11 Chicago-area elementary students hospitalized after eating THC-laced edibles
Eleven elementary school students have been hospitalized after consuming THC -laced edibles, according to Chicago officials.
Ambulances and police officers rushed to attend Fort Dearborn Elementary School, on S. Throop St. in Brainerd, Chicago, at around 1:40 p.m. Tuesday after receiving calls that over a dozen students had consumed an unknown substance and started to feel unwell, according to school principal Kimberly Porter and Chicago police.
When authorities arrived, 22 students were confirmed to have ingested the substance, which was later identified as marijuana edibles containing THC, the psychoactive compound found in cannabis.
Police said that of the 22 students who took the drug, 11 needed medical treatment, CBS News reported.
The students affected were allegedly all sixth-graders who fell ill after a classmate brought cookies into the school that were unknowingly laced with THC.
WGN9 reports that the sick children, aged 11 to 14, were taken to an area hospital and were said to be in good or fair condition.
One parent told the channel that her godson nearly ate one of the cookies, explaining that "He just said he tasted the cookie, and it didn't taste right. So, he spit it out, and that was it. I don't think it was packaged or anything," said Trianna Jones.
In the email sent to parents, Porter wrote: 'We believe our community member may have ingested the unknown substance in the form of 'edibles,' which are food or drinks that are made with cannabis or other prohibited substances.'
"Prohibited substances of any kind are not allowed at our school, and we encourage you to take this opportunity to have a conversation with your child about the health risks associated with consuming edibles, and to remind them not to accept food if they do not know where it came from."
One concerned parent, Ethel Allen, told CBS: "I really would like to know where they actually got the products from, ' adding, 'because it's not easily accessible like you can just go to the corner store and they're going to give it to a child, so it has to be an adult somewhere involved."
Ora Knowles, whose nephew attends Fort Dearborn, said she was shocked that someone was able to smuggle the contraband items into the school.
Chicago police are believed to be investigating the incident.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Doctors issue urgent health warning as dangerous new Covid virus from China triggers US outbreak
A dangerous new Covid variant from China is surging in California, health officials warn. The California Department of Public Health warned this week the highly contagious NB.1.8.1 strain has been detected in the state, making it the sixth US state to be exposed. The variant has also been detected in international travelers arriving in Washington state, Virginia, Hawaii, Rhode Island and New York City since March. Health officials said the variant was first detected in March and has been on the rise since May 1. Since April, NB.1.8.1 has increased from two percent of Covid cases in California to 19 percent, according to health department data. Lab tests suggest NB.1.8.1, which was first detected in January in China, is more infectious than currently circulating strains, which means it could lead to a spike in infections and hospital admissions. World Health Organization data also suggests it makes up more than half the variants currently circulating. The warning comes as some physicians in California have called for the return of mask mandates to emulate countries like Hong Kong. The California Department of Public Health told The Sacremento Bee: ' COVID-19 continues to circulate in California and future seasonal increases in disease levels are likely.' NB.1.8.1 is not yet prevalent enough in the US to be publicly tracked by the CDC. Strain LP.8.1 is currently the most dominant in the US, making up 73 percent of Covid infections. The latest vaccines target the JN.1 variant, which LP.8.1 is descended from. The California Public Health Department said: 'Currently available vaccines are expected to remain effective.' However, health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr has moved to remove access to the Covid vaccine for healthy children and pregnant women. However, it is currently still on the CDC's children's vaccine schedule. Covid tests in California as of April 19, the latest data available, show 2.1 percent of tests came back positive, a steady rate compared to weeks prior. The rate of hospitalizations from Covid during the week of April 19 in California was 1.3 per 100,000 people, a slight decrease from 1.6 per 100,000 the week before. There is usually a delay of several weeks for the most recent data, and infections can take several weeks to result in hospitalization. Nationally, Covid test positivity has decreased from 2.9 percent May 17 to 2.7 percent the week of May 24. Covid-related emergency department visits have also decreased 6.5 percent during that time frame. In China, data shows the proportion of severely ill respiratory patients with Covid has jumped from 3.3 to 6.3 percent over the last month. The proportion of Chinese ER patients testing positive for Covid had jumped from 7.5 to 16.2 percent. Officials in Taiwan are also reporting a surge in Covid emergency room admissions, with the number rising 78 percent in a week over the seven-days to May 3, according to the latest data available. And hospitalizations have risen to a 12-month high in Hong Kong, thought to be driven by the new variant. Symptoms of NB.1.8.1 are similar to other variants and include fever, chills, cough, shortness of breath, fatigue, muscle aches, headache, loss of taste or smell, sore throat, congestion, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Covid swabs cannot detect which variant you have.
Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Haley Joel Osment comes to unexpected deal in cocaine and public intoxication arrest that included racist rant
Haley Joel Osment appears to have put a troublesome situation behind him, in reaching a deal to escape jail time in his public intoxication and cocaine possession arrest less than two months ago. The Sixth Sense star, 37, will attend three Alcoholics Anonymous meeting weekly as part of a deal he hammered out with a court in Northern California following his April 8 arrest at the Mammoth Mountain resort. The Oscar-nominee was allowed to enter a yearlong diversion program in connection with the case stemming from his arrest at the Mammoth Lakes, California ski destination. The Los Angeles native came to the accord days after authorities with the Mono County District Attorney's office said they had filed misdemeanor charges against the actor in connection with the incident. Officials with the District Attorney's office were not pleased with the actor being allowed to attend a diversion program since he previously got a DUI in 2006 in Los Angeles. Authorities with the office, in their objection, also noted that the actor was caught on camera using racial epithets while he was taken into custody, sources told People. Osment had an arraignment slated to July 7, which will be scuttled now that a deal has been worked out. Osment was an overnight child star sensation as the last millennium drew to a close, with his jarring portrayal of Cole Sear opposite Bruce Willis in M. Night Shyamalan's The Sixth Sense. The character, a child with the ability to communicate with the departed, was etched into p op culture lore with the iconic line from the film, 'I see dead people.' The motion picture - which also featured Toni Collette, Olivia Williams, Trevor Morgan and Donnie Wahlberg - was a success at the box office and with critics. It garnered six Oscar nominations in 2000, including Best Director for Shyamalan and Best Actor in a Supporting Role for Osment. The child star lost out on the honors to the legendary Michael Caine for The Cider House Rules, Other nominees Magnolia's Tom Cruise, The Talented Mr. Ripley's Jude Law and The Green Mile's Michael Clarke Duncan. Other films Osment has been featured in include the 1994 megahit Forrest Gump as Forrest Junior, 2000s Pay It Forward and the 2001 Steven Spielberg movie A.I. The charismatic actor has also carved out his presence on the small screen with a number of recurring roles on shows such as Teachers, Comedy Bang! Bang and The Kominsky Method.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Dear Julia: I'm scared my siblings will lose our close bond over inheritance
Q. My siblings and I were always close, but since our parents started dividing assets and discussing inheritance, tensions have skyrocketed. I never thought we were this kind of family, and I'm scared we'll lose our bond. A. I am sorry you're going through this. Inheritance has a way of exposing fault lines even in the closest of families. This isn't just about money — it's about love, fairness, power and belonging. When these core needs feel threatened, emotions run high, close family members become foes and long-buried tensions can surface. What you're describing is extremely common, yet it's an area with surprisingly little psychological research or widely accepted guidance. In this intense and fraught topic, psychotherapy has been lax in offering helpful support. I want to help normalise the difficulties you face. Every family, regardless of wealth, will face these questions. There can be battles over money that shatter families and equally painful disputes about sentimental objects — a floral jug, a photograph album. I've known families who did not speak for decades because of a dispute about an old armchair. Your parents are responsible for holding the family together while they lead this discussion and share their assets. Perhaps they have not thought about it deeply and naively believe it will be straightforward. It is never straightforward unless it is dealt with sensitively. Your parents need to consider their legacy — what they want to be remembered for, what values they hope to pass down — as well as their 'stuff'. Ideally, their decisions should align with what matters most to you all, rather than inadvertently create division. Money is never just money. It often serves as a proxy for deeper, unspoken dynamics: • Love: Am I loved? Who is the favourite? • Power: Who gets to decide?• Control: Is money being used as manipulation?• Security: Will I survive without the money I believe is my right? • Legacy: Who will be loyal to my legacy? Will my legacy be what is remembered more than me? When these questions remain unspoken, resentment or fear can grow. Each family member may tell themselves a story that fits their feelings, ignoring other family members. Old childhood roles re-emerge — was one of you always the 'responsible one' and another the 'bad' sibling? These deeply ingrained narratives shape how you perceive what is 'fair' and who believes they have a right to make the decisions. Reflecting on how your family has historically related to money is essential. Was it openly discussed or shrouded in secrecy? Did previous generations experience financial scarcity, creating a mindset of precarity? Understanding these patterns won't provide instant solutions, but it will help you to see the context within which your beliefs have formed — it can help you to resist being pulled into knee-jerk reactions. Families tend to approach inheritance in one of four ways Equality: Assets are divided equally to preserve family unity. Reciprocity: Distribution is based on past contributions or needs. Egoism: Decisions are made with individual self-interest in mind, with little regard for family cohesion. Tradition: Rules have been passed down from the past, like primogeniture, where the cohesion of the estate overrides individual family members. There are no clear answers to this, but I suggest as a family, you think about these ideas: 1. Pause ongoing plans — talk together. Ask your parents and siblings to delay major decisions and invite open discussion. Transparency is crucial, as secrecy or sudden surprises tend to escalate conflict. It helps if parents can share their reasons and allow space for their children's perspectives to be heard. 2. Commit to honest conversations — this is easier said than done. These discussions aren't just about 'who gets what' but about what feels just and emotionally fair. The key is to ensure that no topic or feeling is off-limits — when people feel heard, it reduces the toxicity of underlying tensions. Be patient; this process takes time. 3. Agree on shared values — what does your family stand for? Do you prioritise fairness, tradition, or security? If you can align on your core values, they can act as a guiding principle for decisions. 4. Accept conflict but prioritise repair — disagreements are inevitable, but how you handle them will determine whether your relationships survive intact. Acknowledge when something feels unfair, name your feelings without blame, and work towards repair rather than retreat into silent resentment, or replay old fights. Be mindful of past family patterns — the roles that each act out. 5. Imagine your future — picture where you want your family to be in five or ten years. What does a 'good outcome' look like — not just financially, but emotionally? If the ultimate goal is to maintain close sibling bonds, then protect and prioritise those relationships over the assets. 6. Seek professional advice — inheritance disputes are rarely just financial; they are deeply psychological. A mediator or family therapist can help to navigate difficult conversations alongside financial advisers who can provide practical guidance. You may not want to spend the money on this now, but any money spent now will save you financially and psychologically . 7. Discuss the chattels — many fiercest battles are over objects with emotional value. If your parents are willing, discuss these now, while they can help to facilitate fairness. Some families take turns choosing items, while others use written agreements to avoid future disputes. • Read more advice from Julia Samuel on The Times These conversations will challenge you all, but they are also an opportunity. I've seen families torn apart over wealth, but I've also seen families who come through this process more robust as a unit, with a deeper love for one another. I believe that family bonds — being there for each other in times of crisis, celebration and day-to-day —are more protective than financial wealth. If you're lucky enough to inherit financial security, let it strengthen your relationships, not break them. I hope this helps, and I wish you and your family the best to find a resolution that works for everyone.
