Cameroon's Biya, 92, reshuffles military top brass ahead of vote
The personnel moves, announced late on Tuesday in a series of presidential decrees, affect nearly all branches of the armed forces. They include the appointment of new chiefs of staff for the infantry, air force and navy as well as the promotion of eight brigadier generals to the rank of major general.
One of the promoted generals is the coordinator of the elite Rapid Intervention Battalion (BIR), a special forces unit often deployed in counter-terrorism operations and seen as central to Biya's security apparatus. The decrees also named a new special presidential military adviser.
The decrees were published two days after Biya, in power since 1982, announced he would run for his eighth term in office in Cameroon's presidential election scheduled for October 12. The seven-year term could keep him in office until he is nearly 100.
The announcement prompted an unprecedented public outcry in the press and on social media in Cameroon, where Biya's age and long absences have raised questions about his fitness to rule.
The government has said Biya is in good health and dismissed any suggestions otherwise.
The decrees concerning the armed forces reflect "a strategy by President Biya and his collaborators to consolidate power by building a fortress of loyal army generals around him" that can suppress any protest to his continued rule, said Anthony Antem, peace and security analyst at the Nkafu Policy Institute in Yaounde.
Celestin Delanga, researcher at the Institute for Security Studies (ISS), said the decrees "come in a unique political and security context."
Biya wants to ensure stability during and after the election and "additional trusted personnel are needed" for that, he said.
The cocoa- and oil-producing Central African nation also faces a host of serious security challenges, notably a conflict with Anglophone separatists and threats from Nigeria-based Islamist fighters in the north.
The government gave no explanation for the overhaul.
The last significant military shake-up in Cameroon came just last year, shortly after Biya returned in October from his latest extended stay abroad which revived speculation about his health.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
How could Japan's election affect economic policy?
July 17 (Reuters) - Japan's Liberal Democratic Party ruling coalition may lose its majority in the upper house in an election on Sunday, which could heighten calls for the government to boost spending and cut tax. Here is a guide on how the election outcome could affect Japan's fiscal and monetary policy: Recent media polls show the LDP coalition could lose its majority, heightening the risk of political instability when the country is struggling to strike a trade deal with the U.S., and stoking fears of an increase in debt. Japan's debt burden is the highest in the developed world at about 250% of GDP. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is regarded as a fiscal hawk, but concern over possible increased spending by parties to ensure political support on Tuesday pushed up bond yields to multi-decade highs. Yields may rise further if the chance of big spending or a sales tax cut increases. If the election loss is small, Ishiba could remain prime minister and seek opposition parties' cooperation to pass bills through parliament. Faced with a big defeat, Ishiba could step down and his party will hold a leadership race to choose a successor. Depending on the extent of loss, there is a slim chance a new premier could be chosen from an opposition party. Regardless of the election outcome, Japan will increase spending as Ishiba has pledged to offer cash payouts to households to ease the cost of living. The estimated 3.5 trillion yen ($23.6 billion) in payouts will be funded by tax revenues. But spending may balloon if the LDP coalition suffers a big loss, as it would heighten calls from within the party and opposition forces to take bolder steps to cushion rising living costs. Some analysts expect Japan to compile an extra budget around autumn this year to fund spending of at least 10 trillion yen, which will likely require additional debt issuance. Japan's sales tax rate is set at 10%, except for food items at 8%. Ishiba has shunned opposition calls to slash the sales tax, which funds social welfare costs for a rapidly ageing population. An election defeat could force Ishiba to cut sales tax, which would leave a huge hole in Japan's finances. Excluding proceeds from debt issuance, the sales tax is Japan's biggest source of revenue. In fiscal 2025, it collected 25 trillion yen, or 21.6% of total budget. Analysts say halving the tax rate would cut revenues by over 10 trillion yen. A sales tax cut will require passing legislation through parliament, so will not take place until April at the earliest. A worst-case scenario is a credit rating downgrade on Japan's sovereign debt, which could trigger a triple selling of bonds, yen and Japanese stocks - and boost the cost of dollar funding for Japanese banks. Moody's Ratings has said an increase in tax cut pressure could be negative for Japan's rating depending on the size and duration of the cut. It rates Japan A1, the fifth-highest level. The ruling coalition has given a quite nod to gradual interest rate hikes, as has the biggest opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan. If the clout of other smaller opposition parties increases, the BOJ could come under pressure to go slow in rate hikes. But the BOJ's long-term rate hike path is unlikely to be affected unless Ishiba is replaced by vocal advocates of bold monetary easing like Sanae Takaichi, who Ishiba narrowly defeated in a LDP leadership race last year. ($1 = 148.1800 yen)
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Tasmania is limping towards an election nobody wants. Will the state have a working government?
In the darkest and coldest months of the year, Tasmanians have been slogging through an election campaign no one wanted. It has been a curious mix of humdrum plodding laced with cyanide levels of bitterness, with the most likely result being another hung parliament. It's a long tale, but here's the quick version. In early June, the Labor opposition moved a motion of no confidence in the Liberal premier, Jeremy Rockliff. The motion passed with the support of three crossbench MPs, the Greens and a casting vote from the Speaker. Rockliff refused to step aside and the opposition leader, Dean Winter, ruled out doing a deal with the Greens to govern in minority, which left the governor with no choice but to call an election just 16 months after the last. Some Tasmanians would be forgiven for feeling a bit of election fatigue. On top of the March 2024 state election, there was the federal election on 3 May, voting for three legislative council seats on 24 May and now this poll. The vibe of the campaign has veered wildly between pedestrian and acrimonious. Candidates have struggled to connect with a disgruntled public, and a combination of the stadium saga and political mudslinging have distracted from Tasmania's serious challenges. Despite the election being brought about by Labor's no-confidence motion, the party seemed curiously unprepared. Its candidate announcements were slow and disjointed, and red corflutes have been greatly outnumbered by blue. Labor's campaign has picked up some momentum in recent weeks by following the federal party's playbook of making big health policy announcements. In contrast to Labor, the Liberals hit the ground running with a slew of candidate announcements. They have presented themselves as the only party with a realistic chance of winning a majority, and sought to frame Winter as a power-hungry wrecker. They have also campaigned hard on health, attempting to neutralise Labor's traditional strength in this area. A bevy of former federal candidates are running, which could lead to changes in personnel, if not a big shift in the distribution of seats in parliament. Ones to watch include: Liberal's Bridget Archer (who lost her seat of Bass in May) and Gavin Pearce (retired Braddon MP) Labor's Brian Mitchell, the Lyons MP who stood aside for Rebecca White Peter George, the anti-salmon farming independent in Franklin and Vanessa Bleyer, a two-time Greens Senate candidate running in Braddon. The Nationals are also in the mix following the latest in a series of Tasmanian 'reboots' over the past few decades. Their candidate list includes former Jacqui Lambie Network and Liberal MPs, which could create a tense and chaotic party room if they win seats. Disappointingly, both Labor and Liberal leaders have repeatedly demanded the other side stop playing 'political games', while merrily engaging in skulduggery of their own. Labor was indignant when the Liberals challenged the eligibility of one of their star candidates, unionist Jessica Munday. A few days later, Rockliff was righteously outraged when Labor grandee and former premier Paul Lennon registered the business 'TasInsure' – the name of the Liberals' proposed state-owned insurance company. It's fair to say no one has covered themselves in glory here. The Liberals went with 'Let's finish the job for Tasmania'. I'm sure this isn't meant to be read as a threat, but I can't help but hear it in Alan Rickman's voice. Even if we leave aside the (unintended?) menacing implications, the slogan encourages voters to wonder why the job hasn't been finished in the previous 11 years of Liberal government. Labor is using 'A Fresh Start for Tasmania': a cliche, but serviceably simple. The problem is, they stretched the slogan to the point of collapse by applying it to all of their policy headings. This meant we ended up enduring 'a fresh start for cost-of-living relief', 'a fresh start for our society', and so on. A special mention to Labor's social media ads, which had all the gravitas of a toddler demanding their turn on the playground swings. The Greens didn't limit themselves to one slogan. Instead, they used various taglines on the theme of 'the mess made by the major parties', or simply stated their main policy pillars: stopping the stadium, investing in health and housing, protecting the environment and stopping privatisation. There were also some questionable offerings from the menagerie of independents. Surely the voters are entitled to expect more from their MPs than the 'familiar face in Clark' offered by former Liberal MP Elise Archer? And as an experienced journalist, I'm sure Peter George could have done better than the derivative 'Time for Change'. What will Tasmanians end up with after a campaign that has been less sound and fury and more white noise and niggle? It looks like more of the same. Polling shows the two major parties are on the nose, particularly with younger voters. Labor and Liberal are fairly aligned on some of the headline issues that divide the electorate, including the stadium and salmon farming. All this points to no party winning a majority of the 35 seats. If this happens, the convention is that the governor gives the party with the most seats the first crack at cobbling together enough support from the crossbench to form a minority government. Minority governments can come in lots of different shapes and sizes, from loose 'confidence and supply' agreements to more formal power-sharing coalitions. If the party with the most seats fails to form government, the governor would typically let the second-largest party try. Both the Liberals and Labor will face big challenges if they are given the opportunity to form minority government. The Liberal party has its nose ahead in most polls. However, several of the crossbench MPs the previous Liberal government relied on for support voted in favour of the no-confidence motion in Rockliff. Most of these MPs are likely to be re-elected, and will be wary of doing deals that essentially put in place the same government they recently helped to bring down. Labor have backed themselves into a corner by repeatedly ruling out working with the Greens. This would leave them needing to negotiate with a diverse array of crossbench MPs. Depending on the final distribution of seats, this might not secure them enough votes on the floor of parliament. If – as seems likely – Tasmania ends up with another hung parliament, it will fall to our MPs to move beyond point scoring and gamesmanship. We urgently need budget repair, alongside ambitious reforms in health, housing, education, sustainability and productivity. Here's hoping the next government is willing to collaborate and compromise – for the good of the state and to restore trust in our political system. Robert Hortle is deputy director, Tasmanian Policy Exchange, University of Tasmania. This article was originally published in the Conversation
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Prince Harry in Diana's footsteps with landmine walk in Angola
The Duke of Sussex has followed in the footsteps of his mother, Princess Diana, as he visited a charity clearing landmines in Angola."Children should never have to live in fear of playing outside or walking to school," said Prince Harry, about the continuing threat of mines to the civilian Harry was in Angola supporting the work of the Halo Trust, the charity that had been backed by Princess Diana on her high-profile visit to the Central African country in image of the princess walking through a minefield, in a visor and body armour, had brought worldwide attention to the danger caused by mines left behind after wars had ended. Prince Harry visited a village near to a minefield and met children who are given lessons in how to avoid detonating the Halo Trust has cleared 120,000 landmines in Angola, left over from years of civil estimated 60,000 people have been killed or injured by mines in the country since 2008 and about a thousand minefields are still to be cleared."The remnants of war still threaten lives every day," said Prince Harry, patron of the Halo also spent time with the British charity during a visit to Angola in 2019 when he walked through a partially-cleared minefield and set off a controlled explosion. Earlier this week, Prince Harry met Angola's President Joao Lourenco, where the prince welcomed the government's renewed support for the charity's Cowan, the Halo Trust's chief executive, said: "We will continue our work in solidarity with the Angolan people until every last mine is cleared." In January 1997, Princess Diana had been photographed in Angola in what became a symbolic image of the efforts to stop the harm to civilians from had walked on a path cleared through a minefield and had given her support to calls for an international ban on the use of had sparked a row, with the princess being criticised by some politicians for her the minefield where she had walked in 1997 was cleared and the site is now a thriving community, with local children attending the Princess Diana School. Sign up here to get the latest royal stories and analysis every week with our Royal Watch newsletter. Those outside the UK can sign up here.
