logo
Federal government to stop funding hotel rooms for asylum seekers, IRCC says

Federal government to stop funding hotel rooms for asylum seekers, IRCC says

Yahoo5 days ago
Asylum seekers staying in federally-funded hotels will soon have to check out as Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) says that funding will end in September.
A spokesperson for IRCC told CBC News via email that as of Thursday, the federal government was housing 485 asylum seekers in five hotels in Ontario and Quebec, noting it has spent approximately $1.1 billion on temporary hotel housing for asylum seekers since 2020.
"This measure was never meant to be permanent, and IRCC is funded to continue hotel operations only until September 30, 2025," the email said.
Ottawa has provided funding for asylum seekers to be housed in hotels across Canada since at least 2018. Federal officials have previously said this system was always meant to be a stop-gap measure to deal with historic surges in migration.
Meanwhile, it was recently revealed that plans to revamp Canada's outdated asylum system have been cancelled, and proposed border laws will likely make it more challenging to claim asylum. IRCC says it will help those still in hotels find housing, but experts and advocates say that could be a tough task in cities with high demand and low supply.
Municipal shelters are consistently full, according to Adaoma Patterson, director of community investments at United Way Greater Toronto. While some additional capacity has been added in the form of a dedicated shelter for asylum claimants in Peel, she says more needs to be done to avoid overloading an already-stressed shelter system.
"I think municipalities are doing everything that they can. But shelters take a long time to build. So it's not something that can happen overnight," Patterson said.
Affordable housing shortages also make it challenging for asylum seekers, who sometimes encounter problems finding landlords willing to rent to them, she said, adding that some could end up on the street or in unsafe living conditions due to overcrowding.
"Anyone who is not in safe, stable housing, there's always a risk that their health is compromised. And then in extreme cases, you might see someone pass away," she said.
Number of asylum seekers declining: IRCC
Over 15,000 asylum claimants who were previously in hotels have now transitioned to independent living, IRCC said in its email to CBC News.
The department says it will help the 485 people remaining in the hotels find longer term housing before the program ends on Sept. 30. It said it will support people on-site while they look for longer-term housing, and that it will continue "supporting provinces and municipalities in developing their own long-term housing strategies."
"While asylum volumes remain high, they are nearly 40 per cent lower than last year," IRCC said.
CBC News asked IRCC why volumes have declined but has yet to receive a response.
WATCH | How the government scrapped plans to revamp the asylum system:
Last year, the federal government cancelled an IRCC project meant to revamp Canada's outdated asylum system. The $68-million project was intended to be a major reform after Canada began seeing surges of asylum seekers entering the country, putting pressure on an already struggling system that relied heavily on paper files.
Meanwhile, the government's proposed Strong Borders Act contains controversial new measures, including changes to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act that would force asylum seekers entering the country to make their claims within a year.
Where will money come from, economist asks
Christopher Worswick, an economics professor at Carleton University who focuses on migration, questions whether the volume of asylum claims has really declined that much.
"Or is this just an attempt to offload it onto the province," he asked.
Worswick says housing asylum claimants is an international obligation — and an expensive one at that.
He warned that while the decision to end hotel funding may be motivated by a desire to cut federal spending, it could result in passing on costs to provinces and municipalities that are also cash-strapped.
With those budget challenges and municipal governments lacking the taxation powers that higher levels of government can use, Worswick wonders, "Where is the money going to come from?"
WATCH | How a Vaughan church is helping house refugees and asylum seekers:
Grassroots organizations stretched to limit
Community organizations have previously stepped in to support asylum seekers who fell through the cracks in different levels of government support. But they say they're also feeling strain.
In 2023, hundreds of asylum seekers slept on the streets in downtown Toronto amid a funding stalemate between the city and the federal government. Miracle Arena For All Nations, a church in Vaughan, Ont., was one of several community groups that stepped up to help.
Minister Isaac Oppong says his congregation has fed and housed over 500 asylum seekers on the church grounds since June 2023. He says he's concerned that ending the hotel program without other solutions in place will again lead to people sleeping in the streets.
"There's nowhere for them to go. There's no repurposed buildings or there's no other housing. We will go back to square one like 2023," he said.
Oppong says his congregation supports asylum seekers on a volunteer basis and hasn't received any government funding. He says it's not financially sustainable for local groups like his to continue supporting the influx of people long-term.
"It's bringing people into your lifeboat because you see they're drowning," he said. "But obviously you can't keep them in the lifeboat. You have to take them somewhere else."
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump didn't chicken out. So what's Canada's next move?
Trump didn't chicken out. So what's Canada's next move?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump didn't chicken out. So what's Canada's next move?

Canada has now learned that the derisive acronym TACO — often slapped on U.S. President Donald Trump — is inaccurate and needs to be tweaked to something more like "Trump (Almost) Always Chickens Out." Despite putting decidedly lower tariffs than he'd threatened on dozens of countries around the globe and giving Mexico a 90-day reprieve from his threat to raise its tariff rate, Trump singled out Canada for an increase. While there's no way that Canada can characterize what happened as a win, there's plenty of evidence that it's not a reason for Prime Minister Mark Carney's government to panic and do something that jeopardizes what really matters for the Canadian economy: tariff-free access to the U.S. for the vast majority of exports. The key evidence backing this perspective comes in the economic number-crunching showing the actual impact of Trump's tariffs on the whole of Canada's exports to the U.S, what's called the effective tariff rate. Think of it as an average, weighted by the value of Canadian goods going across the border. Different economists have slightly different estimates, but even with the increase Trump announced Thursday night, there's consensus the effective tariff rate for Canada is down in the single digits, noticeably lower than the rate for any other major trading partner. That's because despite Trump's bluster, he's allowing the vast majority of Canada's exports into the country with zero tariff under the terms of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). WATCH | Canada's talks with Trump administration will continue, says minister of US trade: Experts and business leaders say Canada's trade negotiators and federal government need to be laser focused on maintaining that tariff-free access through CUSMA, especially since the deal is soon up for review. Goldy Hyder, president and CEO of the Business Council of Canada, says a bigger issue than Trump's incremental increase of the tariffs is the way Canada is struggling to "find a way forward" in its negotiations with the U.S. 'The conversation that we should be having' "I am hoping this is an opportunity to reassess and to some extent reset where we are and where we need to get to for the longer haul," Hyder told CBC's Katie Simpson in an interview Friday. While Hyder says he has empathy for Carney's government as it tries to navigate the uncharted waters of dealing with Trump 2.0 on trade, he's questioning whether its negotiating strategy has been aimed at the correct target. Canada must assess what it needs to do "to get into the conversation that we should be having, which is first and foremost: how are we going to review and renew the USMCA?" Hyder said, using the U.S. government's preferred acronym for the trade deal. The text of CUSMA calls for a formal review starting in July 2026, but consultations between the three countries are expected to begin this fall. As Trump levies blanket tariffs on nearly every other major trading partner, observers are increasingly pointing to the big tariff exemptions Canada is getting from CUSMA as a major competitive advantage. That creates a rather hefty source of motivation for the Carney government to make solidifying CUSMA the long-term goal of its talks with the Trump administration. The eternal question: Trump's real motivation for the tariffs On the other side of the border, there's a view that a significant driving force behind Trump's tariff tactics with Canada is gaining leverage in those CUSMA renewal talks. Although Department of Justice lawyers have been arguing in court that stopping the flow of fentanyl from Canada — as minimal as it is — justifies the tariffs, trade policy expert Inu Manak of the Council for Foreign Relations in Washington, D.C., says she believes there's no way that's really what's motivating Trump. "I do think a lot of this has to do with some sort of renegotiation of parts of the CUSMA deal that the Trump administration is not happy with," Manak told CBC News Network on Friday. Although Trump hit Canada with a tariff increase, Manak isn't criticizing Canada's negotiating tactics. "There's no really good way to go about doing this," she said. "We've seen variation in approaches and no matter what, everyone seems to be getting hit with tariffs." WATCH | Breaking down the winners and loser in Trump's tariff gambit: CUSMA and its tariff-free access must remain the focus for Canada, says John Manley, a former Liberal deputy prime minister, now chair of chair of Jefferies Securities, a global investment banking firm. "The big game is the 93 per cent of Canadian goods that cross the border currently tariff-free under USMCA," Manley told CBC News. "That is what we need to protect." To retaliate or not? Even if the CUSMA renegotiation is what matters most in the long term for Canada, the Carney government also has to think about what its immediate next steps should be. Perhaps the most immediate question along those lines for Ottawa is whether to retaliate or not. Brian Clow, who served as former prime minister Justin Trudeau's deputy chief of staff and led his "war room" on Canada-U.S. trade relations, describes himself as a fan of retaliation, but is not advocating for Carney to fire back at Trump in this instance. "I do think [Carney and his team] need to stop and consider whether to further retaliate right now, given Canada is standing on its own, and the rest of the world is not standing with us," Clow said Friday in an interview with CBC News. WATCH | Should Carney hit back? Here's what a former PMO insider thinks: Carney's government also needs to think about what it can do about the tariffs that are actually having the biggest impact on Canada right now: the sectoral tariffs of 50 per cent on steel and aluminum and 25 per cent on the non-U.S. content of assembled automobiles. "Maybe there's one more step towards the American ask that we can take — that we can live with — that can close this deal," Clow said. The signals from Carney's team suggest the plan is to keep on keeping on. Dominic LeBlanc, the minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade, said Friday that he and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Trump's point man on tariffs, agreed to speak by phone next week and arrange for a meeting later in August. "We'll continue to talk to the Americans," LeBlanc told reporters in Washington. "The United States will continue to be our neighbour, continue to be our most important economic and security partner." Both LeBlanc in his scrum and Carney in his statement acknowledged the need for the government to help the steel, aluminum and auto sectors. Getting carve-outs or reductions of those tariffs will no doubt be an objective as the talks with Team Trump progress.

Canadian charity close to getting aid trucks into Gaza for first time since March
Canadian charity close to getting aid trucks into Gaza for first time since March

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Canadian charity close to getting aid trucks into Gaza for first time since March

OTTAWA — Two months after announcing it had truckloads of food waiting to enter Gaza, a Canadian charity says it's finally about to get its first shipment of aid to desperate Palestinians since March. Human Concern International has two trucks in place filled with bags of flour that were supposed to enter Gaza on Friday. It says it changed its plans because desperate Palestinians have been looting aid trucks. "It's beyond catastrophe, what's happening in Gaza right now," said the group's head, Mahmuda Khan. HCI used to send aid trucks into Gaza regularly before Israel blocked all outside aid in March and set up its own distribution sites. Hundreds of Palestinians have been shot dead by Israeli soldiers while trying to access food at those sites. Israel recently lifted some restrictions on food deliveries and Jordanian soldiers started airdropping aid purchased by Ottawa into the enclave this week. Khan's group was given permission to enter the Gaza strip Thursday with two trucks, each carrying 1,300 25-kilogram bags of flour. She said they chose not to cross into Gaza Thursday because aid trucks have been swarmed by large groups of Palestinians, making it unsafe for locals and staff. She said three truckloads of flour and seven trucks containing 2,080 boxes of food are ready to enter the territory once the charity finds a safer route. Khan said Israel needs to vastly increase the amount of aid it's letting into Gaza, adding authorities at the border are only allowing her group to deliver food that requires cooking, such as lentils and rice. "We're not allowed to put baby formula, we're not allowed to put any meat there right now. So it's calorie-counted versus nutrition calculations," she said. The group is urging Ottawa to push Israel for more access so that canned tuna and baby formula can be allowed in the territory. Her organization has accused Israel of "deliberately limiting types and amounts of food supplies to keep Gazans within a specific malnutrition threshold." The Israeli government says it is meeting its humanitarian obligations. Israel imposed a blockade on Gaza in March, arguing that Hamas had been selling vital supplies and food to pay its fighters. UN agencies say this was not happening to any large extent. After two and a half months, Israel allowed Americans to launch the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which set up aid distribution sites. Hundreds of Palestinians have been killed by Israeli army fire and American contractors while trying to access those sites. A week ago, Israel slightly loosened its restrictions. UNICEF has said it needs to undertake "therapeutic feeding" for children with severe acute malnutrition who can no longer eat normal food. That requires products such as Plumpy'Nut, a mix of peanuts and fats. Khan said her group is also purchasing local produce in Gaza at astronomical rates, with one kilogram of onions costing the equivalent of $21.60 and the same quantity of tomatoes costing $18.90. She said her group has two medical clinics that struggle to find medicines, equipment and fuel for generators. They frequently see children with infectious diseases caused by drinking contaminated water, she said, and the people of Gaza need more than just food. "They need a complete solution, a holistic approach of pure, clean water, nutritional food on an ongoing and consistent basis — and not just for a week or two," she said. Israel has repeatedly pushed back on claims that it is causing starvation in Gaza - the assessment shared by Ottawa, U.S. President Donald Trump and most major global organizations. "Israel has been an active partner in humanitarian aid delivery to Gaza consistent with its responsibilities under international law," Israeli Ambassador Iddo Moed wrote in a media statement Wednesday. He said Israel has facilitated the movement of 600 aid trucks over the previous five days. The UN has said that is the number of aid trucks needed each day in order for Gaza's population to meet its basic humanitarian needs. Gaza was receiving roughly 70 truckloads of aid a day before last week - one of the lowest aid delivery rates since the war started. Israel and the UN have repeatedly blamed each other for delays in aid reaching Palestinians, with Israel saying hundreds of trucks have sat idle. The UN says that in order to retrieve aid at the border or move around most of the Gaza Strip, its trucks must enter zones controlled by the military, load the aid and get it safely to the people who need it. It says the whole trip can take 20 hours. Large crowds of desperate people, as well as criminal gangs, overwhelm the trucks as they enter Gaza and strip them of supplies, The Associated Press has reported. Witnesses tell the agency that Israeli troops regularly fire on the crowds, killing and injuring many. The military frequently assigns routes for trucks to use that are unsuitable; "impassable for long truck convoys, passing through crowded markets, or controlled by dangerous gangs," the UN humanitarian office said last month. The UN released a video Friday of what it said was one of its own convoys on Wednesday. It shows hundreds standing at a roadside as warning shots are fired. After the shooting stops, men and boys swarm the convoy. Israel said it doesn't limit the truckloads of aid coming into Gaza, and that it regularly looks for the best routes to provide access for the international community. — With files from The Associated Press This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 1, 2025. Dylan Robertson, The Canadian Press

'The Trade War Has Lost All Credibility:' Markets Shrug Off Trump's Tariff Blitz On Multiple Countries
'The Trade War Has Lost All Credibility:' Markets Shrug Off Trump's Tariff Blitz On Multiple Countries

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

'The Trade War Has Lost All Credibility:' Markets Shrug Off Trump's Tariff Blitz On Multiple Countries

As President Donald Trump unveiled a blitz of new tariffs across different countries on Thursday, the markets remained largely unfazed by the move. What Happened: On Thursday, in a post on X, The Kobeissi Letter highlighted the market's muted response to Trump's sweeping new moves on the trade and tariff front. The post notes that Trump 'randomly' increased tariffs on Canada, the largest trading partner of the United States, from 25% to 35%. Followed by a string of new tariffs on others, such as 'Vietnam, Switzerland, South Africa, Taiwan, Cambodia, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Turkey, and Venezuela.' Trending: 7,000+ investors have joined Timeplast's mission to eliminate microplastics—now it's your turn to Yet, the market response was underwhelming, with S&P 500 futures 'down a mere 10 points,' which the post attributes almost entirely to 'Amazon's weak earnings results.' It says that in April, when the 'Liberation Day' tariffs were first announced, such a move would have sent the S&P 500 lower by 3% or more. The post says 'the trade war has lost all credibility' in the market, and that it has lost the 'shock effect' that it had a couple of months ago. Why It Matters: This could be seen as a fallout of the 'TACO Trade' meme, or 'Trump Always Chickens Out,' where investors buy equities right after Trump makes a tariff threat, knowing fully well that he will eventually back out. Economist Peter Schiff recently called this 'a classic paradox,' since markets not reacting to Trump's tariffs, because they expect him to 'chicken out,' will eventually lead him to follow through on his threats. 'Investors assume Trump will cancel the August 1 tariffs before they kick in, so stocks aren't selling off,' he says, but since there isn't a dramatic market response to this, 'Trump won't chicken out again.' Read Next: $100k+ in investable assets? Match with a fiduciary advisor for free to learn how you can maximize your retirement and save on taxes – no cost, no obligation. Bezos' Favorite Real Estate Platform Launches A Way To Ride The Ongoing Private Credit Boom Photo courtesy: Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article 'The Trade War Has Lost All Credibility:' Markets Shrug Off Trump's Tariff Blitz On Multiple Countries originally appeared on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store