverse their decision to close the border,' Bianco wrote on Aug. 12. 'It's the reason they won the election and it would be a disaster politically to change.' Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Maine Police Officer Agrees to Leave US After ICE Arrest
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Maine police officer arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has agreed to voluntarily leave the United States, federal authorities announced Monday. Jon Luke Evans, a reserve officer with the Old Orchard Beach Police Department and native of Jamaica, was detained by ICE on July 25 as part of expanded immigration enforcement efforts. A judge has granted voluntary departure for Evans, allowing him to leave the country independently, rather than face formal deportation proceedings. Newsweek reached out to ICE and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) via email on Monday for comment. Why It Matters President Donald Trump has ordered his administration to remove millions of undocumented immigrants as he looks to fulfill his campaign pledge of widespread mass deportations. In addition to people living in the country without legal status, immigrants with valid documentation, including green cards and visas, have also been detained. Immigration authorities have been under increased scrutiny amid allegations of misconduct, with the agency at the center of the national debate over immigration policy. Concerns have been raised over the legality and human impact of ICE's enforcement practices. In this undated photo provided by the Old Orchard Beach Police Department, Officer Jon Luke Evans receives his police badge. In this undated photo provided by the Old Orchard Beach Police Department, Officer Jon Luke Evans receives his police badge. Old Orchard Beach Police Department via AP, File What To Know Evans was employed as a reserve officer after Old Orchard Beach officials verified his work authorization through the DHS's E-Verify program. Federal authorities had previously informed local officials that Evans was legally permitted to work in the United States. However, ICE later alleged that Evans had overstayed his visa and unlawfully attempted to purchase a firearm. Evans admitted after his arrest on July 25 that he attempted to purchase the firearm for use in his role as a police officer, according to ICE. The attempted purchase triggered an alert to Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) agents, who coordinated with ICE to carry out the arrest. Evans lawfully entered the United States on September 24, 2023, through Miami International Airport, but overstayed his visa. He was scheduled to depart on October 1, 2023, but did not board the flight, ICE said in a press release. "Jon Luke Evans not only broke U.S. immigration law, but he also illegally attempted to purchase a firearm. Shockingly, Evans was employed as a local law enforcement officer," ICE ERO Boston acting Field Office Director Patricia H. Hyde said in July. The voluntary departure agreement allows Evans to avoid formal deportation proceedings by paying for his own travel expenses, Portland, Maine, news station WMTW-TV reported. Evans was initially held at the Donald W. Wyatt Detention Facility in Rhode Island before being transferred to an ICE facility in Burlington, Massachusetts. What People Are Saying ICE ERO Boston acting Field Office Director Patricia H. Hyde said in a July statement: "The fact that a police department would hire an illegal alien and unlawfully issue him a firearm while on duty would be comical if it weren't so tragic. We have a police department that was knowingly breaking the very law they are charged with enforcing in order to employ an illegal alien. ICE Boston will continue to prioritize public safety by arresting and removing criminal alien threats from our New England communities." What Happens Next Evans is expected to leave the U.S. following the judge's voluntary departure order, potentially as early as the day it was granted. The case has sparked a public dispute between local and federal authorities over the reliability of employment verification procedures. Old Orchard Beach Police Chief Elise Chard has defended the department's hiring process, emphasizing that federal officials had confirmed Evans' work authorization before his employment. This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.