logo
Teenagers face two-hour cap on social media apps

Teenagers face two-hour cap on social media apps

Telegraph5 hours ago

A two-hour cap on social media apps for teenagers is being considered by the Government.
Peter Kyle, the Technology Secretary, suggested he was considering new limits on scroll time for young people in an attempt to tackle 'addictive' behaviour. It comes as ministers examine a package of potential new online safety measures.
Asked whether he was looking at an 'app cap', Mr Kyle told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg show: 'I'm looking at things that prevent healthy activity, I'm looking at some of the addictive nature of some of the apps and smartphones.
'I'm trying to think how we can break some of the addictive behaviour and incentivise more of the healthy developmental… and also the good communicative side of online life.'
The potential reforms could include teenagers being blocked from accessing social media sites after 10pm and during the school day, according to the Daily Mirror.
Asked what the Government would hope to achieve by such measures, Mr Kyle said: 'I know this is something you and your viewers care deeply about.
'I've not been able to talk publicly about what the Labour approach is because we have the legacy legislation that has to go through first.
'This year we've had illegal content that needs to be taken down, but in July, age-appropriate material must be supplied by platforms, otherwise there'll be criminal sanctions against them.
'And in this time, I've been looking very carefully about what we do next.'
'Safety for a purpose'
Mr Kyle added: 'I want to nail down harder on safety, but I want to use that safety for a purpose, which is to understand what is a healthy online life for children in the same way we understand what health means in the physical, offline world, and I'm trying to incentivise the behaviours and stop the barriers towards moving towards that healthy life.'
A cap on the amount of time teenagers can spend scrolling online would build on proposals for a social media curfew previously floated by Mr Kyle.
Earlier this year, the Technology Secretary told The Telegraph that he was examining the online equivalent of a television watershed for children following concerns that the 'addictive nature' of social media was disrupting their sleep, their families and other aspects of their lives.
He said he was 'watching very carefully' the impact of TikTok's introduction of 10pm curfews for under 16s and tools for parents to switch off access at set times, and encouraged other companies to consider similar features.
'Stronger laws needed'
However, the father of Molly Russell, the 14-year-old girl who took her own life after viewing harmful content on social media, warned that 'sticking plasters' would not be enough to fix the problem.
Ian Russell, who is chairman of the Molly Rose Foundation set up in his daughter's memory, urged the Prime Minister to go further and faster.
He told Kuenssberg's show: 'Every day the Government has delayed bringing in tougher online safety laws we've seen more young lives lost and damaged because of weak regulation and inaction by big tech.
'Parents up and down the country would be delighted to see the Prime Minister act decisively to quell the tsunami of harm children face online, but sticking plasters will not do the job.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Badenoch says organisations should be able to decide if staff can wear burkas
Badenoch says organisations should be able to decide if staff can wear burkas

BreakingNews.ie

time36 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Badenoch says organisations should be able to decide if staff can wear burkas

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has said employers should be able to decide if their staff can wear burkas in the workplace. Mrs Badenoch also said people who come to her constituency surgeries must remove their face coverings 'whether it's a burka or a balaclava'. Advertisement Ms Badenoch posted a video on X of part of her interview with the Telegraph, in which she said: 'My view is that people should be allowed to wear whatever they want, not what their husband is asking them to wear or what their community says that they should wear. 'I personally have strong views about face coverings. 'If you come into my constituency surgery, you have to remove your face covering, whether it's a burka or a balaclava. 'I'm not talking to people who are not going to show me their face. Advertisement 'Organisations should be able to decide what their staff wear for instance, it shouldn't be something that people should be able to override.' She added that France has a ban and has 'worse problems than we do in this country on integration'. On Wednesday, Reform's newest MP Sarah Pochin asked Sir Keir Starmer during Prime Minister's Questions whether he would support such a ban. Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice said his party has 'triggered a national discussion'. Advertisement Asked if he wants to ban burkas, Mr Tice told GB News on Sunday: 'We've triggered a national discussion. I'm very concerned about them (burkas). 'Frankly, I think they are repressive. I think that they make women second-class citizens. 'We're a Christian nation. We have equality between the sexes, and I'm very concerned, and if someone wants to convince me otherwise, well come and talk to me. 'But at the moment, my view is that I think we should follow seven other nations across Europe that have already banned them.' Advertisement He called for a debate on the topic to 'hear where the country's mood is'. Meanwhile, shadow home secretary Chris Philp said 'employers should be allowed to decide whether their employees can be visible or not', when discussing face coverings. Asked on the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme if the Conservative Party's position is not to speak to people who cover their face, Mr Philp said of Mrs Badenoch: 'Well she was talking specifically about her constituency surgery I think, and it is definitely the case that employers should be allowed to decide whether their employees can be visible or not. 'But I don't think this is necessarily the biggest issue facing our country right now. Advertisement 'There's a legitimate debate to have about the burka. 'You've got, obviously, arguments about personal liberty and choice and freedom on one side, and arguments about causing divisions in society and the possibility of coercion on the other. 'That is a debate I think we as a country should be having, but as Kemi said, it's probably not the biggest issue our nation faces today.' Asked if he would talk to people who would not show their face, the Croydon South MP said: 'I have in the past spoken to people obviously wearing a burka – I represent a London constituency – but everybody can make their own choices, that's the point she was making, each employer should be able to make their own choices.'

Campainers urge UK watchdog to limit use of AI after report of Meta's plan to automate checks
Campainers urge UK watchdog to limit use of AI after report of Meta's plan to automate checks

The Guardian

time37 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Campainers urge UK watchdog to limit use of AI after report of Meta's plan to automate checks

Internet safety campaigners have urged the UK's communications watchdog to limit the use of artificial intelligence in crucial risk assessments following a report that Mark Zuckerberg's Meta was planning to automate checks. Ofcom said it was 'considering the concerns' raised by the letter following a report last month that up to 90% of all risk assessments at the owner of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp would soon be carried out by AI. Social media platforms are required under the UK's Online Safety Act to gauge how harm could take place on their services and how they plan to mitigate those potential harms – with a particular focus on protecting child users and preventing illegal content from appearing. The risk assessment process is viewed as key aspect of the act. In a letter to Ofcom's chief executive, Dame Melanie Dawes, organisations including the Molly Rose Foundation, the NSPCC and the Internet Watch Foundation described the prospect of AI-driven risk assessments as a 'retrograde and highly alarming step'. 'We urge you to publicly assert that risk assessments will not normally be considered as 'suitable and sufficient', the standard required by … the Act, where these have been wholly or predominantly produced through automation.' The letter also urged the watchdog to 'challenge any assumption that platforms can choose to water down their risk assessment processes'. A spokesperson for Ofcom said: 'We've been clear that services should tell us who completed, reviewed and approved their risk assessment. We are considering the concerns raised in this letter and will respond in due course.' Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion Meta said the letter deliberately misstated the company's approach on safety and it was committed to high standards and complying with regulations. 'We are not using AI to make decisions about risk,' said a Meta spokesperson. 'Rather, our experts built a tool that helps teams identify when legal and policy requirements apply to specific products. We use technology, overseen by humans, to improve our ability to manage harmful content and our technological advancements have significantly improved safety outcomes.' The Molly Rose Foundation organised the letter after NPR, a US broadcaster, reported last month that updates to Meta's algorithms and new safety features will mostly be approved by an AI system and no longer scrutinised by staffers. According to one former Meta executive, who spoke to NPR anonymously, the change will allow the company to launch app updates and features on Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp more quickly but would create 'higher risks' for users, because potential problems are less likely to be prevented before a new product is released to the public. NPR also reported that Meta was considering automating reviews for sensitive areas including youth risk and monitoring the spread of falsehoods.

Swinney tried to ‘push people into arms of Reform', claims Sarwar
Swinney tried to ‘push people into arms of Reform', claims Sarwar

STV News

timean hour ago

  • STV News

Swinney tried to ‘push people into arms of Reform', claims Sarwar

Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has accused First Minister John Swinney of 'attempting to push people into the arms of Reform', following the Hamilton by-election. During a heated exchange with journalist Martin Geissler on BBC Scotland's Sunday Show, Sarwar branded questions put to him as 'embarrassing' and suggested Geissler was asking about a 'fantasy world'. Sarwar repeatedly described the SNP campaign – which urged voters they could only stop Reform by voting SNP – in the run-up to last week's poll as 'dishonest and disgraceful'. Labour's Davy Russell gained the seat from the SNP with 8,559 votes, while SNP candidate Katy Loudon came second on 7,957, ahead of Reform's Ross Lambie on 7,088. Before the vote, Swinney had claimed 'Labour are not at the races' and he described it as a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Reform. Speaking on Sunday, Sarwar said: 'The best John Swinney had to offer after 18 years was 'vote SNP to stop Farage' – a dishonest, shameful campaign.' He said it showed a 'lack of ambition' from a Government 'running down the clock', and he claimed commentators had been 'embarrassed' by the result. Sarwar added: 'Frankly, your questions are embarrassing too, Martin.' The broadcaster responded: 'I think you should be slightly embarrassed.' PA Media Prior to the vote, John Swinney had claimed only SNP candidate Katy Loudon could stop Reform (PA). Sarwar said he had spoken to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer on Friday following the victory, and the Scottish leader said he wants to see the two-child benefit cap removed 'as fast as possible'. He told the BBC that Labour aims to 'improve growth' and bring mortgage rates and energy bills down to alleviate the cost-of-living crisis. He added: 'Maybe you don't have a mortgage Martin, but people do have mortgages across the country. 'There have been four interest rates cuts because of economic stability and those four interest rates cuts have meant that the average mortgage is down by over £1,000. 'We've started to see energy bills come down, but those need to come down much quicker, because people feel a real pressure in the cost-of-living crisis.' He said voters had 'utterly rejected the SNP and Reform and sent a message to John Swinney that he ran a dishonest and disgraceful campaign that attempted to push people into the arms of Reform rather than confront the issues he has caused in people's communities'. He added: 'That's why, ultimately, people want them removed from office.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store