Pope Leo criticises nuclear deterrence on 80th anniversary of Hiroshima bombing
VATICAN CITY - Pope Leo on Wednesday criticised the "illusory security" of the global nuclear deterrence system, in an appeal on the 80th anniversary of the United States dropping an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima at the end of the Second World War.
Leo, the first U.S.-born pope, said in his weekly audience that the destruction in Hiroshima, which killed about 78,000 people instantly, should serve "as a universal warning against the devastation caused ... by nuclear weapons."
"I hope that in the contemporary world, marked by strong tensions and bloody conflicts, the illusory security based on the threat of mutual destruction will give way to ... the practice of dialogue," said the pontiff.
While the Catholic Church for decades gave tacit acceptance to the system of nuclear deterrence that developed in the Cold War, Leo's predecessor Pope Francis changed the Church's teaching to condemn the possession of nuclear arms.
Francis, who died in April after a 12-year papacy, also strongly backed the U.N. treaty to ban nuclear weapons, which formally went into force in 2021 but has not gained support from any of the nuclear-armed nations.
Leo's appeal on Wednesday came hours after representatives from 120 countries, including the U.S., attended an annual ceremony in Hiroshima to mark the atomic bombing.
Among those attending the ceremony was a delegation of Catholic bishops from Japan, South Korea and the U.S. including Cardinals Blase Cupich of Chicago and Robert McElroy of Washington, D.C.
"We strongly condemn all wars and conflicts, the use and possession of nuclear weapons and the threat to use nuclear weapons," the bishops said in a joint statement on Wednesday. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
17 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Xi looks to tighten grip after scandals shake China's military elite
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Internal turbulence is testing President Xi Jinping's effort to build a military that is loyal, modern, combat-ready and fully under his control. TAIPEI, Taiwan – Outwardly, China's military has never been stronger. Its naval ships venture farther across the oceans. Its nuclear force grows by about 100 warheads every year. Its military flights around Taiwan are increasingly frequent and intimidating. Every few months, China unveils new weapons, like a prototype stealth fighter or newfangled landing barges. Internally, though, China's military is experiencing its most serious leadership disarray in years. Three of the seven seats on the Central Military Commission – the Communist Party council that controls the armed forces – appear to be vacant after members were arrested or simply disappeared. That internal turbulence is testing President Xi Jinping's effort, going back more than a decade, to build a military that is loyal, modern, combat-ready and fully under his control. Mr Xi has set a 2027 target for modernising the People's Liberation Army, or PLA, and also – according to some US officials – for gaining the ability to invade Taiwan, which Beijing claims as its territory. The current wave of investigations and removals has reached some commanders handpicked by Mr Xi, suggesting recurrent problems in a system that he has tried for years to clean up. In the first years after Mr Xi came to power in 2012, he launched an intense campaign to clean up corruption in the military and impose tighter control, culminating in a big reorganisation. 'When Xi Jinping sees his own men making mistakes, he is likely to be especially furious,' Associate Professor Joseph Torigian at American University who has studied Chinese leaders' relations with the military, said of Mr Xi. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Four men arrested in Bukit Timah believed to be linked to housebreaking syndicates Singapore Criminal trial of Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and five others starts Aug 11 Singapore Profile of Kpod user has shifted from hardcore drug users to young people: Experts Tech Former data analyst creates AI tutor that assesses students based on Singapore schools' criteria Opinion Recognising our imperfections is part of what makes Singapore whole Opinion I used to be impatient. Then I became a granddad Business The risks of using 'decoupling' to own two properties Asia Manila struggles to keep a lasting hawker culture, casts eyes on how Asian nations lifted street food 'Control over the military is so existential. It's inherently explosive. That's why any sense of stepping out of line has to be crushed.' The most jarring absence in the military leadership is that of General He Weidong, the second most-senior career officer on the Central Military Commission. He has disappeared from official public events and mentions – an unexplained absence that suggests he, too, is in trouble and may be under investigation. Another top commander, Admiral Miao Hua , who oversaw political work in the military, was placed under investigation in 2024 for unspecified 'serious violations of discipline', a phrase that often refers to corruption or disloyalty. He was among around two dozen, if not more, senior PLA officers and executives in the armaments industry who have been investigated since 2023, according to a recent tally by the Jamestown Foundation. Both men had risen unusually quickly under Mr Xi's patronage. While Chinese officials are vulnerable to investigations for corruption or disloyalty even in the best of times, for him to lose them both reveals an uncommon degree of top-level upheaval. 'The purges may have affected the working of the bureaucracy. It can also create a broader skepticism about the readiness of the Chinese military within the leadership,' said Dr Ely Ratner, who had been an assistant secretary of defence in the Biden administration. Mr Xi's ultimate fears for the Chinese military come from questions of battlefield preparedness, and anxieties that commanders could drift away from absolute loyalty to him and the party. Mr Xi may seek a fourth term as leader of the Communist Party in 2027, and he will need to replace retiring or purged commanders with a new cohort whose devotion to him is beyond question. Recent official statements point to a renewed drive to reinforce ideological control. The Central Military Commission issued new rules in July aimed at 'fully eliminating toxic influences, and restoring the image and authority of political officers.' A series of front-page commentaries in the Liberation Army Daily – the main newspaper of the Chinese military – urged PLA political officers to observe absolute loyalty. Since Mao Zedong's era, the military has served not only as a fighting force but also as a lever of political control for Chinese leaders, as their ultimate protection against potential rivals or popular uprisings. In internal speeches to the military throughout the earlier years in his rule, Mr Xi praised the army for standing by party leaders during the 1989 military crackdown on pro-democracy protests, according to a volume of his speeches to the military published in 2019. There are no signs that the recent turbulence in the military amounts to concerted defiance of Mr Xi. But even relatively few cases of corruption or mismanagement could erode the trust between Mr Xi and his commanders, said Dr Joel Wuthnow, a senior research fellow at the National Defence University in Washington who studies China's military. Mr Xi is the only civilian party leader who sits on the Central Military Commission, which ensures his singular power over the military. That also means that he cannot turn to other civilian officials to help him. 'Xi would have to rely on commanders to develop options and implement them based on a huge amount of information and technical skills,' Dr Wuthnow said. 'If he's unable to verify that those people are honest, professional and competent, then I think his appetite for war goes down because: How can he be sure of the outcome?' The purges are likely to disrupt coordination, weaken confidence in commanders and prompt Beijing to be more wary of considering an amphibious assault on Taiwan, Professor M. Taylor Fravel, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, wrote recently in Foreign Affairs. 'The high intensity kinds of operations that would be involved in an invasion of Taiwan, or a blockade of Taiwan – pretty much anything that would happen under the shadow of US involvement – I think will be impacted for a period of time by these problems,' Prof Fravel said in a telephone interview. But the need to act strongly in a crisis against foes might override any doubts about combat readiness, Prof Fravel said. If Mr Xi felt that a war on Taiwan was necessary, he would most likely not hesitate to send his armed forces into battle, whatever the gaps in the top command, Prof Fravel said. NYTIMES
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Armenians caught between hope and distrust after accord with Azerbaijan
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox YEREVAN - The streets were almost deserted in Yerevan on Aug 9 because of the summer heat, but at shaded parks and fountains, Armenians struggled to make sense of what the accord signed a day earlier in Washington means for them. The leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan, two Caucasian countries embroiled in a territorial conflict since the fall of the USSR, met on Aug 8 and signed a peace treaty under the watch of US President Donald Trump. In Yerevan, however, few of the people asked by AFP were enthusiastic. 'Acceptable' 'It's a good thing that this document was signed because Armenia has no other choice,' said Mr Asatur Srapyan, an 81-year-old retiree. He believes Armenia has not achieved much with this draft agreement, but it is a step in the right direction. 'We are very few in number, we don't have a powerful army, we don't have a powerful ally behind us, unlike Azerbaijan,' he said. 'This accord is a good opportunity for peace.' Ms Maro Huneyan, a 31-year-old aspiring diplomat, also considers the pact 'acceptable', provided it does not contradict her country's constitution. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Four men arrested in Bukit Timah believed to be linked to housebreaking syndicates Singapore Criminal trial of Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and five others starts Aug 11 Singapore Profile of Kpod user has shifted from hardcore drug users to young people: Experts Tech Former data analyst creates AI tutor that assesses students based on Singapore schools' criteria Opinion Recognising our imperfections is part of what makes Singapore whole Opinion I used to be impatient. Then I became a granddad Business The risks of using 'decoupling' to own two properties Asia Manila struggles to keep a lasting hawker culture, casts eyes on how Asian nations lifted street food 'If Azerbaijan respects all the agreements, it's very important for us. But I'm not sure it will keep its promises and respect the points of the agreement,' she added. 'Endless concessions' But Ms Anahit Eylasyan, 69, opposes the agreement and, more specifically, the plan to create a transit zone crossing Armenia to connect the Nakhchivan region to the rest of Azerbaijan. 'We are effectively losing control of our territory. It's as if, in my own apartment, I had to ask a stranger if I could go from one room to another,' she explains. She also hopes not to see Russia, an ally of Armenia despite recent tensions, expelled from the region.' Anahit also criticises Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan for 'making decisions for everyone' and for his 'endless concessions to Azerbaijan'. 'We got nothing in exchange, not our prisoners, nor our occupied lands, nothing. It's just a piece of paper to us,' she fumes. Mr Shavarsh Hovhannisyan, a 68-year-old construction engineer, agrees, saying the agreement 'is just an administrative formality that brings nothing to Armenia.' 'We can't trust Azerbaijan,' Mr Hovhannisyan asserted, while accusing Pashinyan of having 'turned his back' on Russia and Iran. 'It's more of a surrender document than a peace treaty, while Trump only thinks about his image, the Nobel Prize.' 'More stability... in the short term' According to President Trump, Armenia and Azerbaijan have committed 'to stop all fighting forever; open up commerce, travel and diplomatic relations; and respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity'. For Ms Olesya Vartanyan, an independent researcher specialising in the Caucasus, the Washington agreement 'certainly brings greater stability and more guarantees for the months, if not years, to come.' But given the long-lasting tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan, 'I fear that we will have to plan only for the very short term,' she said. AFP
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Animated sitcom South Park finds new relevance skewering the Trump era
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A scene from the second episode of the 27th season of South Park featuring (from left) US President Donald Trump and US Vice-President J.D. Vance. NEW YORK – When the 27th season of South Park premiered in July with a scene showing US President Donald Trump in bed with Satan discussing American financier and child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, the White House attacked the animated sitcom as a 'fourth-rate show' and said it 'hasn't been relevant for over 20 years'. But the episode drew strong ratings, and when the series returned on Aug 6 with its second episode, some of the Trump administration officials and allies who were skewered – including US Vice-President J.D. Vance – took a different tack and tried to show they could take a joke. 'Well, I've finally made it,' Mr Vance wrote on social media as he reposted a scene from the show that imagined Mar-a-Lago as Fantasy Island (1977 to 1984) and the vice-president as Tattoo, the short sidekick who was played by French actor Herve Villechaize in the original TV series. Not all of the officials who were roasted laughed it off. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was portrayed as a serial dog shooter who was obsessed with her appearance. (She wrote in her 2024 memoir about killing her dog with a gun.) Speaking on conservative talk show The Glenn Beck Program on Aug 7, she said it was 'lazy' to make fun of women for how they look. 'Only the liberals and the extremists do that,' she added. 'If they wanted to criticise my job, go ahead and do that. But clearly they can't. They just pick something petty like that.' In the South Park episode, Got A Nut, Mackey, a school counsellor, loses his job because of budget cuts and takes a position with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). He accompanies ICE on raids of a Dora The Explorer Live! show and of heaven, where he is told to round up only brown angels. South Park, which has routinely roasted political figures with satire and dark comedy since its debut in 1997, has regained momentum, as its tart observations of the second Trump administration are commanding attention and breaking through online. Before the episode aired, the Department of Homeland Security's account on social platform X shared a screenshot from a South Park trailer showing masked ICE agents – and added a link to its recruitment website. The South Park social media account responded, 'Wait, so we ARE relevant?' and added a ribald hashtag. The second episode also briefly portrays Mr Charlie Kirk, the founder and chief of the pro-Trump, youth-focused non-profit organisation Turning Point USA. The man himself embraced the parody and approvingly shared several clips on his social media accounts, including a segment in which Cartman fiercely debates 'woke liberal students'. 'Not bad, Cartman,' Mr Kirk wrote on X, where he changed his avatar to an image of Cartman sporting a Kirk-like haircut. NYTIMES
