The US hasn't seen a human bird flu case in 3 months. Experts are wondering why
Has the search for cases been weakened by government cuts? Are immigrant farm workers, who have accounted for many of the U.S. cases, more afraid to come forward for testing amid the Trump administration's deportation push? Is it just a natural ebb in infections?
'We just don't know why there haven't been cases,' said Jennifer Nuzzo, director of the Pandemic Center at Brown University. 'I think we should assume there are infections that are occurring in farmworkers that just aren't being detected.'
The H5N1 bird flu has been spreading widely among wild birds, poultry and other animals around the world for several years, and starting early last year became a problem in people and cows in the U.S.
In the last 14 months, infections have been reported in 70 people in the U.S. — most of them workers on dairy and poultry farms. One person died, but most of the infected people had mild illnesses.
The most recent infections confirmed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were in early February in Nevada, Ohio and Wyoming.
California had been a hotspot, with three-quarters of the nation's infections in dairy cattle. But testing and cases among people have fallen off. At least 50 people were tested each month in late 2024, but just three people were tested in March, one in April and none in May so far, state records show. Overall, the state has confirmed H5N1 infections in 38 people, none after Jan. 14.
During a call with U.S. doctors this month, one CDC official noted that there is a seasonality to bird flu: Cases peak in the fall and early winter, possibly due to the migration patterns of wild birds that are primary spreaders of the virus.
That could mean the U.S. is experiencing a natural — maybe temporary — decline in cases.
It's unlikely that a severe human infection, requiring hospitalization, would go unnoticed, said Michael Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases.
What's more, a patchwork system that monitors viruses in sewage and wastewater has suggested limited activity recently.
New infections are still being detected in birds and cattle, but not as frequently as several months ago.
'Given the fact that the number of animal detections has fallen according to USDA data, it's not surprising that human cases have declined as well,' the CDC said in a statement.
Dr. Gregory Gray said he wasn't concerned about the CDC not identifying new cases in months.
'I don't think that anybody's hiding anything,' said Gray, an infectious disease speicialist at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston.
But Osterholm and some other experts think it's likely that at least some milder infections are going undetected. And they worry that the effort to find them has been eroding.
Resignations at the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration's Center for Veterinary Medicine could slow the government's bird flu monitoring, said Keith Poulsen, director of the Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory.
Three of 14 experts accepted deferred resignation offers at the National Animal Health Laboratory Network, which responds to disease outbreaks with crucial diagnostic information, he said. They are among more than 15,000 USDA staff to accept the offers, an agency spokesperson said.
And dozens of staff were fired at the FDA's Veterinary Laboratory Investigation and Response Network, which investigates animal diseases caused by problems including contaminated pet food. Cats in several states have been sickened and died after eating raw pet food found to contain poultry infected with H5N1.
Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan in Canada, said 'targeted surveillance has really dropped off precipitously since Trump took office.'
She wonders if immigrant farmworkers are too scared to come forward.
'I can't argue with anyone who would be risking getting shipped to a Salvadoran gulag for reporting an exposure or seeking testing,' she said.
The CDC characterizes the risk to the general public as low, although it is higher for people who work with cattle and poultry or who are in contact with wild birds.
Earlier this month, an agency assessment said there is a 'moderate risk' that currently circulating strains of bird flu could cause a future pandemic, but the CDC stressed that other emerging forms of bird flu has been similarly labeled in the past.
Still, research is continuing.
Texas A&M University scientists have collected blood samples from dairy workers in multiple states to test for signs of past H5N1 exposure, said David Douphrate, a workplace health and safety expert leading the project. The yearlong study is funded by a nearly $4 million grant from the CDC and is expected to conclude in July.
Douphrate said he leveraged two decades of relationships with dairy producers and workers to gain access to the farms.
'We have had very good participation,' Douphrate said. 'They have been very willing.'
Similar surveillance is 'urgently needed' among domestic cats, said Kristen Coleman, a researcher at the University of Maryland at College Park who studies emerging animal diseases. She recently released a paper reviewing bird flu in infections in cats between 2004 and 2024.
Barn cats that died after drinking raw milk were one of the first signs that dairy cows were becoming infected with bird flu in 2024. Since then, the Agriculture Department has confirmed more than 120 domestic cats infected with the virus across the U.S.
Infections have mostly been found in cats that died. Less is known about milder infections, whether cats can recover from bird flu — or whether the virus can spill over into people.
Coleman has been collecting blood samples from cats across the U.S. to see if they have evidence of previous exposure to the virus. But the process is slow and research funding is uncertain.
'It's easy to downplay something because that's usually what humans do,' she said. 'But what we really need to be doing is ramping up.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
Proposed rule bans nearly all abortions at VA hospitals
The VA said in the proposal that it is reversing a 2022 rule that for the first time allowed the department to provide abortions in limited circumstances to pregnant veterans and their eligible family members, even in states that banned abortion after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Between 1999 and 2022, the VA excluded almost all abortions and abortion counseling for veterans and their families from their medical benefits package. By reversing the rule, officials are seeking to ensure taxpayer dollars are not used to terminate pregnancies, according to a filing released Friday. They also called the Biden administration's decision to implement the interim rule 'inappropriate' and 'legally questionable.' A final rule could come as soon as the public comment period on the measure closes on Sept. 3. Reproductive rights groups said the move robbed service members of the ability to control their bodies and their futures. 'Since taking office, the Trump administration has repeatedly attacked service members, veterans, and their families' access to basic reproductive care, including gender-affirming care,' Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said, referring to the VA's decision in March to stop providing transgender veterans with hormone therapy. 'Taking away access to health care shows us that the Trump administration will always put politics and retribution over people's lives.' Anti-abortion groups, meanwhile, applauded the Trump administration's decision, calling it a 'major win' for the movement. 'Instead of prioritizing the real and urgent needs of our veterans, the Biden-Harris Administration turned VA hospitals into abortion centers – violating longstanding law and betraying the will of the American people who strongly oppose forced taxpayer-funded abortions,' the anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America said in a statement. 'Thankfully, this injustice is now corrected.'


Time Magazine
24 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
'Flesh-Eating' Bacteria Cases Rising on Gulf Coast: What to Know
At least eight people along the Gulf Coast have died and 22 others have been infected in what local health officials are warning is a rise in cases involving 'flesh-eating' bacteria. The Louisiana Department of Health issued an alert last week saying that there had been 17 cases of Vibrio vulnificus in the state so far this year. All of those patients were hospitalized, and four died. 'This represents a higher number of Vibrio vulnificus cases and deaths than are typically reported,' the department said. 'During the same time period over the previous 10 years, an average of seven Vibrio vulnificus cases and one death were reported each year.' Meanwhile, health officials in Florida have reported 13 cases this year, as of July 24. Four of those cases have resulted in death. Public health experts have generally attributed the rise in cases to climate change. Here's what to know about the bacteria. What is Vibrio vulnificus? Vibrio vulnificus is a type of Vibrio bacteria, many species of which can cause an infection known as vibriosis. Vibrio vulnificus bacteria 'cause the most serious forms of vibriosis,' according to the Cleveland Clinic. Infections can lead to painful blisters, fever, internal bleeding, organ damage, sepsis, and even death, the clinic said. Vibrio vulnificus can also cause necrotizing fasciitis, which is 'a severe infection in which the flesh around an open wound dies,' according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). While Vibrio vulnificus is often referred to as 'flesh-eating bacteria,' the CDC said that many public health experts don't consider it to be the most common cause of necrotizing fasciitis in the country. Read More: Be Careful Where You Swim This Summer How common are infections? Vibrio vulnificus infections are rare. According to the Cleveland Clinic, there are only about 100 to 200 confirmed cases in the country each year. Infections caused by other types of Vibrio bacteria are more common than Vibrio vulnificus. There are about 80,000 vibriosis cases across the country every year, according to the CDC, about 52,000 of which are caused by eating food contaminated with Vibrio bacteria. How is the bacteria transmitted, and how can you protect yourself? Vibrio bacteria typically live in salt water and brackish water, which is a combination of salt water and fresh water, according to the CDC. People can become infected with Vibrio vulnificus from eating raw shellfish, typically oysters, according to the Cleveland Clinic. The bacteria can also infect people who are exposed to seawater or brackish water, via a wound or break in their skin. Most cases occur during the summer, between May and October, when the water is typically warmer. The Cleveland Clinic advises people to reduce their risk of getting infected by avoiding eating raw or undercooked shellfish, washing their hands after preparing or touching raw shellfish, and avoiding contact with seawater and brackish water if they have a wound or new piercing or tattoo, among other measures. Both the Louisiana and Florida Departments of Health warned people with health conditions that put them at increased risk—such as chronic liver disease, kidney disease, or other conditions that compromise their immune systems—to take extra care around the coast. Those individuals 'should wear proper foot protection to prevent cuts and injury caused by rocks and shells on the beach,' the Florida health department advised.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Florida officials warn about risks of raw milk after 21 people sickened
The Florida Department of Health is warning about the risks of drinking raw, unpasteurized milk after 21 people, including six children under the age of 10, were sickened by E. coli and campylobacter bacteria linked to raw milk from the same farm. Seven people have been hospitalized, and two have developed severe complications. "Sanitation practices in this farm are of particular concern due to the number of cases," the department said in a news release. Officials did not identify the farm, but indicated its products were available in Northeast and Central Florida. CBS News has reached out to the health department for more information. Although it is illegal to sell raw milk for human consumption in Florida, it can be sold in the state if it's labeled as a pet food. Raw milk has been promoted by online wellness influencers and raw food advocates, boosting sales in recent years, but public health officials say it can be risky. The Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention say raw milk can carry life-threatening bacteria, such as E. coli, campylobacter, listeria or salmonella. These can cause symptoms including diarrhea, vomiting and stomach cramps. Severe cases can result in a condition called hemolytic uremic syndrome, or HUS, which can lead to kidney failure. Since 1987, 143 outbreaks have been linked to raw milk or raw milk products, some involving miscarriages, stillbirths, kidney failure and even deaths, according to the FDA. Pasteurization — a process of heating the milk — kills these bacteria. Pasteurization is required by federal law for any milk sold across state lines. Some individual states also restrict or ban the sale of raw milk, but others allow it. In an interview with CBS News Miami earlier this year, Mark McAfee, founder of one of the world's largest raw milk producers and head of an advocacy group called the Raw Milk Institute, claimed raw milk offers health benefits such as bioactives that boost the immune system. McAfee sells his raw milk legally in California, where no state law prohibits its sale. But the CDC says such claims are unfounded. "Pasteurized milk offers the same nutritional benefits without the risks of raw milk consumption," the agency says. The Florida Department of Health noted in its statement that "many people consume raw milk safely." But it also advised, "Floridians should be aware of potential risks associated with consumption, which may vary depending on the source of producer's handling of raw milk and milking procedures are vital in prevention of contamination." How safe is our Social Security safety net? Texas House votes to arrest lawmakers who fled state to stop redistricting vote What is "most-favored nation" drug pricing and how does it work? Solve the daily Crossword