logo
Tribal colleges win reprieve from federal staff cuts

Tribal colleges win reprieve from federal staff cuts

Yahoo04-04-2025
The Science and Technology building on the campus of Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute in New Mexico, one of the tribal schools that lost federal funding. (Photographer Dennis Dye/courtesy USGS)
After weeks of uncertainty, two tribal colleges have been told they can hire back all employees who were laid off as part of the Trump administration's deep cuts across the federal workforce in February, part of a judge's order restoring some federal employees whose positions were terminated.
Haskell Indian Nations University in Kansas and Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute, widely known as SIPI, in New Mexico lost about 70 employees in mid-February amid widespread staffing cuts to federal agencies. While most of the nation's 37 tribal colleges and universities are chartered by American Indian tribes, Haskell and SIPI are not associated with individual tribes and are run by the federal government.
This story about tribal colleges was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education.
About 55 employees were laid off and 15 accepted offers to resign, according to a lawsuit filed last month by tribes and students. The colleges were forced to cancel or reconfigure a wide range of services, from sports and food service to financial aid and classes. In some cases, instructors were hired by other universities as adjuncts and then sent back to the tribal colleges to keep teaching.
It was not clear this week when and if the workers would return, whether the employees who resigned would also be offered their jobs back, or if the government would allow colleges to fill vacancies. Both colleges said some employees had turned down the offers.
The Bureau of Indian Education, which runs the colleges, declined to answer questions except to confirm the laid-off workers would be offered jobs with back pay to comply with a judge's order that the government reverse course on thousands of layoffs of probationary employees. But the agency also noted the jobs would be available 'as the White House pursues its appeals process,' indicating possible turmoil if an appeals court reinstates the layoffs.
Both colleges said the bureau also has refused to answer most of their questions.
SIPI leaders were told last week that the positions were being restored, said Adam Begaye, chairman of the SIPI Board of Regents. The 270-student college lost 21 employees, he said, four of whom decided to take early retirement. All but one of the remaining 17 agreed to return, Begaye said.
The chaos has been difficult for those employees, he said, and the college is providing counseling.
'We want to make sure they have an easy adjustment, no matter what they've endured,' Begaye said.
The chairman of Haskell's Board of Regents, Dalton Henry, said he was unsure how many of the 50 lost employees were returning. Like SIPI, Haskell was forced after the layoffs to shift job responsibilities and increase the workload for instructors and others.
Haskell was reviewed by accreditors in December, and Henry said he was worried how the turmoil would affect the process. Colleges and universities must be accredited to offer federal and state financial aid and participate in most other publicly funded programs.
Henry declined to discuss his thoughts on the chaos, saying there was nothing the college could do about it.
'Whatever guidance is provided, that's what we have to adhere to,' he said. 'It's a concern. But at this point, it's the federal government's decision.'
The Bureau of Indian Affairs declined to make the presidents of the two colleges available for interviews.
Tribal colleges and universities were established to comply with treaties and the federal trust responsibility, legally binding agreements in which the United States promised to fund Indigenous education and other needs. But college leaders argue the country has violated those contracts by consistently failing to fund the schools adequately.
In the federal lawsuit claiming the Haskell and SIPI cuts were illegal, students and tribes argued the Bureau of Indian Education has long understaffed the colleges. The agency's 'well-documented and persistent inadequacies in operating its schools range from fiscal mismanagement to failure to provide adequate education to inhospitable buildings,' plaintiffs claimed.
Sen. Jerry Moran and Rep. Tracey Mann, both Kansas Republicans, said before Trump took office that they plan to introduce a bill shifting Haskell from federal control to a congressional charter, which would protect the university from cuts across federal agencies such as the Bureau of Indian Education.
'[F]or the last few years the university has been neglected and mismanaged by the Bureau of Indian Education,' Moran said in a written statement in December. 'The bureau has failed to protect students, respond to my congressional inquiries or meet the basic infrastructure needs of the school.'
The February cuts brought rare public visibility to tribal colleges, most of which are in remote locations. Trump's executive orders spurred outrage from Indigenous communities and a flurry of national news attention.
'We're using this chaos as a blessing in disguise to make sure our family and friends in the community know what SIPI provides,' said Begaye, the SIPI board president.
The uncertainty surrounding the colleges' funding has left a lasting mark, said Ahniwake Rose, president and CEO of the American Indian Higher Education Consortium, which advocates for tribal colleges. But she added she was proud of how the schools have weathered the cuts.
'Indian country is always one of the most resourceful and creative populations,' she said. 'We've always made do with less. I think you saw resilience and creativity from Haskell and SIPI.'
Contact editor Christina A. Samuels at 212-678-3635 or samuels@hechingereport.org.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Legal group accuses Rutgers U. of discrimination against white students
Legal group accuses Rutgers U. of discrimination against white students

New York Post

time04-08-2025

  • New York Post

Legal group accuses Rutgers U. of discrimination against white students

A legal advocacy group has accused New Jersey's flagship public university — Rutgers — of discrimination for excluding white students from scholarship programs that recruit African-American, Native American and Hispanic students. The Equal Protection Project filed a civil rights complaint against Rutgers University with the US Department of Education, claiming the scholarship programs violate federal anti-discrimination laws and are unconstitutional. 5 The Equal Protection Project filed a civil rights complaint against Rutgers University with the US Department of Education. RICHARD HARBUS 'What doesn't Rutgers understand about non-discrimination? Discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin is barred under federal law, state law, and even under Rutgers' own rules. At the Equal Protection Project, we are calling on Rutgers to live up to its own set of rules — that shouldn't be controversial,' said William Jacobson, a Cornell University law professor and founder of the Equal Protection Project. 'Where were the administrators and staff whose jobs supposedly are devoted to preventing discrimination? Why was there no intervention to uphold the legally required equal access to education?' 5 'At the Equal Protection Project, we are calling on Rutgers to live up to its own set of rules — that shouldn't be controversial,' said William Jacobson. The group's Aug. 1 complaint filed with the Education Department accuses four different Rutgers programs of discrimination by excluding white students, a violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Law of 1964, as well as the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause. The Albert W. Dent Graduate Student Scholarship is designated for minority students enrolled in their final year of a healthcare management graduate program. The GEM Fellowship Program provides both financial support and internship opportunities to highly qualified, underrepresented students who wish to pursue graduate study in engineering or science. 5 The group's Aug. 1 complaint filed with the Education Department accuses four different Rutgers programs of discrimination by excluding white students. Robert Kalfus The National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering scholarships are for under-represented students identified as 'African American, American Indian, or Latino and/or first generation.' Lastly, General Motors offers an endowed scholarship at Rutgers for GM workers or their spouses and children and students of 'underrepresented minorities.' According to the complaint, Rutgers considers 'minorities' to be those who 'designate themselves as Black, non-Hispanic; American Indian or Alaska Native; Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, or Hispanic.' Educational institutions that receive federal funding must comply with laws against discrimination. The US Education Department monitors compliance and investigates complaints. 5 Rutgers, in a statement on Sunday, said it will review the complaint but indicated that it has already scrapped two of the programs. RICHARD HARBUS President Trump also issued an executive order directing federal agencies to scrap funding for diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Rutgers, in a statement on Sunday, said it will review the complaint but indicated that it has already scrapped two of the programs. 'Rutgers University remains firmly committed to equal protections afforded under law and rejects discrimination in all its forms. The university will closely review the complaint, but based on preliminary information, two of the scholarships are not administered by the university and the remaining two are no longer being awarded,' the university said in a statement. 5 The group has challenged over 100 colleges and universities for 500 alleged discriminatory scholarships and programs. Robert Kalfus 'As a best practice, the university continuously reviews its websites, programs, and practices to ensure compliance with federal and state law.' The Equal Protection Project asked in the complaint that 'the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights promptly open a formal investigation, impose such remedial relief as the law permits for the benefit of those who have been illegally excluded from Rutgers' various scholarships based on discriminatory criteria, and ensure that all ongoing and future scholarships and programming at Rutgers comports with the Constitution and federal civil rights laws.' The department has taken action against Columbia University and the City University of New York for allegedly failing to protect Jewish students from discrimination, leading to settlements. The legal advocacy group has filed similar discrimination complaints or lawsuits against the New York State Education Department; State University of New York campuses including SUNY-Albany and SUNY-Buffalo Law; and Fordham University and Alfred University. The group has challenged over 100 colleges and universities for 500 alleged discriminatory scholarships and programs. 'Unfortunately, there is a culture on many campuses that excuses racial discrimination against white students. Racial discrimination in education is wrong and unlawful, no matter who benefits or who is harmed.' Jacobson said. The US Education Department had no immediate comment.

Trump wants to ‘Make Indians Great Again' — by bringing back slurs to a school gymnasium near you
Trump wants to ‘Make Indians Great Again' — by bringing back slurs to a school gymnasium near you

San Francisco Chronicle​

time28-07-2025

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Trump wants to ‘Make Indians Great Again' — by bringing back slurs to a school gymnasium near you

In 2014, a group of Native parents, including myself, launched the #NotYourMascot hashtag the night before the Super Bowl. Despite our minority status, representing barely 1.5% of the U.S. population, we were determined to find a way to be heard in the (relatively) new public square of social media. No, the Washington NFL team was not playing. But the Super Bowl was the most opportune moment to get our message out. We informed only our closest associates and a select few Twitter accounts with large followings about our plan — and treated our new hashtag like a state secret, afraid it would get swamped by an army of bots. We devised a list of ready-made tweets to educate the general public about the harm caused by Native mascotry to the most vulnerable population in America — Native Americans have the highest suicide, poverty, murder and rape rates in the country. The plan worked. 'Not Your Mascot' immediately trended — a powerful testament to the impact of collective action. It was probably the first American Indian hashtag to trend in the United States. Now, nearly 12 years later, the president of the United States is trying to undo our work. It's safe to say he did not read any of our tweets. On July 20, President Donald Trump posted on social media: 'The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team.' The leader of the free world then threatened to derail the team's return to the Robert F. Kennedy Stadium in Washington, D.C., after three decades in Maryland. The Commanders' owners are negotiating a nearly $4 billion deal with the D.C. City Council to make the move in 2030. 'I may put a restriction on them,' the president wrote, 'that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders,' I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington…Cleveland should do the same with the Cleveland Indians.' Trump may have written 'The Art of the Deal,' but if he had read our 140-character talking points, he would know that an Emory University study found that teams with American Indian mascots were off-putting to fans and the franchises were worth less than they would be without a race-based mascot. Suzan Harjo, a Cheyenne elder who began suing the franchise in 1992, challenging the former owner Dan Snyder's trademarking of the slur 'R*dskins,' noted in her response to Trump that the 'Harjo curse' (the team's poor performance began the year she started her lawsuit) was only lifted after the team changed its name. 'It's a good example of how long it takes to shake really bad karma.' Commanders managing partner Josh Harris had this to say in February: 'Now, in this building, the name Commanders means something. It's about players who love football, are great at football, hit hard, mentally tough, great teammates.' Even the Washington Post, which conducted a flawed survey in 2016 that showed support for the former name (I addressed this in an article in The Nation at the time), found that its most recent survey showed 62% of fans prefer the new name following the team's most successful season in decades. That, of course, should be that. But Trump's involvement in the mascot controversy goes beyond his recent social media posts or potential distractions from Jeffrey Epstein. In May, Trump's secretary of education, Linda McMahon, announced on a visit to Massapequa High School on Long Island, N.Y., that the state could lose federal funding if they do not allow Native mascots. In June, her department announced that its investigation into the New York Department of Education and the New York State Board of Regents' ban on 'mascots and logos that celebrate Native American history' was being handed over to the Department of Justice for enforcement. Under Trump, the department's civil rights office found the state ban discriminatory because mascotting other racial/ethnic groups, like 'Dutchmen' and the 'Huguenots,' is still allowed. After arguing with R*dskins trolls online in 2013-2014, I am familiar with this view. We'd often hear, 'What about the Vikings or 'Fighting Irish'?' Well, Vikings don't exist anymore, and going 'a Viking' was an activity, a job like being an oiler or packer. And it is not the sole way we know these groups. For so many Americans, American Indians are no more than the stereotypes demonstrated at games: Tomahawk chops and Pocahottie outfits. White Americans, even descendants of Vikings, the Irish, Dutch, and Huguenots, are allowed an individuality that cannot be diminished by obnoxious stereotypes promoted by the mascotry of their ancestors. 'The Trump administration will not stand idly by as state leaders attempt to eliminate the history and culture of Native American tribes,' McMahon, the former CEO of World Wrestling Entertainment, assured Massapequa High School students, parents and alumni. The school is refusing to comply with New York state law and eliminate its Native American mascot. After Trump's post on July 20, Kerry Wachter, the school board president of Massapequa, asked the president to sign an executive order allowing the school to retain its mascot. She claimed that banning mascots of Native people 'would erase this heritage, tear down this history and silence this legacy' in her Long Island town, which is 92.3% white, according to the U.S. Census. Massapequa says it would cost the school $1 million to change its mascot. One million invested in a mascot? If true, that certainly informs you about the types of resources being dubiously invested in the American educational system. Money that would be better spent on genuine education and assistance to poor reservation schools. Even to tribal colleges, many of which have had their budgets practically cut to zero by Trump. As we tweeted years ago, studies show that Native youth exposed to Native mascots have lower self-esteem. Not only that, but their ability to imagine themselves achieving their dreams decreases. And this is because, confronted with the dominant society's inability to see them as human and not a mascot, they retreat from the world and no longer have confidence in being a place where they can thrive. That's why, as Native parents, NotYourMascot sought to educate through tweets. That's why we chose Not Your Mascot, which was an improvement on Change the Name, an earlier messaging effort. We were taking our identity back for ourselves — and we were encouraging Americans of all backgrounds to engage with real Native people, cultures and lives, not mascots. Jacqueline Keeler is a Diné/Dakota writer living in Portland, Ore., and the author of 'Standing Rock, the Bundy Movement, and the American Story of Sacred Lands.'

Denver's $800M bond package for infrastructure projects takes shape
Denver's $800M bond package for infrastructure projects takes shape

Axios

time09-07-2025

  • Axios

Denver's $800M bond package for infrastructure projects takes shape

Denver is one step closer to deciding how it might spend a proposed $800 million bond package that Mayor Mike Johnston wants on the November ballot. State of play: An executive committee handpicked by Johnston — including former Mayor Federico Peña and Denver City Council president Amanda Sandoval — submitted a list of recommended infrastructure projects to Johnston after months of public input. The process drew more than 6,200 survey responses and nearly 1,000 town hall attendees. The big picture: The proposal spans streets, bridges, parks and public safety — but lacks a clear cornerstone project to define the bond. Instead, it focuses on dozens of smaller, long-awaited fixes and new additions: 🏥 Public health and safety New first responder training center A children's advocacy center Upgrades to Denver Health's Westside clinic Denver Animal Shelter expansion 🌳 Parks and public spaces Build-out of two new parks at Emporia Park and Park Hill Park Safety lighting on Cherry Creek and High Line trails Sloan's Lake cleanup Renovations to the Decker, Montbello and Blair Caldwell African American Research libraries 🏘️ Housing and culture A co-located library and housing project in East Denver Site prep for a future American Indian Cultural Embassy 🚧 Infrastructure Santa Fe improvements between Sixth and 13th Avenues — a notorious choke point. Bridge and viaduct repairs, including Cherry Creek crossings and the Quebec bridge over Airlawn Road Upgrades to the Marion and 38th and Blake underpasses What's next: Johnston will review the recommendations and, in the coming weeks, submit a formal package to the Denver City Council, which must vote to put it on the Nov. 4 ballot.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store