Chris Hayes: SCOTUS effectively pardoned Trump. Now he wants to extend that same immunity to others.
This is an adapted excerpt from the May 28 episode of 'All In with Chris Hayes.'
Donald Trump is the first felon ever elected president of the United States, and now, months into his second term, he's handing out 'get out of jail free' cards.
In recent days, the president has gone on something of a pardon spree: On Wednesday alone, Trump granted clemency to at least a half-dozen people, including a pardon for John Roland, the former Republican governor of Connecticut, who was convicted in two federal criminal cases; rapper NBA YoungBoy, who was sentenced to nearly two years in prison in a federal gun case; and former 1st Lt. Mark Bashaw, who was court-martialed for disobeying Covid rules.
Last year, you may remember that Trump's handpicked Supreme Court ruled that almost anything the president does that could be construed as an official act cannot be criminally prosecuted. It was a wild ruling, based on invented doctrine. It was also effectively a pardon from the court.
It appears Trump now wants to reorient the entire federal justice system to extend that same immunity to anyone he deems similarly above the law.
Just consider Trump's pardon of Paul Walzak, a Florida nursing home executive who pleaded guilty to tax crimes last year, less than two weeks after Trump was elected.
According to The New York Times, Walzak started angling for a pardon from the incoming president almost immediately, submitting a pardon application to Trump right around Inauguration Day. 'The application focused not solely on [his] offenses but also on the political activity of his mother, Elizabeth Fago,' the Times reports.
The application noted that Fago had raised millions of dollars for Republican campaigns, including Trump's. 'It also highlighted her connections to an effort to sabotage [Joe Biden's] 2020 campaign by publicizing the addiction diary of his daughter Ashley Biden — an episode that drew law enforcement scrutiny,' the Times reports.
It would appear that was not enough to sway the president, however. So Walzak's mother tried a different approach. Last month, Fago was invited to a $1 million-per-person fundraising dinner at Mar-a-Lago that promised face-to-face access to Trump. Less than three weeks after she attended the dinner, Trump signed a full and unconditional pardon for her son.
That pardon means Walzak avoided an 18-month prison sentence. He also no longer has to pay the government more than $4 million in restitution, which sounds like a pretty good return on an investment in a $1 million fundraiser. To be clear, we do not know that the pardon was connected to the fundraiser — maybe it was all a coincidence! — but the timing is awfully suspicious.
The topic of selling pardons was certainly a concern for judges when Trump's immunity case was before a federal appeals court last year. After one of the judges asked Trump's attorney John Sauer if a president could sell pardons or military secrets, he replied that while the sale of military secrets 'might not be held to be an official act,' that 'the sale of pardons is something that has come up historically and was not prosecuted.'
For Trump, it appears the law is not for seeking justice against wealthy tax cheats with well-connected mothers. Nor is it for locking up Trump supporters who stormed the Capitol. No, those people — including the ones who assaulted police officers and the ones convicted of seditious conspiracy — got a full, unconditional pardon on Trump's very first day.
On his second day, Trump pardoned a man named Ross Ulbricht, the so-called martyr of the Bitcoin movement, who ran the drug trafficking website known as the Silk Road, a marketplace where you could purchase, for instance, fentanyl — which this administration talks so much about wanting to keep outside our borders.
Trump was clear that Ulbricht's pardon was to honor the Libertarian Movement, 'which supported me so strongly.' Incidentally, Ulbricht met with Trump's buddy Roger Stone earlier this month (another recipient of a presidential pardon). This week, Ulbricht also spoke at a Bitcoin conference, along with Vice President JD Vance and the president's sons Eric and Don Jr.
It seems that, in Trump's view, when drug trafficking is facilitated by brown people from foreign countries, it's a crisis so severe that it requires the U.S. to effectively end due process. But when drug trafficking is facilitated by a clean-cut libertarian guy who looks like a peer of the vice president and his sons, it's something to be tolerated, if not commended.
We are seeing this story play out over and over again, especially when it comes to what we used to call corruption, or white-collar crime. Especially when it involves the category of people who Trump might have as Mar-a-Lago members.
Like Carlos Watson, the founder of Ozy media, who was sentenced to nearly a decade in prison after being convicted of fraud and aggravated identity theft. In March, Trump commuted his sentence.
Also in March, Trump pardoned three co-founders of the crypto exchange BitMEX after they pleaded guilty last year to a bank secrecy violation.
That same month, Trump pardoned Trevor Milton, founder of an electric vehicle startup, who was sentenced to four years in prison for securities fraud. Milton, along with his wife, also happened to donate nearly $2 million to a Trump re-election fund late last year.
Also in March, Trump pardoned Brian Kelsey, a former Tennessee Republican state senator, who pleaded guilty to charges stemming from a campaign finance scheme.
In April, Trump pardoned former Nevada Republican lawmaker Michelle Fiore, a MAGA loyalist who was found guilty on wire fraud charges last year. At trial, prosecutors said she raised $70,000 to build a statue for a fallen police officer and then used some of the money on cosmetic surgery instead.
This week, Trump announced he would pardon Todd and Julie Chrisley, the reality TV stars who were convicted on multiple counts of fraud and tax evasion. He also pardoned Michael Grimm, a former Republican congressman from New York and Newsmax commentator who spent seven months in prison a decade ago after pleading guilty to one count of tax fraud.
But Trump wasn't done there. On Wednesday, the president said he was open to pardoning the right-wing extremists convicted of a plot to kidnap Michigan's Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer back in 2020.
The power of presidential pardons and clemency can be a very good thing. In most presidencies in my lifetime, it's been woefully underused. But Trump is not acting in good faith. Instead, he has decided that the purpose of the pardon is to protect those who are loyal to him or who commit the kind of crimes he thinks are no big deal.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tariff fight escalates as Trump appeals second court loss
The Trump administration is fighting to pause a second court ruling that blocked President Donald Trump's sweeping and so-called reciprocal tariffs, the signature economic policy of his second term. The administration's new appeal, filed Monday in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, comes less than a week after a very similar court challenge played out in the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) in New York, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington. At issue in both cases is Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to enact his sweeping "Liberation Day" tariff plan. The plan, which Trump announced on April 2, invokes IEEPA for both his 10% baseline tariff on most U.S. trading partners and a so-called "reciprocal tariff" against other countries. Trump Tariff Plan Faces Uncertain Future As Court Battles Intensify Trump's use of the emergency law to invoke widespread tariffs was struck down unanimously last week by the three-judge CIT panel, which said the statute does not give Trump "unbounded" power to implement tariffs. However, the decision was almost immediately stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals, allowing Trump's tariffs to continue. But in a lesser-discussed ruling on the very same day, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras, an Obama appointee, determined that Trump's tariffs were unlawful under IEEPA. Read On The Fox News App Since the case before him had more limited reach than the case heard by the CIT – plaintiffs in the suit focused on harm to two small businesses, versus harm from the broader tariff plan – it went almost unnoticed in news headlines. But that changed on Monday. Trump Denounces Court's 'Political' Tariff Decision, Calls On Supreme Court To Act Quickly Lawyers for the Justice Department asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit – a Washington-based but still separate court than the Federal Court of Appeals – to immediately stay the judge's ruling. They argued in their appeal that the judge's ruling against Trump's use of IEEPA undercuts his ability to use tariffs as a "credible threat" in trade talks, at a time when such negotiations "currently stand at a delicate juncture." "By holding the tariffs invalid, the district court's ruling usurps the President's authority and threatens to disrupt sensitive, ongoing negotiations with virtually every trading partner by undercutting the premise of those negotiations – that the tariffs are a credible threat," Trump lawyers said in the filing. Economists also seemed to share this view that the steep tariffs were more a negotiating tactic than an espousal of actual policy, which they noted in a series of interviews last week with Fox News Digital. Trump Tariff Plan Faces Uncertain Future As Court Battles Intensify The bottom line for the Trump administration "is that they need to get back to a place [where] they are using these huge reciprocal tariffs and all of that as a negotiating tactic," William Cline, an economist and senior fellow emeritus at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said in an interview. Cline noted that this was the framework previously laid out by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who had embraced the tariffs as more of an opening salvo for future trade talks, including between the U.S. and China. "I think the thing to keep in mind there is that Trump and Vance have this view that tariffs are beautiful because they will restore America's Rust Belt jobs and that they'll collect money while they're doing it, which will contribute to fiscal growth," said Cline, the former deputy managing director and chief economist of the Institute of International Finance. "Those are both fantasies." What comes next in the case remains to be seen. The White House said it will take its tariff fight to the Supreme Court if necessary. Counsel for the plaintiffs echoed that view in an interview with Fox News. But it's unclear if the Supreme Court would choose to take up the case, which comes at a time when Trump's relationship with the judiciary has come under increasing strain. In the 20 weeks since the start of his second White House term, lawyers for the Trump administration have filed 18 emergency appeals to the high court, indicating both the pace and breadth of the tense court article source: Tariff fight escalates as Trump appeals second court loss
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Neighbors, former coworker reacts to death of Lenoir man killed in Catawba County mass shooting
LENOIR, N.C. (QUEEN CITY NEWS) – We are learning more about the man who died in the Catawba County mass shooting from neighbors and a past coworker. Shawn Hood was killed when someone opened fire at a house party in Catawba County, while 11 other people were injured. On Hood's driveway Monday, we found a project he was finishing up. Several neighbors we spoke with said he kept to himself. One neighbor we spoke with did not wish to be identified. MORE | 'He tried to do some work there by himself and he just had some other friends from the outside come over and say hi or hang out with him,' the neighbor said. 'That was about it.' The neighbor said at one point Hood lived in a home on Idlewood St. in Lenoir with his wife and son, but the couple later divorced. Other neighbors we spoke with didn't even know that Hood died this weekend. No neighbor seemed to know why he was at that party. MORE | 'I can't believe it,' the neighbor said. 'What was the 58-year-old doing with a bunch of teenagers? I don't know.' A former coworker we spoke with said during COVID they worked from home, reviewing loans for the Small Business Administration. When their contracts ended last year, she said they did loan reviews for small businesses following Hurricane Helene through a nonprofit. She adds that Hood played baseball and gave lessons in the community – and that he was a nice guy who did not deserve to be murdered. 'It has nothing to do with gun violence,' the neighbor said. 'It had to do with a vengeance attitude. Stupid kid with guns. The guns didn't kill the people, the people killed the people.' Authorities are offering a $15,000 reward for information that leads to any arrests. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Budget Axes Program That Keeps Poor People From Freezing To Death At Home
WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump wants to make some pretty devastating cuts to the Department of Health and Human Services in his new 2026 budget request. But one of the cruelest is a line buried in HHS' Budget in Brief: 'The budget eliminates funding for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program.' The federal block grant program, often referred to as LIHEAP, has been around for decades and helps millions of people in low-income households pay their energy bills. Critically, it helps seniors, families with children, and people with disabilities keep their heat on in the dead of winter and cool air blowing in the sweltering days of summer. More than 6 million households currently rely on LIHEAP for help with energy bills. The Trump administration appears to justify gutting LIHEAP by tying it to diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in government, all of which Trump wants to eradicate. 'Savings come from eliminating radical diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and critical race theory programs, which weaponized large swaths of the Federal Government against the American people and moving programs that are better suited for States and localities to provide,' reads the HHS budget brief, just before it calls for zeroing out LIHEAP funding. To be sure, the president's budget request isn't going to become law. It has to make its way through Congress, where lawmakers will make all kinds of changes to it. But it's going to fall on Republicans to fight to preserve LIHEAP. The Trump administration has already crippled the low-income energy program. On April 1, HHS announced it was putting 10,000 federal employees on administrative leave through June 2, at which they would be terminated. This included the entire staff running LIHEAP. Twenty state attorneys general intervened in May and sued HHS, claiming the mass firings were illegal and calling for everyone's jobs to be restored. The lawsuit is still underway. State administrators that provide LIHEAP assistance still have federal money to keep operating this year, but without federal staff, the program's future looks grim. Trump zeroing out its entire budget certainly feels like its death knell. While Republicans in Congress are overwhelmingly beholden to Trump, they don't have strong margins in either chamber. If even a handful of GOPers push back on a provision in a bill, their opposition could tank the whole thing. LIHEAP could draw such pushback. House and Senate Republicans have called on HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to restore the program's staff and vouched for its need. Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), one of the most politically vulnerable in his party, told Kennedy in April the program is 'vital' to his community. 'The program supports our most vulnerable populations, including seniors, individuals with disabilities, and households with young children under the age of six,' Lawler wrote to Kennedy. 'In FY 2023, 24% of New Yorkers reported being unable to pay their energy bill at least once in a 12-month period. During FY 2023, LIHEAP also helped prevent over 100,000 utility disconnections in New York alone, highlighting this program's critical need.' Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) led a bipartisan letter to Kennedy in April urging him to reverse course on LIHEAP staff cuts. 'We write regarding reports that you have terminated staff responsible for administering the LowIncome Home Energy Program,' reads their letter, signed by 13 senators. 'If true, these terminations threaten to devastate a critical program dedicated to helping Americans afford their home energy bills. 'It is an indispensable lifeline, helping to ensure that recipients do not have to choose between paying their energy bills and affording other necessities like food and medicine,' said the senators. Separately, Murkowski directly told the HHS secretary in May how crucial LIHEAP assistance is for people in her state. 'For us it's not a budget line item,' she told Kennedy as he testified before a Senate committee. 'You've been to Alaska. You know that the temperatures there can get really, really tough. [LIHEAP] keeps people from freezing to death in their homes.' The fate of LIHEAP will almost certainly come up this week on Capitol Hill, with both the House and Senate back in session and Trump's budget request now awaiting their action. Aides to Murkowski, Collins and Lawler did not immediately respond to requests for comment relating to Trump's budget request zeroing out LIHEAP funding.
