The future of flight? First electric aeroplane lands in Denmark
The US aerospace company Beta Technologies' electric plane, ALIA CTOL, completed a 200 kilometre journey between Sønderborg and Copenhagen airports this week, marking Denmark's first test flight with an aircraft that burns no fuel and can be charged in less than an hour.
The company says the fixed-wing electric aeroplane provides a safe, quiet, and low-cost alternative to traditional aircraft and helicopters.
With its wingspan of 15 metres, ALIA CTOL is the size of a Sprinter van. It can fly at a maximum speed of 281 kilometres per hour, according to Beta Technologies.
The aeroplane also emits up to 84 per cent less carbon dioxide than a traditional helicopter of a similar size.
'Many say that green aviation is something for the future,' Jákup Sverri Kass, director of Sønderborg Airport, said at the take-off event in the city 325 kilometres west of Copenhagen.
'But we are standing here today and seeing that the future has begun. This is not just a test. This is the start of something new,' he added.
The American aeroplane kicked off a European grand tour in May from Shannon Airport in Ireland. It has since dropped by multiple airports on the continent to demonstrate the aircraft's all-electric operation and charging infrastructure.
In August, the plane will begin operating cargo flights between Bergen and Stavanger in Norway as part of tests on zero-emission aviation led by the Norwegian Civil Aviation Authority.
Charging is the main challenge
ALIA CTOL is designed for regional flight and can be configured for both passenger and cargo travel with up to five passenger seats.
Beta Technologies says the longest distance the aircraft has flown on a single charge is 622 kilometres.
The plane can be charged using a standard fast charger for electric cars in just 20 to 40 minutes, the company says.
The short-range aeroplane has been carrying its own charger and plugging it into a power unit at airports, which takes longer, due to the lack of permanent charging facilities. It has been making pit stops to charge at airports across Europe.
'There's no existing infrastructure on the ground in Europe like there is in the United States today,' Shawn Hall, the company's chief revenue officer, said from the tarmac at Copenhagen Airport after the plane landed.
In Denmark, Copenhagen Airport CEO Christian Poulsen told Euronews Next the airport will need to adapt its infrastructure to be able to charge aircraft and accommodate a mix of traditional and electric aeroplanes 'when these aircraft come to town'.
The cost of batteries and other lightweight materials will be another factor for electric aeroplane manufacturers to contend with, according to Jørgen Mads Clausen, chair emeritus of the Danish battery system giant Danfoss.
He predicts 'battery technology' for larger electric planes will be available within the next decade.
'But just like with electric cars, it's important to be ready when things take off. Because when the technology matures, things will move fast,' Clausen said at the take-off event.
Sustainable aviation in Europe
The Danish government has committed to launching its first fully sustainable domestic flight route by 2025, with a broader target that all domestic routes will be fossil-free by 2030.
This year, it has introduced a flat fee of 13 Danish kroner (€1.74) per passenger to finance the transition toward sustainable domestic flight.
Several Nordic countries have committed to climate goals for their aviation industries.
In Norway, all domestic flights aim to be electric or hybrid by 2040, while in Sweden, all domestic flights should be fossil-free by 2030 and international flights are expected to follow by 2045.
A Swedish-American company, Heart Aerospace, is developing a 30-passenger plane, the ES-30, designed to have a fully battery-powered range of 200 kilometres.
Other countries in Europe, such as the Netherlands, France, and the United Kingdom, have also tested similar-sized e-planes.
But currently electric planes can, at best, fly regionally within Europe because of their battery range, which means other technologies to reduce flight emissions could also help countries meet their sustainability targets.
Lasse Stenhøj Ingvardsen, a team manager of Renewable Energy Systems at the Danish Technological Institute, told Euronews Next that different technologies can be explored for sustainable aviation.
Many European countries are investing in Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF), a type of fuel made from renewable resources, as well as hydrogen fuel, which doesn't emit carbon dioxide.
'The SAF fuel will be one tool. The electric will be another tool. The hybrid solution will be a third tool. Maybe we will see hydrogen planes,' said Ingvardsen, who was not involved with the recent test flight.
'We don't need to stick to only one'.
For more on this story, watch the video in the media player above.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local France
4 hours ago
- Local France
Readers reveal: The most disappointing tourist sites in France
Quick disclaimer before we start - most of France is great, it's been the most visited country in the world since 2018 and has a huge variety of fantastic things to see and do. There are, however, some sites that don't quite live up to the hype. We asked readers of The Local what they think is the worst tourist attraction in France, and there was a clear winner nominated by multiple respondents to our survey. 1 Eiffel Tower The instantly recognisable icon of Paris was voted the most disappointing experience in France. British tourist Amanda described it as "crowded and expensive, the many street hawkers felt pressuring" while other respondents described it as crowded, mediocre and unnecessary. Advertisement American visitor L Bordor was somewhat more positive, saying it is "pretty to see once, but there's no reason to hang around." Is this fair? The Eiffel Tower is certainly attractive to look at and, despite the protests of Parisians when it was erected in 1889, is the undisputed symbol of the city. As a tourist attraction though? We agree with the above readers - the site itself gets very crowded. It's on an exposed esplanade, which makes it very hot in summer, even though it has become more pedestrian-friendly in the aftermath of the Olympic Games . That said, the area does attract unlicensed street sellers, scammers and pickpockets. Once you've climbed it, the view from the top is good. That said, other points in the city offer beautiful views that include the Eiffel Tower in the skyline. Advertisement Alternatives - The Tower is perhaps best admired from a distance, especially in the evening when you can watch it light up. We suggest taking a picnic to either the Seine quais or the Tuileries gardens so you can have a relaxed experience and appreciate the angular beauty of the tower. If you are keen to visit, we advise going in the evening and having dinner in one of the Tower's restaurants (advance booking is essential) and watching the sun set over the city. READ ALSO : How to be a good tourist in France Otherwise, you can get a free view of the city by climbing to the top of one of the high-end shopping malls near Opera, like the Printemps Haussmann centre. The Montparnasse Tower also has an observatory - though you need to book tickets to get up to the 56th floor. 2 Mona Lisa Before the outraged Leonardo fans start writing in, survey respondents were not dismissing La Joconde herself, just the experience of the visit in the Louvre, which was described as hot, overcrowded and disappointing. Jen from the USA said, "A painting like this requires up-close viewing to appreciate the details. Unfortunately, that's just not possible." Is this fair? The Louvre can indeed get very crowded, and in summer, you'd be lucky to even glimpse its most famous painting through the selfie-taking crowds. In fact the museum's own director described it as "leaky, crowded and hot". There is a plan for a major refurbishment to try and better accommodate the 10 million people who visit each year, including creating a separate section just for Mona Lisa and her fans. Alternatives - the Louvre still has some amazing stuff inside, and it's huge, so there's plenty to see, but if you have the option, we would definitely recommend coming in the winter, spring or autumn, not the summer. Advertisement But Paris is far from a one-trick pony when it comes to museums - the Louvre is the best known, but does that mean that it is intrinsically better than the Musée d'Orsay, the Orangerie, the Petit Palais or the Fondation Louis Vuitton? We would contend that it's not - all of the above museums are different, and it depends on the type of art you love. READ ALSO : 5 lesser-known museums in Paris to avoid the crowds 3 Montmartre and the Moulin Rouge Paris' traditional artists' quarter also came in for some criticism, with several people referring to it as a "tourist trap" with nothing worthwhile to see. When it came to the show at the famous Moulin Rouge, LJ, visiting Paris from Loir-et-Cher, said: "It was a bit of a joke of a show as far as talent. Felt like a tourist trap for sure versus anything cultural or worthwhile." Is this fair? Montmartre's worst problem is perhaps simply being too well known. The area itself is very pretty and there are some worthwhile sites including Sacre Coeur basilica and the Musée de la Vie Romantique which gives a nice overview of the area's artistic heritage (and has a nice café and garden). But it does get very crowded, especially in summer, and more and more shops have been taken over by tourist businesses. While there are good restaurants and bars in the area, there are also an unfortunately high number of over-priced tourist eateries serving poor quality food. Advertisement Alternatives - like many Paris attractions, this is better in winter than summer. When it comes to less well-known areas of the city, we like the cool, artistic and multi-cultural vibe of Belleville/Menilmontant - and Time Out magazine agrees . The top three attractions labelled the most disappointing were all in Paris - is this a comment on Paris, or just the fact that so many people visit the French capital? Perhaps a bit of both, Paris is certainly popular with tourists, and in fact this summer the city's deputy mayor called for a control on the number of tourists , saying the city was becoming saturated. While there are certainly areas that get very busy, there are loads of excellent things to explore in Paris. READ ALSO: 'Avoid the Eiffel Tower' - What to see if you're visiting Paris for just one day 4 Carcassonne But it wasn't only the French capital that was described as disappointing; the Medieval citadel of Carcassonne, in south-west France, also came in for some criticism. Amy C, visiting from Ariège, said: "I found the town crowded, filled with expensive tourist shops filled with cheap goods, and overrated. We purchased tickets for the tour, and the recording was difficult to hear as well as geared to a younger audience." Is this fair? Another victim of its own success (and perhaps that UNESCO world heritage status), Carcassonne is very crowded in the summer. Which is a shame, because the citadel itself is attractive and has an interesting history, linked to the town's spectacularly gory torture museum. Advertisement Alternatives - Carcassonne got its heavily fortified citadel because of the tumultuous and bloody history of the region, around the Cathar movement in the 12th and 13th centuries. But it was not the only castle built during that period - the area is full of them, and many of them have even more exciting/romantic/blood-soaked histories. READ ALSO : 8 must-visit castles in south-west France (you've probably never heard of) 5 Mont-Saint-Michel Like Carcassonne, most visitors didn't have a problem with the site itself, just the crowds that flock there. Although Clare Brigstock did complain that the whole thing felt 'Disneyfied'. Is this fair? Local authorities have been sounding the alarm about overcrowding at Mont-Saint-Michel for some years now, with the crush even reaching dangerous proportions on some summer days. There are a variety of measures in place encouraging people to visit at off-peak times, from an advertising campaign urging people to visit in winter to cheaper tickets for late afternoon and evening slots. Alternatives - There's nothing quite like Mont-Saint-Michel (which is why it is so popular), but the north and west France coastlines are scattered with beautiful islands, some of which are also accessible by causeway. The rest In our survey, these five sites were most likely to be described as disappointing and overrated, with multiple respondents naming them as their worst experience. Some other sites also came in for criticism, including the town of Annecy in the Alps, the Carnac prehistoric stone circles in Brittany and the Brocéliande forest, also in Brittany. Overcrowding was listed as a major concern, while some visitors felt that both Carnac and Brocéliande were not well organised and did not provide enough information to visitors. Ultimately, the biggest problem for France's tourist offering is overcrowding. But France is a big country and data from the tourism ministry suggests that 80 perfect of tourists visit just 20 percent of the country's sites. Which means there are plenty of off-the-beaten-track experiences just waiting to be discovered. READ ALSO : 10 alternatives to France's overcrowded tourist hotspots One respondent, who declined to leave their name, declared that France as a whole was overrated, describing the entire country as 'dirty and rude'. We must respectfully disagree with that point of view. Do you agree with this list? Share your French tourist experiences - and suggestions for alternative sites - in the comments section below.
Euronews
11 hours ago
- Euronews
UK drops demand to access global Apple users' data, US spy chief says
The United Kingdom has backed down from its demand that Apple allow investigators to access data from users anywhere in the world, according to the top US intelligence official. US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard wrote on social media platform X that the UK had rescinded its request for the tech company to provide the government with a 'back door' to access user data, which she said would have 'enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens and encroached on our civil liberties'. The row began months ago, when the UK's Home Office served Apple with a formal notice that required blanket access to encrypted data. The notice, which the UK government has not made public, was first reported by The Washington Post. But even Apple could not access this data without breaking its own encryption methods. In 2022, it introduced an Advanced Data Protection (ADP) feature that offers end-to-end encryption for photos, notes, and iCloud backup. 'We have never built a backdoor or master key to any of our products or services and we never will,' the company says. In response to the UK demand, Apple withdrew ADP from the UK market in February and filed a legal challenge to the order. It's not clear if that will continue. Apple will share user data in certain cases. It says that in the UK, it could share personal information about its users – for example their name and phone number – if it determines that it is necessary for 'national security, law enforcement, or other issues of public importance'. In the United States, Apple says it could provide basic account information, for example a user's email, contacts, and calendar, with 'customer consent' or in response to a US search warrant issued with probable cause.
LeMonde
20 hours ago
- LeMonde
Japan's SoftBank to invest $2 billion in Intel
Japan-based tech investor SoftBank Group said on Tuesday, August 19, that it will invest $2 billion in Intel, as the US government reportedly considers taking a 10% stake in the troubled US chip giant. The move is the latest in SoftBank's succession of investments and business deals in the United States as its charismatic founder, Masayoshi Son, aggressively courts US President Donald Trump. "This strategic investment reflects our belief that advanced semiconductor manufacturing and supply will further expand in the United States, with Intel playing a critical role," Son said in a joint press release with Intel announcing the deal. SoftBank will pay $23 per share of Intel common stock. SoftBank's move came as the Trump administration discussed taking a stake of about 10% in Intel to boost the chipmaker and the American semiconductor sector, according to US media, including Bloomberg News and the Wall Street Journal. Since Trump's return to the White House, Son has already announced other investment plans in the United States, including its leading role in the $500-billion Stargate project to build AI infrastructure there along with cloud giant Oracle and ChatGPT-maker OpenAI. Son stood beside the US president and fellow investors to announce the Stargate project at the White House in January. Lip-Bu Tan, Intel chief executive officer, said in the statement that the latest deal demonstrates its close ties with SoftBank. It is "a company that's at the forefront of so many areas of emerging technology and innovation and shares our commitment to advancing US technology and manufacturing leadership," he said. Trump had pressed Tan, a Malaysian-born tech veteran, to resign "immediately," after a Republican senator raised national security concerns over his links to firms in China. But during a meeting last week, Trump praised Tan, saying in a social media post that "his success and rise is an amazing story." Trump also wrote that members of his cabinet would work with Tan and come up with "suggestions." Intel is one of Silicon Valley's most iconic companies but its fortunes have been dwarfed by Asian powerhouses TSMC and Samsung, which dominate the made-to-order semiconductor business.
