Mother of child who has hip surgery calls for confirmation if surgery was required
The mother of a child on whom bilateral hip surgery was performed is calling for reassurance for parents and confirmation from hospitals about whether surgery was required.
Áine Gladney-Knox, a Sinn Féin candidate for the Carlow-Kilkenny constituency in the last general election, told RTÉ radio's Morning Ireland that her son Archie was diagnosed with hip dysplasia when he was six months old and had bilateral pelvic operation in Crumlin hospital on the 19th of April 2022.
Advertisement
Post surgery Archie had to be readmitted to hospital and undergo a blood transfusion and further surgery. 'He just screamed and screamed and screamed. That child went through absolute hell.
"He really, really went through a horrendous time and we didn't actually get home (from hospital) till the 4th of May.'
Ms Gladney-Knox said the last time Archie had an appointment was 'a year and a half ago' with no further appointment. 'They said as far as they were concerned that they were happy and they were going to leave him for a few years.'
Recently the family received a letter from Children's Health Ireland saying that an audit was being carried out on cases of hip dysplasia surgeries.
Advertisement
'The letter for me was a bit wishy washy because I seen the letter and I just presumed it was like an audit they were doing on children, like it didn't break down what had actually happened.'
Ms Gladney-Knox said she went about her day and it wasn't until she heard about the issue from Pearse Doherty that she went back home, looked at the letter again and realised that Archie was one of those children.
'And that's when I actually sat at my kitchen table and cried my eyes out because I was like, if he is one of the children, after what he's after going through, like it would actually break me as a parent.
Ireland
Politics watch: Government criticised ahead of chi...
Read More
'As a parent, you trust what they're telling you and you listen to what the doctors are saying and you go with what they recommend and that was it and it wasn't until this, now we're like, we still haven't heard a word from anybody, only this letter.
Advertisement
'I'm coming home every day checking my letter box to see if there is an update. Is Archie one of these children? It's eating up every day here in this house.'
Ms Gladney-Knox said she was not at all reassured by the letter, if anything, it had made her more anxious. It had raised more questions and made her question herself and her judgement as a parent. 'We really need these answers. This has been a kick in the teeth. We want to know how long this is going to take. I want answers for my child.
'They have to get this right for all the families and all the children that are involved.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Government can hit NHS waiting times targets despite scepticism, says Reeves
The Chancellor has insisted the Government can hit its NHS waiting times targets despite scepticism from some leaders. Speaking after her spending review, Rachel Reeves said the Government was confident it could hit pledges set down by the Prime Minister last year. Sir Keir Starmer said in December the NHS will carry out 92% of routine operations within 18 weeks by March 2029. However, in March this year, the NHS waiting list for hospital treatment in England rose for the first time in seven months. The Times has also reported that internal Department of Health modelling shows the NHS is on course to hit only about 80% by the end of the parliament, with officials suggesting anything above that is overly optimistic. Asked about the pledge on Wednesday afternoon, Ms Reeves told reporters: 'We've already delivered around three-and-a-half million additional appointments since we came to office last July. 'Waiting lists are already down by 200,000 so we are confident that we can meet our plan for change commitments because of the 3% annual increase in funding for the National Health Service. 'On top of that of course, we're investing in capital spending in the NHS, including in more scanners, but also investment in the NHS digital app to make it easier for patients to access information, to book services, to take some of the costs out of the bureaucracy, as well in running our health service.' Earlier, the 3% increase in real terms for the health service per year in the spending review was welcomed by health leaders but there were warnings it is not enough. Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, which represents all health organisations, said the NHS funding boost was welcome, 'given the precarious state of public finances and will help the NHS to cope with rising demand from an aging population, often with multiple or more complex physical and mental health conditions'. But he warned 'difficult decisions will still need to be made as this additional £29 billion won't be enough to cover the increasing cost of new treatments, with staff pay likely to account for a large proportion of it'. He added: 'So, on its own, this won't guarantee that waiting time targets are met.' Mr Taylor said NHS leaders will need continued backing from the Government to redesign services and balance budgets. 'That means getting political backing when some services are redesigned or cut, including moving hospital services into the community and closer to people's homes as part of the Government's three shifts,' he said. He added that the 'flat settlement' from the Chancellor 'continues to leave a major shortfall in capital funding, and it also fails to lift the ban on private investment that is required to boost NHS capital funding'. There is currently an almost £14 billion maintenance backlog bill to repair NHS hospitals and buildings. Mr Taylor said those issues needed to be addressed in the upcoming national infrastructure strategy and 10-year plan for the health service. Government documents accompanying the spending review show that, on average, from 2023-24 to 2028-29, the NHS in England will receive 3% real terms growth in day-to-day spending, equivalent to a £29 billion real terms increase in annual budgets. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) budget will increase by £2.3 billion in real terms by 2029-30, compared with 2023-24, 'representing a more than 20% real terms increase by the end of the spending review period', the documents said. Overall, the figures suggest DHSC spending will rise 2.8%, though this is less than the average 3.6% in recent years. Sarah Woolnough, chief executive of the King's Fund charity, said the 2.8% average increase in DHSC spending – or 3% for day-to-day NHS spending – 'will have been hard-fought for in the spending round negotiations, despite still being lower than the historical average the NHS has received over recent years'. She added: 'We know there are already trade-offs happening in the NHS due to tight finances. 'The Chancellor said she wants the public to have an NHS there when they need it. 'It is hard to see how all the things she mentions: faster ambulance times; more GP appointments; and adequate mental health services and more; can be met on this settlement alone. 'Particularly when large parts of this additional funding will be absorbed by existing rising costs, such as the higher cost of medicines, which are currently being negotiated, and covering staff pay deals.' According to spending review documents, the Government expects the NHS to deliver 2% productivity growth each year, 'unlocking £17 billion savings over three years' to reinvest back into the NHS to improve patient care. The Government will also invest up to £10 billion in NHS technology and digital transformation by 2028‑29, the documents showed. NHS England boss Sir Jim Mackey, speaking at the NHS ConfedExpo conference in Manchester, said the NHS has done 'really well relative to other parts of the public service'. He added: 'But we all know it's never enough because of the scale of advancement, all the ambition, all things we want to do, the day-to-day cost pressures we're trying to get on top of, etc. 'We're always going to be in a world where we want more money, but I think everyone's starting to accept and understand that we've got what the country can afford to give us. 'We really need to get better value for that money – it is broadly the equivalent of the GDP of Portugal, so it's a huge amount of money by any standards.' NHS England has already budgeted a 2.8% increase in pay for staff in 2025-26, but many leaders the King's Fund spoke to were worried about funding pay rises above this amount. After the spending review, Royal College of Nursing (RCN) general secretary, Professor Nicola Ranger, said staff will now decide whether the 3.6% pay rise offered by the Government is enough. She added: 'Against a backdrop of other cuts, nursing staff will see the NHS being protected but not transformed by today's spending plans. 'When the Government lays out its vision for the future of the NHS and its workforce, it must say how it intends to reverse collapsing student recruitment, boost retention and deliver urgent, structural reform to nursing pay.' Nuffield Trust senior policy analyst, Sally Gainsbury, said: 'Compared to the settlements for other departments – from policing to education – the NHS deal looks generous. 'But seen in the context of all the promises made by the Government to the British people – to drive down waiting lists, shift care closer to home, rapidly improve tech – and the commitments to meet staff pay demands and rising costs of new drugs, today's settlement soon melts away. 'With capital funding staying flat in real terms for the rest of the spending review period, it will be difficult for the NHS to invest in the technology and facility upgrades it needs to meet the Government's ambitious productivity targets.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Doctor who failed to spot girl, 13, was suffering from sepsis and died days later will face no disciplinary sanction
A senior doctor who failed to spot that a 13-year-old girl was suffering from sepsis before she died will face no disciplinary sanctions for failings in his care. Professor Richard Thompson did not refer Martha Mills to intensive care at King's College Hospital in London despite her displaying several high-risk indicators of the life-threatening condition. The on-call consultant also chose not to return to the hospital to assess her in person as her condition deteriorated. A Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) panel sitting in Manchester had ruled those omissions were misconduct, which they described as 'particularly grave', and found his fitness to practise was impaired. But today the tribunal decided there were 'exceptional circumstances' which justified taking no further action against the world-renowned paediatric liver specialist. Martha had been an inpatient on the hospital's Rays of Sunshine Ward after she suffered a serious injury to her pancreas when she slipped while riding a bike on a family holiday in Wales in July 2021. Weeks later she experienced a fever and increased heart rate, followed by more spikes in her temperature before the consultant hepatologist saw Martha on his morning ward round on Sunday August 29. Prof Thompson left the hospital at 3pm, but was phoned at home two hours later by a trainee doctor, who gave an update on Martha's condition. Medical records showed she had deteriorated over the course of the afternoon, and into the early evening, with a drop in her blood pressure, the appearance of a new rash and increases in heart rate, respiratory rate and body temperature. Tribunal chairman Robin Ince noted that by 5pm there were 'several high-risk indicators' as set out in the Nice guidelines relating to sepsis. The duty registrar called Prof Thompson again at 8.30pm because of ongoing concerns over Martha's fever, but she was kept on the ward despite the continued presence of moderate to high-risk indicators and the absence of meaningful clinical improvement. Martha collapsed on August 30 and was moved to intensive care before she was transferred to London's Great Ormond Street Hospital, where she died in the early hours of August 31. Announcing its conclusions on Wednesday, Mr Ince said: 'Professor Thompson has done everything possible to address his failings. 'The tribunal considered that the best way to repair any harm caused by his failings would be for him to continue to provide his specialist expertise at home and abroad. 'To now - some four years after the index event - remove Professor Thompson from practice, even for a short period of time, for one single lapse of judgment in an otherwise exemplary career would, in the tribunal's view, be akin to punishment which is not the role of the MPTS.' Among the 'exceptional circumstances' cited were that there was no allegation or evidence that Prof Thompson either caused or contributed to Martha's death. There were also systemic failings regarding how the ward functioned at the time with regard to referrals to the paediatric intensive care unit, said the tribunal. Mr Ince said: 'A sufficiently clear message has already been sent to the profession and to the public - that even such an experienced doctor as Professor Thompson could still make serious errors of clinical judgment for which he will be called to account. 'The public would be aware that this finding would remain a stain on Professor Thompson's reputation for the rest of his life.' At a 2022 inquest into her death, a coroner ruled that Martha would most likely have survived if doctors had identified the warning signs and transferred her to intensive care earlier. Martha's mother, Merope Mills, said she and her husband, Paul Laity, raised concerns about Martha's deteriorating health a number of times but these were not acted on. The couple later successfully campaigned for Martha's Rule to give patients, families and carers the chance to easily request a second opinion from a senior doctor in the same hospital in the event of a suspected deterioration or serious concern. Giving evidence, Prof Thompson told the MPTS hearing that he no longer provided in-patient care because he began to 'doubt my own judgment' after the tragic events. He said he felt 'deep remorse' for Martha's death but did not believe he made any errors in her case, as he denied all the allegations brought by the General Medical Council (GMC). The tribunal heard he had since completed a training course relating to the management of sepsis and a deteriorating child in paediatric care. His barrister, Ben Rich, said Prof Thompson has been a dedicated doctor and specialist for nearly 40 years and had never previously been investigated by a regulator. He said he had a reputation as a 'hard-working and outstanding clinician and researcher, who has an international reputation as one of the leading paediatric liver specialists in the world'. Mr Rich urged the tribunal members to impose an order of conditions involving supervision on Prof Thompson's registration, but the panel disagreed and said such a measure would be 'unnecessary and artificial', as they opted to take no further action. Christopher Rose, for the GMC, said that Prof Thompson should be suspended to send a message to the wider public and the wider profession, given the seriousness of the failings found. The tribunal had cleared Prof Thompson of the GMC's claims that he gave 'outdated, misleading' information on Martha's condition to a consultant colleague in the intensive care unit, and that he failed to mention her rash. In ruling his fitness to practise was impaired, Mr Ince said: 'There had been a significant potential risk of harm to Martha and it was appropriate to send a message to the profession as to the importance of following the basic and fundamental principles as set out in good medical practice so as to ensure that the potential risks of an adverse outcome are always taken into account.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Doctors told me I had anxiety and turned me away... now I'm bedridden
A mother has been left bedridden after a doctor dismissed her life-threatening neck injury as merely pandemic-induced 'anxiety'. Maisie Moore, from south west London, spends every day sequestered to her bed in a brace given her severe neck pain, alongside other symptoms that include high blood pressure, a racing heart and intense feelings of nausea. The 25-year-old, who described feeling utterly 'trapped' at her ongoing predicament, first began experiencing acute discomfort in her neck more than four years ago. A business owner with no previous medical conditions, she claimed that she first visited West Middlesex Hospital's A&E Department in March 2021 but the pain in her neck was immediately dismissed as simply 'anxiety caused by the pandemic'. Now, both Ms Moore and her partner Rebecca, 21, have set up a GoFundMe page in a bid to cover the £55,000 cost of surgery in Spain urgently needed to help treat her rare health condition. Speaking to MailOnline, the mother-of-one said: 'The nurse I saw was certain it was anxiety and just told me to see my GP. 'I knew it couldn't be that, I just knew. How can a feeling in your neck be anxiety?' Rebecca also said she had her own doubts surrounding the medical professional's view, adding: 'It felt like a bunch of excuses were being made instead of somebody actually looking into the real problem. 'I feel like as a woman people often don't take your medical concerns seriously, it felt like they thought it was all in her head, it was really unfair.' Having visited A&E more than seven times, Ms Moore was eventually referred for both X-rays and MRI scans. However, the couple were left even more disheartened when Ms Moore's results came back as normal. With zero explanations for her bizarre new ailment, Ms Moore was eventually forced to adjust to her 'new normal' of 'slightly manageable' pain. But, in December 2024, she said the once tolerable pain had suddenly become 'unbearable'. The young mother found herself suffering from an alarmingly high heart rate, dizziness, numbness in her neck and forehead, alongside frequent bouts of severe fatigue. She also reported experiencing unusual memory loss and a heightened sensitivity to light and sound. Eventually, her unexplained symptoms had become so unpleasant that the couple were forced to fork out thousands on a specialist MRI from a private health clinic in Barcelona. It was only then that Ms Moore finally learnt that, rather than suffering from acute anxiety, she had a rare condition called craniocervical instability. Characterised by excessive movement at the craniocervical junction, the area in which the skull meets the spine, it is estimated to affect just 1 in every 5,000 individuals. Given the neck is unable to support the weight of the head, the skull then becomes crushed by the brain stem. If left untreated, it can cause rapid neurological decline, chronic fatigue, paralysis and, in the absolute worst case scenario, even life-threatening internal decapitation. While the NHS offers treatment for many of the condition's most common symptoms, the cranio-cervical fusion surgery Ms Moore urgently needs to help stabilise her neck is currently unavailable in the UK. Rebecca, who has been dating Ms Moore for five years, said that over the last six months she has watched in utter despair as her beloved partner has become increasingly 'depressed' and 'not herself'. As a result of her ongoing pain, she has even forced to give up her beloved pet grooming business that she had spent years cultivating. But, what devastates Ms Moore most, is that she fears she may be unable to watch her beloved one-year-old daughter grow up. Ms Moore, who said she is so weak that she can barely even lift up her daughter, described the ongoing ordeal as 'devastating'. She added: 'It's been really upsetting. I feel like I haven't been able to be a proper mum, I can't even lift her up. Without this money, I won't be able to live to see my little girl grow up. It's that simple really.' Ms Moore, who said she feels 'let down' by the medical professional who told her that her symptoms were anxiety, said: If someone had listened to me sooner, I might not have ended up where I am now' Rebecca added: 'Maisie's in bed almost all of the time, she's missing out on so much with our daughter. 'She (their daughter) doesn't understand why she can't be picked up and play with her mum. 'This money is so important to us as a family, because at the end of the day if we don't get it Maisie will eventually end up dying. That's the reality of it.' Ms Moore also said that she hopes that by sharing her heartbreaking story, she may inspire other individuals to advocate for themselves more when speaking to healthcare professionals. She added: 'I do feel a little let down by the medical professional who told me it was anxiety. If someone had listened to me sooner, I might not have ended up where I am now. 'To anyone in a similar position, I would urge them not to give up and keep persevering for answers. You know your own body.'
