DOJ on defense: Dem who beat case sues DOJ, warns border czar he's next: Melber intv
Newark Mayor Ras Baraka is suing Alina Habba — the interim U.S. Attorney for New Jersey and former Trump lawyer — along with a DHS investigator, over his arrest outside an ICE detention facility.. Baraka joins MSNBC's Ari Melber to discuss. (Subscribe to Ari's YouTube now: http://youtube.com/arimelber)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AOC's 6-Word Response To The Donald Trump And Elon Musk Breakup Is Going Viral
We're on day two post-breakup. At this point, we need to remember the "good times." Six months is quite the accomplishment, and honestly, waaay longer than we all thought it would last. One person who had some thoughts about it was AOC. Related: This Senator's Clap Back Fully Gagged An MSNBC Anchor, And The Clip Is Going Viral Here six-word response about it is going viral: Spectrum News/gtconway3d/Twitter: @gtconway3d "The girls are fighting, aren't they?" Related: This Republican Lawmaker's Embarrassing Lack Of Knowledge Of The Term "Intersex" Went Viral After He Proposed An Amendment To Cut LGBTQ+ Funding People in the replies are loving it. "I generally don't care for it when pols do snide, but AOC's charm is so through the roof that she gets away with it," this person commented. "Gonna lib out for a second and say I love her a lot," another person wrote. And this person joked, "Men are too emotional to lead." I'd ALSO like to point out what this person said: "I like how this meme originated with azealia banks chiming in on nicki vs cardi beef in 2018 lol." IYKYK. Also in In the News: People Can't Believe This "Disgusting" Donald Trump Jr. Post About Joe Biden's Cancer Diagnosis Is Real Also in In the News: Republicans Are Calling Tim Walz "Tampon Tim," And The Backlash From Women Is Too Good Not To Share Also in In the News: "We Don't Import Food": 31 Americans Who Are Just So, So Confused About Tariffs And US Trade
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Glitchy, Error-Prone Tool Could Get You Deported—Even If You're a U.S. Citizen
Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily. Juan Carlos Lopez-Gomez, despite his U.S. citizenship and Social Security card, was arrested on April 16 on an unfounded suspicion of him being an 'unauthorized alien.' Immigration and Customs Enforcement kept him in county jail for 30 hours 'based on biometric confirmation of his identity'—an obvious mistake of facial recognition technology. Another U.S. citizen, Jensy Machado, was held at gunpoint and handcuffed by ICE agents. He was another victim of mistaken identity after someone else gave his home address on a deportation order. This is the reality of immigration policing in 2025: Arrest first, verify later. That risk only grows as ICE shreds due process safeguards, citizens and noncitizens alike face growing threats from mistaken identity, and immigration policing agencies increasingly embrace error-prone technology, especially facial recognition. Last month, it was revealed that Customs and Border Protection requested pitches from tech firms to expand their use of an especially error-prone facial recognition technology—the same kind of technology used wrongly to arrest and jail Lopez-Gomez. ICE already has nearly $9 million in contracts with Clearview AI, a facial recognition company with white nationalist ties that was at one point the private facial recognition system most used by federal agencies. When reckless policing is combined with powerful and inaccurate dragnet tools, the result will inevitably be more stories like Lopez-Gomez's and Machado's. Studies have shown that facial recognition technology is disproportionately likely to misidentify people of color, especially Black women. And with the recent rapid increase of ICE activity, facial recognition risks more and more people arbitrarily being caught in ICE's dragnet without rights to due process to prove their legal standing. Even for American citizens who have 'nothing to hide,' simply looking like the wrong person can get you jailed or even deported. While facial recognition's mistakes are dangerous, its potential for abuse when working as intended is even scarier. For example, facial recognition lets Donald Trump use ICE as a more powerful weapon for retribution. The president himself admits he's using immigration enforcement to target people for their political opinions and that he seeks to deport people regardless of citizenship. In the context of a presidential administration that is uncommonly willing to ignore legal procedures and judicial orders, a perfectly accurate facial recognition system could be the most dangerous possibility of all: Federal agents could use facial recognition on photos and footage of protests to identify each of the president's perceived enemies, and they could be arrested and even deported without due process rights. And the more facial recognition technology expands across our daily lives, the more dangerous it becomes. By working with local law enforcement and private companies, including by sharing facial recognition technology, ICE is growing their ability to round people up—beyond what they already can do. This deputization of surveillance infrastructure comes in many forms: Local police departments integrate facial recognition into their body cameras, landlords use facial recognition instead of a key to admit or deny tenants, and stadiums use facial recognition for security. Even New York public schools used facial recognition on their security camera footage until a recent moratorium. Across the country, other states and municipalities have imposed regulations on facial recognition in general, including Boston, San Francisco, Portland, and Vermont. Bans on the technology in schools specifically have been passed in Florida and await the governor's signature in Colorado. Any facial recognition, no matter its intended use, is at inherent risk of being handed over to ICE for indiscriminate or politically retaliatory deportations. At state and local levels, however, there is a way to fight back. For example, there is a package of 'Ban the Scan' bills in the New York State Legislature and New York City Council to curb the use of facial recognition: by police (S5609/A1045), by landlords (A6363 and Intro. 425), by public accommodations (A6211 and Intro. 217), and to make permanent the ban on its use in schools (S3827/A6720). And while New York, the most surveilled city in the country, has the opportunity to lead the way, legislative protections against the risks of facial recognition must proliferate nationwide to fully protect our communities. The only way to completely prevent Trump—or any future authoritarian—from allowing this tech to do his and ICE's bidding is to prevent the use of facial recognition in the first place. Because of the immense power of facial recognition to target political enemies and indiscriminately deport any of us, and because the system's racially biased inaccuracy is already causing wrongful arrests, banning facial recognition is an essential step toward preventing authoritarian overreach. The New York State Legislature can and should pass the Ban the Scan package of facial recognition bills, and the rest of the country should follow suit in protecting communities from this force multiplier for tyranny.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What exactly is Trump's new travel ban about? Not national security
A version of this story appeared in CNN's What Matters newsletter. To get it in your inbox, sign up for free here. Any reasonable American could objectively ask what exactly President Donald Trump's new travel ban, which affects a dozen countries, is about. Is it about protecting Americans from 'murderers,' as Trump said Thursday, or punishing small countries for a modest number of students who overstayed their visas? The drive for Trump's first-term travel ban in 2017 and 2018 was clear. He was seeking to deliver on an ugly campaign promise to ban all Muslims from entering the US. That morphed, over the course of years as the administration adapted to court cases, into a ban on travel to the US by people from certain countries, most of which were majority-Muslim. It was only by agreeing to ignore Trump's anti-Muslim 2016 campaign statements and focus solely on the security-related language in his third attempt at a travel ban that the US Supreme Court ultimately gave its blessing to that ban. '… We must consider not only the statements of a particular President, but also the authority of the Presidency itself,' wrote Chief Justice John Roberts in the majority opinion. Trump is using that authority again in his second term. But this time, as he said Thursday in the Oval Office, the ban is about removing 'horrendous' people who are in the country now and about keeping murderers out. The data suggest the travel ban will primarily affect students and businesspeople from countries in Africa, Asia and the Caribbean as well as the Middle East. It was an attack on Jewish community members in Colorado by an Egyptian national that convinced Trump to speed up plans to ban people from a dozen countries from entering the US, restarting the travel ban policy he pioneered during his first term. But Egypt is not on the travel ban list. Neither is Kuwait, the country where Mohamed Sabry Soliman, the suspect in the Boulder attack, lived before coming to the US. 'Egypt has been a country we deal with very closely. They have things under control,' Trump told reporters Thursday. Instead, the travel ban includes countries that Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who assembled the list, feel don't have things under control. That includes places like Equatorial Guinea in Africa and Burma, also known as Myanmar, in Asia. Neither is a nexus of terror threatening the American homeland. Trump's order announcing the travel ban explains that these countries have high rates of students and other travelers overstaying their visas in the US. It points to a report of DHS 'overstay' data from 2023 to argue that for more than 70% of people from Equatorial Guinea with US student visas, there is no record of them leaving the US when their visa ended. In real numbers, that equals 233 people with student visas. The numbers are similarly small for other African countries. 'They're just throwing things at the wall,' said David Bier, an immigration expert at the libertarian-leaning Cato institute and a Trump immigration policy critic. 'There's not really a coherent philosophy behind any of this,' Bier added. The reinstated travel ban does include countries associated with terrorism, including Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen, all of which were also included in Trump's first-term travel ban. But it's worth noting that no immigrant or traveler from one of these countries has launched a terror attack on the US in recent years, according to a review by the Washington Post during Trump's first term. A man from Sudan killed one person at a Tennessee church in 2017. 'The president claims that there is no way to vet these nationals, yet that is exactly what his consular officers and border officials have successfully done for decades,' Bier said. The man responsible for the ISIS-inspired truck bomb in New Orleans in January, Shamsud-Din Jabbar, was a Texas-born Army veteran and US citizen. The new travel ban also includes Afghanistan, which could jeopardize many Afghans related to those who aided the US during its war there, as Shawn VanDiver, president of the aid organization #AfghanEvac, told CNN's Jim Sciutto on Thursday. 'There are 12,000 people who have been separated through the actions of our government, who have been waiting for more than three and a half years,' he said. The Trump administration recently paused the processing of student visas, interrupting the plans of thousands of people to study in the US. In the Oval Office, Trump said he was not interested in banning students from China. 'It's our honor to have them, frankly, we want to have foreign students, but we want them to be checked,' Trump said, suggesting there will be even more strenuous background checks in the future. The existence of the travel ban list could also factor into tariff negotiations the Trump administration has taken on with nations across the world, as well as its effort to countries nations to take back migrants it wants to deport. 'It's about power and control and manipulating both the US population to suppress dissent as well as trying to manipulate foreign relations with these countries by getting them to do whatever he wants in order to get off the disfavored nation list,' Bier said.
