
French car giant to stop using animal leather - but which brands AREN'T appeasing the vegans
While the decision, confirmed by PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), will see Renault ditch animal leather options from its global car line-up in a few months' time, it has already stopped offering leather seats and steering wheels to UK customers.
'True luxury is free from cruelty – and Renault understands that. By refusing to work with leather, Renault is helping save animal lives, reduce its environmental impact, and prove that compassion and innovation go hand in hand,' PETA's vice president of corporate projects, Yvonne Taylor, said.
The international animal rights organisation estimates the global leather trade is responsible for the death of one billion animals every year. It adds that three cow or bull hides are used per car cabin.
But not every car manufacturer is taking this vegan-friendly direction. A PETA study carried out last year listed the brands that currently use leather-alternative materials but also highlighted those sticking with traditional hides.
Find out which brands aren't appeasing the vegans below...
Renault has committed to eliminating the use of animal leather interiors across its entire range of vehicles by the end of the year, PETA has confirmed
The animal rights group has taken aim at the motor industry's continued use of leather, claiming it is a highly polluting part of the manufacturing process.
While it suggests three cow hides are used for a typically medium-size family car, bigger luxury models can require up to 15 animal skins in total.
'Due to the thicker hides used, non-vegan car interiors tend to have an even worse environmental impact than fashion items made from animal skins,' PETA says.
'Transforming animal hides into leather requires up to 170 chemicals (including cyanide, chromium, and coal-tar derivatives), which are toxic to human tannery workers and poison waterways. One report also linked leather car interiors to illegal land clearing and biodiversity loss,' it added.
The organisation noted a range of new Renault models have already axed leather.
The Renault 5 E-Tech Electric, Symbioz and Rafale all feature seats made from eco-friendly fabrics made with recycled plastic waste from landfill and other recycled textiles.
However, vegans in the UK will be pleased to hear that Renault has been selling new cars with sustainable alternative upholsteries for years with a selection of organic and recyclable materials coming as standard.
It's only in foreign markets that the French firm still offers animal leather cabins.
And Renault isn't the only brand to offer vegan-friendly cabins.
New Renault models feature seats made from eco-friendly fabrics made with recycled plastic waste from landfills and other recycled textiles
Abarth, BYD, Citroen, Dacia, Fiat, Jeep, Mini, Peugeot, Polestar, Smart, Vauxhall and Volvo largely offer leather-alternative interiors across the majority of their ranges, according to PETA's European Vegan Car Interior Survey last year.
Tesla failed to respond to the group's request for information, but This is Money can confirm it uses synthetic, high-quality vegan leather across its vehicle line-up.
Some BMW, Jaguar Land Rover and Mercedes-Benz passenger cars also have non-animal leather as standard, despite being luxury brands consumers would typically associate with the premium material.
That said, no new models are entirely animal product free...
The rubber used in tyres and interior materials in all cars often contains tallow, while some lubricants include animal fat as an ingredient.
And some brands utilise obscure animal products in ways you likely wouldn't imagine.
For instance, during the painting process of Minis, each car is feather-dusted using female ostrich feathers.
Mini says it only uses those that have been shed naturally (which occurs once a year) and they are a 'sustainable tool' to remove traces of dust right before the colour paint layer is applied to guarantee a perfect finish.
But some brands are still sticking with leather interiors, including premium marques such as Audi, Bentley and Rolls-Royce.
Here's a list of brands that told PETA they don't offer vegan-friendly animal leather alternatives in the new models... yet.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Finextra
7 minutes ago
- Finextra
Corpay agrees $2.2bn Alpha Group takeover
Corporate payments outfit Corpay has agreed to buy British peer Alpha Group for $2.2 billion in cash. 0 This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community. Alpha provides B2B cross border FX to corporations and investment funds in the UK and Europe, holding around $3 billion of deposits in over 7000 client accounts. Corpay says the acquisition will improve its FX technology stack and strengthen its ties with investment managers in Europe and beyond. Alpha shareholders will receive 4,250 pence per share, representing a 55% premium to the closing price on 1 May, the day before potential takeover talks were disclosed. An offer in May was rejected. This transaction meaningfully expands our relationships with investment managers and results in four Cross Border customer segments: corporates, financial institutions, investment funds and digital currency providers,' says Ron Clarke, CEO, Corpay. Corpay has had a busy few months, taking a minority stake in business payments automation platform AvidXchange in a deal also involving TPG, and securing a $300 million investment from Mastercard for a three per cent stake in its cross-border business.


The Guardian
8 minutes ago
- The Guardian
M&S advert banned for featuring model who looked ‘unhealthily thin'
An advert by high street retailer Marks & Spencer has been banned for featuring an 'irresponsible' image of a model who appeared 'unhealthily thin'. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said the model's pose, choice of clothing and the camera angle which seemed to tilt downwards all contributed to the impression she was too thin. The picture, which appeared on the M&S app, featured a model wearing slim-fit black trousers and a white off-the-shoulder top, where some of her upper torso can be seen. She faced the camera with one hand in her pocket and the other holding a bag. The advertising watchdog described the model's collarbones as 'very prominent'. It added that the model wore 'large pointed shoes which emphasised the slenderness of her legs' and: 'In part due to the camera angle which appeared tilted downwards, the model's head appeared out of proportion with the rest of her body and further highlighted her small frame.' M&S argued in its submission to the ASA that its 'inclusive women's wear clothing' represented sizes eight to 24. However, it acknowledged that the models in the ads were size eight, and therefore at the lower end of its sizing range. The retailer said it 'took concerns about the depiction of body image in their ads very seriously' and added that 'all models were in good health', and that they 'complied with industry standards and best practices to avoid promoting unhealthy body images'. The ASA ruled that the advert must not appear again in its current form and M&S must ensure all its images 'did not portray models as being unhealthily thin'. M&S confirmed that the images have been removed. The ASA said it also received complaints about three other adverts on the M&S app, website and in an email for the company, where two models wear a pink polka dot dress. In its investigation, it said the model's face 'did not look gaunt', adding that 'while thin, her arms and the leg visible in the shot, did not display any protruding bones'. 'The model appeared in proportion and we considered that she was not presented as unhealthily thin overall,' the ruling concluded. The other images in the ad, which featured another model, also 'showed the model in proportion. We also considered that the model did not appear unhealthily thin in those shots.' The ruling comes amid concerns that the fashion industry is reversing progress made in the body positivity movement in the 2010s due to a recent trend towards skinnier models. Earlier this year, the ASA banned a Next advert for featuring what it deemed an 'unhealthily thin' model in digitally altered clothing. In 2023, it banned Warehouse from using an image of a model in an oversized biker jacket, saying the model's pronounced collar bone, hip bones and torso gave the appearance of her being 'very thin', which made the ad 'irresponsible'. M&S has been contacted for comment.


Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Moment millionaire mining tycoon 'gets in solicitor's face and pushes him against a window' after he refused to be a witness in court battle
The moment a millionaire mining tycoon seemingly got in a solicitor's face and pushed him against a window after he refused to be a witness in court was caught on CCTV. David Lewis confronted Robert Davies MBE outside the lawyer's office in Newport. Mr Lewis, whose company operated Merthyr Tydfil's controversial Ffos-y-Fran mine, was cautioned for assault occasioning actual bodily harm (ABH) and was later prosecuted. However, the case has since been dropped, prompting Mr Davies to release CCTV of the ordeal. The dramatic footage, seen first by WalesOnline, appears to show 75-year-old Mr Davies exiting the office to his firm, RDP Law, while Mr Lewis is outside in his car. Lewis is outside in his car. The mining tycoon, 68, then exits the vehicle and approaches Mr Davies before appearing to get right in his face. Mr Lewis then seems to follow him to the side of the building, with the lawyer appeared to be pinned up against a window. Mr Lewis then seems to follow him to the side of the building in Newport Mr Lewis is the director of Merthyr (South Wales) Ltd, which ran Ffos y Fran - the UK's last opencast coal mine - from 2007 until two years ago when it shut down. The company is currently embroiled in controversy over the land's restoration. Mr Davies has claimed the background to the confrontation regards a civil court case. He told WalesOnline: 'In April 2024, proceedings between companies controlled by Mr Lewis, and a third party, were heard by the High Court in London. Both parties had wanted me as a witness; I declined, but appeared when summoned by the court to do so.' After Mr Davies provided evidence in the High Court, he claims he received a visit from Mr Lewis on May 16 last year while heading out the office. In a statement to police, he said: 'I noticed there was a black convertible car parked in the bay immediately to the right of the front door of the office as one walks out. 'As I was leaving the front entrance, I turned left towards my car and heard someone call: 'Come here you f***ing little s***.' After a police investigation was carried out, a PC emailed Mr Davies: 'Mr Lewis will receive a conditional caution for [assault occasioning actual bodily harm] with the condition to attend a victim awareness course.' After being cautioned, Mr Lewis allegedly failed to comply with the condition, which led to a prosecution being brought for ABH. However, when Mr Lewis appeared at Newport Magistrates' Court this month, the case was reportedly dropped, leaving Mr Davies furious. Prosecutor Adam Warner later wrote to Mr Davies saying: 'I am writing to let you know that I have reviewed the charge of assault occasioning you actual bodily harm on May 16, 2024, and made the decision to stop the prosecution. The reason for my decision is that a six-month time limit to commence a prosecution for the appropriate offence has passed.' MailOnline has contacted Mr Davies for comment, and attempted to contact Mr Lewis for comment.