Hail the Fire Goddesses
The popular story of Madri committing sati is also a later invention. The epic has two versions of Madri's tale. In one, the later one, she commits sati out of guilt that her husband, Pandu, died when he touched her erotically, thus succumbing to a curse. In the earlier one, both die when Pandu touches her. They are both cremated by the orphan Pandavas.
It is a known fact that Vedic literature has absolutely no reference to the practice of burning widows. This practice started appearing in India roughly around 500 AD. The practice started to wane after the arrival of British rule, following fierce condemnation by social reformers and new laws. By Indian law, any glamorisation of the practice of sati—widow burning—is prohibited. While some have argued that these sati practices were a means by which women protected themselves from being violated by invaders, the fact remains that sati stones began to appear in almost every corner of India, at least five centuries before the rise of the Islamic period of India.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
'Deport Now, Appeal Later': What is United Kingdom's new rule and how will it affect Indians?
New Delhi: The United Kingdom has included India in the list of 15 countries whose citizens can be sent back to their respective countries immediately after committing a crime. That is, now Indian criminals committing crimes in the UK will be deported immediately. Earlier, they used to stay in the UK by appealing against deportation. Now they will be sent to India under the 'deport first, appeal later' rule. What is the 'deport first, appeal later' rule? Under the 'deport first, appeal later' rule, citizens sent back to India from the UK can participate in the hearing of the appeal against deportation through video link. However, people involved in serious crimes like terrorism and murder will have to serve a sentence in a UK jail before deportation. Earlier, criminals could stay in the UK for years by appealing against deportation under human rights laws. Now, after being deported, those Indians are not allowed to return to the UK. After returning to India, the Indian government will decide whether to send them to jail or not. Which countries are included in the list? Earlier, Britain used to deport criminals from only 8 countries without appeal. The list of these countries included Finland, Nigeria, Estonia, Albania, Belize, Mauritius, Tanzania and Kosovo. Now the British government has included the names of Angola, Australia, Botswana, Brunei, Bulgaria, Canada, Guyana, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Latvia, Lebanon, Malaysia, Uganda and Zambia. The UK government is also talking to other countries to join this scheme. How many Indian citizens are locked up in the UK? As of June 30, 2025, there are 320 Indian citizens in the prisons of England and Wales, including 310 men and 10 women. Most foreign prisoners were deported after completing 30 per cent of their sentence in the UK. But on Sunday, 10 August, the UK Justice Ministry announced that the process of deporting foreign criminals will start immediately after sentencing, and not after 30 per cent of the sentence is completed. In the first quarter of 2025, 1,903 people were deported from the UK to India, while last year, 6,069 people were deported.
News18
3 hours ago
- News18
Sheikh Hasina's In Absentia Trial: Bangladesh Lawyers Decry ‘Unfair Process', Question Gaps
Last Updated: A Bangladesh court rejected lawyer ZI Khan Panna's request to represent Sheikh Hasina, on trial for alleged crimes against humanity. A special court in Bangladesh on Tuesday turned down a senior lawyer's request to represent deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina, who is on trial in absentia for alleged 'crimes against humanity," prompting renewed debate over whether she is receiving a fair defence. 'The state has appointed a defence lawyer for Sheikh Hasina. This (matter) is over," said M Golam Mortuza Mozumder, chairman of the three-judge International Crimes Tribunal of Bangladesh (ICT-BD). 'It is up to the tribunal who would be appointed as the defence lawyer," he added, questioning why ZI Khan Panna 'will come to defend her" at this stage of the proceedings. 'Now, when the train has left the station, he came and asked the station master to arrange his boarding." Panna's application, presented by lawyer Naznin Nahar, was also rejected in a secondary request to allow him to assist the state-appointed counsel. Hasina and former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal are being tried in absentia, with the tribunal earlier appointing little-known lawyer Amir Hossain to represent them both. A third accused, former police chief Chowdhury Abdullah Al-Mamun, has turned 'approver" to testify against the co-accused. Panna, a 1971 war veteran in his late 70s and chairman of the legal aid committee of the Bangladesh Bar Council, has been openly critical of the former Awami League regime but expressed his willingness to defend the 76-year-old Hasina. He is also known for criticising the current Muhammad Yunus administration for 'patronising forces" opposed to Bangladesh's 1971 independence. British journalist and rights activist David Bergman, who has been following the ICT-BD proceedings, raised concerns last week over the defence arrangements. He noted that one lawyer was appointed for two accused with 'very different interests," creating 'significant potential conflict of interest problems preventing them each from having a proper defence." Bergman also questioned the short preparation time, pointing out that Hossain only received the prosecution's evidence on June 25, which was five weeks before the trial began and has had no contact with either client. 'It is impossible for any lawyer to… devise a proper defence for both clients, particularly when the lawyer has no contact with the client(s)," he said. The ICT-BD, formed in 2010 to try wartime collaborators of Pakistan, is now hearing charges against Hasina and her aides. In a reversal, Tajul Islam, who was once a key defence lawyer for Jamaat-e-Islami leaders, is serving as the tribunal's chief prosecutor. Bergman called the development 'irony," adding, 'There may well be a much stronger word to describe this!" Last month, the tribunal charged Hasina with crimes against humanity for allegedly ordering a deadly crackdown during the 'July Uprising" led by the Students Against Discrimination (SAD) movement. The protests forced her resignation on August 5, 2024, after which she left Bangladesh aboard a military aircraft and has since been in India. Prosecutors say Hasina acted as 'mastermind, conductor and superior commander" in the violence, which the UN rights office estimates killed around 1,400 people between July 15 and August 15 last year. tags : Sheikh Hasina view comments Location : Dhaka, Bangladesh First Published: August 12, 2025, 21:45 IST News world Sheikh Hasina's In Absentia Trial: Bangladesh Lawyers Decry 'Unfair Process', Question Gaps Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Pakistani influencer Abeer Rizvi defends husband after prison sentence for threatening air hostess on London-Lahore flight
Pakistani social media influencer Abeer Rizvi has come to the defence of her husband, former British executive Salman Iftikhar, following his sentencing to 15 months in prison over threats made towards Virgin Atlantic cabin crew during a first-class flight from London to Lahore. Pakistani influencer speaks out after husband's prison sentence The incident occurred on 7 February 2023, when Iftikhar was travelling with his three children. Reports indicate that he had consumed excessive alcohol on board and became aggressive after being asked to return to his seat. He allegedly made threats to flight attendant Angie Walsh and attempted to physically assault another crew member, Tommy Merchant. Despite the seriousness of the situation, Iftikhar was not arrested upon landing in Pakistan. Authorities later apprehended him at his home in Iver, England, on 16 March 2024. At Isleworth Crown Court, he admitted to threatening to kill Walsh and racially harassing her but denied harassment towards Merchant. Veteran flight attendant left traumatised Angie Walsh, a cabin crew veteran with 37 years of service, has described the incident as deeply traumatising, saying it left her unable to work for over a year. Virgin Atlantic issued a statement reaffirming its commitment to the safety of passengers and crew, emphasising that it holds a zero-tolerance policy towards abusive behaviour. Wife urges public to consider mental health Following the sentencing on 5 August, Rizvi addressed the matter on Instagram, where she has more than 500,000 followers. She expressed that her husband's behaviour was the result of underlying mental health issues. According to her, it is important for the public to understand that unseen struggles can often lead to such incidents, and compassion should be shown before passing judgement. Rizvi, who is based in Pakistan, is reported to be one of two women married to Iftikhar. Media sources claim that his second wife, Erum Salman, resides in the United Kingdom. The case has attracted widespread attention due to the combination of high-profile individuals, aviation safety concerns, and the public discussion on mental health accountability.
