logo
Map Shows US Warships Reinforcing Firepower Near Middle East

Map Shows US Warships Reinforcing Firepower Near Middle East

Newsweek29-04-2025

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A pair of Japan-based U.S. destroyers has been operating in the Indian Ocean over the past month, as the Pentagon is enhancing its military presence in the nearby Middle East.
Meanwhile, another destroyer, which was previously deployed for a Western Pacific Ocean mission, is conducting combat operations in the Middle East, a map by Newsweek shows.
Newsweek reached out to the U.S. Central Command and the Iranian permanent mission to the United Nations in New York via email for comment.
A spokesperson for the Japan-headquartered U.S. Seventh Fleet, which maintains a forward presence in the Indo-Pacific region, told Newsweek that it would not discuss specific details regarding ongoing and future operations, as well as ship movements for operational security.
The USS Carl Vinson transits in the U.S. Central Command's area of responsibility in the Middle East on April 19, 2025.
The USS Carl Vinson transits in the U.S. Central Command's area of responsibility in the Middle East on April 19, 2025.
U.S. Navy
Why It Matters
Tensions between the United States and Iran, as well as the Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen, have been rising in recent months due to Tehran's nuclear program and the Houthi attacks on ships, including American warships, in the Red Sea, a key shipping route for global trade.
The U.S. has reinforced its force posture in the Middle East, which falls within the Central Command's area of responsibility, including the re-tasking of a naval strike group led by the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson from its Pacific Ocean deployment to the Middle East.
Meanwhile, America's naval dominance in the Western Pacific Ocean is being challenged by China. There are nine U.S. destroyers assigned to the Destroyer Squadron 15, the principal surface force of the Seventh Fleet, a spokesperson for the Fleet told Newsweek.
What To Know
Photos released by the U.S. Navy show that the destroyers USS Milius and USS Ralph Johnson, both assigned to Destroyer Squadron 15, were operating in the Indian Ocean as of last week. The Indian Ocean is part of the U.S. Seventh Fleet's area of responsibility.
While the two warships were underway in the Indian Ocean, they made port calls at Diego Garcia, a tiny island of the British Indian Ocean Territory that hosts a key U.S. military base.
The USS Milius arrives at U.S. Naval Support Facility Diego Garcia on April 23, 2025.
The USS Milius arrives at U.S. Naval Support Facility Diego Garcia on April 23, 2025.
Mass Communication Specialist Seamen Kamaren Hill/U.S. Navy
The Milius visited the remote island for what the U.S. Navy called a "scheduled port visit" on April 23, while the island hosted the Ralph Johnson twice on April 11 and April 22.
Diego Garcia's logistical capabilities enhance the endurance and readiness of naval forces, a spokesperson for the U.S. Seventh Fleet explained to Newsweek, "reinforcing a sustained presence that is vital for responding to mission requirements and ensuring regional stability."
According to a Newsweek map, the Milius and Ralph Johnson arrived in the Indian Ocean after transiting the Malacca Strait, which links the Western Pacific and Indian Oceans.
The Carl Vinson's sister ship, USS Nimitz, departed from the U.S. West Coast last month for a scheduled deployment to the Western Pacific Ocean. Its naval strike group was initially comprised of four destroyers, which included the Hawaii-homeported USS Wayne E. Meyer.
However, following a stopover at Diego Garcia on April 5, the Wayne E. Meyer has been conducting operations in the Central Command's area of responsibility as part of the Carl Vinson Carrier Strike Group since at least April 13, according to official released photos.
Newsweek reached out to the Nimitz Public Affairs Officer for comment by email.
The Milius, Ralph Johnson, and Wayne E. Meyer are the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, providing offensive and defensive capabilities with a variety of missiles, the U.S. Navy said.
The USS Wayne E. Meyer (R) conducts a replenishment-at-sea in the U.S. Central Command's area of responsibility in the Middle East on April 13, 2025.
The USS Wayne E. Meyer (R) conducts a replenishment-at-sea in the U.S. Central Command's area of responsibility in the Middle East on April 13, 2025.
U.S. Navy
What People Are Saying
A spokesperson for the U.S. Seventh Fleet told Newsweek: "The mission of the U.S. [Seventh] Fleet is to provide operational control and planning for its forces in the Western Pacific and Indian Oceans, while promoting regional stability and maritime security through engagements with allies and partners.
"As forward-deployed naval forces within the [Seventh] Fleet area of operations, our ships and aircraft have the unique privilege of operating in the Western Pacific, granting us the chance to meet our allies and partners face-to-face and reinforce shared commitment to deterring aggression and maintaining a secure and prosperous Indo-Pacific."
The U.S. Central Command reported on April 27: "Since March 15, U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) forces have conducted an intense and sustained campaign targeting the Houthi terrorist organization in Yemen to restore freedom of navigation and American deterrence. These operations have been executed using detailed and comprehensive intelligence ensuring lethal effects against the Houthis while minimizing risk to civilians."
What Happens Next
It was unclear when the Milius and Ralph Johnson would conclude their deployments in the Indian Ocean. It remains to be seen whether the Wayne E. Meyer will stay in the Middle East or rejoin the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group to resume its Western Pacific Ocean mission.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bernie Sanders Introduces Bill Backing RFK Jr., Elon Musk Priority
Bernie Sanders Introduces Bill Backing RFK Jr., Elon Musk Priority

Newsweek

time32 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Bernie Sanders Introduces Bill Backing RFK Jr., Elon Musk Priority

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Senator Bernie Sanders is leading a new bill to address a key priority of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who serves as President Donald Trump's Health and Human Services Secretary. Why It Matters Sanders, a Vermont independent, alongside Senator Angus King, a Maine independent, introduced the "End Prescription Drug Ads Now Act," which, if passed, would ban prescription drug advertising on TV, radio, print and digital platforms as well as social media. Critics say these ads contribute to the high price of healthcare while doing little to improve care in the United States, though proponents say the advertisements can improve patients' knowledge of healthcare. Most wealthy countries, with the U.S. and New Zealand being two notable exceptions, ban pharmaceutical drug advertisements. The bill also represents an issue where Sanders, viewed as perhaps the most progressive senator, has found common ground with Kennedy inside the Trump administration, though the secretary has not commented on this bill specifically. What to Know Sanders and King announced the legislation on Thursday, highlighting that the pharmaceutical industry spent more than $5 billion on TV ads in 2024 and that many of these drugs cost more in the U.S. than in other countries that do not allow drug companies to run ads on TV. "The American people are sick and tired of greedy pharmaceutical companies spending billions of dollars on absurd TV commercials pushing their outrageously expensive prescription drugs," Sanders said, describing the fact that the U.S. stands mostly alone in allowing pharmaceutical ads as an "international embarrassment." vSenator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent, questions U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. during a committee hearing on May 14, 2025 in Washington, D.C. vSenator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent, questions U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. during a committee hearing on May 14, 2025 in Washington, director of communications Anna Bahr confirmed to Newsweek his office has reached out to Republicans to join the bill. Bahr pointed to lobbying from the pharmaceutical and health insurance industries as to why the U.S. has not joined other countries in bannign the ads. "Over the past 25 years, the drug companies have spent $8.5 billion on lobbying. Today, they have some 1,800 well-paid lobbyists in Washington, D.C. – including former leaders of the Republican and Democratic parties," she said in a statement to Newsweek. "Unbelievably, that is more than three lobbyists for every member of Congress. During that same period, they have provided over $700 million in campaign contributions. And they are equal opportunity contributors. They contribute heavily to both Republican and Democratic candidates." Secretary Kennedy—as well as Elon Musk, who previously served in Trump's administration—have expressed support for ending pharmaceutical advertising. "Let's get President Trump back in the White House and me to DC so we can ban pharmaceutical advertising," Kennedy wrote in a post to X (formerly Twitter) on November 3, 2024. During his own presidential campaign, Kennedy said he would have issued an executive order ending the advertisements on his first day in office. Newsweek reached out to DHS for comment via the department's press contact form. Caleb Alexander, professor of epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, told Newsweek that while a potential ban's impact on drug prices remains uunclear, there would be benefits to ending these advertisements. Pharmaceutical advertisements can drive up "inappropriate demand" for prescription drugs in settings where they may not be needed, he said. "In terms of the potential benefits of banning [direct-to-consumer advertisements], the most immediate and likely is that it would temper demand for products in settings where they may not be needed," Alexander said. The U.S. has "evolved to believe" the benefits of the ads, such as empowering patients to identify health concerns, outweigh the risks, though much of the research on the topic indicates that the benefits may not be worth the drawbacks, he said. What People Are Saying Alexander told Newsweek: "Direct to consumer advertising has been a lightning rod for controversy, and it remains a curious and unique feature of the U.S. marketplace. While a ban on direct advertising may be welcomed by many, it's not going to fundamentally transform the marketplace for prescription drugs in the United States, simply because DTCA is highly concentrated among a small number of products. It may be a reasonable political and public health target, but I think that if you just look at the way the dollars flow, there's vastly more money spent on marketing drugs to prescribers." Senator Angus King wrote in a statement: "The widespread use of direct-to-consumer advertising by pharmaceutical companies drives up costs and doesn't necessarily make patients healthier. The End Prescription Drug Ads Now Act would prohibit direct-to-consumer advertising of pharmaceutical drugs to protect people. This bill is a great step to ensure that patients are getting the best information possible and from the right source: their providers and not biased advertisements." Elon Musk wrote to X in November 2024: "No advertising for pharma." What Happens Next It's unclear whether a majority of senators are also in support of the bill. So far, Democratic Senators Chris Murphy of Connecticut, Peter Welch of Vermont, Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Dick Durbin of Illinois have co-sponsored the bill, according to Sanders' office.

Will Israel attack Iran? Trump warns of 'massive conflict' over nuclear program
Will Israel attack Iran? Trump warns of 'massive conflict' over nuclear program

USA Today

time33 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Will Israel attack Iran? Trump warns of 'massive conflict' over nuclear program

Will Israel attack Iran? Trump warns of 'massive conflict' over nuclear program "As long as I think there is an agreement, I don't want them going in, because I think that would blow it," Trump said of U.S.-Iran negotiations. Show Caption Hide Caption Trump reveals plans for 'Golden Dome' missile defense system President Donald Trump has unveiled plans for a 'Golden Dome' missile defense system, modeled after Israel's Iron Dome, aiming to complete it by the end of his term. unbranded - Newsworthy The president also appeared to suggest an Israeli attack, or the threat of one, could help his negotiators. The U.S. pulled some diplomats out of Iraq over concerns of possible Iranian revenge strikes. Trump has also threatened to bomb Iran if diplomacy fails. WASHINGTON − President Donald Trump says he doesn't want Israel to attack Iran while he's actively negotiating an agreement that could prevent Tehran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. The possibility of an imminent Israeli attack on its longtime foe Iran was great enough that Trump said he ordered the evacuation of some American diplomats in the Middle East this week. "There's a chance of massive conflict. We have a lot of American people in this area, and I said, 'We got to tell them to get out,' because something could happen. Soon," Trump said at a White House event. "And I don't want to be the one that didn't give any warning, and missiles are flying into their buildings. It's possible. So I had to do it." Trump's comments came a day after the U.S. abruptly pulled some diplomats out of Iraq. A subsequent report from the New York Times said American and European officials were warning of a possible Israeli attack that could turn the region into a tinder box or undercut the Trump administration's nuclear negotiations. "As long as I think there is an agreement, I don't want them going in, because I think that would blow it. Might help it, actually. But it also could blow it," Trump told reporters on June 12. "Whether or not we get there, I can't tell you, but it will happen soon." Trump has also threatened to bomb Iran if diplomacy fails. His special envoy Steve Witkoff has been working to secure a deal to curb Iran's uranium enrichment program and plans to travel to Oman on Sunday for a sixth round of talks. Israeli Minister of Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer and the head of Israel's spy agency, Mossad chief David Barnea, were also expected to meet with Witkoff. Trump spoke to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the phone on June 9 after a meeting at Camp David with military and national security officials. The White House declined to say what the leaders discussed or who Trump met with at the presidential retreat. Then, on June 11, the administration withdrew personnel from the U.S. embassy in Iraq without explanation. The State Department said its embassies in Bahrain and Kuwait had not changed their staffing and remained fully operational. The move came as Trump said in an interview with "Pod Force One" that he was feeling less confident about an Iranian nuclear deal. However, he told reporters on June 12: "We're fairly close to an agreement. We are fairly close to a pretty good agreement. It's got to be better than pretty good, though." Contributing: Kim Hjelmgaard

Exclusive: Trump administration tells migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela their legal status is terminated
Exclusive: Trump administration tells migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela their legal status is terminated

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Exclusive: Trump administration tells migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela their legal status is terminated

The Department of Homeland Security on Thursday told hundreds of thousands of migrants that their permission to live and work in the United States had been revoked and they should leave the country, according to a copy of the notice obtained by CNN. The termination notice was addressed to nationals of Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela who came to the United States through a Biden-era parole program. More than half a million people from those four countries benefited from the program, though it's unclear how many have since sought other forms of immigration relief while in the United States. The notice, according to DHS, was sent to email addresses provided by those in the program. 'This notice informs you that your parole is now terminated,' the notice reads. 'If you do not leave, you may be subject to enforcement actions, including but not limited to detention and removal, without an opportunity to make personal arrangements and return to your country in an orderly manner.' The notice also states that work permits linked to the program will be revoked and directs parolees to return those permits to US Citizenship and Immigration Services. Thursday's move is the latest step in the Trump administration's aggressive and wide-ranging effort to encourage or force millions of migrants out of the country, whether they are in the U.S. legally or illegally. The Biden administration announced in 2023 that it would grant parole to qualified migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela who submitted to review by authorities rather than attempting to enter the country illegally. Applicants were required to have an American sponsor or US-based sponsor who's lawfully present in the country and clear security vetting. The program became a political flashpoint as Republicans argued the administration was misusing parole authority and overreached in establishing the program for those countries. At the time, Biden officials credited the program for driving down border crossings by instead providing a path for migrants to apply to legally migrate to the US. President Donald Trump signed an order on his first day in office seeking to unilaterally end the program. That move prompted legal challenges that eventually made their way to the Supreme Court, which allowed Trump to strip protections for beneficiaries of the parole program. 'Ending the CHNV parole programs, as well as the paroles of those who exploited it, will be a necessary return to common-sense policies, a return to public safety, and a return to America First,' Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told CNN in a statement. Though the emergency decision from the Supreme Court is not final – the underlying legal case will continue in lower courts – the order allowed the administration to expedite deportations for an estimated 530,000 migrants who had previously benefited from the program. The Trump administration told the Supreme Court that its decision to terminate parole status for the migrants at issue was one of the 'most consequential immigration policy decisions' it has made. Lower court orders temporarily blocking its policy, the administration said, upended 'critical immigration policies that are carefully calibrated to deter illegal entry, vitiating core executive branch prerogatives, and undoing democratically approved policies that featured heavily in the November election.' This article has been updated with additional developments. CNN's Devan Cole and John Fritze contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store