logo
Texas bill creating more weekend early voting could boost turnout, but delay election results

Texas bill creating more weekend early voting could boost turnout, but delay election results

Yahoo15 hours ago

This coverage is made possible through Votebeat, a nonpartisan news organization covering local election administration and voting access. Sign up for Votebeat Texas' free newsletters here.
Texans will have a new schedule for early voting in coming years under new legislation that starts the voting period later but slides it right up to Election Day, eliminating the three-day break in between.
Experts say Senate Bill 2753, which lawmakers approved this week, will likely boost turnout, as it includes more time for voting on weekends. The author of the bill, Sen. Bob Hall, R-Edgewood, told Votebeat that the change also 'simplifies the process' and would reduce the cost of election operations and equipment.
But local election officials said they aren't so sure of that, and are still determining how it will work and what it could cost counties. The bill doesn't allocate any funding for counties to implement the changes.
And there's one notable side effect of taking away the gap after the early-voting period: Partial vote tallies from the early ballots, which are typically released shortly after polls close on Election Day, won't be available until later, election administrators said.
The bill is headed to Gov. Greg Abbott's desk for his signature, though it can become law without it.
The changes have to go into effect no later than August 2027. Some election officials warned that they are likely to need additional election workers to work longer hours to comply with the requirements, as well as more voting equipment and possibly additional polling locations.
'These are just things that we don't know yet because we haven't run an election in this model yet,' said Jennifer Doinoff, Hays County elections administrator and the legislative committee chair for the Texas Association of County Election Officials. 'It's something we're going to have to look at and build from the ground up.'
It's not yet clear when counties would begin implementing the changes. The bill directs the Texas secretary of state to adopt rules and procedures to implement the new timeline and provide a report telling the Texas Legislature 'as soon as practicable' after Sept. 1 that the agency 'has consulted with county election officials and is confident that the counties in this state are prepared."
Also, the Legislature could make changes based on the secretary of state's report because there is a full regular legislative session in 2027 before SB 2753's new early voting timeline has to be used.
Currently, during general elections that have county and state offices on the ballot, Texas offers 12 days of early voting, starting the 17th day before Election Day and ending four days before Election Day. This allows for only a single weekend of voting.
The new law would also require 12 days of early voting, but the period would begin on a Thursday and run for 12 days straight, including two weekends, right up to Election Day. In addition, Sunday voting hours would be extended from six to nine hours a day, and early voting would also be available on any holidays during that period.
While the number of days doesn't change, election officials said the new schedule will eliminate a treasured break for workers before Election Day, and they worry they'll lose workers without it. Some officials also said it can be hard to find people to work Sundays.
In Collin County, the early-voting staffers typically also work on Election Day, said Kaleb Breaux, the county's elections administrator.
'It's a laborious process for them, just mentally and physically,' Breaux said. 'By the time they get to that last week of early voting, they're just worn out.'
Election offices also used the break to set up equipment for Election Day voting, which uses a different set of machines.
Election officials will have to work out whether and how to pay poll workers for any overtime. The bill didn't allocate any funds for counties to pay poll workers.
Hall, the bill author, played down the concerns about staffing, and said he expects some workers would prefer to work on the weekend. 'It's a matter of organization and management,' he said.
Hall said he doesn't anticipate new personnel costs since the total number of days the polls will be open won't change.
The bill will also require changes to the way election officials allocate their space and equipment. It will require any location used as an early-voting polling place to also be used as an Election Day polling place, a new mandate. But in some counties, finding and leasing facilities is difficult.
'We'll have to completely reconfigure early voting,' Trudy Hancock, the Brazos County elections administrator said.
Election officials are also anticipating changes in the timeline for posting election results on Election Day. Early-voting ballots will have to be tabulated at the same time as Election Day ballots, and the extra volume will add to the time needed to complete the security and paperwork steps required after polls close. So tallies from each polling place could take longer to come in, Breaux said.
Hall said he doesn't expect the timeline for full election results to change very much. The partial results that may be delayed 'serve absolutely no purpose in the election process other than to give people a piece of information as quickly as possible,' he said.
'I expect they'll be able to get the total votes not much later if the counties handle it right,' he said.
The schedule change aligns Texas more closely with 22 other states that have a single voting period that runs right up to Election Day, including Arkansas, Missouri, Colorado, Indiana, California and Illinois, according to the Voting Rights Lab. Hall told Votebeat he didn't model the bill after any specific state.
In some of those states, making voting accessible the day before Election Day has helped increase voter turnout, said Daniel Griffith, senior policy director at Secure Democracy Foundation.
'That Monday just right before Election Day, that's when a lot of folks are really thinking about the election,' Griffith said. 'The later you kind of push that last early voting day, the more participation you get.'
Colorado, which is primarily a vote-by-mail state, implemented a single voting period over a decade ago and it has worked smoothly. For in-person voting, the entire state uses a countywide voting model, where people can vote at any polling location in their county — for the entire voting period. That means election officials have fewer polling locations to staff.
Fewer than half of Texas' 254 counties use the countywide model. In the rest, voters have to cast their ballot at their assigned precinct, which typically requires more polling locations on Election Day. The number of early-voting sites varies from county to county, and not all of them use the same sites on Election Day.
Texas counties will need funds and resources to implement the changes in the bill, said Jennifer Morrell, CEO and co-founder of The Elections Group, an election administration consulting firm. Colorado reimburses local jurisdictions when there are state or federal candidates on the ballot, Morrell said, and adjusts the amount for changes in poll worker pay and other costs. Texas will need to do the same, she said.
'Costs go up: paper, ink, equipment,' Morrell said. 'You can't just make stuff up and then expect a local jurisdiction to just do it without additional funding. And even if election officials get creative, they can't maintain it for long.'
Natalia Contreras is a reporter for Votebeat in partnership with the Texas Tribune. She's based in Corpus Christi. Contact Natalia at ncontreras@votebeat.org.
Disclosure: Secure Democracy and Texas Secretary of State have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
Big news: 20 more speakers join the TribFest lineup! New additions include Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of education and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O'Rourke, former U.S. Representative, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing partner at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer.
Get tickets.
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Office of Open Records orders Cambria County to search again for 2024 election failure
Office of Open Records orders Cambria County to search again for 2024 election failure

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Office of Open Records orders Cambria County to search again for 2024 election failure

CAMBRIA COUNTY, Pa. (WTAJ) — Cambria County officials have been ordered to conduct a new search for records related to a major voting system failure during the November 2024 election, following a successful appeal from State Rep. Frank Burns under Pennsylvania's Right-to-Know Law. The state Office of Open Records ruled that the county's original reason for denying Burns' records request, citing a noncriminal investigation, was not valid, requiring the county to either provide the documents or legally attest that they do not exist. Burns requested any documentation explaining the nature of the voting machine malfunction that led to ballots going unscanned and unaccounted for, as well as a tally of how many ballots were successfully or unsuccessfully scanned on Election Day. The Nov. 5, 2024, issue reportedly involved voting machines that had passed pre-election testing but failed when used, prompting concerns from voters and lawmakers alike. Burns has continued to push for transparency surrounding the incident, stating that the public still has no clear explanation for what went wrong or how many ballots were impacted. In response to an inquiry from WTAJ, Cambria County's solicitor, Ronald Repak, provided a statement acknowledging the OOR ruling and outlining the four key parts of the decision. According to the county, the OOR deemed one of Burns' requests moot after the county turned over the logic and accuracy testing records. The OOR also denied Burns' request for a finding of bad faith, instead stating, 'The County has been timely, attentive, and professional in both its responses to the Requester and to the OOR and has made serious attempts to provide the Requester with the information he is seeking.' The county confirmed the OOR did grant Burns' request for the number of ballots that failed to scan, which officials say occurred because the ballots did not include TIS (timing) marks required by the tabulation system. The county said this issue affected all ballots when polls opened. Additionally, the OOR granted Burns' request for documentation explaining the nature of the problem. The county reiterated it has repeatedly said the mistake was due to a clerical error by a county worker who uploaded ballots to the system without the necessary marks. Officials said there was no malicious intent. 'The County has no issue with completing another search to answer questions which the County has already gone to great lengths in answering,' Repak stated. The OOR has given the county 30 days to provide Burns with the relevant records or a sworn statement that they do not exist. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Supreme Court turns away RNC challenge to Pennsylvania ballot ruling
Supreme Court turns away RNC challenge to Pennsylvania ballot ruling

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Supreme Court turns away RNC challenge to Pennsylvania ballot ruling

The Supreme Court on Friday turned away the Republican National Committee's (RNC) bid to block Pennsylvania voters' in-person, do-over option when they return a defective mail ballot. The announcement was intended for Monday morning, but the court mistakenly released it early due to what a court spokesperson called an 'apparent software malfunction.' The order leaves in place a 4-3 ruling from Pennsylvania's top court that voters can still cast a vote at their polling place on Election Day if their mail ballot was rejected for technical reasons, despite a state law saying such votes 'shall not be counted' if the mail ballot was timely received. The additional option impacts thousands of voters each election cycle. The legal battle gained attention just ahead of the 2024 election, when President Trump narrowly beat former Vice President Harris in the key swing state and went on to retake the White House. Just before the election, the Supreme Court declined the RNC's request to intervene on an emergency basis. Now returning to the high court on its normal docket, the RNC urged the Supreme Court to use its case as a vehicle to more broadly restrict state courts' power over elections. Two years ago, the high court declined to endorse the maximalist version of the so-called 'independent state legislature' theory, which would give state legislatures near-total control over setting federal election rules by preventing state courts from restraining their actions. However, the justices in that decision warned that courts may not 'arrogate to themselves the power vested in state legislatures.' The justices have yet to adopt a specific test to measure when a court crosses that constitutional line, and the RNC cast its petition as a prime opportunity to do so. 'Failure to correct the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's indefensible distortion of the General Assembly's laws would effectively do just that by sending a strong message that judicial review under the Elections and Electors Clauses is illusory. The result would directly contravene the Constitution,' the RNC's attorneys at Jones Day wrote in the petition. The justices' refusal to take up the case comes months after the justices turned away a petition arising from Montana asking them to take up similar issues. The Pennsylvania case arose after Faith Genser and Frank Matis attempted to vote in the state's 2024 Democratic primary. Initially, the duo planned to vote by mail. But they mistakenly returned 'naked' ballots, meaning they didn't include a required secrecy envelope. With their votes invalid, Genser and Matis went to their polling place on the day of the primary election to cast provisional ballots. They sued after the Butler County elections board refused to count those ballots. The RNC's petition was joined by the Republican Party of Pennsylvania and the Butler County Board of Elections.

Commerce's Lutnick receives a timely reminder: ‘We cannot build bananas in America'
Commerce's Lutnick receives a timely reminder: ‘We cannot build bananas in America'

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Commerce's Lutnick receives a timely reminder: ‘We cannot build bananas in America'

Ahead of Donald Trump's second inaugural, there were plenty of rumors that billionaire Howard Lutnick was well positioned to lead the Treasury Department — one of the most sought-after positions in any White House Cabinet. The Associated Press reported that some prominent supporters had lobbied on his behalf. Those efforts ultimately fell short, and Trump tapped Lutnick to serve as commerce secretary. As for why, exactly, he didn't get a more prominent position, The Bulwark reported two weeks after Election Day that Lutnick kept 'shooting himself in the foot' with foolish rhetoric. The report quoted a Trump adviser who said Lutnick needed to learn how to 'shut the f--- up.' And yet, he keeps finding microphones and making things worse for himself. This week, for example, Lutnick appeared on Capitol Hill, where he seemed eager to defend the president's policies on trade tariffs. As part of one especially memorable exchange, Democratic Rep. Madeleine Dean of Pennsylvania asked the Cabinet secretary, 'What's the tariff on bananas?' He responded, 'The tariff on bananas would be representative of the countries that produce them,' before ultimately acknowledging that the rate would be 10%. The congresswoman reminded the witness that Walmart has already increased the cost of bananas by 8%. After pointing to the possibility of increasingly unlikely trade deals, Lutnick eventually declared: 'If you build in America, and you produce your product in America, there will be no tariff.' It was at that point that Dean lowered the boom. 'We cannot build bananas in America,' she explained. Lutnick didn't respond, which was just as well given the circumstances. Complicating matters for the commerce secretary, embarrassing moments like these have become a staple of his tenure. Lutnick announced that the president was preparing to waive taxes on Americans earning under $150,000 per year, only to walk that back soon after. He urged a national television audience to buy stock in Tesla, sparking an ethics controversy the White House struggled to defend. In one especially glaring incident, Lutnick suggested that only criminals would complain about missing a Social Security check. A month later, the secretary pitched a 'new model' of American employment that sounded an awful lot like the factory jobs that existed in the 19th century. And don't even get me started on his 'little screws to make iPhones' comments. The Wall Street Journal recently reported that Lutnick's rhetorical record was proving to be so 'challenging' to the White House that officials asked him to start saying less. He might need a reminder. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store