
Australians lose more money to gambling in a year than government spends on aged care, report finds
Australians are losing more money to gambling each year than the federal government spends on aged care and almost as much as it spends on the national disability insurance scheme, a new report has found.
The report by Equity Economics found that despite the cost-of-living crisis, the amount of money being lost to gambling has significantly increased. Expenditure on gambling has also risen faster than the cost of education, housing and inflation.
'There is a hidden, unspoken black hole in household budgets that government cost-of-living policies has failed to address,' the report said. 'This black hole is gambling losses.
'Governments have responded swiftly in recent years to the cost-of-living crisis, but there had been a complete policy vacuum on mitigating the cost-of-living impacts of gambling,' the report said.
According to the report, Australians lose $31.5bn to the gambling industry each year. The authors drew a direct comparison to the $28.3bn the federal government spends on the aged care sector each year and the $35.2bn it allocates for the NDIS.
'Contrary to expectations, gambling expenditure relative to household expenditure has not decreased amidst the cost-of-living crisis,' the report said. 'Instead, it has continued to rise year on year after the temporary dip caused by Covid-19 venue and event closures, to return to pre-pandemic levels.
'Lower-income households are particularly vulnerable, as the rising cost of essential goods and services further squeezes already tight budgets, leaving even less room for unexpected expenses, emergencies, or discretionary spending.'
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
The report was commissioned by the Alliance for Gambling Reform and Wesley Mission, which are both long-term campaigners for stronger restrictions on gambling advertising and operating hours.
The alliance's chief executive, Martin Thomas, said gambling was often ignored as a cost-of-living impact on families.
'Gambling reforms, such as banning gambling advertising, represent a non-inflationary, low-cost suite of initiatives that would bring profound relief to families,' Thomas said.
Wesley Mission's chief executive, Stu Cameron, said state and federal governments had not taken enough action to address 'spiralling gambling losses'.
'Every day we see the impact of gambling losses on families, yet for too long it has remained a hidden, unspoken black hole in household budgets that governments have failed to address,' Cameron said.
'There is overwhelming public support for banning gambling advertising. It's time for the major parties to stop dancing to the tune of the sports gambling industry and have the political will and moral courage to act in accordance with the community's wishes.'
The Monash University associate professor Charles Livingstone has previously told Guardian Australia that gambling losses often increase during times of financial hardship because 'people gamble when they are desperate'.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'Desperate people often turn to desperate measures and some people unfortunately think they have an opportunity to win something,' Livingstone said.
'The more prevailing reason for this is people under stress are more likely to develop a gambling habit as it relieves their stress and that's the same reason why there are so many poker machines in areas of disadvantage.'
The Equity Economics report said gambling losses 'disproportionately burden those households least able to afford them'.
'Given gambling's public health impact, addictive nature and significant negative externalities, coupled with insufficient regulation and widespread accessibility, there is a clear need for stronger government intervention,' the report said.
On Tuesday, the NSW government announced it no longer planned to remove 9,500 poker machines from the state over the next five years, despite pledging to do so before the state election.
During a parliamentary hearing, the state's gaming minister, David Harris, said the government's policy had changed after listening to advice from an independent panel on gambling reform.
The panel's members included several groups that operate or profit from poker machines including Clubs NSW, the Australian Hotels Association, Gaming Technologies Australia and Leagues Clubs Australia.
In Australia, Gambling Help Online is available on 1800 858 858. The National Debt Helpline is at 1800 007 007. In the UK, support for problem gambling can be found via the NHS National Problem Gambling Clinic on 020 7381 7722, or GamCare on 0808 8020 133. In the US, call the National Council on Problem Gambling at 800-GAMBLER or text 800GAM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
US immigration raid of Omaha meat plant cuts staff, fuels food production worries
CHICAGO, June 11 (Reuters) - U.S. meat producer Glenn Valley Foods was operating an Omaha, Nebraska, facility with about 30% of its staff on Wednesday after federal agents detained workers in an immigration raid the previous day, slashing the output of products it sells to grocery stores and restaurants, the company's president said. In the wake of Tuesday's sweep by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, livestock traders and market analysts expressed concerns that the potential deportation of undocumented workers from such raids could disrupt U.S. food production at a time when beef prices have soared and meat processors report a labor shortage. ICE agents detained about 74 to 76 workers out of roughly 140 at the Glenn Valley Foods plant, President Chad Hartmann said. Other workers did not show up on Wednesday because they felt afraid or traumatized, he said, adding that the facility's production dropped to about 20% of normal. Glenn Valley Foods sells steak, chicken and corned beef products to restaurants and grocery stores, according to its website. Retail beef prices have set records as the size of the U.S. cattle herd has declined to its lowest level in 70 years after a years-long drought raised feed costs. Consumer demand for steaks and hamburgers has stayed strong nevertheless. Glenn Valley Foods is trying to determine how long it will take to hire new employees, Hartmann said. "The hole that got punched into our business is staffing," he said. Livestock traders worried that immigration raids could slow meat companies' demand to buy cattle from farmers to process into beef, if the companies do not have enough workers. Chicago Mercantile Exchange cattle futures came under pressure on Tuesday during the raid, after recently hitting records. "There's certainly going to be nervousness out there on where the labor situation goes, going forward," said Matt Wiegand, a commodity broker for risk management firm FuturesOne in Nebraska. Meatpackers still face an acute worker shortage, said Julie Anna Potts, president of the Meat Institute industry group. It worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic, when major companies such as Tyson Foods (TSN.N), opens new tab temporarily shut plants because of a lack of workers. Glenn Valley used E-Verify, a federal database used for checking employees' immigration status. Hartmann said Homeland Security told him on Wednesday that there was no better system. "We will have to continue to use it," he said. ICE said a criminal investigation was ongoing into what immigration officials called a large-scale employment of immigrants who are present in the U.S. illegally. Footage, opens new tab of the Glenn Valley raid released by ICE showed agents searching the plant, restraining workers' hands and ankles, and taking them into custody. ICE officers have been intensifying efforts in recent weeks to deliver on U.S. President Donald Trump's agenda of record-level deportations. Tensions boiled over in Los Angeles over the weekend when protesters took to the streets after ICE arrested migrants at Home Depot stores, a garment factory and a warehouse, according to rights advocates. On Tuesday night, demonstrators marched in New York, Atlanta and Chicago. More than half of all meatpacking workers in the U.S. are immigrants, according to the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a think tank. The Omaha World-Herald newspaper said on Tuesday that raids were also reported at local plants run by large meatpackers Tyson and JBS USA ( Tyson and JBS told Reuters their facilities were not raided.


Wales Online
6 hours ago
- Wales Online
Company linked to Tory Peer Baroness Mone should pay back £121m for ‘faulty' PPE, High Court hears
Company linked to Tory Peer Baroness Mone should pay back £121m for 'faulty' PPE, High Court hears PPE Medpro is being sued for an alleged breach of contract over the supply of PPE during the Covid pandemic, with the Government claiming the gowns were unusable The company in court is linked to Baroness Mone (Image: PA Archive/PA Images ) A company linked to Tory peer Michelle Mone should pay back more than £121 million for breaching a Government contract for 25 million surgical gowns during the coronavirus pandemic, the High Court has heard. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) is suing PPE Medpro for allegedly breaching a deal for the gowns, with lawyers for the Government telling the court they were "faulty" because they were not sterile. The company, a consortium led by Baroness Mone's husband, businessman Doug Barrowman, was awarded Government contracts by the former Conservative administration to supply PPE during the pandemic, after she recommended it to ministers. Any wrongdoing has been denied. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here The Government is seeking to recover the costs of the contract, as well as the costs of transporting and storing the items, which amount to an additional £8,648,691. PPE Medpro said it "categorically denies" breaching the contract, and its lawyers claimed the company had been "singled out for unfair treatment". Opening the trial on Wednesday, Paul Stanley KC, for the DHSC, said: "This case is simply about whether 25 million surgical gowns provided by PPE Medpro were faulty. Article continues below "It is, in short, a technical case about detailed legal and industry standards that apply to sterile gowns." Mr Stanley said in written submissions the "initial contact with Medpro came through Baroness Mone", with discussions about the contract then going through one of the company's directors, Anthony Page. Baroness Mone remained "active throughout" the negotiations, Mr Stanley said, with the peer stating Mr Barrowman had "years of experience in manufacturing, procurement and management of supply chains". But he told the court Baroness Mone's communications were "not part of this case", which was "simply about compliance". He said: "The department does not allege anything improper happened, and we are not concerned with any profits made by anybody." In court documents from May this year, the DHSC said the gowns were delivered to the UK in 72 lots between August and October, 2020, with £121,999,219.20 paid to PPE Medpro between July and August that year. The department rejected the gowns in December, 2020, and told the company it would have to repay the money, but this has not happened and the gowns remain in storage, unable to be used. In written submissions for trial, Mr Stanley said 99.9999% of the gowns should have been sterile under the terms of the contract, equating to one in a million being unusable. The DHSC claims the contract also specified PPE Medpro had to sterilise the gowns using a "validated process", attested by CE marking, which indicates a product has met certain medical standards. He said "none of those things happened", with no validated sterilisation process being followed, and the gowns supplied with invalid CE marking. He continued that 140 gowns were later tested for sterility, with 103 failing. He said: "Whatever was done to sterilise the gowns had not achieved its purpose, because more than one in a million of them was contaminated when delivered. "On that basis, DHSC was entitled to reject the gowns, or is entitled to damages, which amount to the full price and storage costs." In his written submissions, Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said the "only plausible reason" for the gowns becoming contaminated was due to "the transport and storage conditions or events to which the gowns were subject", after they had been delivered to the DHSC. He added the testing did not happen until several months after the gowns were rejected, and the samples selected were not "representative of the whole population", meaning "no proper conclusions may be drawn". He said the DHSC's claim was "contrived and opportunistic" and PPE Medpro had been "made the 'fall guy' for a catalogue of failures and errors" by the department. He said: "It has perhaps been singled out because of the high profiles of those said to be associated with PPE Medpro, and/or because it is perceived to be a supplier with financial resources behind it. "In reality, an archetypal case of 'buyer's remorse', where DHSC simply seeks to get out of a bargain it wished it never entered into, left, as it is, with over £8 billion of purchased and unused PPE as a result of an untrammelled and uncontrolled buying spree with taxpayers' money." He also said there was a "delicious irony" that Baroness Mone was mentioned in the DHSC's written submissions, when she had "zero relevance to the contractual issues in this case". Neither Baroness Mone nor Mr Barrowman is due to give evidence in the trial, and did not attend the first day of the hearing on Wednesday. A PPE Medpro spokesperson said the company "categorically denies breaching its obligations" and will "robustly defend" the claim. Article continues below The trial before Mrs Justice Cockerill is due to last five weeks, with a judgment expected in writing at a later date.


Fashion United
9 hours ago
- Fashion United
Pinko returns to profitability following strategic restructuring and new leadership
After navigating several challenging years, Italian womenswear brand PINKO has successfully returned to profitability in the first quarter of 2025. This marks a significant achievement in its ongoing transformation, driven by a strategic overhaul and new leadership. The company, founded in 1986 by Pietro Negra and Cristina Rubini, reported Q1 sales exceeding 70 million euros and a positive EBITDA shift of 6 million euros, moving from -1.2 million euros to +5 million euros year-on-year. This turnaround comes as PINKO works to emerge from Italy's Composizione negoziata della crisi, a negotiated debt settlement procedure. Chairman Pietro Negra described it as a "real turning point," emphasizing a prudent, sustainable business plan designed to generate cash flow starting this year. A new phase under CEO Laura Manelli The arrival of CEO Laura Manelli in March 2025 signaled a decisive shift for PINKO. With extensive experience at leading fashion houses such as Armani, Versace, Fendi, and Sergio Rossi, Manelli brings a strong background in financial oversight and fashion operations. Under her leadership, PINKO has concentrated on redefining its business model, streamlining operations, and realigning with core brand values. "We prefer not to call it a relaunch," Manelli stated. "There is untapped potential in the brand. These results confirm that our new approach is working." She underscored the company's strengths in brand recognition and customer loyalty, attributing the recent progress to employee commitment and the new management team's direction. Lessons learned from overexpansion PINKO's current position follows a period of rapid expansion and financial strain. After growing revenue from 197 million in 2019 to 303 million euros in 2022, the company embarked on an ambitious international strategy targeting 500 million euros in turnover. However, significant investments in China and the US underperformed, leading to liquidity issues and a debt load exceeding 100 million euros by late 2023. "The post-Covid growth wave misled us," Negra admitted. "We invested too fast, especially in China, where market dynamics shifted rapidly. Our mistake wasn't going to China – it was going too fast." The restructuring blueprint To regain financial stability, PINKO implemented comprehensive restructuring measures, including closing underperforming stores, cutting operational costs, resizing the company, and simplifying its governance. The plan has been submitted to banks for final approval and is expected to conclude the debt resolution process by mid-year. Both Negra and Manelli emphasize that the crisis was financial, not a crisis of brand identity. "This was a financial crisis, not a crisis of image," Manelli noted. The brand's appeal remains intact, and current efforts are focused on refining market positioning and improving operational efficiency. Future outlook: Strategic recalibration Positioned firmly in the 'entry-to-luxury' segment, PINKO is recalibrating its international strategy with a more selective and geographically cautious approach. A new partnership with Lima Commercial Management in Shanghai, signed in February 2025, exemplifies this shift towards sustainable growth in China. Domestically and internationally, PINKO is also deliberately moving away from the post-pandemic pricing surge observed across the luxury sector. "We're lowering our prices," Negra stated. "Our aim is to offer the best value for money while maintaining our aspirational brand presence." With strong Q1 figures, a refined strategy, and new leadership at the helm, PINKO appears to be transitioning beyond crisis towards a more measured and resilient future.