The Atlantic Announces Tom Bartlett as Staff Writer
Below is the staff announcement from editor in chief Jeffrey Goldberg and executive editor Adrienne LaFrance:
Dear everyone,
We are very glad to share the news that Tom Bartlett is joining The Atlantic as a staff writer. Tom is an extraordinary reporter and a brilliant, empathetic writer—qualities that were all on display in the stories he wrote for us earlier this year about the Texas measles outbreak. As you no doubt remember, Tom found and interviewed the family of the first American child to die of measles in a decade, and he was also first to report on the conversations that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had with victims' families.
At The Atlantic, he will cover a wide range of stories at the intersection of health and science, with a particular focus on attacks against enlightenment values and the remaking of American public health in the second Trump presidency.
Tom comes to us with great expertise in scientific controversy and rooting out scientific dishonesty. Most recently, during his 22 years at The Chronicle of Higher Education, he covered the reproducibility crisis in psychology, numerous academic scandals, and even research about falsehoods that was itself falsified. Tom is also a seasoned features writer. (The Tom Bartlett completists among us will also remember his excellent profiles of Tucker Carlson and Gene Weingarten for the Washingtonian.) He has become one of the nation's great experts on the anti-vaccine movement, and is skilled at covering the field's major players with requisite scrutiny while still maintaining respectful curiosity about why people believe what they believe, and always demonstrating a willingness to go where the story—and the truth—lead him.
Tom is based in Austin, Texas. Please join us in welcoming him to the team.
Adrienne and Jeff
The Atlantic has announced a number of new hires this year, including managing editor Griff Witte; staff writers Isaac Stanley-Becker, Tyler Austin Harper, Quinta Jurecic, Nick Miroff, Toulouse Olorunnipa, Ashley Parker, Alexandra Petri, Missy Ryan, Vivian Salama, Michael Scherer, Jamie Thompson, Josh Tyrangiel, Caity Weaver, and Nancy Youssef; and senior editors Jenna Johnson and Dan Zak. Please reach out with any questions or requests.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
Sherrod Brown and Mamdani are very different — today's Democrats need both
News that former Sen. Sherrod Brown intends to enter the 2026 race to regain a Senate seat in Ohio is just the kind of development that the Democratic Party sorely needs. With polls showing approval of their party at historic lows, and that it is bleeding support from working-class voters, Brown promises a return to the pragmatic liberalism that once made the Democrats this country's home for blue-collar voters. Welcome back, Sherrod. Brown is a longtime proponent of what he calls the 'dignity of work.' And stylistically, he is the polar opposite of New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani. Since he won his party primary, Mamdani — educated at an elite liberal arts college and a self-described Democratic socialist — has become a news media darling and lightning rod for Republicans eager to paint Democrats as radical left lunatics, out of touch with the American mainstream. Mamdani, whose website notes that he 'co-found(ed) his college's first Students for Justice in Palestine chapter,' has leaned into that caricature. His campaign promises city-owned grocery stores, 'free public buses, universal child care, new affordable housing, and a higher minimum wage — all to be funded through a 2 percent tax on the top 1 percent of earners.' And it doesn't help that he was initially reluctant to denounce the anti-Zionist catch phrase, 'Globalize the Intifada.' Yet Mamdani succeeded by energizing young voters and bringing new voters to the polls. Brown, who graduated from Yale, displays none of the polish or easy cosmopolitanism associated with an Ivy League education. His gravelly voice, down-to-earth manner, and rumpled appearance suggest that he is more comfortable in bowling alleys and union halls than in the company of New York socialites. More importantly, Brown understands and speaks to the grievances of working-class Americans of all races. He embraces a populist agenda, without the hard edge of anger that often comes with it. The more America sees of him, the better it will be for the Democratic Party. During his three terms in the Senate, Brown was a workers' rights champion. That is why he earned a 4 percent rating from the ultra-conservative political action group Heritage Action for America and a 100 percent rating from the AFL-CIO national labor union. Despite this record, he lost his bid for re-election in 2024 to Trump-backed candidate Bernie Moreno by 4 percent of the vote. He could not overcome the red wave that swept Ohio. After the election, Brown offered the following diagnosis of the problems of the Democratic Party. 'I've seen [an] erosion of American jobs, and I've seen the middle class shrink. People have to blame someone. And it's been Democrats.' For emphasis, he added, 'At this point, this has been 30 years since NAFTA of the Democrats drifting away from workers.' Now, he argues Democrats need to focus on 'the dignity of work and show up at picket lines and go to union halls and listen to workers and tell stories about how unions have changed people's lives for the better.' Brown makes a compelling case that the dignity of work should be at the center of the Democratic Party agenda. In his view, it is one thing that Americans have in common. He knows that the party cannot recover if it does not speak to the broadest swath of voters in a language that they recognize and understand. Promises of 'free' stuff won't go over well in communities where working people take pride, justified or not, in earning everything they have gotten. He is not shy about calling out rising corporate profits and executive salaries at a time when wages ' are largely flat, and the cost of living keeps getting more expensive.' He recognizes that 'We have an economy today that does not reward work and does not value the work of Americans without four-year college degrees.' Brown's vision for the Democratic Party begins with an acknowledgement of those facts. And he is telling his colleagues that they cannot win if they are seen as the party of the status quo. Or, if they are the party of the coastal elites. There is much to admire in what Mamdani did in his New York City campaign, and he sure looks like the kind of new voice that Democrats need. But for people between the coasts, the Mamdani phenomenon may seem to be just the latest twist in the political tastes of coastal elites. That's why the Democrats also need Sherrod Brown. Whether or not he can win in Ohio, his campaign will offer a vision for a Democratic Party looking to compete beyond the coasts and its current wealthy, well-educated base.
The Hill
35 minutes ago
- The Hill
Zohran Mamdani is a political risk Democrats shouldn't take
In a twist of comic irony, New York City — the embodiment of American capitalism — may soon have a democratic socialist mayor in 33 year old Zohran Mamdani. That being said, assuming Mamdani wins November's general election, the joke may be on national Democrats. Put another way, even as a mayoral candidate, by dint of New York City's status and his elevation into a national figure, Mamdani presents severe risks to the Democratic Party on the national stage. And as the party looks to regain even one chamber of Congress next year, there is a very real chance that Mamdani's extreme, socialist policies put the entire party's political fortunes in jeopardy. The first risk is if Mamdani's primary victory portends, or ushers in, a seismic shift for the wider Democratic Party. Coming at a time when Democrats are at a crossroads, Mamdani's win may embolden progressives, sideline moderates and drive the party further to the left. If this is the direction the Democratic Party moves in, they will end up even less politically relevant than they are today. At the same time, Mamdani's views are considerably out of line with what mainstream Democratic views should be — particularly on the economy and public safety. The U.S. is a capitalist nation. Although more can be done to ensure everyone has an equal opportunity and is protected by a social safety net, the U.S. is not a socialist country. And on public safety, Mamdani, a past proponent of 'defund the police,' is pledging to move 'billions of dollars (from the NYPD budget) to a new Department of Community Safety' that emphasizes soft on crime measures, according to New York Post reporting. With Democrats already struggling to overcome perceptions that they can't be trusted to handle the economy or public safety. And given New York City's prominence, Mamdani's policies may quickly become the face of the entire party, a gift to the GOP. The second, and arguably biggest, risk Mamdani poses lies in how he would govern. Mamdani campaigned on endless handouts backed by huge tax increases, replacing police officers with social workers, and Soviet-inspired government-run grocery stores. Whether Mamdani is able to implement any, or all, of these campaign pledges or not, Democrats will find themselves between a rock and a hard place. Either Mamdani is seen as ineffective, and just another Democrat who promised utopia but was unable to actually deliver on his lofty promises. Or, more dangerously, New Yorkers get a firsthand lesson on the dangers of socialism, sparking a considerable backlash against the Democratic Party as a whole. Worse, with New York City being a global center of culture, finance and entertainment, the entire country will witness the damage from Mamdani's policies. When government-run grocery stores show themselves to be a horrendous idea, which the Soviet Union has already shown them to be, Republicans will immediately pounce on this failure to underscore the danger in electing any Democrat. Should crime spike due to a sharp reduction in the number of police officers, Democrats across the country will be branded as soft on crime. Similarly, if excessively high taxes on the city's high-earners cause capital flight, a destruction of the city's tax base and drastically lower the overall quality of life, voters' trust in Democrats to handle the economy will sink, and it's already tremendously low. Finally, there is the issue of how Mamdani will govern the city with the world's largest Jewish population outside of Israel. Due to his history of antisemitic remarks, whether his refusal to condemn 'globalize the intifada' or unwillingness to accept Israel as a Jewish state, vitriol he's never shared for other ethnoreligious states, there are very real concerns that under his leadership, New York City will be even more hostile for Jews. Far from being a local issue, if Mamdani fails to protect New York's Jewish citizens, it will reinforce perceptions that the Democratic Party is rife with antisemitism. To be sure, national Democrats seem to be aware of the risks Mamdani poses. Some moderates, such as Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.), have been blunt, saying Mamdani's 'policies do not comport' with Democrats' agenda. Others, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jefferies (D-N.Y.) have taken a softer approach, but still indicate some unease with the socialist who has become the face of the Democratic Party. Speaking to CNBC's 'Squawk Box' on Thursday, Jefferies refused to endorse Mamdani or even say whether he was 'convinced' about Mamdani and the kind of mayor he would be. Asked about Mamdani's policy proposals, Jefferies said, 'Now, he's going to have to demonstrate…that his ideas can actually be put into reality.' Hardly a show of confidence from a party leader. Taken together, the elevation of Mamdani and his extreme views may deepen the animosity and alienation many voters feel when they think about today's Democratic Party. If voters see Mamdani's leadership devastating New York City and come to believe that this is what the Democratic Party has to offer, it stands to reason that Democrats across the country will pay the price, and likely for many election cycles to come. 'The End of Democracy? Russia and China on the Rise and America in Retreat.'
Boston Globe
35 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
What to know about Zelensky's meeting with Trump
They are looking to safeguard Ukraine and Europe more broadly from any further aggression from Moscow — but also are providing a show of support for Zelensky after his last visit to the White House led to an angry confrontation. The American and Ukrainian leaders are scheduled to first meet privately, without the Europeans. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Here's what to know about the Washington meeting. Advertisement The talks could be a pivotal moment in the war After meeting Putin in Alaska, Trump is making a big push for a breakthrough. A lot of issues need to be resolved, however, and the two sides have previously established red lines that are incompatible, including questions of whether Ukraine will cede any land to Russia, the future of Ukraine's army and whether the country will have any guarantee against further Russian aggression. In a post on social media Sunday night, Trump appeared to shift the burden for ending the war to Zelensky, whose country was invaded in February 2022. Advertisement 'President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight,' he wrote. A comprehensive peace deal could still be a long way off. Putin wants the Donbas As a condition for peace, the Russian leader wants Kyiv to give up the Donbas, the industrial region in eastern Ukraine that has seen some of the most intense fighting but that Russian forces have failed to capture completely. In his Sunday night post, Trump wrote that Zelensky should also accept Russia's illegal 2014 annexation of Ukraine's Crimea region. As part of a deal, Putin has said the United States and its European allies can provide Ukraine with a security guarantee resembling NATO's collective defense pledge, according to a senior US official. Trump envoy Steve Witkoff called that a 'game-changing' step though he offered few details on how it would work. Ukraine has long pressed for some kind of guarantee that would prevent Russia from invading again. Ukraine won't surrender land to Russia Zelensky has rejected Putin's demand that Ukraine surrender the Donbas region, made up of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, since the Ukrainian Constitution forbids giving up territory or trading land. That also means he can't cede Crimea either. Instead, freezing the front line — which snakes roughly 1,000 kilometers (620 miles) from northeastern to southeastern Ukraine — seems to be the most the Ukrainian people might accept. Russia currently holds about 20% of Ukrainian territory. Europe's security is also at stake in the talks European leaders see Ukraine's fight as a bulwark against any Kremlin ambitions to threaten other countries in eastern Europe and beyond. French President Emmanuel Macron described Ukraine as an 'outpost of our collective defense if Russia wanted to advance again.' Advertisement 'If we are weak with Russia today, we'll be preparing the conflicts of tomorrow and they will impact the Ukrainians and — make no mistake — they can impact us, too.' Macron said Sunday. The European political heavyweights expected in Washington are Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. Civilians are killed as the fighting continues Ukraine has in recent months been losing more territory against Russia's bigger army, and Moscow's forces breached Ukrainian lines in a series of minor infiltrations in the Donetsk region ahead of the Alaska summit. But there is no sign of a looming, major Russian breakthrough on the front line. Both sides have also kept up their daily long-range strikes behind the front line. A Russian drone strike on Kharkiv, Ukraine's second-largest city, killed six people late Sunday, including an 18-month-old and a 16-year-old, according to regional head Oleh Syniehubov. The attack on the northeastern city injured 20 others, including six children, he said. Russia's Defense Ministry on Monday reported intercepting 23 Ukrainian drones over Russian regions and the annexed Crimean peninsula overnight.
