logo
Scientists racing to discover the depth of ocean damage sparked by the LA wildfires

Scientists racing to discover the depth of ocean damage sparked by the LA wildfires

NBC News16-02-2025

LOS ANGELES — On a recent Sunday, Tracy Quinn drove down the Pacific Coast Highway to assess damage wrought upon the coastline by the Palisades Fire.
The water line was darkened by ash. Burnt remnants of washing machines and dryers and metal appliances were strewn about the shoreline. Sludge carpeted the water's edge. Waves during high tide lapped onto charred homes, pulling debris and potentially toxic ash into the ocean as they receded.
'It was just heartbreaking,' said Quinn, president and CEO of the environmental group Heal the Bay, whose team has reported ash and debris some 25 miles (40 kilometers) south of the Palisades burn area west of Los Angeles.
As crews work to remove potentially hundreds of thousands of tons of hazardous materials from the Los Angeles wildfires, researchers and officials are trying to understand how the fires on land have impacted the sea. The Palisades and Eaton fires scorched thousands of homes, businesses, cars and electronics, turning everyday items into hazardous ash made of pesticides, asbestos, plastics, lead, heavy metals and more.
Since much of it could end up in the Pacific Ocean, there are concerns and many unknowns about how the fires could affect life under the sea.
'We haven't seen a concentration of homes and buildings burned so close to the water,' Quinn said.
Fire debris and potentially toxic ash could make the water unsafe for surfers and swimmers, especially after rainfall that can transport chemicals, trash and other hazards into the sea. Longer term, scientists worry if and how charred urban contaminants will affect the food supply.
The atmospheric river and mudslides that pummeled the Los Angeles region last week exacerbated some of those fears.
When the fires broke out in January, one of Mara Dias' first concerns was ocean water contamination. Strong winds were carrying smoke and ash far beyond the blazes before settling at sea, said the water quality manager for the Surfrider Foundation, an environmental nonprofit.
Scientists on board a research vessel during the fires detected ash and waste on the water as far as 100 miles (161 kilometers) offshore, said marine ecologist Julie Dinasquet with the University of California, San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Things like twigs and shard. They described the smell as electronics burning, she recalled, 'not like a nice campfire.'
Runoff from rains also are a huge and immediate concern. Rainfall picks up contaminants and trash while flushing toward the sea through a network of drains and rivers. That runoff could contain 'a lot of nutrients, nitrogen and phosphate that end up in the ash of the burn material that can get into the water,' said Dias, as well as 'heavy metals, something called PAHs, which are given off when you burn different types of fuel.'
Mudslides and debris flows in the Palisades Fire burn zone also can dump more hazardous waste into the ocean. After fires, the soil in burn scars is less able to absorb rainfall and can develop a layer that repels water from the remains of seared organic material. When there is less organic material to hold the soil in place, the risks of mudslides and debris flows increase.
Los Angeles County officials, with help from other agencies, have set thousands of feet of concrete barriers, sandbags, silt socks and more to prevent debris from reaching beaches. The LA County Board of Supervisors also recently passed a motion seeking state and federal help to expand beach clean ups, prepare for storm runoff and test ocean water for potential toxins and chemicals, among other things.
Beyond the usual samples, state water officials and others are testing for total and dissolved metals such as arsenic, lead and aluminum and volatile organic compounds.
They also are sampling for microplastics, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs, that are harmful to human and aquatic life, and polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, a group of man-made chemicals shown to cause cancer in animals and other serious health effects. Now banned from being manufactured, they were used in products like pigments, paints and electrical equipment.
County public health officials said chemical tests of water samples last month did not raise health concerns, so they downgraded one beach closure to an ocean water advisory. Beachgoers were still advised to stay out of the water.
Dinasquet and colleagues are working to understand how far potentially toxic ash and debris dispersed across the ocean, how deep and how fast they sunk and, over time, where it ends up.
Forest fires can deposit important nutrients like iron and nitrogen into the ocean ecosystem, boosting the growth of phytoplankton, which can create a positive, cascading effect across the ecosystem. But the potentially toxic ash from urban coastal fires could have dire consequences, Dinasquet said.
'Reports are already showing that there was a lot of lead and asbestos in the ash,' she added. 'This is really bad for people so its probably also very bad for the marine organisms.'
A huge concern is whether toxic contaminants from the fire will enter the food chain. Researchers plan to take tissue fragments from fish for signs of heavy metals and contaminants. But they say it will take a while to understand how a massive urban fire will affect the larger ecosystem and our food supply.
Dias noted the ocean has long taken in pollution from land, but with fires and other disasters, 'everything is compounded and the situation is even more dire.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This U.S. beach is the top "bacteria hot spot" in the country
This U.S. beach is the top "bacteria hot spot" in the country

Time Out

time2 days ago

  • Time Out

This U.S. beach is the top "bacteria hot spot" in the country

Summer is almost here, and throngs of sun-seekers will soon be heading to sandy beaches for some R&R. But before you pack your towel and sunscreen, take note: some of the country's most stunning beaches are hiding a dirty secret—literally. According to the Surfrider Foundation's 2024 Clean Water Report, beachgoers may be swimming in water contaminated with unsafe levels of bacteria. The report ranks the most bacteria-laden beaches, and the biggest offender is Kahalu'u Beach in Oahu, Hawaii, where a jaw-dropping 92-percent of water samples failed to meet health standards. Right behind it is Waikomo Stream at Koloa Landing in Poipu, Hawaii, with a 90-percent failure rate. And it's not just Hawaii. The report lists top bacteria hot spots all across the U.S.—from the East and West Coasts to Puerto Rico. These aren't remote, forgotten beaches. They're community hubs, tourist magnets and vital ecosystems. The foundation points to a nasty brew of stormwater runoff, sewage overflows, agricultural waste and failing infrastructure as the primary culprits for bacterial buildup. Nearly 10 trillion gallons of untreated stormwater runoff hit U.S. waterways each year. Add in 900 billion gallons of untreated sewage from aging systems, and it's a health hazard in the making. These beaches may look pristine, but the detected bacteria can cause rashes, stomach bugs, skin infections or worse. Raw sewage also feeds harmful algal blooms, kills fish and devastates coral reefs. Climate change only fuels the mess with rising seas and more intense storms overwhelming fragile systems. In 2024, Surfrider's Blue Water Task Force processed over 10,000 samples from 604 sites, with a shocking 80% showing high bacteria levels. Volunteers test water and trace pollutants, but they can't fix the root problems alone. That's why Surfrider is calling on Congress to stop slashing EPA funding and instead invest in clean water and resilient infrastructure. Clean, swimmable beaches shouldn't be a luxury—they should be a given. U.S. beaches with the highest levels of bacteria Waikomo Stream at Koloa Landing, Kauai, HI Kahalu'u, Kahalu'u, O'ahu, HI Imperial Beach - San Diego, CA San Luis Creek Mouth- Avila Beach, CA Linda Mar Beach - Pacifica, CA South Sound Thea Foss Floating Dock - Tacoma, WA Playa Crashboat - Aguadilla, PR Park View Kayak Launch - Miami Beach, FL Ballard Park - Melbourne, FL Windmill Beach - Sag Harbor, NY

Do you thrive on three hours sleep? You might have 'short sleeper syndrome', scientists say
Do you thrive on three hours sleep? You might have 'short sleeper syndrome', scientists say

Daily Mail​

time23-05-2025

  • Daily Mail​

Do you thrive on three hours sleep? You might have 'short sleeper syndrome', scientists say

We're all regularly told of the benefits of getting at least seven hours of sleep a night. But a new study has revealed that a small group of people can thrive on as little as three hours of slumber. While the rest of us would likely nod off at our desks, or start snoring on the train, they appear bright-eyed and bushy tailed. Now, experts have pinpointed a new genetic variant linked to 'short sleeper syndrome'. And it could help to develop treatments for sleep disorders such as insomnia and sleep apnoea. So, are you one of the lucky few who can flourish on just a few hours of kip? 'Our bodies continue to work when we go to bed, detoxifying themselves and repairing damage,' co-author Ying-Hui Fu, a neuroscientist at the University of California in San Francisco, told Nature. 'These people, all these functions our bodies are doing while we are sleeping, they can just perform at a higher level than we can.' Since the turn of the millennium Professor Fu and her team have been analysing the genes of short sleepers – people who can get by on six hours or less per night. So far they have identified five mutations in four genes that can contribute to the trait. This includes in one gene that helps to regulate circadian rhythm – the internal clock responsible for regulating our sleep-wake cycle. A part of the latest study, the researchers searched for new mutations in the DNA of a naturally short sleeper who slept an average of 6.3 hours per night. They discovered one in SIK3, a gene that produces a particular type of protein which sends chemical signals to other proteins to change their function. Mice engineered with the same genetic mutation also slept less, the researchers found – though not by much. These animals typically snooze for around 12 hours a day, and those with the genetic mutation slept for around 31 minutes less. The researchers found that the genetic mutation might shorten sleep by supporting the brain's ability to regulate itself and maintain a stable environment. WHAT IS 'SHORT SLEEPER SYNDROME'? Short Sleeper Syndrome (SSS), or Familial Natural Short Sleep (FNSS), is a condition where individuals can function normally with less sleep than most people, typically between four and six hours per night. However, some can thrive on as little as three hours of slumber every day. They often wake up feeling refreshed and alert, without needing to nap or sleep longer on weekends. SSS is not considered a sleep disorder, and individuals with SSS don't typically experience negative health consequences from their short sleep duration Since the mice only lost a fraction of their sleep, it indicates that the SIK3 mutation is not a major cause of reduced sleep needs, Clifford Saper, a neurologist at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts, said. However, it clearly does have some impact. 'This work fits very well with what is known about SIK3, and that may help us understand the basis for sleepiness,' he said. The researchers hope that finding enough mutations in naturally short sleepers could get a better idea of how sleep is regulated in people, which could lead to treatment for sleep disorders. Famous faces that didn't get much sleep include Winston Churchill and Margaret Thatcher, who allegedly got by on just four or five hours' slumber. However, for the average person, this is ill-advised. A 2022 study found that getting less than five hours of shut-eye per night in later life could raise the risk of getting a chronic illness by a fifth. Researchers looked at 7,864 British people, who were asked at the age of 50, 60 and 70 how much sleep they got on an average weeknight. These people were tracked over 25 years to see if they developed any of a list of 13 common chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes, coronary heart disease or dementia. People aged 50 getting five hours of sleep a night or fewer, compared to those sleeping for seven hours, were found 20 per cent more likely to develop one of the 13 illnesses for the first time. But they also had a higher risk of going on to get two or more of these diseases. It shows a lack of sleep is not only linked to illness in later life, but to multiple illnesses which people live with at the same time, raising their risk of hospitalisation and disability. Jo Whitmore, senior cardiac nurse at the British Heart Foundation, which helped to fund the research, said: 'This research adds to a growing body of research that highlights the importance of getting a good night's sleep.' ABOUT CIRCIDIAN RHYTHMS Our internal circadian rhythms, or circadian clock, is responsible for waking our bodies up in the morning and ensuring they get a good night's rest. In a healthy person, cortisol levels peak at around 8am, which wakes us up (in theory), and drop to their lowest at 3am the next day, before rising back to its peak five hours later. Ideally, this 8am peak will be triggered by exposure to sunlight, if not an alarm. When it does, the adrenal glands and brain will start pumping adrenaline. By mid-morning, the cortisol levels start dropping, while the adrenaline (for energy) and serotonin (a mood stabilizer) keep pumping. At midday, metabolism and core body temperature ramp up, getting us hungry and ready to eat. After noon, cortisol levels start their steady decline. Metabolism slows down and tiredness sets in. Gradually the serotonin turns into melatonin, which induces sleepiness. Our blood sugar levels decrease, and at 3am, when we are in the middle of our sleep, cortisol levels hit a 24-hour low.

Why perfume could be bad for you
Why perfume could be bad for you

Telegraph

time21-05-2025

  • Telegraph

Why perfume could be bad for you

Wearing perfume or using a fragranced body lotion could be bad for health, a study suggests. Ingredients in perfume have been shown for the first time to interfere with a protective invisible cloud around human skin that is thought to clean and filter the air we breathe. The scents are themselves harmless to human health but by interfering with the protective cloud that clings to our skin they could be diminishing the benefits it provides, scientists believe. Researchers at the University of California Irvine and Max Planck Institute discovered the skin cloud in 2022, which is technically known as an 'oxidation field'. They found that ozone in the air reacts with natural oils on the surface of our skin, such as squalene, a chemical which keeps skin supple, and creates short-lived particles called OH radicals through a process called ozonolysis, which form a protective bubble around the body. OH radicals are highly reactive and neutralise toxic molecules which has earned them the nickname 'detergents of the atmosphere' for their cleaning properties. They target pollutants in the air but also help clean surfaces. A study of four volunteers, published in the journal Science Advances, investigated what happens to the chemical cloud when people have no products on their skin, after they apply perfume, when wearing lotion and after dabbing scented essential oils on their skin. Data show that the perfume used in the study, the unisex CK One, diminished the cloud by 86 per cent, and the lotion, Unilever's Neutral Sensitive Skin, by 34 per cent. 'Affects human health' 'This study has determined that the human oxidation field generated by people exposed to ozone indoors is substantially disrupted when personal care products are worn,' the authors write. They add: 'Given that the human oxidation field influences the chemical composition of air in the breathing zone and close to the skin, it affects our intake of chemicals, which, in turn, affects human health.' Experiments found that the ethanol which makes up most perfumes diminishes the cleansing aura by converting the OH radicals into other products quickly and therefore wicks away the cloud. However, the tested lotion interferes with the cloud by preventing the crucial OH radicals from being made in the first place. Prof Jonathan Williams, of the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Mainz, Germany, co-author of the study, told The Telegraph: 'For both these applications, the result was to actually suppress the OH field, but the suppression seems to occur through two different mechanisms. 'There may be other methods, maybe there's other ways you can influence it, but I think we've shown that, at least in those two cases, it reduces the oxidation field.' However, he added that it remains unknown whether the diminishing of the chemical body cloud is a health net positive or negative when considering every chemical and environment. 'What we've discovered here is really the phenomenon that there is an oxidation field and it can be manipulated by various forms – at least these two,' Prof Williams said. 'But I really, unfortunately, cannot give a clear message to the public of whether I recommend on a health basis to wear or avoid perfume or lotion because there is not enough information to base a recommendation.' The scientists found that not all nice smelling chemicals have a significant impact, however. Linalool, a citrus-scented essential oil which makes up about a third of lavender oil, only reduces the OH cloud by about ten per cent. 'This demonstrates that the ozonolysis of linalool, in the absence of ethanol, may not have a large impact on the OH concentration inside a room,' the scientists said. The implications for health remain unknown and will be the subject of further research, but previous studies have shown that having a plentiful supply of the chemicals that make up the protective cloud is linked to better airway function, lower inflammation, reduced biological stress, healthier blood vessels and improved blood pressure.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store