Shocking new claim made at rape trial of Irish firefighter accused of attacking drunk woman in Boston hotel
An Irish firefighter accused of raping a drunk lawyer during a St. Patrick's Day trip to Boston left no DNA on her body, his trial was told.
Terrence Crosbie's attorneys told a Boston court on Wednesday that the lack of genetic material suggested their client was innocent of the March 2024 sex attack.
Crosbie, who was visiting Boston from Dublin for St Patrick's Day, is accused of raping the 29 year-old lawyer shortly after she'd had drunken but consensual sex with his hotel roommate Liam O'Brien, the Boston Globe reported.
During Wednesday's hearing, the court was also told how a vaginal tear had been found during a medical examination on the woman afterwards.
But defense attorneys asserted that the injury could have happened during the consensual encounter at the Omni Parker House hotel with O'Brien, who is also a firefighter.
They further alleged the woman had gaps in her memory, didn't know the name of the man she had slept with, and failed to mention any tattoos - despite the suspect having visible ink on his body.
Crosbie, a married father of two daughters, was away from his family for the fateful trip to Boston and was arrested on a JetBlue flight as he tried to flee back to Ireland.
'Would you be surprised if she said otherwise?' an officer asked. 'One hundred percent,' he replied.
Sounding agitated, Crosbie then asked: 'Am I being accused of something or is Liam being accused of something?'
He recounted drinking at several bars, including The Dubliner and The Black Rose, before returning to the hotel and finding O'Brien in their room 'with a girl.' Not wanting to intrude, he said he waited in a hallway chair for hours.
Later, he returned to the room, used his key card to enter, and said: 'Is it OK if I come in?'
He told police he used the flashlight on his phone, saw no one in the room, and got into bed. Moments later, the woman left the room. 'I didn't see anyone,' he said.
The woman, however, told the court that after consensual sex with O'Brien, she moved to the second bed and woke up to find another man assaulting her.
She alleges that man is Crosbie, who denies a charge of rape.
'I woke up, and a guy was inside of me,' she said tearfully, reading a text she sent to a friend shortly after the alleged incident.
Boston Police Detective Joseph McDonough confirmed that Crosbie's DNA was not found on the woman, and that she never mentioned any tattoos - which would have been visible in 'booking photos.'
Defense attorney Daniel Reilly grilled McDonough about inconsistencies in the woman's account, including the fact that she didn't know O'Brien's name and failed to mention hugging or shaking hands with Crosbie earlier that night.
'Fair to say you were aware [the woman] had gaps in her memory?' Reilly asked. 'Yes,' McDonough replied.
Security footage showed the woman and O'Brien entering the hotel at 11:51 p.m., with Crosbie arriving shortly after. Lock records showed him entering the room at 1:55 a.m., and the woman leaving at 2:16 a.m.
Medical staff testified that the woman had a 'vaginal tear', but confirmed it could result from consensual sex.
'Would you agree that could be from consensual sexual activity?' Reilly asked nurse Lindsay Walsh. 'Yes,' she responded.
Crosbie's legal team now suggests the woman may have mistakenly believed she was assaulted by the wrong man - setting the stage for a high-stakes battle over memory, evidence, and identity in the days ahead.
Earlier in the trial, the woman wept in Suffolk Superior Court as she recalled the moment she woke up to a man 'inside of her' at the historic downtown hotel.
Crosbie, who was in town as part of a Dublin Fire Brigade delegation for the St. Patrick's Day parade, has been jailed since his arrest. Prosecutors described the incident as a 'nightmare' attack on a sleeping woman.
The woman - whose identity is being withheld - became emotional as she viewed photographs of the hotel room and security footage of herself leaving.
She testified that Crosbie whispered: 'This guy is sleeping. I know you want this.'
She said she screamed: 'What are you doing? Stop!'
Under questioning, she told the jury Crosbie followed her around the room, tried to kiss her, and pushed her against the wall as she gathered her belongings.
'I just wanted to get out of there,' she sobbed. 'I didn't know anyone. I just wanted to get out.'
She said she had spent March 14 bar hopping - starting with a work party at Big Night Live at 1:45 p.m., then heading to State Street Provisions, and ending up at The Black Rose around 9 p.m.
She admitted drinking five or six beers but insisted she was 'totally coherent,' saying alcohol had no 'negative impact' on her judgment, even if it made her feel 'looser.'
After meeting O'Brien at The Black Rose, she went back to his hotel room at around 11:30 p.m. - unaware he was sharing it with Crosbie.
She said she had consensual sex with O'Brien before falling asleep in the other bed - only to allegedly wake up to the assault moments later.
Back in 2017 Crosbie wrote about wanting to visit Amsterdam and see a soccer game before adding a questionable comment
The Irish fireman is accused of raping a woman in Boston has a history of disturbing posts, including one where he shared his desire to 'rupture his wife's cervix'
Prosecutor Daniela Mendes told jurors that Crosbie returned to the room, found the woman 'vulnerable and defenseless,' and 'took full, violent advantage of it.'
Reilly, meanwhile, continued to press the accuser on her shifting account, asking about the lighting in the room and whether she accurately recalled what Crosbie said.
'It's fair to say your testimony from yesterday doesn't match what you first told the detective?' he asked. 'Yes,' she replied.
At the hospital, her blood alcohol level was .135 - well over the legal driving limit of 0.08. When asked if she was still impaired at the time, she said: 'I guess.'
However, nurse Carly Littlejohn testified the woman was medically cleared to undergo evidence collection - indicating she was sober enough to give informed consent for the procedure.
Last year, DailyMail.com reported on Crosbie's disturbing social media history.
In a 2017 post, he wrote about wanting to visit Amsterdam to watch a football game, saying: 'Ajax away be a descent (sic) trip. 6ft blondes & most unreported rape capital of Europe sure even if it's Vigo vs Lyon be worth a trip.'
And in a 2021 tweet to his wife on her birthday, he wrote: 'Happy Birthday babe. I will rupture your cervix later.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
GCHQ intern jailed over data breach which risked exposing 17 colleagues
Manchester University computer science student Hasaan Arshad, 25, was in 'flagrant breach' of tight security rules when he used his mobile phone to remove material from a computer system and transfer it to his private computer on August 24 2022. The defendant, who has an autism spectrum disorder, was said to be an academically gifted 'perfectionist' who was motivated by a desire to complete the project he had been tasked with at GCHQ as his placement was coming to an end. But sentencing him on Friday, Mrs Justice McGowan said his was 'intellectual arrogance' and he acted under the belief that the 'rules do not apply to him'. Arshad, from Rochdale, Greater Manchester, pleaded guilty to an offence under the Computer Misuse Act which carries a maximum penalty of life in prison. The defendant also admitted two charges of making an indecent photograph of a child in relation to 40 category A videos and four category B videos downloaded from the dark web and found on his personal phone following his arrest. Sentencing, Mrs Justice McGowan jailed Arshad for six years for the data breach and a further year and a half for the sexual offences. She said: 'The risk raised by this conduct was at the highest level. 'I accept there is no evidence of any intention to sell, disclose or ransom the material. 'The risk was obvious and the actual damage that might have followed is incalculable.' The judge went on: 'The consequences are that all the material taken and anything linked to it is now valueless at best and positively dangerous at worst. 'It has been destroyed and alternatives have had to be found. There is a huge economic loss, additionally there is a loss of trust with our allies and damage to the standing of our security which can only be of benefit to others. Additionally these acts have damaged the security of others working for GCHQ.' Part of the hearing – including a detailed assessment of the harm caused – was held behind closed doors in the absence of the press and public. However, the court was told that Arshad's actions 'lost a tool' being developed at GCHQ, risked exposing the identities of 17 GCHQ colleagues, and undermined the trust of partners. Opening the facts in open court, prosecutor Duncan Atkinson KC said the data breach also 'created a significant risk of damage to national security'. The Government Communications Headquarters – known as GCHQ – is the UK's intelligence, security and cyber agency and plays an important role in keeping the country safe, in conjunction with MI5 and the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6). The highest levels of security are needed for GCHQ to carry out its work to gain information about threats to the UK from 'hostile states or terrorists' by using lawful covert tools and techniques, the court was told. Mr Atkinson said: 'Put bluntly, if hostile states or terrorists were aware of how GCHQ was able to gather intelligence about their plans, they would be able to prevent the intelligence community in the UK from learning of those plans at a stage and to an extent that allows the intelligence community to thwart them.' At the time of the offence, Arshad was coming to the end of an industry year placement with a technical development team which required him to work at a secure GCHQ site near Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, and use computer systems. The court heard he was part of a team that worked on the development of 'tools and techniques' to obtain information about threats to the UK. Arshad had undergone GCHQ induction and was required to sign the Official Secrets Act. It was made 'abundantly clear' to Arshad that his access to top secret material had to be in controlled circumstances at 'an extremely secure location', Mr Atkinson said. He went on: 'In flagrant breach of those obvious and necessary restrictions, the defendant used a mobile handset provided for his use whilst on his work placement but with strictly confined scope as to its permitted use, to remove top secret material from the top secret network of the technical development team to which he had been attached. 'He then transported that material from the secure location where he had been working to his home, risking it falling into the wrong hands or being lost, and downloaded it onto a removable hard drive which formed part of the IT system that he used at his home address. 'This significant security breach compromised lawful intelligence-related activity that was being undertaken in the national interest. In doing so, he threw away many thousands of hours of work, and significant sums of taxpayers' money.' Mr Atkinson said his actions had damaged 'confidence in UK security' because the data included the identities of a 'significant number' of GCHQ colleagues and put others' safety at 'direct risk'. Following his arrest, the defendant, who went on to achieve a first class honours degree, admitted removing data without authorisation 'out of curiosity' saying he had no intention to share it. He told police: 'I'm sorry for my actions and I understand the stupidity of what I have done.' Arshad said he 'went out of my way' to ensure the data was stored locally and not in the cloud. Mitigating, Nina Grahame KC said the defendant had been 'reckless' 'thoughtless and naive' and put his 'possessive' desire to complete his project above all else. He took the data home because he wanted to 'continue and complete the most exciting and challenging work the defendant had ever undertaken' in the hope of gaining future employment at GCHQ, Ms Grahame said. The court was told Arshad was driven by ambition and perfectionism having achieved the second highest mark in the country for his computer science A level. His parents were 'distraught and heartbroken' at what happened and 'feared' for his wellbeing in prison, Ms Grahame added. Bethan David, head of the Crown Prosecution Service Counter Terrorism Division, said: 'Hasaan Arshad knew his actions were prohibited after he signed the Official Secrets Act and received his induction training. 'His conduct was deliberate and intentional, and represented a flagrant breach of the obvious and necessary rules in place. 'The Crown Prosecution Service will always seek to prosecute anyone that knowingly jeopardises and endangers the safety of our country.'
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
GCHQ intern jailed over data breach which risked exposing 17 colleagues
Manchester University computer science student Hasaan Arshad, 25, was in 'flagrant breach' of tight security rules when he used his mobile phone to remove material from a computer system and transfer it to his private computer on August 24 2022. The defendant, who has an autism spectrum disorder, was said to be an academically gifted 'perfectionist' who was motivated by a desire to complete the project he had been tasked with at GCHQ as his placement was coming to an end. But sentencing him on Friday, Mrs Justice McGowan said his was 'intellectual arrogance' and he acted under the belief that the 'rules do not apply to him'. Arshad, from Rochdale, Greater Manchester, pleaded guilty to an offence under the Computer Misuse Act which carries a maximum penalty of life in prison. The defendant also admitted two charges of making an indecent photograph of a child in relation to 40 category A videos and four category B videos downloaded from the dark web and found on his personal phone following his arrest. Sentencing, Mrs Justice McGowan jailed Arshad for six years for the data breach and a further year and a half for the sexual offences. She said: 'The risk raised by this conduct was at the highest level. 'I accept there is no evidence of any intention to sell, disclose or ransom the material. 'The risk was obvious and the actual damage that might have followed is incalculable.' The judge went on: 'The consequences are that all the material taken and anything linked to it is now valueless at best and positively dangerous at worst. 'It has been destroyed and alternatives have had to be found. There is a huge economic loss, additionally there is a loss of trust with our allies and damage to the standing of our security which can only be of benefit to others. Additionally these acts have damaged the security of others working for GCHQ.' Part of the hearing – including a detailed assessment of the harm caused – was held behind closed doors in the absence of the press and public. However, the court was told that Arshad's actions 'lost a tool' being developed at GCHQ, risked exposing the identities of 17 GCHQ colleagues, and undermined the trust of partners. Opening the facts in open court, prosecutor Duncan Atkinson KC said the data breach also 'created a significant risk of damage to national security'. The GCHQ headquarters in Cheltenham (PA) The Government Communications Headquarters – known as GCHQ – is the UK's intelligence, security and cyber agency and plays an important role in keeping the country safe, in conjunction with MI5 and the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6). The highest levels of security are needed for GCHQ to carry out its work to gain information about threats to the UK from 'hostile states or terrorists' by using lawful covert tools and techniques, the court was told. Mr Atkinson said: 'Put bluntly, if hostile states or terrorists were aware of how GCHQ was able to gather intelligence about their plans, they would be able to prevent the intelligence community in the UK from learning of those plans at a stage and to an extent that allows the intelligence community to thwart them.' At the time of the offence, Arshad was coming to the end of an industry year placement with a technical development team which required him to work at a secure GCHQ site near Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, and use computer systems. The court heard he was part of a team that worked on the development of 'tools and techniques' to obtain information about threats to the UK. Arshad had undergone GCHQ induction and was required to sign the Official Secrets Act. It was made 'abundantly clear' to Arshad that his access to top secret material had to be in controlled circumstances at 'an extremely secure location', Mr Atkinson said. He went on: 'In flagrant breach of those obvious and necessary restrictions, the defendant used a mobile handset provided for his use whilst on his work placement but with strictly confined scope as to its permitted use, to remove top secret material from the top secret network of the technical development team to which he had been attached. 'He then transported that material from the secure location where he had been working to his home, risking it falling into the wrong hands or being lost, and downloaded it onto a removable hard drive which formed part of the IT system that he used at his home address. 'This significant security breach compromised lawful intelligence-related activity that was being undertaken in the national interest. In doing so, he threw away many thousands of hours of work, and significant sums of taxpayers' money.' Mr Atkinson said his actions had damaged 'confidence in UK security' because the data included the identities of a 'significant number' of GCHQ colleagues and put others' safety at 'direct risk'. Former GCHQ staff member, Hasaan Arshad, leaving the Old Bailey after a hearing (Ben Whitley/PA) Following his arrest, the defendant, who went on to achieve a first class honours degree, admitted removing data without authorisation 'out of curiosity' saying he had no intention to share it. He told police: 'I'm sorry for my actions and I understand the stupidity of what I have done.' Arshad said he 'went out of my way' to ensure the data was stored locally and not in the cloud. Mitigating, Nina Grahame KC said the defendant had been 'reckless' 'thoughtless and naive' and put his 'possessive' desire to complete his project above all else. He took the data home because he wanted to 'continue and complete the most exciting and challenging work the defendant had ever undertaken' in the hope of gaining future employment at GCHQ, Ms Grahame said. The court was told Arshad was driven by ambition and perfectionism having achieved the second highest mark in the country for his computer science A level. His parents were 'distraught and heartbroken' at what happened and 'feared' for his wellbeing in prison, Ms Grahame added. Bethan David, head of the Crown Prosecution Service Counter Terrorism Division, said: 'Hasaan Arshad knew his actions were prohibited after he signed the Official Secrets Act and received his induction training. 'His conduct was deliberate and intentional, and represented a flagrant breach of the obvious and necessary rules in place. 'The Crown Prosecution Service will always seek to prosecute anyone that knowingly jeopardises and endangers the safety of our country.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Man arrested on suspicion of murder of Annie McCarrick released
A man who was arrested on suspicion of the murder of Annie McCarrick, who went missing from Dublin 32 years ago, has been released without charge. The man in his 60s was arrested on Thursday morning and detained at a Dublin garda station for questioning. Ms McCarrick, originally from Long Island in New York, was 26 when she went missing on March 26 1993. In March 2023, gardai upgraded the missing person inquiry to a murder investigation. The arrest was the first made in the case. The forensic and technical examination of a house and garden in Clondalkin in west Dublin is to continue over the weekend. The search is being supported by a cadaver dog from an external agency and officers said Ms McCarrick's family are being kept updated. Gardai said the current residents of the home are not connected with Ms McCarrick or her disappearance. The American had moved to Ireland to live permanently in January 1993 and was staying in rental accommodation in Sandymount when she went missing two months later. She was not at home on Saturday March 27 when friends called for a dinner she had invited them to, and she had not turned up for work on Saturday or the following Sunday morning. Groceries purchased by Ms McCarrick in Quinnsworth on the Friday morning were found left in her shopping bags. A receipt in the bags confirmed the date and time of purchase as March 26 1993 at 11.02am, her last confirmed activity.
