Pope Leo XIV's Pollachi connection
Over 18 years ago, Father Robert Francis Prevost — now elected Pope, under the papal name Leo XIV — stood quietly outside a school gate in Pollachi, a small town in Tamil Nadu. He was serving as the Prior General of the Order of St. Augustine when he visited Shenbagam Matriculation Higher Secondary School in October 2006.
According to the Regional Vicar of the Augustinians in India, Father Prevost served as the Prior General of the Order from 2001 to 2013. During this period, he made two visits to India — in 2004 and 2006 — meeting Augustinian communities in Kerala and Tamil Nadu. On 22 April 2004, he concelebrated the ordination mass of six Augustinian deacons at St. Francis Xavier's Church in Kathrikadavu near Kaloor, Kerala.
His second visit, in October 2006, brought him back to Kerala to participate in the Asia-Pacific Meeting of the Order of St. Augustine, held in Aluva.
During this trip, he made a two-day visit to Shenbagam School in Pollachi, which had then just come under the management of the Augustinian Fathers under the Diocese of Coimbatore. The school, originally established in 1995 by a local businessman, had fewer than 500 students when the transition took place.
Father Sumesh Joseph Illikkaparambil, Correspondent of Shenbagam Matric. Hr. Sec. School, on Friday, shares an old photograph of #PopeLeoXIV, taken during his visit to the school in #Pollachi of #Coimbatore dist. in #TamilNadu in 2006.
📹: M. Periasamy (@peri_periasamy) pic.twitter.com/WE1GsiRaor — The Hindu - Chennai (@THChennai) May 9, 2025
At the school, Father Prevost interacted with the Augustinian Fathers and staff, and posed for a photograph that now holds renewed significance for the school community. His visit, modest at the time, has become a moment of quiet pride for those who remember it.
The school's current correspondent, Father Sumesh Joseph Illikkaparambil, displayed one of the photographs taken that day. In 2006, he was a 26-year-old brother undergoing formation to become a priest in Kerala. 'We remember his visit vividly. He had come for the Asia-Pacific gathering in Aluva, and after that, he visited the school to see how the newly taken-over institution was functioning. That's when the photo was taken — him standing humbly at our school gate,' he said.
''We never imagined then that he would go on to lead the Church. Nor did I imagine that I would one day serve as correspondent at the very school he visited.''Father Sumesh Joseph Illikkaparambil
'He is someone who likes to mingle with people and engage in outreach activities. The school has changed completely since his visit — we now have nearly 1,400 students and over 100 teaching and non-teaching staff,' added Father Sumesh.
'He may recall to the world his visit to India — especially Tamil Nadu — whenever he's asked about his time in the region. We're even planning to create a small memorial here to mark his visit,' he said.
As Pope Leo XIV begins his spiritual leadership from Rome, the school in Pollachi remembers the quiet afternoon a visiting priest stood at their gate, before history gave him a new name.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
04-06-2025
- Business Standard
China slams Macron for Taiwan remarks, opposes Nato role in Asia-Pacific
China on Wednesday said it will firmly oppose any attempts by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (Nato) to expand into the Asia-Pacific and sharply criticised French President Emmanuel Macron for equating the Ukraine and Taiwan conflicts and for calling on Asian countries to align with Europe. "We firmly oppose relevant remarks. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China's territory... The Taiwan question and the Ukraine crisis are not comparable at all,' said Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian at a media briefing, responding to a question about Macron's speech at the recent Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. Macron urged Asian countries to build a new alliance with Europe to avoid becoming "collateral damage" in the power struggle between the United States and China. His remarks drew reactions from both Washington and Beijing. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who also attended the event, in a separate address called on the US' Indo-Pacific allies to increase their defence spending as a share of GDP to counter China. China reiterates Taiwan stance, downplays South China Sea tensions China has previously clashed with the Philippines over claims in the South China Sea. Asserting that Taiwan is an inalienable part of its territory, Lin said China strongly opposes any statements or actions that misrepresent or distort the nature of the Taiwan issue. On the South China Sea conflict, Lin maintained that the situation in the region remains generally stable. China claims most of the area in the South China Sea, while the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, and Taiwan have counterclaims. 'There is no problem with the freedom of navigation and overflight that countries enjoy in accordance with the law in the South China Sea,' Lin said. Nato warned against expansion in Asia-Pacific 'As a regional defensive organisation, Nato has no right to reach beyond its geographical scope and mandate defined by its treaty,' Lin added. 'China firmly opposes Nato's attempt to advance eastward into the Asia-Pacific, stir up tensions and create confrontation in the region, and sabotage regional and even global peace and stability. Asia-Pacific countries do not welcome Nato in the Asia-Pacific, and the region certainly does not need an Asia-Pacific Nato,' he said.
News18
04-06-2025
- News18
‘We Stand With India': Australia's Deputy PM Condoles Pahalgam Victims, Meets Rajnath Singh
Last Updated: Defence Minister Rajnath Singh also thanked Australia for standing by India during Operation Sindoor. In a strong show of solidarity, Australian Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles on Wednesday extended condolences for the victims of the Pahalgam terror attack and reiterated Australia's firm support to India in its fight against terrorism. During his bilateral meeting with Defence Minister Rajnath Singh at the Manekshaw Centre in New Delhi, Marles opened his remarks by conveying condolences from the Australian Prime Minister. 'I extend condolences from the Australian PM for the victims of Pahalgam… I offer prayers to them… we extend all support to India to combat terrorism," he said. VIDEO | Australian Deputy PM and Minister of Defence Richard Marles, during a bilateral meeting with Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, says, 'Can I start by passing on my PM's condolences to India for all those who lost their lives in the Pahalgam terror attack… We will continue… — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) June 4, 2025 Marles underscored that Australia stands with India and all countries against terrorism. He appreciated the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, stating that under Modi's leadership, the bilateral relationship between the two countries has grown stronger. 'We certainly see India as a friend and it is on our highest priority," Marles added. The meeting between the two leaders also focused on the growing defence partnership between the two Indo-Pacific powers. Marles noted that defence ties have become a significant part of the bilateral relationship, with maritime security playing a key role. 'We look forward to the annual meeting between the two countries later this year," he said. The meeting reflects the growing strategic convergence between New Delhi and Canberra amid shared concerns over regional stability and terrorism, and comes in the wake of the brutal terror attack in Pahalgam that drew widespread international condemnation. First Published: June 04, 2025, 13:18 IST
The Wire
26-05-2025
- The Wire
What Have We Learnt From the World War II?
A World War II aerial photograph collected from Wikimedia Commons via The Public Domain Review. Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute Now As the world marks the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II in 2025, the warnings of philosopher George Santayana – 'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it' – resound with chilling urgency. What was once hailed as the final, most brutal lesson in the futility of global conflict now appears to have faded into historical abstraction. World War II was supposed to be humanity's last descent into large-scale, industrialised slaughter. Yet on May 11, 2025, Pope Leo XIV stood in St. Peter's Square and uttered a plea that rang as both a warning and lament: 'No more war.' His words come at a time when the world finds itself on the verge of repeating the gravest mistakes of the 20th century. As global conflicts intensify and militarisation escalates, the phrase 'third world war' has moved from speculative fiction to a real and terrifying possibility. The world's failure to heed the lessons of 1945 is no longer a philosophical concern – it is a matter of survival. WWII's enduring warnings World War II, fought between 1939 and 1945, remains the deadliest and most destructive conflict in human history. With a staggering toll of 70 to 85 million lives – including 27 million Soviet civilians and 6 million Jews murdered in the Holocaust – it left scars that continue to shape international consciousness. The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki introduced a new era of existential threat, claiming over 200,000 lives and marking the dawn of the nuclear age. Pope Paul VI later called these bombings 'a butchery of untold magnitude,' while American bishops, in a rare moment of candor in 1946, lamented the 'widespread, unspeakable suffering' they had unleashed. The creation of the United Nations that same year – founded to 'save succeeding generations from the scourge of war' – was born from this trauma and intended to be a global mechanism for peace. Yet these lessons have faded. The reverence for the sanctity of human life, the moral clarity against indiscriminate destruction, and the commitment to dialogue over violence have all eroded. The years following WWII did not evolve into a promised era of peace, but into an increasingly fragmented and militarised world. Cold War to cold reality The end of WWII did not deliver the enduring peace it promised. Instead, it marked the beginning of the Cold War, a geopolitical standoff between the US and the Soviet Union from 1947 to 1991. This period saw the rise of proxy conflicts in Korea, Vietnam, and Afghanistan, and the unchecked proliferation of nuclear weapons. The 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis brought the world closer to nuclear annihilation than ever before. Yet even after the Cold War's end, peace remained elusive. The 1990s saw bloodshed in the Gulf and the Balkans. The 21st century opened with prolonged wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, while recent years have witnessed brutal civil conflict in Syria, Russia's war in Ukraine, and Israel's war in Gaza. These are not isolated flashpoints. They are parts of a grim pattern: a global system that defaults to militarism, ideological division, and strategic dominance. On May 8, 2025 – V-E Day's 80th anniversary – the World Socialist Web Site remarked that the world is observing this milestone 'under conditions of escalating global conflict.' Also read: Countdown to Surrender: How World War II Ended in Europe Military spending, too, reveals the dangerous trajectory. In 2024, the world spent a record $2.7 trillion on arms. Alarmingly, former aggressors like Germany and Japan are now among the top spenders – indicative of a world regressing to militarism, ignoring Pope John XXIII's 1963 call in Pacem in terris to pursue negotiation over arms. Hiroshima's echo The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki remain the only uses of nuclear weapons in war – but the threat they introduced has only grown. Pope Francis, during his 2019 pilgrimage to these cities, condemned the possession of nuclear weapons as 'immoral,' and in 2024, Pax Christi USA echoed that view. Yet nuclear stockpiles persist. The United States and Russia still hold 14,000 of the world's 15,000 warheads. Nine nations continue to rely on the threat of mutual destruction, undermining disarmament treaties like the Non-Proliferation Treaty (1970). The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists' Doomsday Clock now stands at 90 seconds to midnight – the closest it has ever been, reflecting unprecedented risk. Einstein's 1946 warning – that 'the unleashed power of the atom has changed everything save our modes of thinking' – remains heartbreakingly apt. While exhibitions by groups like Soka Gakkai have raised awareness among millions, progress toward disarmament is frozen. Nuclear deterrence remains state policy, while new threats – cyber war, space militarisation – compound the risks. The new world disorder Pope Leo XIV's reference to a 'third world war fought piecemeal,' echoing Pope Francis, captures the terrifying fragmentation of contemporary violence. Today's wars may lack the clarity of nation-state alliances, but they are no less interconnected or destructive. Ukraine is now the site of Europe's largest land war since 1945. In Gaza, civilian suffering has reached horrifying levels, with statements like Israeli producer Elad Barashi's call for a 'Shoah' (Holocaust) sparking global outrage and chilling reminders of past genocidal rhetoric. Elsewhere, tensions mount in the South China Sea, the Arctic, and even in space – fueled by nationalism, resource competition, and emerging technologies. The failure of international mechanisms to contain or prevent these conflicts exposes the weakening of multilateral institutions, including the UN. As Secretary-General António Guterres observed in 2020, the world's inability to fulfill the UN Charter's peace mandate reflects deep failures: rising inequality, eroding democratic norms, and unchecked disinformation. Disarmament The moral imperative for disarmament has never been clearer. From Pope John XXIII's era to Pope Leo XIV's, the message is consistent: humanity must walk away from the precipice. The United States, as the only nation to have deployed nuclear weapons in war, bears a unique responsibility. Global initiatives – from the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission to the Toda Institute – demonstrate that alternatives exist. A world without nuclear arms is not fantasy but a matter of political will. Moreover, reducing conventional arms flows, banning landmines, and curbing the global arms trade – largely driven by the U.S. – are essential to preventing future atrocities. Equally important are education, healthcare, and sustainable development. The World Day of Peace messages have long urged nations to divert resources from 'bullets to classrooms, clinics, and clean energy.' Giving peace a chance 'Give peace a chance' – John Lennon's refrain – should no longer be dismissed as idealism. It is a mandate for survival. The 80th anniversary of World War II's end is not just a moment of reflection; it is a dire call to action. Peace requires more than treaties – it demands global resolve. That means strengthening international cooperation, reforming global governance, and rekindling a collective moral compass. It means refusing the seductive logic of war and embracing the hard, unglamorous work of diplomacy and dialogue. As Pope Leo XIV's voice rises above St. Peter's Square, the question is whether the world is listening. If we fail to remember – and act on – the lessons of 1945, we may find ourselves not at the edge of another war, but at the end of peace altogether. Hasnain Naqvi is a former member of the history faculty at St. Xavier's College, Mumbai.
