logo
Spending review must scrap benefit cap or face unbearable poverty

Spending review must scrap benefit cap or face unbearable poverty

The Chancellor has pledged to invest in 'Britain's renewal' ahead of the spending review, which will be unveiled after Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday.
Ms Reeves is expected to announce significant increases in spending on the NHS, defence and schools, with £113 billion of investment expected thanks to looser borrowing rules.
That will mean more money for the Scottish Government, with the Barnett Formula designed to allocate funding to devolved administrations when spending declarations are made on issues like health, justice and education.
Ms Reeves already announced a significant U-turn on winter fuel payment cuts, leading to hopes the UK Government could abolish the two-child limit, at a cost of around £3 billion.
The policy restricts means-tested benefits, including Universal Credit, to the first two children in a household.
Experts have said scrapping it would be the most beneficial way to lift thousands of children immediately out of poverty across the UK.
Read more:
Scottish ministers have announced they will mitigate the policy from April 2026 – but scrapping it frees up millions of pounds.
Speaking to The Herald, Ms Kelly said: 'While we remain hopeful of what might emerge from the spending review, social security and welfare alone won't lift families out of poverty long term.
'We hope to see an end to the two-child limit but this must be combined with action on housing, employment, childcare, and addressing the public debt crisis.
'Immediate support is needed for those in greatest need, alongside long-term strategies to rebuild communities and create sustainable routes out of poverty.'
The charity boss added: 'We have seen the same research as ministers and know it would be the most effective lever. It is beyond time to pull it.
'Taking this single measure has the potential to transform the lives of thousands of children in Scotland and hundreds of thousands across Britain.
'If it is not taken, however, the impact is equally huge but devastating for those children will remain in poverty, their lives constrained by poverty and their life chances sabotaged by poverty.'
The Chancellor's review is not considered a 'fiscal event', meaning there will not be any detailed tax or spending decisions.
Read more:
But she will set out her spending plans until 2029, department by department.
Ms Reeves has already committed to reversing cuts to winter fuel payments, in a major U-turn from the UK Government.
It means that around nine million pensioners with an income of under £35,000 a year will now receive the payment automatically – but the Scottish Government has refused to say whether it will make equivalent changes to devolved legislation.
First Minister John Swinney has also urged the UK Government to take more action and spend more money to address the country's housing crisis.
The Scottish Government declared a national housing emergency in May 2024, following the footsteps of 12 local authorities, including Glasgow and Edinburgh.
He said the Scottish Government is already investing £768m this year in affordable housing, but called on UK ministers to do more.
"We continue to call on the UK Government to provide multi-year funding for housing to give developers and third sector organisations long-term certainty,' Mr Swinney said.
The Chancellor said the investment was only possible because of the 'stability' she has introduced after the October budget.
She is expected to say her spending review will 'ensure that renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, their jobs, their communities'.
The Chancellor will say: 'The priorities in this spending review are the priorities of working people.
'To invest in our country's security, health and economy so working people all over our country are better off.'
But the spending review is expected to set out tough spending limits for departments other than health, defence and education.
She will say on Wednesday: 'I have made my choices. In place of chaos, I choose stability. In place of decline, I choose investment. In place of retreat, I choose national renewal.
'These are my choices. These are this Government's choices. These are the British people's choices.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New call for full State Pension for half a million older people after Winter Fuel Payment U-turn
New call for full State Pension for half a million older people after Winter Fuel Payment U-turn

Daily Record

time21 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

New call for full State Pension for half a million older people after Winter Fuel Payment U-turn

Around 453,000 pensioners are living in a country which does not have a reciprocal agreement with the UK Government. Pension Credit – Could you or someone you know be eligible? Earlier this week the UK Government announced Winter Fuel Payments will be reinstated for over 9 million pensioners later this year. The U-turn and Chancellor Rachel Reeves Spending Review on Wednesday have prompted calls from the 'End Frozen Pensions Campaign' for the annual State Pension uprating to be reinstated for around 453,000 retirees living in countries which do not have a reciprocal agreement with the UK Government. The campaign said it would cost the UK Government just under £60 million per year to end this 'historic wrong'. The policy, which prevents State Pensions from being increased annually - to counteract the impact of inflation for UK pensioners living in certain countries - means some are receiving as little as £60 per week, far below the current £176.45 rate for the Basic State Pension for those living in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. John Duguid, Chair of the End Frozen Pensions Campaign, said: "The Government's U-turn on Winter Fuel Payments shows there is a common consensus that the most vulnerable in our society rely on such payments as essential lifelines during times of need. 'Victims of the Frozen Pensions scandal, who receive only a fraction of their full UK State Pension because they live in some countries overseas, should not be excluded from this rationale. Yet the Government's continued refusal to address this longstanding discrimination means they continue to suffer from often negligible levels of state support. 'These British pensioners, many of whom spent their working lives in the UK, receive on average just £60 per week compared to the more than £170 per week they would be entitled to in the UK, or a non-frozen country.' He added: 'Ending this historic wrong would cost just under £60 million per year. This would barely register in the overall State Pension budget. But this isn't only about cost, it is about the principle of treating British state pensioners fairly and equally. 'Similar to the Government's decision to reinstate Winter Fuel Payments, ending this scandal is the correct and morally just action to take. The Government should do right by those who paid fairly into the system, and ensure they have dignity in their retirement.' Last month, cross-party MPs united to intensify pressure on the UK Government over its refusal to reform the so-called 'frozen pensions' policy. Only British overseas pensioners living in specific countries - mostly within the Commonwealth - are impacted, in what Rebecca Smith MP described as "the ultimate postcode lottery'. Those in the USA see the same annual increase as British pensioners living in the UK or France, while those in Australia or Canada, see their State Pension remain 'frozen' and effectively fall in value. For example, 100-year-old Second World War veteran Anne Puckridge, who lived and worked in the UK until the age of 76 and served in all three of the RAF, Navy and the Army, has received just £72.50 per week since 2001, the year she moved to Canada to be nearer her daughter. Jim Shannon MP similarly questioned the logic of the policy applying in only some countries and not others, arguing 'the arbitrary distinction between countries with and without an operating agreement lacks logic and smacks of red tape and bureaucracy gone mad." The Minister for Pensions, Torsten Bell MP, was mostly notably challenged on the estimated cost of ending the policy, which is estimated at £60m per year - 0.04 per cent of the annual State Pension budget - rather than the £950m per year quoted by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). The difference explained by the fact the DWP are quoting for uprating and backdating payments to account for the years affected pensioners have been frozen. However, campaigners are instead asking to receive the annual increase from this point onwards. Douglas McAllister MP stressed that campaigners and supportive MPs are 'not seeking a full backdating, but for the Government to introduce some form of yearly indexing to answer that injustice'. Longterm critic of the policy Sir Roger Gale MP argued the policy is 'not a matter of cost. It is a matter of moral responsibility and duty.' The Minister was also reminded by a number of MPs that 'the vast majority of impacted pensioners still report having no knowledge of the policy's existence prior to moving overseas'. ‌ State Pension payments 2025/26 Full New State Pension Weekly payment: £230.25 Fortnightly payment: £460.50 Four-weekly payment: £921 Annual amount: £11,973 Full Basic State Pension ‌ Weekly payment: £176.45 Fortnightly payment: £352.90 Four-weekly payment: £705.80 Annual amount: £9,175 Future State Pension increases The Labour Government has pledged to honour the Triple Lock or the duration of its term and the latest predictions show the following projected annual increases: 2025/26 - 4.1% (the forecast was 4%) 2026/27 - 2.5% 2027/28 - 2.5% 2028/29 - 2.5% 2029/30 - 2.5% Article continues below Recent analysis released by Royal London revealed only around half of people receiving the New State Pension last year were getting the full weekly amount - and around 150,000 were on less than £100 per week.

NHS Dumfries and Galloway predicts budget burst of £28 million in 2025/26 financial year
NHS Dumfries and Galloway predicts budget burst of £28 million in 2025/26 financial year

Daily Record

time34 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

NHS Dumfries and Galloway predicts budget burst of £28 million in 2025/26 financial year

The overspend is down from the £33.6 million previously expected and includes £21.7 million of cuts. The financial picture of Dumfries and Galloway's healthboard is improving ... but not enough to win approval from the Scottish Government. A report for Monday's board meeting of NHS Dumfries and Galloway revealed an overspend of £28 million is expected in the current financial year. ‌ That's down from the £33.6 million prediction at the last meeting. ‌ However, the Scottish Government has set a target of a £25 million overspend. Finance boss Katy Kerr's report states the previous draft plan, submitted at the end of March, was not approved. And while 'additional Scottish Government funding' and 'local improvements' have led to the expected overspend being brought down, it still does not meet the requirements of Scottish Ministers. The previous meeting was told that, as things stood, NHS Dumfries and Galloway was due to overspend by £95 million over the next three years. That position has been improved, with the budget burst now expected to be around £87.5 million. That includes £66.7 million worth of savings over the same period. ‌ Ms Kerr reported that more than 50 savings schemes worth around £15 million have been found for the current financial year. The savings target is £21.6 million – more than the record £20.1 million the health board saved last year. Members approved the financial recovery plan on Monday and chief executive, Julie White, said: 'This past year's savings have been hard-won, delivered through changes to financial controls, service reviews and transformation which have impacted the way we work right across oursystem. ‌ 'But we're now in a position where we have to go further, and faster. 'The next phase of recovery will be even more difficult, and it will require difficult decisions. 'To deliver the level of savings required, we will have to become more efficient and consider further changes to the way in which we deliverservices. ‌ 'We will, however, continue to focus on delivering improvements to our performance, particularly our waiting times for planned and unscheduled care. 'We've shown this year that progress is possible. But we need to be honest about what comes next. 'Recovery at this scale means changing how we deliver care. 'Our focus will be on protecting what matters most — that is the delivery of front line core NHS services to the highest possible standards within our available resources, but we need to be clear this requires us to modernise our provision through areas such as a greater use of technology and digital innovation.'

'Fed up' Brian Cox hits out at Keir Starmer on BBC Debate Night
'Fed up' Brian Cox hits out at Keir Starmer on BBC Debate Night

The National

time36 minutes ago

  • The National

'Fed up' Brian Cox hits out at Keir Starmer on BBC Debate Night

The Succession star was speaking as he appeared on the BBC Scotland Debate Night programme on Wednesday evening. Cox called for more unity of purpose from Scottish politicians and the public more widely. READ MORE: Wee Ginger Dug: John Swinney needs to rethink his strategy over Scottish independence 'I'm not just talking about parties, I'm talking about the country,' he said. 'I'm talking about this country, which I love, and I'm very proud that I come from this country, but I've seen it time and time again where there's this endless debate: debate this, that, this, that, this. 'I just feel that we need unity, we need unity of purpose, and we haven't got unity of purpose. I'm sorry, but we simply don't. 'We have so much dissension, and we've lost the way really big time, and I feel that we should resume that, we should get it back.' Cox said he did not know which political party could unite Scotland, but suggested it was 'certainly' not Labour under Starmer. The actor went on: 'I'm not pleased with Mr Starmer and his attitude towards Scotland, because everything for him is England. 'He talks about England, he talks about English football.' After applause from the audience, the Dundee-born star added: 'I'm at heart a socialist, so I get, I do really get annoyed when it's not about socialism, it's about something else, and that's what I feel is lacking. 'I'm just, I'm sick of it really, I'm fed up. READ MORE: These key economic truths show how independent Scotland and Wales can succeed 'I come back to this country. I love this country and I see dissension after dissension after dissension, the inability to come together, and it's an appalling situation.' Asked if pro-independence parties should unite, Cox said: 'Absolutely they should, because it's in everybody's interests.' Talking about the Labour Government, he added: 'They're not interested in us. I know for a start that Starmer is certainly not interested and doesn't want an independent Scotland. 'He only sees it as a sort of encumbrance to what he is, so I'm not happy about that situation.' Brian Cox is known for his role as Logan Roy in the smash hit SuccessionElsewhere, Cox, a former Labour supporter, said that the UK Government's attitude to Scotland was 'nebulous'. 'I worry about a lot of things that go on, and I'm particularly worried about the attitude towards Scotland,' he said of the impact of the Spending Review, which Rachel Reeves announced on Wednesday. Cox went on: 'There certainly should be more detail, but they also should certainly understand what the need of this country is – and that's what gets me. 'It's a bit bland, it's a bit off, you know, just off the cuff, and I really want to see really what they think about Scotland, and I find it a little bit nebulous.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store