
Abraham Lincoln's empathy is what our divided nation needs
Tribune News Service
In our era, they might seem like performative gestures for the president. A quiet visit with the wife of a wounded soldier. A conversation with a battlefield nurse or a kitchen worker. A hand extended to a Black woman who had once been enslaved. Abraham Lincoln didn't publicise these moments, though. He prioritised them for personal reasons. Because even as he held the Union together with the force of his will — even as he buried his own child and bore the weight of a nation at war — he made time for mercy. He listened to the voices of those without power, a practice that steeled him for wielding his own.
Empathy is getting a bad rap these days. Elon Musk recently declared it the 'fundamental weakness' of Western civilisation, summing up the ethos of the administration he just left. Even those who defend empathy speak of it mainly as a private virtue, not one that compels any particular action by public figures. But in the hands of a great leader, empathy can become a powerful political force. Whenever America has begun to fray — during war, depression, civil upheaval — the country has rallied behind a president who focused on the disenfranchised. If we're to survive our current crisis of division, our civic leaders need to do the same thing. And, as citizens, so do we. Maybe that's why Lincoln's name keeps rising in our conversations, as historians and storytellers nudge us in this direction. Lincoln is a figure in exhibits, podcasts and intellectual festivals this summer. The Metropolitan Opera is working to produce George Saunders' moving novel 'Lincoln in the Bardo,' a deeply empathetic portrayal of the 16th president. New scholarship further reveals a deeply sensitive and heartfelt man.
In this modern moment of anxiety, they're showing the way to a better place — or at least the first step toward it. How did Lincoln cultivate the trait of empathy? Partly by surrounding himself with compassionate people. That's according to 'Loving Lincoln,' a new biography examining his story through the lives of the women who, despite their lack of franchise, were his key influencers. By his female relatives, Lincoln was nurtured into what his stepmother called 'the best boy I ever saw,' historian Stacy Lynn writes. Their stories 'offer evidence of Lincoln's kindness and sensitivity, his patience, his moral center, his social and political virtues, the breadth of his compassion, and his inspirational legacy.'
By far, the deepest relationship of his life was with his wife, Mary, whose steely resolve helped bolster his commitment to freeing enslaved people. She was in favor of emancipation very early on, and she pressed her husband on the issue. The Lincoln White House became a place of mercy and goodwill, in no small part because of the compassion the president showed for his wife in her grief. He welcomed Black people to the White House. Mary Dines, who worked in the kitchen, urged Lincoln to visit the camps where newly freed families lived, and he went. Elizabeth Keckley, a formerly enslaved woman who became Mary Lincoln's dressmaker and confidante, called him 'kind and generous by nature.' Lincoln also welcomed Frederick Douglass and Sojourner Truth. 'I never was treated by any one with more kindness and cordiality than were shown to me by that great and good man, Abraham Lincoln,' Truth said later. To meet the gaze of all these people, to shake their hands, to give them audience — these were not symbolic gestures. They were radical acts of inclusion by the leader who kept the Union intact. This is meaningful for us today, in our moment of deep national division.
For those in office, the life of Lincoln is a guideline. He spoke publicly of the need for love and compassion. He surrounded himself with confidantes who embraced it. And he took action on it, ultimately assisting the emancipation of 4 million people from bondage. Elected officials today can do likewise. They can reject the dogma of hatred in discussing immigration. They can surround themselves with advisers who, even if they favor downsising government, hold respect for public service and public servants. They can vote and act with care for those on the margins of society. But the work of public compassion isn't all on their shoulders. Each of us can train ourselves individually for compassion. A good first step is the one Lincoln modeled all his life. We can start today by using compassionate language, a practice that can lead to feeling it in the heart. Research shows language doesn't just express emotion — it can help shape it. Certain practices can actually increase activity in the neural networks that enhance empathy and emotional regulation. Showing empathy to others feels good, too. Compassion, as with charity, begins at home.
Ultimately, though, we have a compassionate responsibility to one another. So what can we as individuals do to fulfill it? We can reach out to friends and family members with differing perspectives. We can try to talk, understand and share. We can reward kindness in those who seek our votes — this fall, next year and the two after that. We can help change the national tenor by changing our own.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arabian Post
an hour ago
- Arabian Post
Putin's Upcoming Visit to Strengthen Russia-India Ties
Russian President Vladimir Putin will visit India in the coming weeks, with expectations that the trip will significantly bolster bilateral relations across various sectors, including trade, defence, and energy. The visit, anticipated to be a key moment in Russia-India relations, will occur amid shifting geopolitical dynamics, particularly following the global attention on the ongoing war in Ukraine and its implications for international alliances. The timing of the visit is critical, as both Russia and India seek to expand their strategic cooperation. Over the past few years, both nations have deepened their partnership through numerous agreements aimed at enhancing their economic and military ties. As global power dynamics continue to shift, the Russia-India alliance has become increasingly important, not just for the two countries but also within the broader context of the BRICS grouping, of which both nations are founding members. One of the central themes of the visit will be the strengthening of economic ties, especially in the energy sector. With the ongoing energy crisis exacerbated by sanctions on Russia, India has emerged as one of the key buyers of Russian oil. The visit is expected to solidify agreements surrounding the energy trade, including the potential for India to increase its imports of Russian crude oil at discounted rates. This move is likely to provide India with a cost-effective energy source while helping Russia circumvent Western sanctions. ADVERTISEMENT Discussions are expected to focus on further cooperation in defence, where Russia has long been a major supplier of military hardware to India. The two nations are expected to advance negotiations on new defence contracts, including the potential for joint production and technology sharing. The defence ties between Russia and India date back decades, and the visit will likely see the formalisation of further agreements that could further align their military interests. The visit will also involve talks on expanding technological collaboration, particularly in the areas of space and nuclear energy. Both countries have made significant strides in these fields, and there is potential for further joint ventures, which could bring both economic and technological benefits to each nation. Putin's presence in India is expected to reinforce Moscow's commitment to its relationship with New Delhi, signalling Russia's ongoing support for India's strategic ambitions in the global arena. Putin's upcoming visit also comes at a time of heightened global tension. As the war in Ukraine continues to dominate headlines, Russia has increasingly sought to deepen ties with countries that have been less critical of its actions, including India. New Delhi has maintained a relatively neutral stance in the conflict, focusing instead on its national interests and calling for peace talks. This approach has allowed India to strengthen its ties with Russia without facing the same level of international scrutiny as some of the West. The visit is likely to be significant for the future of BRICS, a bloc of emerging economies that includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. The group has been exploring the possibility of expanding its membership, and Putin's visit could serve as a platform for discussing further collaboration within this framework. As BRICS nations continue to challenge the traditional Western-dominated global order, Russia and India are likely to explore ways to enhance their collective influence in international forums. While both nations have shared interests, their relationship has not been without challenges. India's growing economic ties with the West, especially in the technology and trade sectors, have sometimes created friction in its ties with Russia. However, the long-standing nature of their partnership, especially in defence, has ensured that these tensions have remained manageable. Putin's visit is expected to reinforce the idea that despite external pressures, Russia and India will continue to prioritise their strategic interests.


Gulf Today
17 hours ago
- Gulf Today
A ray of housing hope is emerging in Washington
Matthew Yglesias, Tribune News Service Housing affordability is a key issue for the American consumer on which the Trump administration has done nothing useful. From tariffs on construction material to higher budget deficits driving up interest rates to deporting building trades workers, virtually every policy lever is being thrown in an anti-supply direction. At the same time, good news may be coming from Congress where last week the powerful Senate Banking Committee passed an important package of bipartisan housing reforms with unanimous support. The only fly in the ointment is that the package is so ambitious, and the emergence of consensus between Republican Chairman Tim Scott and ranking member Elizabeth Warren so unexpected, that little groundwork has been laid for advancing these ideas in the House. But if champions for these ideas can be found in the lower house, Congress would have the opportunity to get something critical done on the long-neglected issue of federal housing policy. One particular aspect of the package that I've been following for years is the somewhat obscure topic of chassis requirements for manufactured homes. Most aspects of housing policy are state and local in nature, but since the 1970s the federal government, through the Department of Housing and Urban Development, or HUD, has been the primary regulatory of houses that are built in factories and transported to their ultimate destination. The process of transporting these 'trailers' generally requires them to have an attached chassis that allows them to be transferred from the factory to their destination. But HUD, for no particularly good reason, requires the chassis to be permanently attached to the structure. This requirement was adopted amidst a boom in the market share of manufactured homes as part of a deliberate regulatory crackdown pushed by traditional homebuilders and affiliated labor interests. The chassis requirement is not single-handedly responsible for the shrinkage of the manufactured housing sector, but it is a big factor as the chassis makes it hard to site trailers on top of basements, hard to engage in architectural innovation, and easy for exclusion-minded local governments to discriminate in favor of stick-built homes. Both Scott and the Biden administration were agreed on the desirability of repealing the chassis rule and promoting a new boom in manufactured housing. But in the previous Congress, Scott paired chassis reform with an effort to roll back some Consumer Financial Protection Bureau regulations that he felt were unduly squelching the market for entry-level mortgages. Former Senate Banking Chairman Sherrod Brown, a Democrat, strongly objected to Scott's mortgage changes and the whole thing was deadlocked. Brown lost last his Senate seat in November, but that meant he was replaced as top Democrat on the committee by Warren — the CFPB's biggest champion — in a way that made progress seem, if anything, less likely. But rather than continue the deadlock, Warren worked out a deal that includes Scott's proposals on both manufactured housing and mortgages and expands them by some other ideas. One of these is the Build More Housing Near Transit Act long championed by Democratic Rep. Scott Peters of California which would have the Department of Transportation prioritize funding mass transit projects in places that are relaxing zoning requirements to allow dense construction near the stations. Another is the Housing Supply Frameworks Act that would direct HUD to promulgate a set of best practices for supply-friendly local land use planning. The Better Use of Intergovernmental and Local Development for Housing Act (the name makes no sense, but it lets them call it BUILD Housing) and the Unlocking Housing Supply Through Streamlined and Modernized Reviews Act both streamline National Environmental Policy Act reviews for infill housing, along with a few modifications or the creation of new pro-supply grant programs. A very intriguing development is a small $200 million competitive grant program for local governments that take regulatory action to increase housing supply. This is a notion that has been kicked around in Washington in concept form at least since President Barack Obama's second term but was stymied by, among other things, questions about how to measure compliance. A new Census product based on the agency's Master Address File allows for housing production to be measured at the Census block level for the first time. This administrative improvement makes it possible to take the idea of 'race to the top, but for housing' from concept to legislation. The $200 million isn't enough to radically alter American housing policy, but it will do some good on its own while more importantly allowing advocates to field test the new measurement system and lay the groundwork for more aggressive ideas. If the grant program is a small carrot, Warren of Massachusetts and Republican Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana worked together on a provision that would wield Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) as a stick by depriving high-priced communities that stymie new housing of their federal grant money. For years now, even the most YIMBY-minded Republicans have tended to shy away from the federalism implications of conditioning federal grants on zoning changes. CDBG is perhaps an easier program for them to get to yes on since it primarily goes to urban areas where Democrats live.


Al Etihad
17 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Trump hails envoy talks with Putin, but new sanctions still due
6 Aug 2025 22:13 WASHINGTON (AFP)President Donald Trump on Wednesday hailed talks between his envoy and Russian President Vladimir Putin over the Ukraine war, but US officials said sanctions would still be imposed on Moscow's trading partners."Great progress was made!" Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, adding that he had briefed some European allies on the talks between Steve Witkoff and Putin in Moscow. "Everyone agrees this War must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come." A screengrab from Truth Social Minutes later, a senior US official said that "secondary sanctions" were still expected to be implemented on sanctions target Russia's remaining trade partners, seeking to impede Moscow's ability to survive already sweeping Western Russian partners, such as China and India, would aim to stifle Russian exports but would also risk significant international has given Russia until Friday to make progress towards peace or face new penalties. The US president on Wednesday ordered steeper tariffs on Indian goods over New Delhi buying Russian oil.