Explained: The Misconduct Complaint Against Judge James Boasberg
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The U.S. Department of Justice has filed a formal misconduct complaint against Chief U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, a prominent federal judge in Washington, D.C., accusing him of violating judicial ethics by making improper public remarks about President Donald Trump and his administration.
Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the move on July 28. Newsweek contacted the DOJ for comment by email outside regular working hours.
Why It Matters
Boasberg is presiding over Martínez v. Mayorkas, a high-profile case brought by a group of Venezuelan asylum-seekers who allege that their transfer to a Salvadoran detention facility on March 15 violated federal law and international human rights norms.
The DOJ filed its complaint days after Boasberg said he was considering disciplinary proceedings against government lawyers for their conduct in that case, Reuters reported. The move raises questions about potential retaliation and the separation of powers between the judiciary and executive branch.
Judge James Boasberg, the chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, at an American Board Association panel discussion at the Marriott Marquis in Washington, D.C., on April 2.
Judge James Boasberg, the chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, at an American Board Association panel discussion at the Marriott Marquis in Washington, D.C., on April 2.
AFP via Getty Images/Drew Angerer
What To Know
What Is a Judicial Misconduct Complaint?
A judicial misconduct complaint is a formal allegation filed against a sitting federal judge claiming behavior that violates the Code of Conduct for United States Judges.
These complaints are reviewed by the appropriate judicial council—in this case, likely the D.C. Circuit—and may lead to disciplinary actions, including reprimand, censure or even referral for impeachment in severe cases. However, most complaints are dismissed or resolved confidentially unless clear evidence of serious misconduct emerges.
What Boasberg Said That Sparked the Complaint
The DOJ complaint cites comments Boasberg made at the Judicial Conference in March, where he expressed concern that the Trump administration would "disregard rulings of federal courts" and trigger "a constitutional crisis."
According to the complaint, Boasberg's words and conduct "erode public confidence in judicial neutrality, and warrant a formal investigation under Rule 11," which stipulates how a chief judge of a U.S. Court of Appeals should respond when a judicial misconduct or disability complaint is filed.
The department said the judge's remarks undermined the appearance of judicial neutrality and breached ethical standards requiring judges to avoid political commentary.
What the Complaint Against Boasberg Says
According to the court document obtained by Newsweek, the DOJ has accused Boasberg of violating Canon 1, Canon 2(A) and Canon 3(A)(6) of the judicial code, which prohibit judges from making "public comment on the merits of a matter pending or impending in any court" and require them to maintain impartiality and "uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary."
The complaint further said Boasberg's conduct had called into question the integrity of pending proceedings and eroded public confidence in the judiciary's ability to fairly adjudicate matters involving the executive branch.
What People are Saying
Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on X on Monday: "Today at my direction, the Justice Department filed a misconduct complaint against U.S. District Court Chief Judge James Boasberg for making improper public comments about President Trump and his Administration. These comments have undermined the integrity of the judiciary, and we will not stand for that."
What Happens Next
The complaint signals a sharp escalation in the broader institutional conflict between Trump's Justice Department and federal courts handling cases related to his administration's policies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Ghislaine Maxwell's Prison Conditions Come Under Scrutiny
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Ghislaine Maxwell's transfer to a minimum security prison "reeks of a coordinated protection racket run at taxpayer expense to shield the president," a senator said. Maxwell was jailed for 20 years in 2022 for various crimes related to sex trafficking over her role in grooming girls for Jeffrey Epstein to abuse. Questions have been asked after she was moved to a minimum security prison in Texas shortly after meetings with the Deputy U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche over two days in July. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, former Rhode Island attorney general, asked for all documents relating to the transfer as he raised concerns about Maxwell's potential "access to the community" from a minimum security facility despite being a convicted sex offender. Whitehouse is a prominent Democrat who has leveled a range of accusations at President Donald Trump before, including in May when he told MSNBC that the president's tariff policies opened the door to potential corruption. The Bureau of Prisons told Newsweek in an email: "The Bureau of Prisons responds directly to Members of Congress and their staff. Out of respect and deference to Members, we do not comment on our Congressional briefings or share our Congressional correspondence with the media. "Additionally, for privacy, safety, and security reasons, we do not discuss the conditions of confinement for any incarcerated individual." Newsweek contacted the Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice (DOJ) and White House as well as Maxwell's lawyer for comment. Ghislaine Maxwell attends the ETM 2014 Children's Benefit Gala at Capitale, in New York City, on May 6, 2014. President Donald Trump takes questions from reporters at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in Washington on... Ghislaine Maxwell attends the ETM 2014 Children's Benefit Gala at Capitale, in New York City, on May 6, 2014. President Donald Trump takes questions from reporters at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in Washington on August 5, 2025. More Paul Zimmerman/WireImage/Why It Matters Trump has been under pressure from his own base over a review he ordered into the Epstein files, with many MAGA supporters feeling they were led to believe bombshell new information was coming, including an "Epstein client list." The backlash began after a DOJ and FBI memo in July indicated no new charges against Epstein's associates and said there was no evidence of Epstein blackmailing rich and powerful men, as alleged by victims. It added: "This systematic review revealed no incriminating 'client list.'" Trump then faced greater scrutiny over his own friendship with Epstein, though Trump said in 2019: "I had a falling out with him. I haven't spoken to him in 15 years. I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you." What To Know Polling by YouGov between August 9-11 also showed 47 percent of Americans believe Maxwell should not have been moved to a minimum security prison compared to 14 percent who backed the transfer and 38 percent who said they were not sure. It comes as Allison Gill, host of the Mueller She Wrote podcast, reported she had been given some of Maxwell's prison information by an anonymous source. Gill said Maxwell was eligible to leave the prison for work which, if true, echoed Epstein being "allowed to leave prison as part of the sweetheart deal he got from Alex Acosta," who as then U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida brokered Epstein's heavily criticized plea deal in 2008. Maxwell's lawyer, David Oscar Markus, replied to the suggestion on X: "Another day, another false rumor about Ghislaine meant to unnecessarily inflame folks." Another day, another false rumor about Ghislaine meant to unnecessarily inflame folks. — David Oscar Markus (@domarkus) August 12, 2025 Whitehouse, a Senate Judiciary Committee member, told Newsweek: "Ghislaine Maxwell's quiet transfer to a 'Club Fed' prison does not comport with the seriousness of the sex crimes she was found guilty of. It just so happens that the transfer was facilitated one week after Maxwell's highly unusual meeting with the deputy attorney general. "This whole thing reeks of a coordinated protection racket run at taxpayer expense to shield the president from the fallout from his years-long friendship with a notorious sex trafficker. The American people deserve real answers on this sordid saga." Trump was recently asked at a press conference about the transfer and said: "I didn't know about it at all. I read about it just like you did. It's not a very uncommon thing." What People Are Saying Whitehouse wrote to Federal Bureau of Prisons Director William K. Marshall asking for a plethora of documents, including documents related to: "Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, any member of the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, or any other Department of Justice official not employed by the Bureau of Prisons." In his letter, published on his website, he wrote: "Roughly one week after Mr. Blanche's meetings, Ms. Maxwell was suddenly transferred from a low-security facility in Tallahassee, Florida, to a minimum-security prison camp in Bryan, Texas. "Ms. Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence for participation in a scheme with Epstein to traffic and sexually exploit minors. "By default, Bureau policy requires individuals like Ms. Maxwell, whose criminal history involves sex offenses, to be placed, at a minimum, at low-security facilities because they 'are not appropriate for placement at an institution which would permit inmate access to the community (i.e., MINIMUM security).' "Ordinarily, Bureau officials in Tallahassee would need to request waiver of this policy as part of their request to transfer Ms. Maxwell to a minimum-security facility, subject to approval by Bureau officials in Grand Prairie, Texas." Gill reported that Maxwell was granted a sex-offender waiver allowing her to move to a minimum security prison.
UPI
3 hours ago
- UPI
Judge to hear Trump's immigration suit against all 15 Maryland federal judges
A judge Wednesday will hear the Trump administration's suit against 15 federal judges in Maryland on an immigration procedure. Pictured are protestors in Los Angeles in April. Photo by Jim Ruymen/UPI | License Photo Aug. 13 (UPI) -- A judge Wednesday will consider a lawsuit in which the President Donald Trump administration filed suit against all 15 Maryland federal judges over a deportation order. Chief Judge George Russell on May 21 made a standing order that set rules for cases where immigrants face immediate risk of deportation. The order applies a temporary stay of deportation of a few days while the case is considered. The suit is an escalation of the administration's battle against the judiciary, which has slowed his use of executive power. As the top judge in the district of Maryland, it's part of Russell's job to set procedures for how courts administer cases. The order was in response to the Trump administration's flurry of actions taken to deport people without due process. The most well-known case is that of Salvadoran man Kilmar Abrego Garcia who was wrongly deported from Maryland to a detention center in El Salvador. He was eventually returned. The hearing Wednesday will be in the Baltimore federal courthouse but has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Thomas Cullen, who normally presides in Virginia. Justice Department lawyers under Attorney General Pam Bondi said in court filings that the order "harms the federal government's sovereign interests on a repeated and ongoing basis" because it applies even when the immigrant may have no valid legal argument or the court has no jurisdiction over the case. The Department of Justice argued that the court has no authority to issue the order, which goes far beyond Russell's authority as a chief judge. The judges have hired a legal team that includes Paul Clement, who served as solicitor general under Republican President George W. Bush. The lawyers' attorneys argued in their filings that the lawsuit is "fundamentally incompatible with the separation of powers," which assigns different functions to the president and courts. The standing order is a purely administrative procedure and does not reflect any consideration of the legal merits of any claim, they wrote. Robert Koulish, research professor and director of undergraduate law programs at the University of Maryland, told the Baltimore Banner that he had predicted that Maryland would be a target of the Trump administration because the state is heavily Democratic with political leaders who have been critical of the White House's immigration stance. "We have everything that the administration is looking to make an example of -- it's a state that will never be purple, or never turn red," Koulish said. Maryland has seen a surge in immigration arrests compared with the rest of the country, the Banner reported. Under Trump, average weekly ICE arrests in the state rose 165% through June of this year, compared with 2024, outpacing the 122% rise nationwide, according to the Banner's recent analysis of government data. Other states have seen even more. In Pennsylvania and West Virginia, weekly arrests have more than tripled under the administration. They have more than quadrupled in Virginia. Baltimore has also taken the president's criticism for other reasons, including his mentioning the city this week as part of a list of Democratic-led cities he calls crime-ridden. Maryland has become "ground zero" for some of the administration's "most aggressive and legally questionable immigration tactics," said Krish O'Mara Vignarajah, president and CEO of the Baltimore-based Global Refuge, which helps immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers. "The message seems clear: There will be extreme pushback on jurisdictions like Maryland who welcome immigrants, defend their rights under the law, and hold the federal government accountable to its constitutional obligations," she told the Banner.
Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Schools to open with unprecedented protections for children and their parents amid ICE raids
LOS ANGELES - Los Angeles public schools are opening Thursday for the new academic year confronting an intense and historically unique moment: They will be operating in opposition to the federal government's immigration raids and have set in motion aggressive moves to protect children and their immigrant parents. School police and officers from several municipal forces will patrol near some 100 schools, setting up "safe zones" in heavily Latino neighborhoods, with a special concentration at high schools where older Latino students are walking to campus. Bus routes are being changed to better serve areas with immigrant families so children can get to school with less exposure to immigration agents. Community volunteers will join district staff and contractors to serve as scouts - alerting campuses of nearby enforcement actions so schools can be locked down as warranted and parents and others in the school community can be quickly notified via email and text. L.A. Mayor Karen Bass spoke about "how profound this moment is in U.S. history" during a Monday news conference with local officials. "Here you have an entire array of elected officials, appointed officials, education leaders, people committed to our children, and we are gathered here today to talk about protecting our children from the federal government," Bass said. L.A. schools Supt. Alberto Carvalho said recently that the nation's second-largest school system will oppose "any entity, at any level, that seeks to interfere with the educational process of our children. We are standing on the right side of the Constitution, and years from now, I guarantee you, we will have stood on the right side of history. We know that." High school boy mistakenly handcuffed The worries among school officials and parents are not without cause. On Monday federal agents reportedly drew their guns on a 15-year-old boy and handcuffed him outside Arleta High School. The confrontation ended with de-escalation. Family members persuaded federal agents that the boy - who is disabled - was not the person they were looking for, Carvalho said. The situation was largely resolved by the time the school principal realized what was going on and rushed out to assist. School police also arrived and scooped up unspent bullets dropped on the ground by the agents, Carvalho said. A spokesperson for U.S. Customs and Border Protection said Tuesday that Arleta High was not being targeted. Instead agents were conducting "a targeted operation" on a "criminal illegal alien," they described as "a Salvadoran national and suspected MS-13 pledge with prior criminal convictions in the broader vicinity of Arleta." At a Tuesday White House briefing, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, responded to a question that referenced the L.A. Times reporting about the incident. "I'll have to look into the veracity of that report," Leavitt said. "I read the L.A. Times almost every single day, and they are notorious for misleading the public... This administration wants to ensure that all school children across the country, in every city, from Los Angeles to D.C., can go to school safely." School communities in fear The incident outside Arleta High is among the ongoing confrontations across the region that have provoked public protests and prompted the Trump administration in June to deploy troops to Los Angeles. Enforcement actions have included masked agents arresting people at parking lots, in parks, on sidewalks and next to bus stops. Litigation, including a temporary restraining order, appears to have slowed down local immigration raids, but federal officials have strongly affirmed that they have not stopped. Trump administration policy is that no location - including a school - is off limits for enforcement actions in his drive to deport at least 1 million immigrants a year. "People in our country illegally can self-deport the easy way, or they can get deported the hard way. And that's not pleasant," Donald Trump said in a video posted to a White House social account. "A big part of it is to create the sense of fear so people will self-deport," said Jimmy Gomez, a Trump critic and Democratic member of Congress representing Los Angeles. The ripple effect is that school communities are experiencing fear and trauma, worried that agents will descend on or near campuses. Most in the state's public school systems, including in L.A. Unified have embraced a counter mission, protecting the right of children - regardless of immigration status - to a public education. That right to an education is, so far, protected by past U.S. Supreme Court rulings. For most school officials up and down the state, a necessary corollary to that right is safeguarding students' guardians and close relatives. On Tuesday, 30 school board members from L.A. County - which has 80 school districts - convened in Hawthorne to emphasize their own focus on protecting immigrant families. "We're about to welcome students back to schools, but we're very concerned that these fears and anxieties may potentially have an impact for students not wanting to come back," said Lynwood Unified school board member Alma Castro, an organizer of the event. She called her district a "safe haven." Among other measures, her district has trained staff to "restrict the sharing of any student files, any student information, and there's been some work with thinking about our facilities to ensure that we have campuses that are closed off, that people can't just walk in." Protecting immigrant families L.A. Unified, with about 400,000 students, has been layering on protections for months, recently working to incorporate ideas advocated by the teachers union and immigrant-rights groups. A major ongoing effort is building safe-passage networks one, two and three blocks out from a campus. Participants include paid outside groups, district employees and volunteer activists. School police - though diminished in numbers due to staffing cuts - are to patrol sensitive areas and are on call to move quickly to where situations arise. Some anti-police activists want the protective mission accomplished without any role for school police. A safe-passage presence has expanded from 40 schools last year to at least 100 this year, among about 1,000 campuses total, Carvalho said. "It is virtually impossible, considering the size of our community, to ensure that we have one caring, compassionate individual in every street corner in every street," Carvalho said. "But we are deploying resources at a level never before seen in our district." Other various efforts include: •Starting a task force to coordinate safe passage zones with local cities •Setting up a donor-supported compassion fund to help families with legal and other costs •Coordinating food aid for families in hiding •Providing legal referrals •Contacting more than 10,000 families to encourage them to send children to schools •Providing information about online schooling options •Distributing a "family preparedness" guide Carvalho and leaders of other school districts reiterated that K-12 campuses and anything related to schooling, such as a school bus or a graduation ceremony, will be off limits to immigration agents unless they have a valid judicial warrant for a specific individual - which has been rare. "We do not know what the enrollment will be like," Carvalho said. "We know many parents may have already left our community. They may have self-deported... We hope that through our communication efforts, our awareness efforts, information and the direct counseling with students and parents, that we'll be able to provide stable attendance for kids in our community." Reason to be afraid Mary, a Los Angeles mother of three without legal status, was terrified, but more or less knew what to do when immigration agents came to her door twice in May for a "wellness check" on her children: She did not let them in to her home. She did not step outside. And, eventually, the agents - at least eight of them who arrived with at least three vehicles - left. Mary had learned about what to do in this situation from her Los Angeles public school. Mary, who requested that her full name not be used, has three children, one of whom attends an Alliance College-Ready charter school, a network of 26 privately operated public schools. Like L.A. Unified, Alliance has trained staff on the legal rights of immigrants and also trained parents about how to handle encounters with immigration agents and where to go for help. Alliance largely serves low-income, Latino communities and the immigration raids affected attendance in the school last year. Normally, attendance runs about 90% at the end of their school year. This June, average daily attendance at 14 Alliance high schools had dipped below 80%. Six fell below 70% and one dropped as low as 57.5%. Alliance also attempted to gather deportation data. Nine families responded in a school network that enrolls about 13,000. In two cases, students were deported; three other students had family members deported; one student and a sibling were in a family that self-deported; one student was detained; two families reported facing deportation proceedings. While these numbers are small, the reports are more than enough to heighten fear within the community. And some families may have declined to be candid about their circumstances. "What's happening now is that no one is safe anywhere, not even in your home, at work, outside, taking a stroll," L.A. school board member Rocio Rivas said in an interview. Still, Rivas is encouraging families to send children to school, which she considers safer than other places. Alliance is focusing heavily on mental-health support and also arranging carpools to and from school - in which the driver is a U.S. citizen, said Omar Reyes, a superintendent of instruction at the Alliance charter group. Carvalho, a onetime undocumented immigrant himself, said that students deserve a traditional and joyous first day followed by a school year without trauma. Children, he said, "inherently deserve dignity, humanity, love, empathy, compassion and great education. --------- -Times staff writer Andrea Castillo contributed to this report. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
