Tribal colleges win reprieve from federal staff cuts
The Science and Technology building on the campus of Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute in New Mexico, one of the tribal schools that lost federal funding. (Photographer Dennis Dye/courtesy USGS)
After weeks of uncertainty, two tribal colleges have been told they can hire back all employees who were laid off as part of the Trump administration's deep cuts across the federal workforce in February, part of a judge's order restoring some federal employees whose positions were terminated.
Haskell Indian Nations University in Kansas and Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute, widely known as SIPI, in New Mexico lost about 70 employees in mid-February amid widespread staffing cuts to federal agencies. While most of the nation's 37 tribal colleges and universities are chartered by American Indian tribes, Haskell and SIPI are not associated with individual tribes and are run by the federal government.
This story about tribal colleges was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education.
About 55 employees were laid off and 15 accepted offers to resign, according to a lawsuit filed last month by tribes and students. The colleges were forced to cancel or reconfigure a wide range of services, from sports and food service to financial aid and classes. In some cases, instructors were hired by other universities as adjuncts and then sent back to the tribal colleges to keep teaching.
It was not clear this week when and if the workers would return, whether the employees who resigned would also be offered their jobs back, or if the government would allow colleges to fill vacancies. Both colleges said some employees had turned down the offers.
The Bureau of Indian Education, which runs the colleges, declined to answer questions except to confirm the laid-off workers would be offered jobs with back pay to comply with a judge's order that the government reverse course on thousands of layoffs of probationary employees. But the agency also noted the jobs would be available 'as the White House pursues its appeals process,' indicating possible turmoil if an appeals court reinstates the layoffs.
Both colleges said the bureau also has refused to answer most of their questions.
SIPI leaders were told last week that the positions were being restored, said Adam Begaye, chairman of the SIPI Board of Regents. The 270-student college lost 21 employees, he said, four of whom decided to take early retirement. All but one of the remaining 17 agreed to return, Begaye said.
The chaos has been difficult for those employees, he said, and the college is providing counseling.
'We want to make sure they have an easy adjustment, no matter what they've endured,' Begaye said.
The chairman of Haskell's Board of Regents, Dalton Henry, said he was unsure how many of the 50 lost employees were returning. Like SIPI, Haskell was forced after the layoffs to shift job responsibilities and increase the workload for instructors and others.
Haskell was reviewed by accreditors in December, and Henry said he was worried how the turmoil would affect the process. Colleges and universities must be accredited to offer federal and state financial aid and participate in most other publicly funded programs.
Henry declined to discuss his thoughts on the chaos, saying there was nothing the college could do about it.
'Whatever guidance is provided, that's what we have to adhere to,' he said. 'It's a concern. But at this point, it's the federal government's decision.'
The Bureau of Indian Affairs declined to make the presidents of the two colleges available for interviews.
Tribal colleges and universities were established to comply with treaties and the federal trust responsibility, legally binding agreements in which the United States promised to fund Indigenous education and other needs. But college leaders argue the country has violated those contracts by consistently failing to fund the schools adequately.
In the federal lawsuit claiming the Haskell and SIPI cuts were illegal, students and tribes argued the Bureau of Indian Education has long understaffed the colleges. The agency's 'well-documented and persistent inadequacies in operating its schools range from fiscal mismanagement to failure to provide adequate education to inhospitable buildings,' plaintiffs claimed.
Sen. Jerry Moran and Rep. Tracey Mann, both Kansas Republicans, said before Trump took office that they plan to introduce a bill shifting Haskell from federal control to a congressional charter, which would protect the university from cuts across federal agencies such as the Bureau of Indian Education.
'[F]or the last few years the university has been neglected and mismanaged by the Bureau of Indian Education,' Moran said in a written statement in December. 'The bureau has failed to protect students, respond to my congressional inquiries or meet the basic infrastructure needs of the school.'
The February cuts brought rare public visibility to tribal colleges, most of which are in remote locations. Trump's executive orders spurred outrage from Indigenous communities and a flurry of national news attention.
'We're using this chaos as a blessing in disguise to make sure our family and friends in the community know what SIPI provides,' said Begaye, the SIPI board president.
The uncertainty surrounding the colleges' funding has left a lasting mark, said Ahniwake Rose, president and CEO of the American Indian Higher Education Consortium, which advocates for tribal colleges. But she added she was proud of how the schools have weathered the cuts.
'Indian country is always one of the most resourceful and creative populations,' she said. 'We've always made do with less. I think you saw resilience and creativity from Haskell and SIPI.'
Contact editor Christina A. Samuels at 212-678-3635 or samuels@hechingereport.org.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
40 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Alliance brings border message to Washington
The Jay Treaty Border Alliance brought a narrow focus to the capital of the United States this week, demanding the country end blood quantum requirements for border-crossing rights and respect that it is up to First Nations to determine their own membership. 'The issue is other people tend to make it about an immigration issue, a border security issue. It's not about a border security issue. We're simply saying remove the blood quantum requirement from the legislation,' said Mohawk Council of Kahnawake chief Cody Diabo, who was part of the delegation to Washington, DC. The Alliance exists to advocate for the recognition of border-crossing rights as guaranteed by the 1794 Jay Treaty between Great Britain and the United States, which acknowledges the prerogative of Onkwehón:we to freely traverse the colonial border. However, the US requires that the individual demonstrate they are 'at least 50 percent of the American Indian race,' whether through ministry documentation or a letter from the band along with other evidence. 'Many of the First Nations determine our memberships based more on lineage, and we don't do blood quantum anymore,' said Diabo. 'It's kind of ironic because right now First Nations people are the only ones who get judged based off their blood quantum. Everyone else from the past, whether of Asian descent, or any others, that's all been removed from US legislation except for First Nations people.' The delegation, which included officials representing Indigenous communities from both sides of the border, met with staffers working for elected Republicans and Democrats as well as Sara Perkins, who is deputy assistant secretary at the Office of Intergovernmental Affairs under the US Department of Homeland Security. While the new US administration under president Donald Trump has earned a reputation for being hostile to those it does not view as Americans, Diabo said a heightened degree of difficulty exercising Jay Treaty rights has been a couple years in the making, overlapping with the latter part of former US president Joe Biden's term. Diabo said he was optimistic that US officials were open to what the delegation had to say. He explained to them that communities like Kahnawake built skylines in the US and have a history of joining the US Armed Forces. 'I referenced my grandfather who was in the Navy, who lied about his age and signed up at 16 after Pearl Harbor was attacked, and it never seemed like a problem then, when they needed something from us,' said Diabo, who felt this message was well received. Meanwhile, he said, officials from the Department of Homeland Security signalled a desire to keep the conversation going with technical tables and that one of the department's advisors, who is Lakota, showed particular interest in ensuring the discussion doesn't get sidelined. 'Overall, there were a lot of positive things that happened. Hopefully I can report back in a couple weeks or maybe by midsummer to see what kind of progress there's been,' he said. In terms of the government on this side of the border, Diabo said it is still essential that Canada recognize the Jay Treaty as the US and Great Britain do, adding that prime minister Mark Carney's welcoming of King Charles for the throne speech should come with a willingness to acknowledge the validity the agreement, which predates Canadian Confederation. marcus@ Marcus Bankuti, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Yahoo
28-05-2025
- Yahoo
Grand Forks district to offer stoles to Native graduates next year; parent group still seeks beading on caps
May 27—GRAND FORKS — The Grand Forks Public Schools Native American Parent Committee voted Tuesday to formally ask district administration to consider allowing Indigenous students to wear traditional beadwork on their graduation caps. The meeting came after students were notified beadwork on their mortarboards would not be allowed at their graduation ceremonies this year. It's a longstanding district policy that no adornments are allowed on graduation caps, but parents say students have worn Indigenous beadwork without issue in years past. According to some in attendance at Tuesday's meeting, the notification came too late for some families who had already begun beading their students' caps — a prayerful cultural practice often done by older members of a family for their younger loved ones. Eagle feathers on graduation caps, allowed explicitly by state law, will still be permitted. Assistant superintendents Catherine Gillach and Matt Bakke and Central High School Principal Jon Strandell were on hand for the meeting. Gillach said the district intends to introduce stoles for American Indian students next year that families may bead however they want. The district had intended to provide the stoles to families this year, but ran out of time to have them delivered. Gillach emphasized that the district wants to find a way to celebrate and honor its Indigenous students' cultural heritage, but that by hypothetically allowing some groups to decorate their caps and not others, the district runs the risk of violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. At minimum, she said, the district will have to proceed cautiously. "We don't want to be the judge and the jury at the end," she said. "Like this expression is OK, and this one is respectful, this is not." Chad Ward, Native American liaison for the district, said there's nothing wrong with the stoles proposal, but that the district's response to the issue has left many Native American families feeling like something important is being taken away from the ceremonies. He described the profound impacts of colonization and assimilation on Indigenous families, and that beadwork is an important way for many Indigenous people to practice their culture in their day-to-day lives. For many, it holds great significance to incorporate the beadwork into a day as important as a graduation. "At the end of the day," Ward added, "with all due respect, this is Indian Country." In an hourlong dialogue, Indigenous parents discussed the significance of beading the cap specifically. Jayme Davis, a state representative from Belcourt, noted that many Indigenous families choose to bead the graduation cap because it is the symbol of graduation and the completion of a major milestone in the students' lives, much more so than the stoles. "Stoles don't equate the visibility that the cap has. That for me, is the difference between the stole and the graduation cap, is that meaning," she said. "And to me — just for me — if this were coming down, it would say to me, 'Yeah, you can be Native, but not too Native. We don't want it too visible.'" "... It's not just a racial thing, it's a political and cultural thing, and it's specifically for us, because we are the first peoples of this land," Davis continued. "So we're exercising this right, this sovereignty. We're not necessarily asking for privilege to do this. It should be a right for us." Following the NAPC vote, conversations about beading on caps will continue at the district level, Gillach said. Immediately following the NAPC meeting, the full Grand Forks School Board heard an update on Native American student graduation rates in the district. The district is on track to meet and surpass a graduation rate goal set during the 2022-2023 school year, according to Superintendent Terry Brenner. That year, the four-year graduation rate for Native American students in the district was 46%. The district hoped to see that number rise to 80% by September 2028. Last school year, the four-year Native American graduation rate was 73%. Brenner credited the improvement in large part to programs and practices instituted by Ward as the new Native American liaison and funded by the NAPC, including celebration ceremonies for Indigenous students completing kindergarten, fifth grade, eighth grade and 12th grade. Other interventions, such as counselor tracking of earned credits, credit recovery options and a partnership with UND to match GFPS students with Native American student mentors, were also highlighted as successes. There are still questions in the data, Brenner noted. Across district campuses, while 73% of Indigenous seniors are on track to graduate based on credits earned, only 42% of freshmen, 54% of sophomores and 53% of juniors are on track. (For comparison, when looking at the total student body across campuses, 77% of freshmen, 81% of sophomores, 83% of juniors and 84% of seniors are on track to graduate.) Why do so many Indigenous students appear to spend most of their high school careers not on track to graduate, only to suddenly catch up as seniors? The answer is chronic absenteeism, said district Chief Academic Officer Amy Bartsch. Some 58% of Native American freshmen in the district are considered chronically absent, Bartsch said. Bartsch called chronic absenteeism a "community issue that we all have to rally behind to support our families to make school accessible to all," and Gillach noted that the School Board has discussed issues of transportation in the past. But she also said the district needs to consider how to ensure the school environment itself is conducive to the success of its Indigenous students. Those conversations are already happening at the campus level, she said. "Are we representing our students well enough in the curriculum?" she asked. "We work really hard on relationships, and yet we recognize there are some discrepancies between kids reporting that they feel safe and welcome, and feeling like they truly belong." In other news: * The district is poised to "open the virtual doors" to Grand Forks Virtual High School next school year, according to Gillach. Registration for the fully online program is now closed, and a pilot group of 26 high-schoolers are currently enrolled. They include 13 from Central High School, 11 from Red River High School, two homeschooled students and 10 students currently on Individualized Education Plans. The district has hopes to expand the program in future years. * Lizette Miller, secretary at Community High School, was recognized as the district's Classified Employee of the Year. Community Principal Terry Bohan presented her with the award. Two additional district employees were also recognized as the Certified Employees of the Fourth Quarter. Behavior analyst Brittney Hansen was presented with the award by Special Education Director Elisa Diederich, and Viking Elementary literacy specialist Lisa Spicer was presented with the award by Viking Principal Jolyn Bergstrom. * Discovery Elementary School was recognized as the school of the week during the meeting's "celebrating success" portion. The elementary school is celebrating 10 years since its opening. * District Business Manager Brandon Baumbach presented the general fund financial statement for July 1, 2024, through April 30, 2025. During that time, total general fund revenue was $113,584,932 and total general fund expenditures were $94,337,173, resulting in revenue over expenses of $19,247,760.
Yahoo
21-05-2025
- Yahoo
5 things to know about Native Hawaiian rights in 2025
HONOLULU (KHON2) — In early 2025, new executive orders from Washington, D.C. put Native Hawaiian programs under a shadow of fear. What looked like a wave of federal changes against diversity, equity and inclusion sparked confusion and concern across Hawai'i. For many, the worry was simple but heavy: Would the federal government still recognize its obligations to Native Hawaiians? DOGE cuts hit Native Hawaiian programs That fear reached classrooms, healthcare clinics, housing programs and small businesses. For Native Hawaiian advocates, it was more than a question about policy. It was a question about identity and survival. But something else happened, too. A quiet, strategic form of advocacy unfolded behind the scenes. Leaders asked questions that mattered. Congress stepped in with sharp reminders. And in time, one agency responded clearly. Now, as the situation continues to evolve, Native Hawaiians are walking forward with clarity, caution and the deep understanding that their rights are rooted in law, not trends. Local political analyst Stan Fichtman provided details on what has been happening, and caught up with Kumu Bradford Lum, former Chair of the Hawaiian Affairs Caucus, to better understand how we got here and what comes next. Here are the top things to know about Native Hawaiian rights under the 2025 DEI executive orders signed in January were aggressive. They attempted to circumvent Congress end federal DEI programs by removing funding tied to critical race theory and gender identity and pushed a version of 'merit-based' hiring that left out equity concerns. These orders did not name Native Hawaiians directly. But the broad language caused alarm. Many wondered if Hawaiian immersion schools, ʻohana-focused health programs or Native-specific small business supports would be cut. Kumu Lum said Native Hawaiian leadership has been deliberate in drawing a line. 'As far as Native Hawaiian issues, we are doing our best not to be part of the DEI,' Kumu Lum said. 'We are distinguishing ourselves as separate and not be lumped together.' The United States Department of Education backed that distinction in April. In a response to the National Indian Education Association, the department clarified that Native Hawaiian, American Indian and Alaska Native programs are not considered DEI. That clarification helped. According to Fichtman, the relief was immediate. Yes, you can still be Native Hawaiian; and yes, the federal government still has a responsibility to you. The reason Native Hawaiian programs are still standing has nothing to do with DEI. It has everything to do with history. Fichtman indicated that this is about trust obligations going back to Prince Kūhiō and the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act. Native rights are grounded in federal law, not DEI policy; so, dismantling DEI doesn't dismantle those obligations. Kumu Lum puts it this way: 'As Native Hawaiians, Native Americans and Native Alaskans, we are all Indigenous peoples of America.' Hence, that status comes with legal commitments that cannot be erased by a single executive order. Those obligations span housing, education, economic development and health. They are based on trust relationships, not political preference. That legal framework is what protected many Native Hawaiian programs from being swept up in the DEI rollback. In early February, U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska sent a letter to the White House's Office of Management and Budget. It was direct. Would the new DEI bans affect Native Hawaiian, Native American and Alaska Native programs? Hawai'i's Senator Brian Schatz, who co-leads the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, helped drive that message. Their letter pointed to law, not ideology. This is where the quiet power of Congress shows up, Fichtman said. A single letter, sent on official committee letterhead, can redirect an entire agency's interpretation of an executive order. OMB never replied. But the Department of Education did. That response, though indirect, was enough to protect key Native Hawaiian programs, for now. The Education Department clarified its position. Other agencies have not. 'We are concerned,' Kumu Lum said. He listed key programs that could be harmed: '$30 million could be affected. Small Business Administration Native 8(a) Business Development Programs. Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act. Hawaiian Homes Commission Act. And the Native Hawaiian Education Act, which will impact Hawaiian immersion schools and other Native Hawaiian education programs.' Then there's the Native Hawaiian Health Care Act. Kumu Lum called that out specifically. 'We are truly concerned on Native Hawaiian Health Care Act.' Without formal guidance from agencies like the Department of the Interior or Health and Human Services, those fears remain real. Kumu Lum said it clearly: 'We now have to wait and see what happens and be prepared to what will happen and to find alternative options to accommodate our needs for our Hawaiian keiki, students, parents and kūpuna.' The DEI orders never erased Native identity. But they tested it. Fichtman indicated that this was not just a shift in policy. Rather, it was an existential question. People were wondering, 'Can we still legally be Native Hawaiian in the eyes of the federal government?' What brought the answer wasn't a protest. It wasn't a court ruling. It was a carefully written letter, grounded in law, backed by legacy and followed by another from a federal department. Advocacy doesn't always need to be loud to be effective, Fichtman said. Sometimes, the work is done in conference rooms, not headlines. Kumu Lum's view carries that same message. Native Hawaiian advocates will continue distinguishing their programs from DEI and continue watching how federal agencies interpret the law. They will also continue protecting what matters most, our keiki, our parents and our kūpuna. You can access Fichtman's political analysis at You can find out more about the Hawaiian Affairs Caucus by clicking . Check out more news from around Hawaii The story is not finished. But as 2025 moves ahead, Native Hawaiians are walking with the same strength that guided their ancestors: clarity, kuleana and aloha. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.